- Anatotitan
Taxobox|
name = "Anatotitan"
fossil_range =Late Cretaceous
image_width = 200px
image_caption = "Anatotitan copei" skeletons at theAmerican Museum of Natural History ,New York
regnum =Animal ia
phylum =Chordata
classis = Sauropsida
superordo =Dinosaur ia
ordo =Ornithischia
familia =Hadrosauridae
subfamilia =Hadrosaurinae
genus = "Anatotitan"
genus_authority = Chapman & Brett-Surman, 1990
subdivision_ranks =Species
subdivision =
* "A. copei" (Lull & Wright, 1942 [originally "Anatosaurus copei"] ) (type)
* "A. longiceps" (Marsh, 1890 [originally "Trachodon longiceps"] ) ("nomen dubium ")"Anatotitan" (pronEng|əˌnætoʊˈtaɪtən a-NAT-o-TIE-tan; "large duck") is a
genus of flat-headed or hadrosaurinehadrosaurid ornithopod dinosaur (a "duck-billed dinosaur") from the very end of theCretaceous Period, in what is nowNorth America . Remains of "Anatotitan" have been preserved in the Hell Creek andLance Formation s, which are dated to the lateMaastrichtian stage of theLate Cretaceous Period, representing the last three million years before the extinction of the dinosaurs (68 to 65million years ago ). This dinosaur is known from at least six specimens pertaining to two species, discovered in theU.S. states ofSouth Dakota andMontana . Several of these specimens are extremely complete skeletons with well-preserved skulls. It was a large animal, up to approximately 12 meters (39 ft) in length, with an extremely long and lowskull . "Anatotitan" exhibits one of the most striking examples of the "duckbill" snout common to hadrosaurs. It has a long taxonomic history, including decades classified with the genera "Anatosaurus ", "Diclonius ", and "Trachodon ".Description
The skull and skeleton of "Anatotitan" are well-known.
Edward Drinker Cope estimated the length of what is now thetype specimen as about 12 meters (38 ft) long, with a skull 1.18 meters long (3.87 ft).cite journal |last=Cope |first=Edward D. |authorlink=Edward Drinker Cope |year=1882 |title=On the characters of the skull in the Hadrosauridae |journal=Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences |volume=35 |pages=97-107] This estimate was later revised downward to a length of 8.8 meters (29 ft),cite book |last=Lull |first=Richard Swann |authorlink=Richard Swann Lull |coauthors= and Wright, Nelda E. |title=Hadrosaurian Dinosaurs of North America |year=1942 |publisher=Geological Society of America |series=Geological Society of America Special Paper 40 |pages=p. 225 ] although to be fair a dozenvertebra e, the hips, and thigh bones had been carried away by a stream cutting through it, and the tip of the tail was incomplete.cite journal |last=Osborn |first=Henry Fairfield |authorlink=Henry Fairfield Osborn |date=1909 |title=The Upper Cretaceous iguanodont dinosaurs |journal=Nature |volume=81 |issue=2075 |pages=160-162] A second skeleton currently exhibited next to the type, but in a standing posture, is estimated at 9.1 meters (30 ft) long, with its head 5.2 meters (17 ft) above the ground. The hip height of this specimen is estimated as approximately 2.1 meters (7 ft).cite book|chapter=Anatotitan |last=Glut |first=Donald F. |authorlink=Donald F. Glut |title=Dinosaurs: The Encyclopedia |year=1997 |publisher=McFarland & Co |location=Jefferson, North Carolina |pages=132-134 |isbn=0-89950-917-7] Other sources have estimated the length of "Anatotitan" as approximately 12 meters (39 ft).cite book |last=Sues |first=Hans-Dieter|editor=Farlow, James O., and Brett-Surman, Michael K. (eds.) |title=The Complete Dinosaur |year=1997 |publisher=Indiana University Press |location=Bloomington|isbn=0-253-33349-0 |pages=p.338 |chapter=Ornithopods] "Anatotitan" may have weighed about 3metric ton s (3.3 tons).The skull of "Anatotitan" is known for its long, wide muzzle. Cope compared it to that of a
goose in side view, and to a short-billed spoonbill in top view. The skull was longer and lower proportionally than in any other known hadrosaurid. The toothless portion of the anteriormandible ref|gracilis|* was relatively longer than in any hadrosaur.cite book |last=Chapman |first=Ralph E. |coauthors=and Brett-Surman, Michael K. |year=1990 |chapter=Morphometric observations on hadrosaurid ornithopods |editors=Carpenter, Kenneth, and Currie, Philip J. (eds.) |title=Dinosaur Systematics: Perspectives and Approaches |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |pages=163-177 |isbn=0-521-43810-1] The bones surrounding the large openings for thenostril s formed deep pockets around the openings. The eye sockets were rectangular and longer front to back than top to bottom, although this may have been exaggerated by postmortem crushing. The skull roof was flat and lacked a bony crest, and thequadrate bone that formed the articulation with the lower jaw was distinctly curved. The lower jaw was long and straight, lacking the downward curve seen in other hadrosaurids, and possessing a heavy ridge running its length. Thepredentary was wide and shovel-like.Lull and Wright, "Hadrosaurian Dinosaurs of North America", pp. 157-159.] The ridge on the lower jaw may have reinforced the long, slender jaw.Lull and Wright, "Hadrosaurian Dinosaurs of North America", pp. 163-164.]As mounted, the vertebral column of "Anatotitan" includes twelve neck, twelve back, nine sacral, and thirty+ tail vertebrae. The limb bones were longer and more lightly built than those of other hadrosaurids of comparable size. "Anatotitan" had a distinctive pelvis, based on the proportions and form of the
pubis bone . "Anatotitan", like other hadrosaurids, could move both on two legs and on four legs. It probably preferred to forage for food on four legs, but ran on two.cite book |last=Horner |first=John R. |authorlink=Jack Horner (paleontologist) |coauthors=Weishampel, David B.; and Forster, Catherine A |editor=Weishampel, David B.; Osmólska, Halszka; and Dodson, Peter (eds.)|title=The Dinosauria |edition=2nd |year= 2004|publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=0-520-24209-2 |pages=438-463 |chapter=Hadrosauridae ]Henry Fairfield Osborn used the skeletons in theAmerican Museum of Natural History to portray both quadrupedal and bipedal stances for "Anatotitan".Classification
"Anatotitan" was a hadrosaurine hadrosaurid, as it lacked a hollow crest on its head.cite book |last=Weishampel |first=David B. |authorlink=David B. Weishampel |coauthors=and Horner, Jack R. |editor= Weishampel, David B.; Osmólska, Halszka; and Dodson, Peter (eds.)|title=The Dinosauria |edition=1st |year=1990 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=0-520-06727-4 |pages=pp. 534-561 |chapter=Hadrosauridae] It has long been recognized as close to "
Edmontosaurus ",cite journal |last=Lambe |first=Lawrence M. |authorlink=Lawrence Lambe |year=1920 |title=The hadrosaur "Edmontosaurus" from the Upper Cretaceous of Alberta |journal=Department of Mines, Geological Survey Memoirs |volume=120 |pages=1-79] particularly the species now named "E. annectens".cite journal |last=Hatcher |first=John B. |authorlink=John Bell Hatcher |title=The genus and species of the Trachodontidae (Hadrosauridae, Claosauridae) Marsh |journal=Annals of the Carnegie Museum |volume=1 |pages=377-386 ] "Anatotitan" and "Edmontosaurus" are so similar that several authors, fromJohn Bell Hatcher in 1902, to Jack Horner,David B. Weishampel , andCatherine Forster in 2004, have proposed that what is now known as the type species of "Anatotitan" ("Anatotitan copei") is a synonym of "E. annectens". "A. copei" and "E. annectens" also spent several decades in the same genus, "Anatosaurus", following the influential 1942 revision of Hadrosauridae by Richard Swann Lull andNelda Wright , until they were formally put into different genera byMichael K. Brett-Surman . "Shantungosaurus " is a gigantic hadrosaurine fromChina which may also be related to these North American dinosaurs.Discovery and history
Like many dinosaurs, "Anatotitan" has a long and somewhat confusing taxonomic history. The
holotype , or original specimen, was a complete skull and most of a skeleton collected in 1882 by Dr. J. L. Wortman and R. S. Hill for famous Americanpaleontologist Edward Drinker Cope . This specimen, found inHell Creek Formation rocks,cite book |last=Norell |first=M. A. |coauthors=Gaffney, E. S.; and Dingus, L. |title=Discovering Dinosaurs in the American Museum of Natural History |publisher=Knopf |location=New York |year=1995 |pages=156-158 |isbn=0-679-43386-4] came from northeast of theBlack Hills ofSouth Dakota and originally had extensive skin impressions. It was missing most of the pelvis and part of the torso due to a stream cutting through it. The bill had impressions of a horny sheath with a tooth-like series of interlocking points on the upper and lower jaws. When describing this specimen (now theholotype of "Anatotitan copei", AMNH 5730), Cope assigned it to "Diclonius mirabilis". This combination was created by combining "Diclonius", a hadrosaurid genus based on teeth and described by Cope, with "Trachodon mirabilis", an older name based on teeth and published byJoseph Leidy . Cope, believing that Leidy had abandoned "Trachodon", assigned the old species to his genus. Leidy had come to recognize that his "Trachodon" was based on the remains of multiple kinds of dinosaurs, and had made some attempts to revise the genus, but did not make a formal declaration of his intentions.cite book |last=Creisler |first=Benjamin S. |year=2007 |chapter=Deciphering duckbills: a history in nomenclature |editor=Carpenter, Kenneth (ed.) |title=Horns and Beaks: Ceratopsian and Ornithopod Dinosaurs |publisher=Indiana University Press |location=Bloomington and Indianapolis |pages=185-210 |isbn=0-253-34817-X]Cope's description promoted hadrosaurids as amphibious, contributing to this long-time image.cite journal |last=Ostrom |first=John H. |authorlink=John Ostrom |title=A reconsideration of the paleoecology of the hadrosaurian dinosaurs |journal=American Journal of Science |volume=262 |pages=975-997] His reasoning was that the teeth of the lower jaw were weakly connected to the bone and liable to break off if used to consume terrestrial food, and he described the beak as weak as well. Unfortunately for Cope, aside from misidentifying several of the bones of the skull,cite journal |last=Marsh |first=Othniel C. |authorlink=Othniel Charles Marsh |year=1893 |title=The skull and brain of "Claosaurus" |journal=American Journal of Science, 3rd series |volume=45 |pages=83-86] by chance the lower jaws he was studying were missing the walls supporting the teeth from the inside; the teeth were actually well-supported.Lull and Wright, "Hadrosaurian Dinosaurs of North America", pp. 43.] This specimen, AMNH 5730, was purchased by the American Museum of Natural History in 1899. Cope intended to describe the skeleton as well as the skull, but his promised paper never appeared.
Several years after Cope's description, his rival
Othniel Charles Marsh published on a sizable lower jaw recovered by John Bell Hatcher in 1889 fromLance Formation rocks in Niobrara County,Wyoming . Marsh named this partial jaw "Trachodon longiceps".cite journal |last=Marsh |first=Othniel C. |authorlink=Othniel Charles Marsh |year=1890 |title=Additional characteristics of the Ceratopsidae, with notice of new Cretaceous dinosaurs |journal=American Journal of Science, 3rd series |volume=39 |pages=418-426] It is cataloged as YPM 616. As noted by Lull and Wright, this long slender partial jaw shares with Cope's specimen a prominent ridge running on its side. However, it is much larger: Cope's specimen had adentary , or tooth-bearing bone of the lower jaw, 92.0 centimeters (36.2 in) long, whereas Marsh's dentary was estimated at 110.0 centimeters (43.3 in) long.A second mostly complete skeleton (AMNH 5886) was found in 1904 in Hell Creek Formation rocks at Crooked Creek in central
Montana by Oscar Hunter, arancher . Upon finding the partially-exposed specimen, he and a companion argued about whether or not the remains were recent or fossil. Hunter demonstrated that they were brittle and thus stone by kicking the tops off the vertebrae, an act later lamented by the eventual collectorBarnum Brown . Another cowboy, Alfred Sensiba, bought the specimen from Hunter for apistol , and later sold it to Brown, who excavated it for theAmerican Museum of Natural History in 1906. This specimen had a nearly completevertebra l column, permitting the restoration of Cope's specimen. In 1907, these two specimens were famously mounted side-by-side in the American Museum of Natural History, under the name "Trachodon mirabilis". Cope's specimen is positioned on fours with its head down, as if feeding, because it has the better skull, while Brown's specimen, with a less perfect skull, is posed bipedally with the head less accessible.Henry Fairfield Osborn described the tableau as representing the two animals feeding along amarsh , the standing individual having been startled by the approach of a "Tyrannosaurus ". Impressions of appropriate plant remains and shells based on associated fossils were included on the base of the group, includingginkgo leaves, "Sequoia " cones, and horsetail rushes.From "Diclonius" to "Anatotitan"
Taxonomy of hadrosaurids was convoluted by the turn of the 20th century, with different authors proposing schemes splitting and synonymizing genera and species, most of them known from poor material. A consensus briefly emerged around John Bell Hatcher's 1902 work grouping almost all of the hadrosaurs then known (as well as "Claorhynchus " and "Polyonax ", now thought to be horned dinosaurs) into "Trachodon". This included "Cionodon ", "Diclonius", "Hadrosaurus", "Ornithotarsus ", "Pteropelyx ", "Thespesius ", and a species Marsh had named "Claosaurus annectens" in 1892. Hatcher considered Marsh's "C. annectens" to be the same species as Cope's "Diclonius mirabilis", the two differentiated only by individual variation or distortion from pressure.cite journal |last=Hatcher |first=John B. |authorlink=John Bell Hatcher |year=1902 |title=The genus and species of the Trachodontidae (Hadrosauridae, Claosauridae) Marsh |journal=Annals of the Carnegie Museum, part 14 |volume=1 |pages=377-386] This consensus lasted for a few years, until after 1910 new material from Canada and Montana showed a greater diversity of hadrosaurids than previously suspected.Charles W. Gilmore in 1915 reassessed hadrosaurids and recommended that "Thespesius" be reintroduced for hadrosaurids from Lance Formation-age rock units, and that "Trachodon" should be restricted to a hadrosaurid from the olderJudith River Formation and its equivalents. He also recognized that "Trachodon" was based on inadequate material.cite journal |last=Gilmore |first=Charles W. |authorlink=Charles W. Gilmore |year=1915 |title=On the genus "Trachodon" |journal=Science |volume=41 |pages=658-660] A multiplicity of names resumed, with the American Museum duckbills being known as "Diclonius mirabilis", "Trachodon mirabilis", "Trachodon annectens", "Claosaurus", or "Thespesius".This confusing situation was temporarily resolved in 1942 by
Richard Swann Lull andNelda Wright . In theirmonograph on hadrosaurian dinosaurs of North America, they opted to settle the questions revolving around the American Museum duckbills, Marsh's "Claosaurus annectens", and several other species by creating a new generic name. They created the new genus "Anatosaurus " ("duck lizard") and made Marsh's species thetype species , calling it "Anatosaurus annectens". To this genus, they also assigned Marsh's "Trachodon longiceps", a pair of species that had been assigned to "Thespesius" under Gilmore's "Lance Formation hadrosaurid" conception ("T. edmontoni" from Gilmore in 1924 and "T. saskatchewanensis" from Charles M. Sternberg in 1926), and Cope's "Diclonius mirabilis".Lull and Wright, "Hadrosaurian Dinosaurs of North America", pp. 154-164.] Lull and Wright decided to remove the American Museum specimens from "Diclonius" (or "Trachodon") because they found no convincing reason to assign the specimens to either. Because this left the skeletons without a species name, Lull and Wright gave them their own species, "Anatosaurus copei", in honor of Cope. Cope's original specimen (AMNH 5730) was made theholotype of the species, with Brown's (AMNH 5886) as theplesiotype . At this time, only two specimens of "Anatosaurus copei" were known.This state of affairs persisted for several decades, until Michael K. Brett-Surman reexamined the pertinent material for his graduate studies in the 1970s and 1980s. He concluded that the type species of "Anatosaurus", "A. annectens", was actually a species of "
Edmontosaurus ", and that "A. copei" was different enough to warrant its own genus.cite book |last=Brett-Surman |first=Michael K. |year=1975 |title=The appendicular anatomy of hadrosaurian dinosaurs |series=M.A. thesis |publisher=University of California |location=Berkeley] cite journal |last=Brett-Surman |first=Michael K. |year=1979 |title=Phylogeny and paleobiogeography of hadrosaurian dinosaurs |journal=Nature |volume=277 |issue=5697 |pages=560-562] cite book |last=Brett-Surman |first=Michael K. |year=1989 |title=A revision of the Hadrosauridae (Reptilia: Ornithischia) and their evolution during the Campanian and Maastrichtian |series=Ph.D. dissertation |publisher=George Washington University |location=Washington, D.C. ] Although theses anddissertation s are not regarded as official publications by theInternational Commission on Zoological Nomenclature , which regulates the naming of organisms, his conclusions were known to other paleontologists, and were adopted by several popular works of the time.cite book |last=Glut |first=Donald F. |title=The New Dinosaur Dictionary |year=1982 |publisher=Citadel Press |location=Secaucus, NJ |isbn=0-8065-0782-9 |pages=p. 49, 53] cite book |last=Lambert |first=David |coauthors=and the Diagram Group |title=A Field Guide to Dinosaurs |year=1983 |publisher=Avon Books |location=New York |isbn=0-380-83519-3 |pages=p. 156-161] His replacement name, "Anatotitan", was known and published as such in the popular literature by 1990.cite book |last=Lambert |first=David |coauthors=and the Diagram Group |title=The Dinosaur Data Book |year=1990 |publisher=Avon Books |location=New York |isbn=0-380-75896-3 |pages=p. 41] Formal publication of the name "Anatotitan copei" took place the same year, in an article co-written by Brett-Surman withRalph Chapman (although the name is sometimes credited as Brett-Surman "vide" Chapman and Brett-Surman because it came out of Brett-Surman's work). By this time, three additional specimens were known for "A .copei", bringing the total to five. The name "Anatotitan" is a combination of theLatin "anas" ("duck") and the Greek "Titan", meaning large. The debate about the proper taxonomy of the "A. copei" specimens continues to the present: returning to Hatcher's argument of 1902, Jack Horner,David B. Weishampel , andCatherine Forster regarded "Anatotitan copei" as representing crushed "Edmontosaurus annectens" skulls.Potential second species "A. longiceps" was first added to "Anatotitan" by
George Olshevsky in 1991.cite book |author=Olshevsky, George. |authorlink=George Olshevsky |year=1991 |title=A Revision of the Parainfraclass Archosauria Cope, 1869, Excluding the Advanced Crocodylia. |series=Mesozoic Meanderings No. 2 |publisher=Publications Requiring Research |location=San Diego |pages=196pp] This was accepted byDonald F. Glut (1997), although David B. Weishampel and Jack Horner (1990) regarded it as a potential synonym of "Anatotitan copei". As with "A. copei", the 2004 Horner-Weishampel-Forster review assigned "A. longiceps" to "Edmontosaurus annectens".Paleoecology
True "Anatotitan" remains are known definitely only from late
Maastrichtian -age rocks from South Dakota (Hell Creek Formation andLance Formation ) and Montana (Hell Creek Formation), USA. No bonebeds or accumulations of multiple individuals have yet been reported.Dale Russell , in a popular work, described the environment of the Hell Creek Formation of the Fort Peck area as a flat floodplain, with a relatively dry subtropical climate that supported a variety of plants ranging from angiospermtree s, tocedar and bald cypress, tofern s andginkgo s.cite book |last=Russell |first=Dale A. |authorlink=Dale Russell |title=An Odyssey in Time: Dinosaurs of North America |year=1989 |publisher=NorthWord Press, Inc. |location=Minocqua, Wisconsin |isbn=1-55971-038-1 |pages=175–176 ] Other dinosaurs that shared its time and place include thehypsilophodont s "Bugenasaura " and "Thescelosaurus ", the ceratopsids "Triceratops " and "Torosaurus ", hadrosaurid "Edmontosaurus", ankylosaurid "Ankylosaurus ",pachycephalosauria ns "Pachycephalosaurus " and "Stygimoloch ", and the theropods "Ornithomimus ", "Troodon ", and "Tyrannosaurus ".Weishampel, David B.; Barrett, Paul M.; Coria, Rodolfo A.; Le Loeuff, Jean; Xu Xing; Zhao Xijin; Sahni, Ashok; Gomani, Elizabeth, M.P.; and Noto, Christopher R. (2004). "Dinosaur Distribution". "The Dinosauria" (2nd). 517–606.] cite web | author = Phillip Bigelow | title = Cretaceous "Hell Creek Faunal Facies"; Late Maastrichtian | url= http://www.scn.org/~bh162/hellcreek2.html | accessdate = 2007-01-26 ]Paleobiology
As a hadrosaurid, "Anatotitan" would have been a large
herbivore , eatingplant s with a sophisticated skull that permitted a grinding motion analogous to chewing. Its teeth were continually replaced and packed into dental batteries that contained hundreds of teeth, only a relative handful of which were in use at any time. Plant material would have been cropped by its broad beak, and held in the jaws by acheek -like structure. Feeding would have been from the ground up to around 4 meters (13 ft) above. Like other hadrosaurs, it could have moved both bipedally andquadruped ally.The extensive depressions surrounding its nasal openings may hosted nasal diverticula. These postulated diverticula would have taken the form of inflatable soft-tissue sacs. Such sacs could be used for both visual and auditory signals.cite journal |last=Hopson |first=James A. |year=1975 |title=The evolution of cranial display structures in hadrosaurian dinosaurs |journal=Paleobiology |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=21–43 ]
In popular culture
Although "Anatotitan" is not as well-known as many of its sister dinosaur taxa, the genus has appeared occasionally in popular media, and has become a representation of dinosaurs in popular culture. "Anatotitan" appeared in the final episode of the
BBC documentary series "Walking with Dinosaurs ", "Death of a Dynasty". [http://www.dinosaur.org/walkingwithresources.htm Walking with Dinosaurs: Celluloid (and Digital) Dinosaurs History of Dinosaur Movies (and Television Documentaries)] . 2000. Retrieved 2007-06-06.] Director and producerJasper James depicted "Anatotitan" as the last duck-billed dinosaur genus and as prey for the carnivoroustheropod "Tyrannosaurus rex". "Anatotitan" also appeared in the Americannature documentary "When Dinosaurs Roamed America " as a peaceful herbivorous dinosaur.Notes
This toothless section is also known as a "diastema".
References
External links
* [http://dml.cmnh.org/2004Oct/msg00235.html Post] on the [http://dml.cmnh.org Dinosaur Mailing List] , detailing skepticism on the synonymy of "Edmontosaurus" and "Anatotitan".
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.