- Anglican doctrine
Anglican doctrine (also called Episcopalian doctrine in some countries) is the body of Christian teachings used to guide the religious and moral practices of
Approach to doctrine
Anglicanism does not possess an agreed-upon confession of faith like the
Presbyterian Westminster Confession, nor does it claim a founding theologian like a John Calvinor a Martin Luther, or a central authority such as the Roman Catholicmagisterium, to set the parameters of acceptable belief and practice. The universally agreed-upon foundations of Anglican doctrine are the three great creeds of the early ecumenical councils (the Apostles', Nicene and Athanasian Creeds), the principles enshrined in the so-called Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral, and the dispersed authority of the four instruments of unity of the Anglican Communion.
Additionally, there are two parallel streams informing doctrinal development and understanding in Anglicanism. Firstly, there is an appeal to the historical formularies, prayer-books, ordinals and the so-called "standard divines". Most prominent of the historical formularies are the
Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion, principally authored by Thomas Cranmer. These are divided into four sections, moving from the general (the fundamentals of the faith) to the particular (the interpretation of scripture, the structure and authority of the church, and the relationship between church and society). Anglicans also take the principle of " lex orandi, lex credendi" seriously; regarding the content, form, and rubrics of liturgyas an important element of doctrinal understanding, development and interpretation. Secondly, Anglicans cite the work of the standard divines, or foundational theologians, of Anglicanism as instructive. Such divines usually include Cranmer, Richard Hooker, Lancelot Andrewesand John Jewel.
The second stream of doctrine is contained in the formally adopted doctrinal positions of the constitutions and
canon lawof various national churches and provinces of the Anglican Communion. These are usually formulated by general synods of national or regional churches and interpreted and enforced by a bishop-in-council structure, involving consultation between the bishops and delegated lay and clerical leadership, although the extent of the devolution of authority from the bishops varies from place to place. This stream is the only binding and enforceable expression of doctrine in Anglicanism, which can sometimes result in conflicting doctrinal understandings between and within national churches and provinces.
Interpretation of doctrine
The foundations and streams of doctrine are interpreted through the lenses of various
Christian movements, which have gained wide acceptance among clergyand laity. Prominent among those in the latter part of the 20th century and the early 21st century are Liberal Christianity, Anglo-Catholicism, and Evangelicalism. The lenses afforded by these perspectives emphasise or supplement particular aspects of historical theological writings, canon law, formularies, and prayer books. These perspectives often conflict with each other, and can conflict with the formal doctrines. Some of these differences help to define "parties" or "factions" within Anglicanism. However, with certain notable exceptions that led to schisms, Anglicans have grown a tradition of tolerating internal differences. This tradition of tolerance is sometimes known as comprehensiveness.
Origins of Anglican doctrine
Anglican doctrine emerged from the interweaving of two main strands of
Christiandoctrine during the English Reformationin the 16th and 17th centuries. The first strand is the Catholicdoctrine taught by the established church in Englandin the early 1500s. The second strand is a range of ProtestantReformed teachings brought to England from neighbouring countries in the same period, notably Calvinismand Lutheranism.
At the time of the Reformation, the Church of England was the national expression of the institutional Catholic Church. The formal doctrines had been documented in
canon lawover the centuries, and the Church of England still follows an unbroken tradition of canon law today. The English Reformationdid not dispense of all previous doctrines. The church not only retained the core Catholic beliefs common to Reformed doctrine in general, such as the Trinity, the Virgin Birthof Jesus, the nature of Jesus as fully human and fully God, the Resurrection of Jesus, Original Sin, and Excommunication(as affirmed by the Thirty-Nine Articles), but also retained some Catholic teachings which were rejected by true Protestants, such as the three orders of ministry and the apostolic successionof bishops. It is for this reason that Anglican doctrine is often said to tread a middle path, or " via media" between Roman Catholicand Protestant perspectives.
Foundational elements of Anglican doctrine
cripture, creeds and ecumenical councils
Central to Anglican doctrine are the foundational documents of Christianity – all the books of the Old and
New Testaments are accepted, but the books of the Apocrypha, while recommended as instructive by Article VI of the Thirty-Nine Articles, are declared not “to establish any doctrine”.
Article VIII of the Thirty-Nine Articles declared the three Catholic creeds — the Apostles’, the Nicene and the Athanasian — to be “be proved by most certain warrants of holy Scripture” and were included in the first and subsequent editions of The Book of Common Prayer. All Anglican prayer books continue to include the Apostles’ and Nicene Creed. Some — such as the Church of England’s
Common Worshipor A New Zealand Prayer Book— omit the Athanasian Creed, but include alternative "affirmations". This liturgical diversity suggests that the principles enunciated by the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds remain doctrinally unimpeachable. Nonetheless, metaphorical or spiritualised interpretations of some of the creedal declarations — for instance, the virgin birth of Jesus and his resurrection — have been commonplace in Anglicanism since the integration of biblical critical theoryinto theological discourse in the nineteenth century.Fact|date=September 2008
The first four ecumenical councils of Nicea, Constantinople, Ephesus, and Chalcedon "have a special place in Anglican theology, secondary to the Scriptures themselves." [Frederick P. Shriver, "Councils, Conferences, and Synods," in "Anglicanism", ed. by S. Sykes and J. Booty, 1988-99 (London: SPCK, 1988), p. 189.] This authority is usually considered to pertain to questions of the nature of Christ (the hypostasis of divine and human) and the relationships between the Persons of the
Holy Trinity, summarised chiefly in the creeds which emerged from those councils. Nonetheless, Article XXI of The Thirty-Nine Articles limit the authority of these and other ecumenical councils, noting that "they may err, and sometimes have erred." In other words, their authority being strictly derivative from and accountable to scripture.
Reformeddoctrine and theologywere developed into a distinctive English form by bishops and theologians led by Thomas Cranmer and Matthew Parker. Their doctrine was summarised in the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion which were adopted by the Parliament of Englandand the Church of England in 1571.
The early English Reformers, like contemporaries on the European continent such as
John Calvin, John Knoxand Martin Luther, rejected many Roman Catholic teachings. The Thirty-Nine Articles list core Reformeddoctrines such as the sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures for salvation, the execution of Jesus as "the perfect redemption, propitiation, and satisfaction for all the sins of the whole world", Predestinationand Election. Some of the articles are simple statements of opposition to Roman Catholic doctrine, such as Article XIV which denies "Works of Supererogation", Article XV which implicitly excludes the Immaculate Conception, and XXII which explicitly rejects the concept of Purgatory. Catholic worship and teaching was at the time conducted in Latin, while the Articles required church services to use the vernacular. By the same token, the Articles show their Calvinist influence by rejecting other strands of Protestantteaching, such as those of the doctrine of common property of "certain Anabaptists".
Unlike the Scottish Reformers the Articles hew out a "via media" between Roman Catholic and extreme Protestant views, alluded to above. For example, in contrast to Calvin, the Articles did not explicitly reject the
Lutherandoctrine of consubstantiation. They also endorse an Episcopal polity, appointing the English monarch as Supreme Governor of the Church of Englandto replace the Bishop of Rome. The Articles can also be read as permitting the acceptance of the five so-called "non-dominical" sacraments as legitimately sacramental, in addition to Baptismand the Eucharist.
Over the years, the
Church of Englandhas not amended the Thirty-Nine Articles. However, synodical legislators made changes to canon law to accommodate those who feel unable to adhere strictly to the Thirty-Nine Articles. The legal form of the declaration of assent required of clergy on their appointment, which was at its most rigid in 1689, was amended in 1865 and again in 1975 to allow more latitude. Outside of the Church of England, the Articles have an even less secure status and are generally treated as an edifying historical document not binding on doctrine or practice.
The Homilies are two books of thirty-three sermons developing Reformed doctrines in greater depth and detail than in the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion. During the reigns of
Edward VIand Elizabeth I, Thomas Cranmer and other English Reformers saw the need for local congregations to be taught Christian theology and practice. Sermons were appointed and required to be read each Sunday and holy day in English. Some are straightforward exhortations to read scripture daily and lead a life of faith; others are rather lengthy scholarly treatises directed at academic audiences on theology, church history, the fall of the Christian Empire and the heresies of Rome.
The homilies are noteworthy for their beautiful and magisterial phrasing and the instances of historical terms. Each homily is heavily annotated with references to scripture, the church fathers, and other primary sources. The reading of the homilies in church is still directed under Article XXXV of the Thirty-Nine Articles.
The original Book of Common Prayer of the Church of England was published in 1549, and its most recently approved successor was issued in 1662. It is this edition that national prayer-books (with the exception of Scotland’s) used as a template as the Anglican Communion spread outside England. The foundational status of the 1662 edition has led to its being cited as an authority on doctrine. This status reflects a more pervasive element of Anglican doctrinal development, namely that of "lex orandi, lex credendi", or "the law of prayer is the law of belief" [ For an excellent short article on this concept, from which much of the content of this section is derived, see W. Taylor Stevenson, "Lex Orandi—Lex Credendi," in "The Study of Anglicanism", op cit., pp. 174-88] (see below).
The Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral is a summation of the Anglican approach to theology, worship and church structure and is often cited as a basic summary of the essentials of Anglican idenity. The four points are:
#The Holy Scriptures as containing all things necessary to salvation;
#The Creeds (specifically, the Apostles’ and Nicene) as the sufficient statement of Christian faith;
#The dominical sacraments of Baptism and Holy Communion;
#The historic episcopate locally adapted.
The four points were included in resolutions of the
Episcopal Church in the United Statesof 1886 and (more significantly) the 1888 Lambeth Conferenceof bishops of the Anglican Communion. Primarily intended as a means of pursuing ecumenical dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church, the Quadrilateral soon became a “sine qua non” for essential Anglican identity.
As mentioned above, Anglicanism has no theologian comparable to the founding theologians of eponymous schools, like
Lutheranism, Calvinism, or Thomism. Nonetheless, it has writers whose works are regarded as standards for faith and doctrine. While there is no definitive list, such individuals are implicitly recognised as authoritative by their inclusion in Anglican liturgical calendars or in anthologies of works on Anglican theology. These include such early figures as Lancelot Andrewes, John Cosin, Thomas Cranmer, Richard Hooker, John Jewel, Matthew Parker, and Jeremy Taylor; and later figures such as Joseph Butler, William Law, John Wesley, and George Whitefield. The nineteenth century produced several prominent Anglican thinkers, notably John Keble, Frederick Denison Maurice, John Henry Newman, and Edward Pusey. More recently, Charles Gore, Michael Ramsey, and William Templehave been included among the pantheon. While this list gives a snapshot, it is not exhaustive, but while many Anglicans would include other names to the list, few would exclude any of the ones enumerated.
Given that the foundational elements of Anglican doctrine are either not binding or are subject to local interpretation, methodology has tended to assume a place of key importance. Hence, it is not so much a body of doctrinal statements so much as the process of doctrinal development that is important in Anglican theological identity.Fact|date=September 2008
Lex orandi, lex credendi
Anglicanism has traditionally expressed its doctrinal convictions based on the prayer texts and liturgy of the church. In other words, appeal has typically been made to what Anglicans do and prescribe in common worship, enunciated in the texts of the Book of Common Prayer and other national prayer books, to guide theology and practice. Applying this axiom to doctrine, there are three venues for its expression in the worship of the Church:
*The selection, arrangement, and composition of prayers and exhortations;
*The selection and arrangement of the lectionary; and
rubrics(regulations) for liturgical action and variations in the prayers and exhortations. [Ibid., 175]
The principle of "lex orandi, lex credendi" functions according to the so-called "three-legged stool" of scripture, tradition, and reason attributed to Richard Hooker. ["
Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity", III.8.13-15; and V.8.2. Hooker himself, however, never used the "stool" analogy.] This doctrinal stance is intended to enable Anglicanism to construct a theology that is pragmatic, focused on the institution of the church, yet engaged with the world. It is, in short, a theology that places a high value on the traditions of the faith and the intellect of the faithful, acknowledging the primacy of the worshipping community in articulating, amending, and passing down the church’s beliefs. In doing so, Anglican theology is inclined towards a comprehensive consensus concerning the principles of the tradition and the relationship between the church and society. In this sense, Anglicans have viewed their theology as strongly incarnational — expressing the conviction that God is revealed in the physical and temporal things of everyday life and the attributes of specific times and places.
This approach has its hazards, however. For instance, there is a countervailing tendency to be "text-centric," that is, to focus on the technical, historical, and interpretative aspects of prayer books and their relationship to the institution of the church, rather than on the relationship between faith and life. Second, the emphasis on comprehensiveness often instead results in compromise or tolerance of every viewpoint. The effect that is created is that Anglicanism may appear to stand for nothing or for everything, and that an unstable and unsatisfactory middle-ground is staked while theological disputes wage interminably. Finally, while "lex orandi, lex credendi" helped solidify a uniform Anglican perspective when the 1662 Prayer Book and its successors predominated, and while expatriate bishops of the
United Kingdomenforced its conformity in territories of the British Empire, this has long since ceased to be true. Liturgical reform and the post-colonialreorganisation of national churches has led to a growing diversity in common worship since the middle of the twentieth century.
The process of doctrinal development
The principle of "lex orandi, lex credendi" discloses a larger theme in the approach of Anglicanism to doctrine, namely, that doctrine is considered a lived experience; since in living it, the community comes to understand its character. In this sense, doctrine is considered to be a dynamic, participatory enterprise rather than a static one.
This inherent sense of dynamism was articulated by
John Henry Newmana century and a half ago, when he asked how, given the passage of time, we can be sure that the Christianity of today is the same religion as that envisioned and developed by Jesus Christand the apostles. [For Newman’s discussion of doctrinal development, see his "Essays on the Development of Doctrine" (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1909 [originally published 1845] )] As indicated above, Anglicans look to the teaching of the Bible and of the undivided Church of the first five centuries as the sufficient criterion for an understanding of doctrine, as expressed in the creeds. Yet they are only a criterion: interpretation, and thus doctrinal development, is thoroughly contextual. The reason this is the case is chiefly due to three factors:
#Differing theories of interpretation of scripture, developed as a result of the symbolic nature of language, the difficulty of translating its cultural and temporal aspects, and the particular perceptual lenses worn by authors;
#The accumulation of knowledge through science and philosophy; and
#The emerging necessity of giving some account of the relationship of Christ to distinct and evolving cultural realities throughout the world, as Christianity has spread to different places.
Newman’s suggestion of two criteria for the sound development of doctrine has permeated Anglican thinking. These are, first, that development must be open and accessible to the faithful at every stage; and second, that it must be subject to appeal to scripture and the precedents of antiquity through the process of sound scholarship. The method by which this is accomplished is by the distillation of doctrine through, and its subordination to a dominant Anglican
ethosconsisting of the maintenance of order through consensus, comprehensiveness, and contract; and a preference for pragmatism over speculation. [Stevenson, 177-79] In other words, the former — experience — flows from the latter — method. Anglican doctrinal methodologymeans concurrence with a base structure of shared identity: An agreement on the fundamentals of the faith articulated in the creeds; the existence of Protestant and catholic elements creating both a "via media" as well as a "union of opposites" [A phrase used by Frederick Denison Maurice in "The Kingdom of Christ", Vol. II (London: SCM, 1958 [originally published 1842] ), 311.] ; and the conviction that there is development in understanding the truth, expressed more in practical terms rather than theoretical ones. [ Stephen Sykes, "The Integrity of Anglicanism" (London and Oxford: Mowbray & Co., 1978), 10ff.] In short, the character of Anglicanism is that the church "contains in itself many elements regarded as mutually exclusive in other communions." [Ibid., 8]
Anglican churches in other countries generally inherited the doctrinal apparatus of the Church of England, consisting most commonly an adaptation of the Thirty-Nine Articles and the Quadrilateral into general principles. From the earliest times, they have adapted them to suit their local needs.
Constitutions and canon law
Canon law in the churches of the Anglican Communion stem from the law of the patristic and
MedievalWestern church which was received, along with the limiting conditions of the English Reformation. Canon law touches on several areas of church life: ecclesiology, that is, the governance and structure of the church as an institution; liturgy; relationships with secular institutions; and the doctrines which implicitly or explicitly touch on these matters. Such laws have varying degrees and means of enforcement, variability, and jurisdiction.
The nature of canon law is complicated by the status of the Church of England as subordinate to the crown; a status which does not affect jurisdictions outside England, including those of the
Scottish Episcopal Church, the Church of Ireland, and the Church in Wales. It is further complicated by the relationship between the autonomous churches of the Communion itself; since the canon law of one jurisdiction has no status in that of another. Moreover, there is — as mentioned above — no international juridical systemwhich can formulate or enforce uniformity in any matter. This has led to conflict regarding certain issues (see below), leading to calls for a "covenant" specifying the parameters of Anglican doctrinal development (see Anglican realignmentfor discussion).
Instruments of unity
As mentioned above, the Anglican Communion has no international juridical organisation. The Archbishop of Canterbury's role is strictly symbolic and unifying; and the Communion's three international bodies are consultative and collaborative, their resolutions having no legal effect on the independent provinces of the Communion. Taken together, however, the four do function as "instruments of unity", since all churches of the Communion partcipate in them. In order of antiquity, they are:
Archbishop of Canterbury, as the spiritual head of the Communion, is the focus of unity, since no church claims membership in the Communion without being in communion with him.
Lambeth Conferenceis a consultation of the bishops of the Communion, intended to reinforce unity and collegiality through manifesting the episcopate, to discuss matters of mutual concern, and to pass resolutions intended to act as guideposts. It is held roughly every ten years and invitation is by the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Anglican Consultative Councilmeets usually at three year intervals. Consisting of representative bishops, clergy, and laity chosen by the thirty-eight provinces, the body has a permanent secretariat, the Anglican Communion Office, of which the Archbishop of Canterbury is president.
# The Primates' Meeting is the most recent manifestation of international consultation and deliberation, having been first convened by Archbishop of Canterbury
Donald Cogganas a forum for "leisurely thought, prayer and deep consultation." [Quoted, for example, by the [http://www.anglicancommunion.org/windsor2004/section_c/p5.cfm 2004 Windsor report] (accessed 2007-07-17), where it is sourced to the Lambeth Conference 1978, Report, p. 123.]
Since there is no binding authority in the Communion, these international bodies are a vehicle for consultation and persuasion. In recent years, persuasion has tipped over into debates over conformity in certain areas of doctrine, discipline, worship, and ethics.
The effect of nationalising the Christian faith in England inevitably led to conflict between factions wishing to remain obedient to the
Pope, those wishing more radical reform, and those holding a middle ground. A range of Presbyterian, Congregational, Baptistand other Puritanviews gained currency in the Church in England, Ireland, and Wales through the late 16th and early 17th centuries. Although the Pilgrim Fathersfelt compelled to leave for New England, other Puritansgained increasing ecclesiastical and political authority, while Royalists advocated Arminianismand the Divine Right of Kings. This conflict was one of the ultimate causes of the English Civil War. The Church of England, with the assistance of Presbyterian Church of Scotlandtheologians and clergy, set down their newly developed Calvinistdoctrines in the Westminster Confessionof 1648, which was never formally adopted into church law. After the Restoration of 1660 and the 1662 Act of Uniformity reinforced Cranmer's Anglicanism, those wishing to hold to the stricter views set out at Westminster either emigrated or covertly founded non-conformist Presbyterian, Congregational, or Baptist churches at home.
The 1700s saw the
Great Awakening, the Methodistschism, and the identification of the Evangelical party among the many conservatives who remained in the Anglican churches. The schism with the Methodistsin the 18th century had a theological aspect, particularly concerning the Methodist emphasis on personal salvation by faith alone, although John Wesleycontinued to regard himself as a member of the Church of England. The same period also saw the emergence of the High Churchmovement, which began to identify with the Catholicheritage of Anglicanism, and to emphasise the importance of the Eucharistand church tradition, while mostly rejecting the legitimacy of papal authority in England. The High Churchmen gave birth to the Oxford Movementand Anglo-Catholicismin the 1800s, which also saw the emergence of Liberal Christianityacross the Protestantworld.
The mid 19th century saw doctrinal debate between adherents of the
Oxford Movementand their Low Churchor Evangelical opponents, though the most public conflict tended to involve more superficial matters such as the use of church ornaments, vestments, candles, and ceremonial (which were taken to indicate a sympathy with Roman Catholic doctrine), and the extent to which such matters ought to be restricted by the church authorities. These conflicts led to further schism, for example in the creation of the Reformed Episcopal Churchin North America.
Doctrinal controversies in the 20th century
Beginning in the sixteenth century, Anglicanism came under the influence of
Latitudinarianism, chiefly represented by the Cambridge Platonists, who held that doctrinal orthodoxy was less important than applying rational rigour to the examination of theological propositions. The increasing influence of German higher criticismof the Bible throughout the nineteenth century, however, resulted in growing doctrinal disagreement over the interpretation and application of scripture. This debate was intensified with the accumulation of insights derived from the natural and social sciences which tended to challenge literally-read biblical accounts. Figures such as J.B. Lightfoot and Brooke Foss Westcotthelped mediate the transition from the theology of Hooker, Andrewes, and Taylor to accommodate these developments. In the early twentienth century, the liberal catholicism of Charles Goreand William Temple attempted to fuse the insights of modern biblical criticism with the theology expressed in the creeds and by the Apostolic Fathers, but the following generations of scholars, such as E.G. Selwynand John A.T. Robinsonquestioned what had hitherto been the sacrosanct status of these verities. As the century progressed, the conflict sharpened, chiefly finding its expression in the application of biblically-derived doctrine to social issues.
Anglicans have debated the relationship between doctrine and social issues since its origins, when the focus was chiefly on the church's proper relationship to the state. Later, in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, the focus shifted to
slavery. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Anglicans fiercely debated the use of artificial contraceptionby Christian couples, which was prohibited by church teaching. In 1930 the Lambeth Conferencetook a lone stand among major Christian denominations at the time and permitted its use in some circumstances [O'Grady, Kathleen, 1999 "Contraception and religion, A short history" from The Encyclopedia of Women and World Religion (Serinity Young et al. eds). Macmillan, 1999, reprinted on http://www.mum.org/contrace.htm, retrieved August 15, 2006] (see also Christian views on contraception).
The 20th century also saw an intense doctrinal debate among Anglicans over the
ordination of women, which led to schism, as well as to the conversion of some Anglican clergy to Roman Catholicism or Eastern Orthodoxy. Even today, there is no unanimity of doctrine or practice in the Anglican Communion as it relates to women's ordination. Finally, in the 1950s, 60s, and 70s Anglican churches wrestled with the issue of the remarriage of divorced persons, which was prohibited by dominical commandment. Once again, there is presently no unanimity of doctrine or practice.
The focus of doctrinal debate on issues of social theology has continued into the twenty-first century. Indeed, the total eclipse of issues of classical doctrine, such as confessions of faith, has been exemplified by the relatively non-controversial decisions by some Communion provinces to amend the Nicene Creed by dropping the
filioque clause, or supplementing the historic creeds with other affirmations of faith. [See for example the Church of England's Common Worshiptexts, which include several forms of affirmation alongside the traditional creeds. [http://www.cofe.anglican.org/worship/liturgy/commonworship/texts/word/creeds.html Creeds and Authorized Affirmations of Faith] . Retrieved 2008-04-21] As of 2006, the two prominent doctrinal issues being actively debated in Anglican synods and convocations across the world are the consecrationof women as bishops and the place of gay and lesbian people in the life of the church — specifically with respect to same-sex unionsand ordination(see Anglican views of homosexuality).
The consecration of bishops and the extension of sacraments to individuals based on gender or
sexual orientationwould ordinarily be matters of concern to the synods of the autonomous provinces of the Communion. Insofar as they affect other provinces, it is by association — either the physical association between the individuals to whom the sacraments have been extended and those who oppose such extension; or the perceptual association of Anglicanism generally with such practices. Regardless, these issues have incited debate over the parameters of domestic autonomy in doctrinal matters in the absence of international consensus. Some dioceses and provinces have moved further than others can easily accept, and some conservative parishes within them have sought pastoral oversight from bishops of other dioceses or provinces, in contravention of traditional Anglican polity(see Anglican realignment). These developments have led some to call for a covenant to delimit the power of provinces to act on controversial issues independently, while others have called for a renewed commitment to comprehensiveness and tolerance of diverse practice.
Anglican Eucharistic theology
History of Calvinist-Arminian debate
Anglican Marian theology
Christian theological controversy
ome contemporary advocates of Anglican doctrine
Eric Lionel Mascall
Rowan Williams Evangelicalism:
J. I. Packer
N. T. Wright
David Edward Jenkins
John Shelby Spong
* [http://www.churchsociety.org/issues_new/doctrine/39A/iss_doctrine_39A_history.asp The history of the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion.]
* [http://www.religioustolerance.org/div_epis.htm LIBERAL - CONSERVATIVE DIVISIONS WITHIN THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, B.A. Robinson, 2000 updated 2003 Liberal-Conservative divisions in Anglicanism]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.