- Butler Act
The Butler Act was a 1925
Tennessee law forbiddingpublic school teachers to deny the literal Biblical account of man’s origin and to teach in its place theevolution of man from lower orders ofanimal s. The law did "not" prohibit the teaching of any evolutionary theory of any other species ofplant or animal.Provisions of the law
The law, "AN ACT prohibiting the teaching of the Evolution Theory in all the Universities, Normals and all other public schools of Tennessee, which are supported in whole or in part by the public school funds of the State, and to provide penalties for the violations thereof" (Tenn. HB 185, 1925) specifically provided::"That it shall be unlawful for any teacher in any of the Universities, Normals and all other
public school s of the State which are supported in whole or in part by the public school funds of the State, to teach any theory that denies the Story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in theBible , and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals." [ [http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/tennstat.htm Full text of the Butler Act and the bill that repealed it] ]It additionally outlined that an offending teacher would be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined between $100 and $500 for each offense.
By the terms of the statute, it could be argued, it was not illegal to teach that
ape s descended fromprotozoa , to teach the mechanisms of variation andnatural selection , or to teach the prevailing scientific theories ofgeology or theage of the Earth . It did not even require that theGenesis story be taught. It prohibited only the teaching that man evolved, or any other theory denying that man was created byGod as recorded in Genesis. However the author of the law, a Tennessee farmer namedJohn Washington Butler , specifically intended that it would prohibit the teaching of evolution. He later was reported to have said, "No, I didn't know anything about evolution when I introduced it. I'd read in the papers that boys and girls were coming home from school and telling their fathers and mothers that the Bible was all nonsense." After reading copies ofWilliam Jennings Bryan 's lecture "Is the Bible True?" as well asCharles Darwin 's "The Origin of Species " and "The Descent of Man", Butler decided evolution was dangerous.Origin of the law
Butler presented his bill on
January 21 ,1925 (Chapter 117, House Bill 198, by Mr. Butler, Public Acts of Tennessee for 1925). The committee on education recommended Bill 198 for passage onJanuary 23 . OnJanuary 28 , the House passed Butler's Bill 71 to 5. In the Senate another anti-evolution bill was already meeting stiff opposition from the judiciary committee where it was referred for consideration. OnJanuary 29 , aware the House had already voted on Butler's bill, the committee recommended rejection of the other bill by a vote of 5 to 4 and it was not untilMarch 10 that the Senate judiciary committee recommended 7–4 for the Butler Act to be passed. OnMarch 13 the Tennessee Senate debated the Butler Act. One senator endeavored to ridicule the bill by attaching an amendment to also "prohibit the teaching that the earth is round," but was ruled out of order by the speaker. Finally, the Butler bill was passed by the Senate 24 to 6, with one senator "present and not voting."Reportedly dismayed the legislature had passed the bill but needing the support of rural legislators for educational reform, Governor
Austin Peay signed the Butler Act into law onMarch 21 . Peay told the press: "After a careful examination, I can find nothing of consequence in the books now being taught in our schools with which this bill will interfere in the slightest manner. Therefore, it will not put our teachers in jeopardy. Probably the law will never be applied." A Tennessee lawyer, in an often quoted line, said: "The Legislature did not know it passed the fool thing." However it was several weeks before a single educator could be induced to express an opinion on the subject, and the head of thezoology department at theUniversity of Tennessee refused to show his zoology textbooks to reporters. The University's president secretly issued unofficial instructions to his faculty to make no changes in their instruction.Challenges
The law was challenged by the ACLU in the famed
Scopes Trial , in which John Scopes, a high school sports coach who occasionally acted as a substitute teacher, agreed to be arrested on a charge of having taught evolution, and was nominally served a warrant onMay 5 ,1925 . Scopes was indicted onMay 25 and ultimately convicted; on appeal theTennessee Supreme Court found the law to be constitutional under theTennessee State Constitution , because:We are not able to see how the prohibition of teaching the theory that man has descended from a lower order of animals gives preference to any religious establishment or mode of worship. So far as we know, there is no religious establishment or organized body that has in its creed or confession of faith any article denying or affirming such a theory. — Scopes v. State 289 S.W. 363, 367 (Tenn. 1927)
Despite this decision, the Tennessee Supreme Court reversed the conviction on a technicality (that the jury should have fixed the amount of the fine), and the case was not retried. During the trial, Butler told reporters: "I never had any idea my bill would make a fuss. I just thought it would become a law, and that everybody would abide by it and that we wouldn't hear any more of
evolution in Tennessee."The law remained on the books until 1967, when a dismissed teacher complained that it violated his First Amendment right to free speech. Fearing another courtroom fiasco, the Tennessee legislature repealed the law.
ee also
*
Scopes Trial References
*"Author of the Law Surprised by Fuss", "
The New York Times " (18 July 1925 ), page 1.External links
* [http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/tennstat.htm Full text of the Butler Act and the bill that repealed it]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.