Manchester, Buxton, Matlock and Midlands Junction Railway

MetaSidebar|25%|#eeffff|right|Stations and Landmarks
Amber Gate
Watstandwell Bridge "High Peak Junction (C&HPR)"

Cromford Bridge
Matlock Bath
Matlock
Darley
Rowsley "Rowsley mpd" "Haddon Tunnel"
Bakewell
Hassop
Longstone
Monsal Dale
Millers Dale :: Blackwell Mill :: Buxton)
Peak Forest "Dove Holes Tunnel"
Chapel-en-le-Frith
Chinley
Bugsworth
New Mills "(For stations to Manchester see Sheffield and Midland Railway Companies' Committee)"

The Manchester, Buxton, Matlock and Midlands Junction Railway initially served neither Manchester nor the Midlands, since its connection with the North Midland Railway at Ambergate Junction was in a northerly direction. This was possibly because of a planned intention to join with the proposed Ambergate, Nottingham, Boston and Eastern Junction Railway which would meet it a little further north along the North Midland line. The Act for a line from just south of Stockport to Ambergate was passed in 1846.

Original Plans

The initial plan was to build a line from Ambergate to Stockport as a joint venture between Manchester and Birmingham Railway and the Midland Railway, using the former's line to allow the latter to gain access to Manchester. However, almost immediately the Manchester and Birmingham became part of the LNWR, which was averse to the Midland entering Manchester.

The line opened as far as Rowsley in 1849, but went no further, giving its promoters something of a problem. In order to derive some income from it, they developed Matlock Bath as a tourist town.

Expansion

In 1853, a junction was made by the Cromford and High Peak Railway now LNWR-owned. Meanwhile, with LNWR's support, the Stockport, Disley and Whaley Bridge Railway connected Manchester to the north end of the C&HPR, and in 1863 extended to Buxton, which blocked the Midland's plans. However, undaunted, the Midland extended from Rowsley to Buxton, at almost the same time.

The section between Rowsley and Ambergate was still jointly leased with the LNWR. For many years, the town of Wirksworth had been campaigning for a branch line from Duffield. The CH&PR was interested, but had insufficient funds. The Midland was initially unenthusiastic, but then realised that the branch could be extended to Rowsley, avoiding the section to Ambergate, being unsure about what might occur when joint lease expired in 1871.

If the LNWR gained control, it would cause considerable problems. However, the LNWR gave up its share of the lease on a line that was isolated from the rest of its system when it expired, and the Midland was relieved of the necessity of extending from Wirksworth over a very difficult piece of terrain.but the LNWR did not pursue its obstruction of the Midlands use of the original line. The branch opened to Wirksworth in 1867 but was not carried further.

Meanwhile the Midland had joined with the Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (another competitor to the LNWR) to extend from Millers Dale to New Mills to meet the MS&LR's line into Manchester London Road. This became known as the Sheffield and Midland Railway Companies' Committee and provided the route the Midland had been looking for. The whole line had been extremely costly to build, with many tunnels and earthworks. With its bends and gradients, it proved a challenge to footplate crews.

The Midland's main line

The Midland thus had a path from London to Manchester London Road (now Piccadilly), and later constructed a more direct line from New Mills into Manchester Central station. In LMS days it featured named expresses, such as The Palatine and the Peaks.

Closure

The line from Matlock to Buxton was closed in 1968. Continuing support is being given by a heritage group Peak Rail who have restored the section from Matlock to Rowsley. The line from Matlock to Ambergate, plus the section of the Midland Main Line to Derby, are now referred to as the Derwent Valley Line. Meanwhile, the Wirksworth branch still exists and is currently being restored as the Ecclesbourne Valley Railway.

Current status

Although the track has been lifted between Rowsley and Buxton and is now part of the Monsal Trail, plans to re-open it are proposed from time to time, and the Derbyshire County Council has pledged to keep the trackbed free of development.

Part of the line has been re-opened by the heritage railway organisation Peak Rail who run services from near Matlock to Rowsley.

References

* Pixton, B., (2000) North Midland: Portrait of a Famous Route, Cheltenham: Runpast Publishing
* Truman, P., Hunt, D., (1989) "Midland Railway Portrait" Sheffield: Platform 5 Publishing
* The newsletter of the Friends of the Derwent Valley Line,May 2005.
* Derbyshire County Council (2004) Derby to Manchester Railway Matlock to Buxton / Chinley Link Study. Main Report, Volume 1A: Version: Final.

External links

* [http://www.thesectionalappendix.co.uk/MIDTMCEN01.html British Railways 1960, Trent to Manchester Central]
* [http://www.derbyshire.gov.uk/transport_roads/transport_planning/derby_manchester_rail_project/ County Council Feasibility Study "This report also has detailed plans of the line."]
* [http://www.fdvl.org.uk/ Friends of the Derwent Valley Line]
* [http://www.peakrail.co.uk/index.htm Peak Rail site]
* [http://derbyshire-peakdistrict-co-uk.leia.parcomweb.net/monsaltrail.htm Monsal Trail guide]
* [http://www.cressbrook.co.uk/visits/monsaltrail.php Monsal Trail description]