History of private equity and venture capital

History of private equity and venture capital

The history of private equity and venture capital and the development of these asset classes has occurred through a series of boom and bust cycles since the middle of the 20th century. Within the broader private equity industry, two distinct sub-industries, leveraged buyouts and venture capital experienced growth along parallel although interrelated tracks.

Since the origins of the modern private equity industry in 1946, there have been four major epochs marked by three boom and bust cycles. The early history of private equity — from 1946 through 1981 — was characterized by relatively small volumes of private equity investment, rudimentary firm organizations and limited awareness of and familiarity with the private equity industry. The first boom and bust cycle — from 1982 through 1993 — was characterized by the dramatic surge in leveraged buyout activity financed by junk bonds and culminating in the massive buyout of RJR Nabisco before the near collapse of the leveraged buyout industry in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The second boom and bust cycle (from 1992 through 2002) emerged out of the ashes of the savings and loan crisis, theinsider trading scandals, the real estate market collapse and the recession of the early 1990s. This period saw the emergence of more institutionalized private equity firms, ultimately culminating in the massive Dot-com bubble in 1999 and 2000. The third boom and bust cycle (from 2003 through 2007) came in the wake of the collapse of the Dot-com bubble—leveraged buyouts reach unparalleled size and the institutionalization of private equity firms is exemplified by the Blackstone Group's 2007 initial public offering.

In its early years through roughly the year 2000, the history of the private equity and venture capital asset classes is best described through a narrative of developments in the United States as private equity in Europe consistently lagged behind the North American industry. With the second private equity boom in the mid-1990s and liberalization of regulation for institutional investors in Europe, the emergence of a mature European private equity market has occurred.


Investors have been acquiring businesses and making minority investments in privately held companies since the dawn of the industrial revolution. Merchant bankers in London and Paris financed industrial concerns in the 1850s; most notably Credit Mobilier, founded in 1854 by Jacob and Isaac Pereire, who together with New York based Jay Cooke financed the United States Transcontinental Railroad.

Later, J. Pierpont Morgan's J.P. Morgan & Co. would finance railroads and other industrial companies throughout the United States. In certain respects, J. Pierpont Morgan's 1901 acquisition of Carnegie Steel Company from Andrew Carnegie and Henry Phipps for $480 million represents the first true major buyout as they are thought of today.

Due to structural restrictions imposed on American banks under the Glass-Steagall Act and other regulations in the 1930s, there was no private merchant banking industry in the United States, a situation that was quite exceptional in developed nations. As late as the 1980s, Lester Thurow, a noted economist, decried the inability of the financial regulation framework in the United States to support merchant banks. US investment banks were confined primarily to advisory businesses, handling mergers and acquisitions transactions and placements of equity and debt securities. Investment banks would later enter the space, however long after independent firms had become well established.

With few exceptions, private equity in the first half of the 20th century was the domain of wealthy individuals and families. The Vanderbilts, Whitneys, Rockefellers and Warburgs were notable investors in private companies in the first half of the century. In 1938, Laurance S. Rockefeller helped finance the creation of both Eastern Air Lines and Douglas Aircraft and the Rockefeller family had vast holdings in a variety of companies. Eric M. Warburg founded E.M. Warburg & Co. in 1938, which would ultimately become Warburg Pincus, with investments in both leveraged buyouts and venture capital.

Origins of modern private equity

It was not until after World War II that what is considered today to be true private equity investments began to emerge marked by the founding of the first two venture capital firms in 1946: American Research and Development Corporation. (ARDC) and J.H. Whitney & Company. [Wilson, John. "The New Ventures, Inside the High Stakes World of Venture Capital."]

ARDC was founded by Georges Doriot, the "father of venture capitalism" [ [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/theymadeamerica/whomade/doriot_hi.html/ WGBH Public Broadcasting Service, “Who made America?"-Georges Doriot”] ] (former dean of Harvard Business School), with Ralph Flanders and Karl Compton (former president of MIT), to encourage private sector investments in businesses run by soldiers who were returning from World War II. ARDC's significance was primarily that it was the first institutional private equity investment firm that raised capital from sources other than wealthy families although it had several notable investment successes as well. [http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3398496/ The New Kings of Capitalism, Survey on the Private Equity industry] The Economist, November 25, 2004] ARDC is credited with the first major venture capital success story when its 1957 investment of $70,000 in Digital EquipmentCorporation (DEC) would be valued at over $355 million after the company's initial public offering in 1968 (representing a return of over 500 times on its investment and an annualized rate of return of 101%). [ [http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=15 Joseph W. Bartlett, "What Is Venture Capital?"] ] Former employees of ARDC went on to found several prominent venture capital firms including Greylock Partners (founded in 1965 by Charlie Waite and Bill Elfers) and Morgan, Holland Ventures, the predecessor of Flagship Ventures (founded in 1982 by James Morgan). [Kirsner, Scott. "Venture capital's grandfather." The Boston Globe, April 6, 2008.] ARDC continued investing until 1971 with the retirement of Doriot. In 1972, Doriot merged ARDC with Textron after having invested in over 150 companies.

J.H. Whitney & Company was founded by John Hay Whitney and his partner Benno Schmidt. Whitney had been investing since the 1930s, founding Pioneer Pictures in 1933 and acquiring a 15% interest in Technicolor Corporation with his cousin Cornelius Vanderbilt Whitney. By far, Whitney's most famous investment was in Florida Foods Corporation. The company, having developed an innovative method for delivering nutrition to American soldiers, later came to be known as Minute Maid orange juice and was sold to The Coca-Cola Company in 1960. J.H. Whitney & Company continues to make investments in leveraged buyout transactions and raised $750 million for its sixth institutional private equity fund in 2005.

Before World War II, venture capital investments (originally known as "development capital") were primarily the domain of wealthy individuals and families. One of the first steps toward a professionally-managed venture capital industry was the passage of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958. The 1958 Act officially allowed the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) to license private "Small Business Investment Companies" (SBICs) to help the financing and management of the small entrepreneurial businesses in the United States. Passage of the Act addressed concerns raised in a Federal Reserve Board report to Congress that concluded that a major gap existed in the capital markets for long-term funding for growth-oriented small businesses. Additionally, it was thought that fostering entrepreneurial companies would spur technological advances to compete against the Soviet Union. Facilitating the flow of capital through the economy up to the pioneering small concerns in order to stimulatethe U.S. economy was and still is the main goal of the SBIC program today. [ [http://www.sba.gov/aboutsba/sbaprograms/inv/index.html Small Business Administration Investment Division (SBIC)] ] The 1958 Act provided venture capital firms structured either as SBICs or Minority Enterprise Small Business Investment Companies (MESBICs) access to federal funds which could be leveraged at a ratio of up to 4:1 against privately raised investment funds. The success of the Small Business Administration's efforts are viewed primarily in terms of the pool of professional private equity investors that the program developed as the rigid regulatory limitations imposed by the program minimized the role of SBICs. In 2005, the SBA significantly reduced its SBIC program, though SBICs continue to make private equity investments.

Early venture capital and the growth of Silicon Valley (1959 - 1981)

During the 1960s and 1970s, venture capital firms focused their investment activity primarily on starting and expanding companies. More often than not, these companies were exploiting breakthroughs in electronic, medical or data-processing technology. As a result, venture capital came to be almost synonymous with technology finance.

It is commonly noted that the first venture-backed startup was Fairchild Semiconductor (which produced the first commercially practicable integrated circuit), funded in 1959 by what would later become Venrock Associates. [ [http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2007/spch102407bgc.htm The Future of Securities Regulation] speech by Brian G. Cartwright, General Counsel U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. University of Pennsylvania Law School Institute for Law and Economics Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. October 24, 2007.] Venrock was founded in 1969 by Laurance S. Rockefeller, the fourth of John D. Rockefeller's six children as a way to allow other Rockefeller children to develop exposure to venture capital investments.

It was also in the 1960s that the common form of private equity fund, still in use today, emerged. Private equity firms organized limited partnerships to hold investments in which the investment professionals served as general partner and the investors, who were passive limited partners, put up the capital. The compensation structure, still in use today, also emerged with limited partners paying an annual management fee of 1-2% and a carried interest typically representing up to 20% of the profits of the partnership.

An early West Coast venture capital company was Draper and Johnson Investment Company, formed in 1962 [http://www.draperco.com/history.html Web site history] by William Henry Draper III and Franklin P. Johnson, Jr. In 1965 Bill Draper and Paul Wythes founded [http://www.shv.com/ Sutter Hill Ventures] , and Pitch Johnson formed [http://www.assetman.com Asset Management Company] .

The growth of the venture capital industry was fueled by the emergence of the independent investment firms on Sand Hill Road, beginning with Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield & Byers and Sequoia Capital in 1972. Located, in Menlo Park, CA, Kleiner Perkins, Sequoia and later venture capital firms would have access to the burgeoning technology industries in the area. By the early 1970s, there were many semiconductor companies based in the Santa Clara Valley as well as early computer firms using their devices and programming and service companies. [In 1971, a series of articles entitled "Silicon Valley USA" were published in the Electronic News, a weekly trade publication, giving rise to the use of the term Silicon Valley.] Throughout the 1970s, a group of private equity firms, focused primarily on venture capital investments, would be founded that would become the model for later leveraged buyout and venture capital investment firms. In 1973, with the number of newventure capital firms increasing, leading venture capitalists formed the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA). The NVCA was to serve as the industry trade group for the venture capital industry. [Official website of the [http://www.nvca.org/ National Venture Capital Association] , the largest trade association for the venture capital industry.] Venture capital firms suffered a temporary downturn in 1974, when the stock market crashed and investors were naturally wary of this new kind of investment fund. It was not until 1978 that venture capital experienced its first major fundraising year, as the industry raised approximately $750 million. During this period, the number of venture firms also increased. Among the firms founded in this period, in addition to Kleiner Perkins and Sequoia, that continue to invest actively are TA Associates, Mayfield Fund, Apax Partners, New Enterprise Associates, Oak Investment Partners and Sevin Rosen Funds.

Venture capital played an instrumental role in developing many of the major technology companies of the 1980s. Some of the most notable venture capital investments were made in firms that include: Tandem Computers, Genentech, Apple Inc., Electronic Arts, Compaq, Federal Express and LSI Corporation.

Early history of leveraged buyouts (1955-1981)

McLean Industries and public holding companies

Although not strictly private equity, and certainly not labeled so at the time, the first leveraged buyout may have been the purchase by Malcolm McLean's McLean Industries, Inc. of Pan-Atlantic Steamship Company in January 1955 and Waterman Steamship Corporation in May 1955. [On January 21, 1955, McLean Industries, Inc. purchased the capital stock of Pan Atlantic Steamship Corporation and Gulf Florida Terminal Company, Inc. from Waterman Steamship Corporation. In May, McLean Industries, Inc. completed the acquisition of the common stock of Waterman Steamship Corporation from its founders and other stockholders.] Under the terms of the transactions, McLean borrowed $42 million and raised an additional $7 million through an issue of preferred stock. When the deal closed, $20 million of Waterman cash and assets were used to retire $20 million of the loan debt. The newly elected board of Waterman then voted to pay an immediate dividend of$25 million to McLean Industries. [Marc Levinson, "The Box, How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger", pp. 44-47 (Princeton Univ. Press 2006). The details of this transaction are set out in ICC Case No. MC-F-5976, "McLean Trucking Company and Pan-Atlantic American Steamship Corporation--Investigation of Control", July 8, 1957. ]

Similar to the approach employed in the McLean transaction, the use of publicly traded holding companies as investment vehicles to acquire portfolios of investments in corporate assets would become a new trend in the 1960s popularized by the likes of Warren Buffett (Berkshire Hathaway) and Victor Posner (DWG Corporation) and later adopted by Nelson Peltz (Triarc), Saul Steinberg (Reliance Insurance) and Gerry Schwartz (Onex Corporation). These investment vehicles would utilize a number of the same tactics and target the same type of companies as more traditional leveraged buyouts and in many ways could be considered a forerunner of the later private equity firms. In fact, it is Posner who is often credited with coining the term "leveraged buyout" or "LBO" [Trehan, R. (2006). " [http://www.4hoteliers.com/4hots_fshw.php?mwi=1757 The History Of Leveraged Buyouts] ". December 4, 2006. Accessed May 22, 2008] Posner, who had made a fortune in real estate investments in the 1930s and 1940s acquired a major stake in DWG Corporation in 1966. Having gained control of the company, he used it as an investment vehicle that could execute takeovers of other companies. Posner and DWG are perhaps best known for the hostile takeover of Sharon Steel Corporation in 1969, one of the earliest such takeovers in the United States. Posner's investments were typically motivated by attractive valuations, balance sheets and cash flow characteristics. Because of its high debt load, Posner's DWG would generate attractive but highly volatile returns and would ultimately land the company in financial difficulty. In 1987, Sharon Steel sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Warren Buffett, who is typically described as a stock market investor rather than a private equity investor, employed many of the same techniques in the creation on his Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate as Posner's DWG Corporation and in later years by more traditional private equity investors. In 1965, with the support of the company's board of directors, Buffett assumed control of Berkshire Hathaway. At the time of Buffett's investment, Berkshire Hathaway was a textile company, however, Buffett used Berkshire Hathaway as an investment vehicle to make acquisitions and minority investments in dozens of the insurance and reinsurance industries (GEICO) and varied companies including: American Express, The Buffalo News, the Coca-Cola Company, Fruit of the Loom, Nebraska Furniture Mart and See's Candies. Buffett's value investing approach and focus on earnings and cash flows are characteristic of later private equity investors. Buffett woulddistinguish himself relative to more traditional leveraged buyout practitioners through his reluctance to use leverage and hostile techniques in his investments.

KKR and the pioneers of private equity

The industry that is today described as private equity was conceived by a number of corporate financiers, most notably Jerome Kohlberg, Jr. and later his protégé, Henry Kravis. Working for Bear Stearns at the time, Kohlberg and Kravis along with Kravis' cousin George Roberts began a series of what they described as "bootstrap" investments. They targeted family-owned businesses, many of which had been founded in the years following World War II and by the 1960s and 1970s were facing succession issues. Many of these companies lacked a viable or attractive exit for their founders as they were too small to be taken public and the founders were reluctant to sell out to competitors, making a sale to a financial buyer potentially attractive. Their acquisition of Orkin Exterminating Company in 1964 is among the first significant leveraged buyout transactions. [ [http://www.investmentu.com/research/private-equity-history.html The History of PrivateEquity] (Investment U, The Oxford Club] In the following years, the three Bear Stearns bankers would complete a series of buyouts including Stern Metals (1965), Incom (a division of Rockwood International, 1971), Cobblers Industries (1971) and Boren Clay (1973) as well as Thompson Wire, Eagle Motors and Barrows through their investment in Stern Metals. Although they had a number of highly successful investments, the $27 million investment in Cobblers ended in bankruptcy. [Barbarians at the Gate, p. 133-136]

By 1976, tensions had built up between Bear Stearns and Kohlberg, Kravis and Roberts leading to their departure and the formation of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts in that year. Most notably, Bear Stearns executive Cy Lewis had rejected repeated proposals to form a dedicated investment fund within Bear Stearns and Lewis took exception to the amount of time spent on outside activities. [ In 1976, Kravis was forced to serve as interim CEO of a failing direct mail company Advo.] Early investors included the Hillman Family [Refers to Henry Hillman and the Hillman Company. [http://www.answers.com/topic/the-hillman-company?cat=biz-fin The Hillman Company] (Answers.com profile)] By 1978, with the revision of the ERISA regulations, the nascent KKR was successful in raising its first institutional fund with approximately $30 million of investor commitments. [Barbarians at the Gate, p. 136-140]

Meanwhile in 1974, Thomas H. Lee founded a new investment firm to focus on acquiring companies through leveraged buyout transactions, one of the earliest independent private equity firms to focus on leveraged buyouts of more mature companies rather than venture capital investments in growth companies. Lee's firm, Thomas H. Lee Partners, while initially generating less fanfare than other entrants in the 1980s, would emerge as one of the largest private equity firms globally by the end of the 1990s.

The second half of the 1970s and the first years of the 1980s saw the emergence of several private equity firms that would be survive through the various cycles both in leveraged buyouts and venture capital. Among the firms founded during these years were: Cinven, Forstmann Little & Company, Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, Candover, and GTCR.

Management buyouts also came into existence in the late 1970s and early 1980s. One of the most notable early management buyout transactions was the acquisition of Harley-Davidson. A group of managers at Harley-Davidson, the motorcycle manufacturer, bought the company from AMF in a leveraged buyout in 1981, but racked up big losses the following year and had to ask for protection from Japanese competitors.

Regulatory and tax changes impact the boom

The advent of the boom in leveraged buyouts in the 1980s was supported by three major legal and regulatory events:

*"Failure of the Carter tax plan of 1977" - In his first year in office, Jimmy Carter put forth a revision to the corporate tax system that would have, among other results, reduced the disparity in treatment of interest paid to bondholders and dividends paid to stockholders. Carter's proposals did not achieve support from the business community or Congress and was not enacted. Because of the different tax treatment, the use of leverage to reduce taxes was popular among private equity investors and would become increasingly popular with the reduction of the capital gains tax rate. [Saunders, Laura. [http://www.forbes.com/forbes/1988/1128/192_print.html How The Government Subsidizes Leveraged Takeovers] . Forbes, November 28, 1988.]

* "Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)" - With the passage of ERISA in 1974, corporate pension funds were prohibited from holding certain risky investments including many investments in privately held companies. In 1975, fundraising for private equity investments cratered, according to the Venture Capital Institute, totaling only $10 million during the course of the year. In 1978, the US Labor Department relaxed certain of the ERISA restrictions, under the "prudent man rule," [The “prudent man rule” is a fiduciary responsibility of investment managers under ERISA. Under the original application, each investment was expected to adhere to risk standards on its own merits, limiting the ability of investment managers to make any investments deemed potentially risky. Under the revised 1978 interpretation, the concept of portfolio diversification of risk, measuring risk at the aggregate portfolio level rather than the investment level to satisfy fiduciary standardswould also be accepted.] thus allowing corporate pension funds to invest in private equity resulting in a major source of capital available to invest in venture capital and other private equity. Time reported in 1978 that fund raising had increased from $39 million in 1977 to $570 million just one year later. [Taylor, Alexander L. " [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,954903-3,00.html Boom Time in Venture Capital] ". TIME magazine, Aug. 10, 1981.] Additionally, many of these same corporate pension investors would become active buyers of the high yield bonds (or junk bonds) that were necessary to complete leveraged buyout transactions.

*"Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (ERTA)" - On August 15, 1981, Ronald Reagan signed the Kemp-Roth bill, officially known as the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, into law, lowering of the top capital gains tax rate from 28 percent to 20 percent, and making high risk investments even more attractive.

In the years that would follow these events, private equity would experience its first major boom, acquiring some of the famed brands and major industrial powers of American business.

The first private equity boom (1982 to 1993)

The decade of the 1980s is perhaps more closely associated with the leveraged buyout than any decade before or since. For the first time, the public became aware of the ability of private equity to affect mainstream companies and "corporate raiders" and "hostile takeovers" entered the public consciousness. The decade would see one of the largest booms in private equity culminating in the 1989 leveraged buyout of RJR Nabisco, which would reign as the largest leveraged buyout transaction for nearly 17 years. In 1980, the private equity industry would raise approximately $2.4 billion of annual investor commitments and by the end of the decade in 1989 that figure stood at $21.9 billion marking the tremendous growth experienced. [Source: Thomson Financial's [http://vx.thomsonib.com/ VentureXpert] database for Commitments. Searching "All Private Equity Funds" (Venture Capital, Buyout and Mezzanine).]

Beginning of the LBO boom

The beginning of the first boom period in private equity would be marked by the well-publicized success of the Gibson Greetings acquisition in 1982 and would roar ahead through 1983 and 1984 with the soaring stock market driving profitable exits for private equity investors.

In January 1982, former US Secretary of the Treasury William E. Simon and a group of investors, which would later come to be known as Wesray Corp., acquired Gibson Greetings, a producer of greeting cards. The purchase price for Gibson was $80 million, of which only $1 million was rumored to have been contributed by the investors. By mid-1983, just sixteen months after the original deal, Gibson completed a $290 million IPO and Simon made approximately $66 million. [Taylor, Alexander L. " [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,951242,00.html Buyout Binge] ". TIME magazine, Jul. 16, 1984.] Simon and Wesray would later complete the $71.6 million acquisition of Atlas Van Lines. The success of the Gibson Greetings investment attracted the attention of the wider media to the nascent boom in leveraged buyouts.

Between 1979 and 1989, it was estimated that there were over 2,000 leveraged buyouts valued in excess of $250 million [Opler, T. and Titman, S. "The determinants of leveraged buyout activity: Free cash flow vs. financial distress costs." Journal of Finance, 1993.] Notable buyouts of this period (not described elsewhere in this article) include: Malone & Hyde (1984), Wometco Enterprises (1984), Beatrice Companies (1985), Sterling Jewelers (1985), Revco Drug Stores (1986), Safeway (1986), Southland Corporation (1987), Jim Walter Corp (later Walter Industries, Inc., 1987), Blackrock (1988), Federated Department Stores (1988), Marvel Entertainment (1988), Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company (1988) and Hospital Corporation of America (1989).

Because of the high leverage on many of the transactions of the 1980s, failed deals occurred regularly, however the promise of attractive returns on successful investments attracted more capital. With the increased leveraged buyout activity and investor interest, the mid-1980s saw a major proliferation of private equity firms. Among the major firms founded in this period were:

Bain Capital, Chemical Venture Partners, Hellman & Friedman, Hicks & Haas, (later Hicks Muse Tate & Furst, The Blackstone Group, Doughty Hanson, BC Partners, and The Carlyle Group.

Additionally, as the market developed, new niches within the private equity industry began to emerge. In 1982, Venture Capital Fund of America, the first private equity firm focused on acquiring secondary market interests in existing private equity funds was founded and then, two years later in 1984, First Reserve Corporation, the first private equity firm focused on the energy sector, was founded.

Venture capital in the 1980s

The public successes of the venture capital industry in the 1970s and early 1980s (e.g., DEC, Apple, Genentech) gave rise to a major proliferation of venture capital investment firms. From just a few dozen firms at the start of the decade, there were over 650 firms by the end of the 1980s, each searching for the next major "home run". While the number of firms multiplied, the capital managed by these firms increased only 11% from $28 billion to $31 billion over the course of the decade.POLLACK, ANDREW. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE0D61E3CF93BA35753C1A96F948260 Venture Capital Loses Its Vigor] ." New York Times, October 8, 1989.]

The growth the industry was hampered by sharply declining returns and certain venture firms began posting losses for the first time. In addition to the increased competition among firms, several other factors impacted returns. The market for initial public offerings cooled in the mid-1980s before collapsing after the stock market crash in 1987 and foreign corporations, particularly from Japan and Korea, flooded early stage companies with capital.POLLACK, ANDREW. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE0D61E3CF93BA35753C1A96F948260 Venture Capital Loses Its Vigor] ." New York Times, October 8, 1989.]

In response to the changing conditions, corporations that had sponsored in-house venture investment arms, including General Electric and Paine Webber either sold off or closed these venture capital units. Additionally, venture capital units within Chemical Bank (today CCMP Capital) and Continental Illinois National Bank (today CIVC Partners), among others, began shifting their focus from funding early stage companies toward investments in more mature companies. Even industry founders J.H. Whitney & Company and Warburg Pincus began to transition toward leveraged buyouts and growth capital investments.POLLACK, ANDREW. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE0D61E3CF93BA35753C1A96F948260 Venture Capital Loses Its Vigor] ." New York Times, October 8, 1989.] [Kurtzman, Joel. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE0DB1E3EF934A15750C0A96E948260PROSPECTS; Venture Capital] ." New York Times, March 27, 1988.] [LUECK, THOMAS J. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE4DD113EF935A35751C0A961948260 HIGH TECH'S GLAMOUR FADES FOR SOME VENTURE CAPITALISTS ] ." New York Times, February 6, 1987.] Many of these venture capital firms attempted to stay close to their areas of expertise in the technology industry by acquiring companies in the industry that had reached certain levels of maturity. In 1989, Prime Computer was acquired in a $1.3 billion leveraged buyout by J.H. Whitney & Company in what would prove to be a disastrous transaction. Whitney's investment in Prime proved to be nearly a total loss with the bulk of the proceeds from the company's liquidation paid to the company's creditors. [Norris, Floyd " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CEED71E3FF931A2575BC0A964958260 Market Place; Buyout of Prime Computer Limps Toward Completion] ." New York Times, August 12, 1992]

Although lower profile than their buyout counterparts, new leading venture capital firms were also formed including Draper Fisher Jurvetson (originally Draper Associates) in 1985 and Canaan Partners in 1987 among others.

Corporate raiders, hostile takeovers and greenmail

Although the "corporate raider" moniker is rarely applied to contemporary private equity investors, there is no formal distinction between a "corporate raid" and other private equity investments acquisitions of existing businesses. The label was typically ascribed by constituencies within the acquired company or the media. However, a corporate raid would typically feature a leveraged buyout that would involve a hostile takeover of the company, perceived asset stripping, major layoffs or other significant corporate restructuring activities. Management of many large publicly traded corporations reacted negatively to the threat of potential hostile takeover or corporate raid and pursued drastic defensive measures including poison pills, golden parachutes and increasing debt levels on the company's balance sheet. Additionally, the threat of the corporate raid would lead to the practice of "greenmail", where a corporate raider or other party wouldacquire a significant stake in the stock of a company and receive an incentive payment (effectively a bribe) from the company in order to avoid pursuing a hostile takeover of the company. Greenmail represented a transfer payment from a company's existing shareholders to a third party investor and provided no value to existing shareholders but did benefit existing managers. The practice of "greenmail" is not typically considered a tactic of private equity investors and is not condoned by market participants.

Among the most notable corporate raiders of the 1980s included Carl Icahn, Victor Posner, Nelson Peltz, Robert M. Bass, T. Boone Pickens, Harold Clark Simmons, Kirk Kerkorian, Sir James Goldsmith, Saul Steinberg and Asher Edelman. Carl Icahn developed a reputation as a ruthless corporate raider after his hostile takeover of TWA in 1985. [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1590446,00.html 10 Questions for Carl Icahn] by Barbara Kiviat, TIME magazine, Feb. 15, 2007] The result of that takeover was Icahn systematically selling TWA's assets to repay the debt he used to purchase the company, which was described as asset stripping. [ [http://www.stlmag.com/media/St-Louis-Magazine/October-2005/TWA-Death-Of-A-Legend/ TWA - Death Of A Legend] by Elaine X. Grant, St Louis Magazine, Oct 2005] In 1985, Pickens was profiled on the cover of Time magazine as "one of the most famous and controversial businessmen in the U.S." for his pursuit of Unocal, Gulf Oil and Cities Services. [GREENWALD, JOHN. [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,961946,00.html High Times for T. Boone Pickens] . Time magazine, March 4, 1985] In later years, many of the corporateraiders would be re-characterized as "Activist shareholders".

Many of the corporate raiders were onetime clients of Michael Milken, whose investment banking firm, Drexel Burnham Lambert helped raise blind pools of capital with which corporate raiders could make a legitimate attempt to takeover a company and provided high-yield debt financing of the buyouts.

Drexel Burnham raised a $100 million blind pool in 1984 for Nelson Peltz and his holding company Triangle Industries (later Triarc) to give credibility for takeovers, representing the first major blind pool raised for this purpose. Two years later, in 1986, Wickes Companies, a holding company run by Sanford Sigoloff would raise a $1.2 billion blind pool. [Bruck, Connie. "Predator's Ball". New York: Simon and Schuster, 1988. p.117 - 118]

In 1985, Milken raised a $750 million for a similar blind pool for Ronald Perelman which would ultimate prove instrumental in acquiring his biggest target: The Revlon Corporation. In 1980, Ronald Perelman, the son of a wealthy Philadelphia businessman, and future "corporate raider" having made several small but successful buyouts, acquired MacAndrews & Forbes, a distributor of licorice extract and chocolate, that Perelman's father had tried and failed to acquire it 10 years earlier.cite book | title=When Money Is King| last=Hack| first=Richard| date=1996| pages = 13|publisher=Dove Books| location=Beverly Hills, CA| isbn=0-7871-1033-7] Perelman would ultimately divest the company's core business and use MacAndrews & Forbes as a holding company investment vehicle for subsequent leveraged buyouts including Technicolor, Inc., Pantry Pride and Revlon. Using the
Pantry Pride subsidiary of his holding company, MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Perelman's overtures were rebuffed. Repeatedly rejected by the company's board and management, Perelman continued press forward with a hostile takeover raising his offer from an initial bid of $47.50 per share until it reached $53.00 per share. After receiving a higher offer from a white knight, private equity firm Forstmann Little & Company, Perelman's Pantry Pride finally was able to make a successful bid for Revlon, valuing the company at $2.7 billion.cite news |first=Richard |last=Stevenson |title=Pantry Pride Control of Revlon Board Seen Near |publisher=New York Times |page=D5 |date=1985-11-05 |accessdate=2007-04-27] The buyout would prove troubling, burdened by a heavy debt load.cite news |first=Ann |last=Hagedom |title=Possible Revlon Buyout May Be Sign Of a Bigger Perelman Move in Works |publisher=Wall Street Journal |page=1
date=1987-03-09 |accessdate=2007-05-16
] Cite web|url=http://www.webcitation.org/5OlTv7US7|title=Revlon Reports First Profitable Quarter in Six Years|accessdate=2007-02-07|publisher=Business Wire|year=2005|author=Gale Group] Cite web|url=http://www.webcitation.org/5OlTv7USQ|title=Revlon profit first in more than 6 years|accessdate=2007-03-20|publisher=Bloomberg Publishing|year=2005|author=Cotten Timberlake and Shobhana Chandra] Under Perelman's control, Revlon sold 4 divisions: two of which were sold for $1 billion, its vision care division was sold for $574 million and its National Health Laboratories division was spun out to the public market in 1988. Revlon also made acquisitions including Max Factor in 1987 and Betrix in 1989 later selling them to Procter & Gamble in 1991.cite web |url=http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/MacAndrews-amp;-Forbes-Holdings-Inc-Company-History.html
title=MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. |accessdate=2008-05-16 |format=HTML |work=Funding Universe
] Perelman exited the bulk of his holdings in Revlon through an IPO in 1996 and subsequent sales of stock. As of December 31, 2007, Perelman still retains a minority ownership interest in Revlon. The Revlon takeover, because of its well-known brand was profiled widely by the media and brought new attention to the emerging boom in leveraged buyout activity.

In later years, Milken and Drexel would shy away from certain of the more "notorious" corporate raiders as Drexel and the private equity industry attempted to move upscale.

RJR Nabisco and the Barbarians at the Gate

Leveraged buyouts in the 1980s including Perelman's takeover of Revlon came to epitomize the "ruthless capitalism" and "greed" popularly seen to be pervading Wall Street at the time. One of the final major buyouts of the 1980s proved to be its most ambitious and marked both a high water mark and a sign of the beginning of the end of the boom that had begun nearly a decade earlier. In 1989, KKR closed on a $31.1 billion dollar takeover of RJR Nabisco. It was, at that time and for over 17 years, the largest leverage buyout in history. The event was chronicled in the book, "Barbarians at the Gate: The Fall of RJR Nabisco", and later made into a television movie starring James Garner.

F. Ross Johnson was the President and CEO of RJR Nabisco at the time of the leveraged buyout and Henry Kravis was a general partner at Kohlberg Kravis Roberts. The leveraged buyout was in the amount of $25 billion (plus assumed debt), and the battle for control took place between October and November 1988. KKR would eventually prevail in acquiring RJR Nabisco at $109 per share marking a dramatic increase from the original announcement that Shearson Lehman Hutton would take RJR Nabisco private at $75 per share. A fierce series of negotiations and horse-trading ensued which pitted KKR against Shearson Lehman Hutton and later Forstmann Little & Co. Many of the major banking players of the day, including Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Salomon Brothers, and Merrill Lynch were activelyinvolved in advising and financing the parties.

After Shearson Lehman's original bid, KKR quickly introduced a tender offer to obtain RJR Nabisco for $90 per share—a price that enabled it to proceed without the approval of RJR Nabisco's management. RJR's management team, working with Shearson Lehman and Salomon Brothers, submitted a bid of $112, a figure they felt certain would enable them to outflank any response by Kravis's team. KKR's final bid of $109, while a lower dollar figure, was ultimately accepted by the board of directors of RJR Nabisco. KKR's offer was guaranteed, whereas the management offer (backed by Shearson Lehman and Salomon) lacked a "reset", meaning that the final share price might have been lower than their stated $112 per share. Additionally, many in RJR's board of directors had grown concerned at recent disclosures of Ross Johnson' unprecedented golden parachute deal. TIME magazine featured Ross Johnson on the cover of their December 1988 issue along with the headline, "AGame of Greed: This man could pocket $100 million from the largest corporate takeover in history. Has the buyout craze gone too far?". [ [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601881205,00.html Game of Greed] (TIME magazine, 1988)] KKR's offer was welcomed by the board, and, to some observers, it appeared that their elevation of the reset issue as a deal-breaker in KKR's favor was little more than an excuse to reject Ross Johnson's higher payout of $112 per share. F. Ross Johnson received $53 million from the buyout.

At $31.1 billion of transaction value, RJR Nabisco was by far the largest leveraged buyouts in history. In 2006 and 2007, a number of leveraged buyout transactions were completed that for the first time surpassed the RJR Nabisco leveraged buyout in terms of nominal purchase price. However, adjusted for inflation, none of the leveraged buyouts of the 2006 – 2007 period would surpass RJR Nabisco. Unfortunately for KKR, size would not equate with success as the high purchase price and debt load would burden the performance of the investment.

Interestingly, two years earlier, in 1987, Jerome Kohlberg, Jr. resigned from Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. over differences in strategy. Kohlberg did not favor the larger buyouts (including Beatrice Companies (1985) and Safeway (1986) and would later likely have included the 1989 takeover of RJR Nabisco), highly leveraged transactions or hostile takeovers being pursued increasingly by KKR.STERNGOLD, JAMES. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE7DF1F3CF93AA25755C0A961948260 BUYOUT PIONEER QUITTING FRAY] ." New York Times, June 19, 1987.] The split would ultimately prove acrimonious as Kohlberg sued Kravis and Roberts for what he alleged were improper business tactics. The case was later settled out of court. [BARTLETT, SARAH. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE2D8153CF933A0575BC0A96F948260 Kohlberg InDispute Over Firm] ." New York Times, August 30, 1989] Instead, Kohlberg chose to return to his roots, acquiring smaller, middle-market companies and in 1987, he would found a new private equity firm Kohlberg & Company along with his son James A. Kohlberg, at the time a KKR executive. Jerome Kohlberg would continue investing successfully for another seven years before retiring from Kohlberg & Company in 1994 and turning his firm over to his son. [ANTILLA, SUSAN. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D00E4DC1031F937A15757C0A962958260 Wall Street; A Scion of the L.B.O. Reflects] ." New York Times, April 24, 1994]

As the market reached its peak in 1988 and 1989, new private equity firms were founded which would emerge as major investors in the years to follow, including: ABRY Partners, Coller Capital, Landmark Partners, Leonard Green & Partners and Providence Equity Partners.

LBO bust (1990 to 1992)

By the end of the 1980s the excesses of the buyout market were beginning to show, with the bankruptcy of several large buyouts including Robert Campeau's 1988 buyout of Federated Department Stores, the 1986 buyout of the Revco drug stores, Walter Industries, FEB Trucking and Eaton Leonard. Additionally, the RJR Nabisco deal was showing signs of strain, leading to a recapitalization in 1990 that involved the contribution of $1.7 billion of new equity from KKR. [Wallace, Anise C. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2D91E31F935A25754C0A966958260 Nabisco Refinance Plan Set] ." The New York Times, July 16, 1990.] Additionally, in response to the threat of unwelcome LBOs, certain companies adopted a number of techniques, such as the poison pill, to protect them against hostile takeovers by effectively self-destructing the company if it were to be taken over (these practices are increasingly discredited).

The collapse of Drexel Burnham Lambert

Drexel Burnham Lambert was the investment bank most responsible for the boom in private equity during the 1980s due to its leadership in the issuance of high-yield debt. The firm was first rocked by scandal on May 12, 1986, when Dennis Levine, a Drexel managing director and investment banker, was charged with insider trading. Levine pleaded guilty to four felonies, and implicated one of his recent partners, arbitrageur Ivan Boesky. Largely based on information Boesky promised to provide about his dealings with Milken, the Securities and Exchange Commission initiated an investigation of Drexel on November 17. Two days later, Rudy Giuliani, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, launched his own investigation.cite book |last=Stone |first=Dan G. |title=April Fools: An Insider's Account of the Rise and Collapse of Drexel Burnham |year=1990 |publisher=Donald I. Fine |location=New York City |isbn=1556112289]

For two years, Drexel steadfastly denied any wrongdoing, claiming that the criminal and SEC cases were based almost entirely on the statements of an admitted felon looking to reduce his sentence. However, it was not enough to keep the SEC from suing Drexel in September 1988 for insider trading, stock manipulation, defrauding its clients and stock parking (buying stocks for the benefit of another). All of the transactions involved Milken and his department. Giuliani began seriously considering indicting Drexel under the powerful Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), under the doctrine that companies are responsible for an employee's crimes.

The threat of a RICO indictment, which would have required the firm to put up a performance bond of as much as $1 billion in lieu of having its assets frozen, unnerved many at Drexel. Most of Drexel's capital was borrowed money, as is common with most investment banks and it is difficult to receive credit for firms under a RICO indictment. Drexel's CEO, Fred Joseph said that he had been told that if Drexel were indicted under RICO, it would only survive a month at most."Den of Thieves". Stewart, J. B. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1991. ISBN 0-671-63802-5.]

With literally minutes to go before being indicted, Drexel reached an agreement with the government in which it pleaded "nolo contendere" (no contest) to six felonies – three counts of stock parking and three counts of stock manipulation. It also agreed to pay a fine of $650 million – at the time, the largest fine ever levied under securities laws. Milken left the firm after his own indictment in March 1989. [http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/5/New-Street-Capital-Inc.html New Street Capital Inc.] - Company Profile, Information, Business Description, History, Background Information on New Street Capital Inc at ReferenceForBusiness.com] Effectively, Drexel was now a convicted felon.

In April 1989, Drexel settled with the SEC, agreeing to stricter safeguards on its oversight procedures. Later that month, the firm eliminated 5,000 jobs by shuttering three departments – including the retail brokerage operation.

Meanwhile, the high-yield debt markets had begun to shut down in 1989, a slowdown that accelerated into 1990. On February 13, 1990 after being advised by Secretary of the Treasury Nicholas F. Brady, the SEC, the NYSE and the Federal Reserve, Drexel Burnham Lambert officially filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

&L and the shutdown of the Junk Bond Market

In the 1980s, the boom in private equity transactions, specifically leveraged buyouts, was driven by the availability of financing, particularly high-yield debt, also known as "junk bonds". The collapse of the high yield market in 1989 and 1990 would signal the end of the LBO boom. At that time, many market observers were pronouncing the junk bond market “finished.” This collapse would be due largely to three factors:

* The collapse of Drexel Burnham Lambert, the foremost underwriter of junk bonds (discussed above).

* The dramatic increase in default rates among junk bond issuing companies. The historical default rate for high yield bonds from 1978 to 1988 was approximately 2.2% of total issuance. In 1989, defaults increased dramatically to 4.3% of the then $190 billion market and an additional 2.6% of issuance defaulted in the first half of 1990. As a result of the higher perceived risk, the differential in yield of the junk bond market over U.S. treasuries (known as the "spread") had also increased by 700 basis points (7 percentage points). This made the cost of debt in the high yield market significantly more expensive than it had been previously. [Altman, Edward I. " [http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~ealtman/report.pdf THE HIGH YIELD BOND MARKET: A DECADE OF ASSESSMENT, COMPARING 1990 WITH 2000] ." NYU Stern School of Business, 2000] [HYLTON, RICHARD D. [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CEFD91231F932A25752C0A966958260 CorporateBond Defaults Up Sharply in '89] New York Times, January 11, 1990.] The market shut down altogether for lower rated issuers.

* The mandated withdrawal of savings and loans from the high yield market. In August 1989, the U.S. Congress enacted the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 as a response to the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s. Under the law, savings and loans (S&Ls) could no longer invest in bonds that were rated below investment grade. Additionally, S&Ls were mandated to sell their holdings by the end of 1993 creating a huge supply of low priced assets that helped freeze the new issuance market.

Despite the adverse market conditions, several of the largest private equity firms were founded in this period including: Apollo Management, Madison Dearborn and
TPG Capital.

The second private equity boom and the origins of modern private equity

Beginning roughly in 1992, three years after the RJR Nabisco buyout, and continuing through the end of the decade the private equity industry once again experienced a tremendous boom, both in venture capital (as will be discussed below) and leveraged buyouts with the emergence of brand name firms managing multi-billion dollar sized funds. After declining from 1990 through 1992, the private equity industry began to increase in size raising approximately $20.8 billion of investor commitments in 1992 and reaching a high water mark in 2000 of $305.7 billion, outpacing the growth of almost every other asset class. [Source: Thomson Financial's [http://vx.thomsonib.com/ VentureXpert] database for Commitments. Searching "All Private Equity Funds" (Venture Capital, Buyout and Mezzanine).]

Resurgence of leveraged buyouts

Private equity in the 1980s was a controversial topic, commonly associated with corporate raids, hostile takeovers, asset stripping, layoffs, plant closings and outsized profits to investors. As private equity reemerged in the 1990s it began to earn a new degree of legitimacy and respectability. Although in the 1980s, many of the acquisitions made were unsolicited and unwelcome, private equity firms in the 1990s focused on making buyouts attractive propositions for management and shareholders. According to The Economist, “ [B] ig companies that would once have turned up their noses at an approach from a private-equity firm are now pleased to do business with them.” [http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3398496/ The New Kings of Capitalism, Survey on the Private Equity industry] The Economist, November 25, 2004] Additionally, private equity investors became increasingly focused on the long term development of companies theyacquired, using less leverage in the acquisition. In the 1980s leverage would routinely represent 85% to 95% of the purchase price of a company as compared to average debt levels between 20% and 40% in leveraged buyouts in the 1990s and the first decade of the 21st century. KKR's 1986 acquisition of Safeway, for example, was completed with 97% leverage and 3% equity contributed by KKR, whereas KKR's acquisition of TXU in 2007 was completed with approximately 19% equity contributed ($8.5 billion of equity out of a total purchase price of $45 billion). Additionally, private equity firms are more likely to make investments in capital expenditures and provide incentives for management to build long-term value.

The Thomas H. Lee Partners acquisition of Snapple Beverages, in 1992, is often described as the deal that marked the resurrection of the leveraged buyout after several dormant years. [ [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE2D71F3CF930A35757C0A964958260 Thomas H. Lee In Snapple Deal] (The New York Times, 1992)] Only eight months after buying the company, Lee took Snapple Beverages public and in 1994, only two years after the original acquisition, Lee sold the company to Quaker Oats for $1.7 billion. Lee was estimated to have made $900 million for himself and his investors from the sale. Quaker Oats would subsequently sell the company, which performed poorly under new management, three years later for only $300 million to Nelson Peltz's Triarc. As a result of the Snapple deal, Thomas H. Lee, who had begun investing in private equity in 1974, would find new prominence in the private equity industry and catapult his Boston-based
Thomas H. Lee Partners to the ranks of the largest private equity firms.

The following year, David Bonderman and James Coulter, who had worked for Robert M. Bass during the 1980s completed a buyout of Continental Airlines in 1993, through their nascent Texas Pacific Group, (today TPG Capital). TPG was virtually alone in its conviction that there was an investment opportunity with the airline. The plan included bringing in a new management team, improving aircraft utilization and focusing on lucrative routes. By 1998, TPG had generated an annual internal rate of return of 55% on its investment. Unlike Carl Icahn's hostile takeover of TWA in 1985. [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1590446,00.html 10 Questions for Carl Icahn] by Barbara Kiviat, Time Magazine, Feb. 15, 2007] , Bonderman and Texas Pacific Group were widely hailed as saviors of the airline, marking the change in tone from the 1980s. The buyout of Continental Airlines wouldbe one of the few successes for the private equity industry which has suffered several major failures, including the 2008 bankruptcies of ATA Airlines, Aloha Airlines and Eos Airlines.

Among the most notable buyouts of the mid-to-late 1990s included: Duane Reade (1990 (1997), Sealy Corporation (1997), KinderCare Learning Centers (1997), J. Crew (1997), Domino's Pizza (1998), Regal Entertainment Group (1998), Oxford Health Plans (1998) and Petco (2000).

As the market for private equity matured, so too did its investor base. The Institutional Limited Partner Association was initially founded as an informal networking group for limited partner investors in private equity funds in the early 1990s. However the organization would evolve into an advocacy organization for private equity investors with more than 200 member organizations from 10 countries. As of the end of 2007, ILPA members had total assets under management in excess of $5 trillion with more than $850 billion of capital commitments to private equity investments.

The venture capital boom and the Internet Bubble (1995 to 2000)

In the 1980s, FedEx and Apple Inc. were able to grow because of private equity or venture funding, as were Cisco, Genentech, Microsoft and Avis. [ [http://fusion.dalmatech.com/%7Eadmin24/files/private_equity_intro.pdf "Private Equity: Past, Present, Future"] , by Sethi, Arjun May 2007, accessed October 20, 2007.] However, by the end of the 1980s, venture capital returns were relatively low, particularly in comparison with their emerging leveraged buyout cousins, due in part to the competition for hot startups, excess supply of IPOs and the inexperience of many venture capital fund managers. Unlike the leveraged buyout industry, after total capital raised increased to $3 billion in 1983, growth in the venture capital industry remained limited through the 1980s and the first half of the 1990s increasing to just over $4 billion more than a decade later in 1994.

After a shakeout of venture capital managers, the more successful firms retrenched, focusing increasingly on improving operations at their portfolio companies rather than continuously making new investments. Results would begin to turn very attractive, successful and would ultimately generate the venture capital boom of the 1990s. Former Wharton Professor Andrew Metrick refers to these first 15 years of the modern venture capital industry beginning in 1980 as the "pre-boom period" in anticipation of the boom that would begin in 1995 and last through the bursting of the Internet bubble in 2000. [Metrick, Andrew. "Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation." John Wiley & Sons, 2007. p.12]

The late 1990s were a boom time for the venture capital, as firms on Sand Hill Road in Menlo Park and Silicon Valley benefited from a huge surge of interest in the nascent Internet and other computer technologies. Initial public offerings of stock for technology and other growth companies were in abundance and venture firms were reaping large windfalls. Among the highest profile technology companies with venture capital backing were Amazon.com, America Online, E-bay, Intuit, Macromedia, Netscape, Sun Microsystems and Yahoo!.

The bursting of the Internet Bubble and the private equity crash (2000 to 2003)

The Nasdaq crash and technology slump that started in March 2000 shook virtually the entire venture capital industry as valuations for startup technology companies collapsed. Over the next two years, many venture firms had been forced to write-off their large proportions of their investments and many funds were significantly "under water" (the values of the fund's investments were below the amount of capital invested). Venture capital investors sought to reduce size of commitments they had made to venture capital funds and in numerous instances, investors sought to unload existing commitments for cents on the dollar in the secondary market. By mid-2003, the venture capital industry had shriveled to about half its 2001 capacity. Nevertheless, PricewaterhouseCoopers' [http://www.pwcmoneytree.com/moneytree/index.jsp MoneyTree Survey] shows that total venture capital investments held steady at 2003 levels through the second quarter of 2005.

Although the post-boom years represent just a small fraction of the peak levels of venture investment reached in 2000, they still represent an increase over the levels of investment from 1980 through 1995. As a percentage of GDP, venture investment was 0.058% percent in 1994, peaked at 1.087% (nearly 19x the 1994 level) in 2000 and ranged from 0.164% to 0.182 % in 2003 and 2004. The revival of an Internet-driven environment (thanks to deals such as eBay's purchase of Skype, the News Corporation's purchase of MySpace.com, and the very successful Google.com and Salesforce.com IPOs) have helped to revive the venture capital environment. However, as a percentage of the overall private equity market, venture capital has still not reached its mid-1990s level, let alone its peak in 2000.

tagnation in the LBO market

Meanwhile, as the venture sector collapsed, the activity in the leveraged buyout market also declined significantly. Leveraged buyout firms had invested heavily in the telecommunications sector from 1996 to 2000 and profited from the boom which suddenly fizzled in 2001. In that year at least 27 major telecommunications companies, (i.e., with $100 million of liabilities or greater) filed for bankruptcy protection. Telecommunications, which made up a large portion of the overall high yield universe of issuers, dragged down the entire high yield market. Overall corporate default rates surged to levels unseen since the 1990 market collapse rising to 6.3% of high yield issuance in 2000 and 8.9% of issuance in 2001. Default rates on junk bonds peaked at 10.7 percent in January 2002 according to Moody's. [BERENSON, ALEX. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C03E3D81530F931A35752C0A9649C8B63 Markets & Investing; Junk Bonds Still Have Fans Despite a Dismal Showing in 2001] ." New YorkTimes, January 2, 2002.] SMITH, ELIZABETH REED. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E0DD123FF932A3575AC0A9649C8B63 Investing; Time to Jump Back Into Junk Bonds?] ." New York Times, September 1, 2002.] As a result, leveraged buyout activity ground to a halt. [Berry, Kate. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE3DF1738F93AA35754C0A9669C8B63 Converging Forces Have Kept Junk Bonds in a Slump] ." New York Times, July 9, 2000.] [Romero, Simon. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9802EEDC163EF934A25751C1A9679C8B63 Technology & Media; Telecommunications Industry Too Devastated Even for Vultures] ." New York Times, December 17, 2001.] The major collapses of former high-fliers including WorldCom, Adelphia Communications, Global Crossing and WinStar were among the most notable defaults in the market. In addition to the high rate of default, many investors lamented the low recovery rates achievedthrough restructuring or bankruptcy.SMITH, ELIZABETH REED. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E0DD123FF932A3575AC0A9649C8B63 Investing; Time to Jump Back Into Junk Bonds?] ." New York Times, September 1, 2002.]

Among the most affected by the bursting of the internet and telecom bubbles were two of the largest and most active private equity firms of the 1990s: Tom Hicks' Hicks Muse Tate & Furst and Ted Forstmann's Forstmann Little & Company. These firms were often cited as the highest profile private equity casualties, having invested heavily in technology and telecommunications companies. [Atlas, Riva D. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F00E5D61E31F933A05751C1A9679C8B63 Even the Smartest Money Can Slip Up] ." New York Times, December 30, 2001] Hicks Muse's reputation and market position were both damaged by the loss of over $1 billion from minority investments in six telecommunications and 13 Internet companies at the peak of the 1990s stock market bubble. [ [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9402EFDE1739F935A15752C0A9659C8B63 Will He Star Again In a Buyout Revival] (New York Times,2003)] [ [http://www.forbes.com/2001/04/23/0423faceshicks.html Forbes Faces: Thomas O. Hicks] (Forbes, 2001)] [ [http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2002/nf20021113_4262.htm An LBO Giant Goes "Back to Basics"] (BusinessWeek, 2002)] Similarly, Forstmann suffered major losses from investments in McLeodUSA and XO Communications. [Sorkin, Andrew Ross. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9905E4D9103EF937A15751C0A9649C8B63 Business; Will He Be K.O.'d by XO? Forstmann Enters the Ring, Again] ." New York Times, February 24, 2002.] [Sorkin, Andrew Ross. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B02E5D71331F935A35755C0A9629C8B63 Defending a Colossal Flop, in His Own Way] ." New York Times, June 6, 2004.] Tom Hicks resigned from Hicks Muse at the end of 2004 and Forstmann Little was unable to raise a new fund. The treasure of the State of Connecticut, sued Forstmann Little to return the state's $96 million investment to that pointand to cancel the commitment it made to take its total investment to $200 million. [" [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9504E3D81631F935A15751C0A9649C8B63 Connecticut Sues Forstmann Little Over Investments] ." New York Times, February 26, 2002.] The humbling of these private equity titans could hardly have been predicted by their investors in the 1990s and forced fund investors to conduct due diligence on fund managers more carefully and include greater controls on investments in partnership agreements.

Deals completed during this period tended to be smaller and financed less with high yield debt than in other periods. Private equity firms had to cobble together financing made up of bank loans and mezzanine debt, often with higher equity contributions than had been seen. Private equity firms benefited from the lower valuation multiples. As a result, despite the relatively limited activity, those funds that invested during the adverse market conditions delivered attractive returns to investors. Meanwhile, in Europe LBO activity began to increase as the market continued to mature. In 2001, for the first time, European buyout activity exceeded US activity with $44 billion of deals completed in Europe as compared with just $10.7 billion of deals completed in the US. This was a function of the fact that just six LBOs in excess of $500 million were completed in 2001, against 27 in 2000. [Almond, Siobhan." [http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&bn=NULL&c=TDDArticle&cid=1011110631623 European LBOs: Breakin' away] ." TheDeal.com, January 24, 2002]

As investors sought to reduce their exposure to the private equity asset class, an area of private equity that was increasingly active in these years was the nascent secondary market for private equity interests. Secondary transaction volume increased from historical levels of 2% or 3% of private equity commitments to 5% of the addressable market in the early years of the new decade. [Vaughn, Hope and Barrett, Ross. "Secondary Private Equity Funds: The Perfect Storm: An Opportunity in Adversity". Columbia Strategy, 2003.] [Rossa, Jennifer and White, Chad. Dow Jones Private Equity Analyst Guide to the Secondary Market (2007 Edition).] Many of the largest financial institutions (e.g., Deutsche Bank, Abbey National, UBS AG) sold portfolios of direct investments and “pay-to-play” funds portfolios that were typically used as a means to gain entry to lucrative leveraged finance and mergers andacquisitions assignments but had created hundreds of millions of dollars of losses. Some of the most notable financial institutions to complete publicly disclosed secondary transactions during this period include: Chase Capital Partners (2000), National Westminster Bank (2000), UBS AG (2003), Deutsche Bank (MidOcean Partners) (2003) Abbey National (2004) and Bank One (2004).

The third private equity boom and the Golden Age of Private Equity (2003-2007)

As 2002 ended and 2003 began, the private equity sector, had spent the previous three two and a half years reeling from major losses in telecommunications and technology companies and had been severely constrained by tight credit markets. As 2003 got underway, private equity began a five year resurgence that would ultimately result in the completion of 13 of the 15 largest leveraged buyout transactions in history, unprecedented levels of investment activity and investor commitments and a major expansion and maturation of the leading private equity firms.

The combination of decreasing interest rates, loosening lending standards and regulatory changes for publicly traded companies would set the stage for the largest boom private equity had seen. The Sarbanes Oxley legislation, officially the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act, passed in 2002, in the wake of corporate scandals at Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems and Global Crossing among others, would create a new regime of rules and regulations for publicly traded corporations. In addition to the existing focus on short term earnings rather than long term value creation, many public company executives lamented the extra cost and bureaucracy associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. For the first time, many large corporations saw private equity ownership as potentially more attractive than remaining public. Sarbanes-Oxley would have the opposite effect on the venture capital industry. Theincreased compliance costs would make it nearly impossible for venture capitalists to bring young companies to the public markets and dramatically reduced the opportunities for exits via IPO. Instead, venture capitalists have been forced increasingly to rely on sales to strategic buyers for an exit of their investment. [Anderson, Jenny. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/01/business/01regs.html Sharply Divided Reactions to Report on U.S. Markets] ." New York Times, December 1, 2006.]

Interest rates, which began a major series of decreases in 2002 would reduce the cost of borrowing and increase the ability of private equity firms to finance large acquisitions. Lower interest rates would encourage investors to return to relatively dormant high-yield debt and leveraged loan markets, making debt more readily available to finance buyouts. Additionally, alternative investments also became increasingly important as investors sough yield despite increases in risk. This search for higher yielding investments would fuel larger funds and in turn larger deals, never thought possible, became reality.

Certain buyouts were completed in 2001 and early 2002, particularly in Europe where financing was more readily available. In 2001, for example, BT Group agreed to sell its international yellow pages directories business (Yell Group) to Apax Partners and Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst for £2.14 billion (approximately $3.5 billion at the time), [citeweb|url=http://www.yellgroup.com/english/aboutyell-yelluk-yellukhistory-2000|title=Yell.com History - 2000+|publisher=Yell.com|accessdate=2008-01-11] making it then the largest non-corporate LBO in European history. Yell later bought US directories publisher McLeodUSA for about $600 million, and floated on London's FTSE in 2003.

Resurgence of the large buyout

Marked by the two-stage buyout of Dex Media at the end of 2002 and 2003, large multi-billion dollar U.S. buyouts could once again obtain significant high yield debt financing and larger transactions could be completed. The Carlyle Group, Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, along with other private investors, led a $7.5 billion buyout of QwestDex. The buyout was the third largest corporate buyout since 1989. QwestDex's purchase occurred in two stages: a $2.75 billion acquisition of assets known as Dex Media East in November 2002 and a $4.30 billion acquisition of assets known as Dex Media West in 2003. R. H. Donnelley Corporation acquired Dex Media in 2006. Shortly after Dex Media, other larger buyouts would be completed signaling the resurgence in private equity was underway. The acquisitions included "Burger King" (by Bain Capital), "Jefferson Smurfit" (by Madison Dearborn), "Houghton Mifflin" [SUZANNE KAPNER AND ANDREW ROSS SORKIN." [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B01E2D6103FF932A05753C1A9649C8B63 Market Place; Vivendi Is Said To Be Near Sale Of Houghton] ." New York Times, October 31, 2002] [" [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9504E2DC133FF932A35752C0A9659C8B63 COMPANY NEWS; VIVENDI FINISHES SALE OF HOUGHTON MIFFLIN TO INVESTORS] ." New York Times, January 1, 2003.] (by Bain Capital, the Blackstone Group and Thomas H. Lee Partners) and TRW Automotive by the Blackstone Group.

In 2006 USA Today reported retrospectively on the revival of private equity: [Krantz, Matt. [http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/2006-03-16-private-equity-usat_x.htm Private equity firms spin off cash] USA Today, March 16, 2006.]

: "LBOs are back, only they've rebranded themselves private equity and vow a happier ending. The firms say this time it's completely different. Instead of buying companies and dismantling them, as was their rap in the '80s, private equity firms… squeeze more profit out of underperforming companies."

:"But whether today's private equity firms are simply a regurgitation of their counterparts in the 1980s… or a kinder, gentler version, one thing remains clear: private equity is now enjoying a "Golden Age." And with returns that triple the S&P 500, it's no wonder they are challenging the public markets for supremacy."

By 2004 and 2005, major buyouts were once again becoming common and market observers were stunned by the leverage levels and financing terms obtained by financial sponsors in their buyouts. Some of the notable buyouts of this period include: Dollarama (2004), Toys "R" Us (2004), The Hertz Corporation (2005), Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (2005) and SunGard (2005).

Age of the mega-buyout

As 2005 ended and 2006 began, new "largest buyout" records were set and surpassed several times with nine of the top ten buyouts at the end of 2007 having been announced in an 18-month window from the beginning of 2006 through the middle of 2007. Additionally, the buyout boom was not limited to the United States as industrialized countries in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region also saw new records set. In 2006, private equity firms bought 654 U.S. companies for $375 billion, representing 18 times the level of transactions closed in 2003. [Samuelson, Robert J. " [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/14/AR2007031402177.html The Private Equity Boom] ". The Washington Post, March 15, 2007.] Additionally, U.S. based private equity firms raised $215.4 billion in investor commitments to 322 funds, surpassing the previous record set in 2000 by 22% and 33% higher than the 2005 fundraising total. [Dow Jones Private Equity Analyst as referenced in [http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2007/01/11/us_private_equity_funds_break_record/ U.S. private-equity funds break record] Associated Press, January 11, 2007.] However, venture capital funds, which were responsible for much of the fundraising volume in 2000 (the height of the dot-com bubble), raised only $25.1 billion in 2006, a 2% percent decline from 2005 and a significant decline from its peak. [Dow Jones Private Equity Analyst as referenced in Taub, Stephen. [http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/8537972/c_8519925?f=home_todayinfinance Record Year for Private Equity Fundraising] . CFO.com, January 11, 2007.] The following year, despite the onset of turmoil in the credit markets in the summer, saw yet another record year of fundraising with $302 billion of investor commitments to 415 funds. [DowJones Private Equity Analyst as referenced in [http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBNG14655120080108 Private equity fund raising up in 2007: report] , Reuters, January 8, 2008.]

Among the largest buyouts of this period included: Georgia-Pacific Corp (2005), Albertson's (2006), Equity Office Properties (2006 ), Freescale Semiconductor (2006), GMAC (2006), HCA (2006), Kinder Morgan (2006), Harrah's Entertainment (2006), TDC A/S (2006), Sabre Holdings (2006), Travelport (2006), Alliance Boots (2007), Biomet (2007), Chrysler (2007), First Data (2007) and TXU (2007).

Publicly traded private equity

Although there had previously been certain instances of publicly traded private equity vehicles, the convergence of private equity and the public equity markets attracted significantly greater attention when several of the largest private equity firms pursued various options through the public markets. Taking private equity firms and private equity funds public appeared an unusual move since private equity funds often buy public companies listed on exchange and then take them private. Private equity firms are rarely subject to the quarterly reporting requirements of the public markets and tout this independence to prospective sellers as a key advantage of going private. Nevertheless, there are fundamentally two separate opportunities that private equity firms pursued in the public markets. These options involved a public listing of either:

*A "private equity firm" (the management company), which provides shareholders an opportunity to gain exposure to the management fees and carried interest earned by the investment professionals and managers of the private equity firm. The most notable example of this public listing was completed by The Blackstone Group in 2007

*A "private equity fund" or similar investment vehicle, which allows investors that would otherwise be unable to invest in a traditional private equity limited partnership to gain exposure to a portfolio of private equity investments.

In May 2006, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts raised $5 billion in an initial public offering for a new permanent investment vehicle (KKR Private Equity Investors or KPE) listing it on the Euronext exchange in Amsterdam (ENXTAM: KPE). KKR raised more than three times what it had expected at the outset as many of the investors in KPE were hedge funds seeking exposure to private equity but could not make long term commitments to private equity funds. Because private equity had been booming in the preceding years, the proposition of investing in a KKR fund appeared attractive to certain investors. [Timmons, Heather. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/04/business/worldbusiness/04place.html Opening Private Equity's Door, at Least a Crack, to Public Investors] ." New York Times, May 4, 2006.] However, KPE's first-day performance was lackluster, trading down 1.7% and trading volume was limited. [Timmons, Heather. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/10/business/10private.html Private Equity Goes Public for $5 Billion. Its Investors Ask, ‘What’s Next?’] ." New York Times, November 10, 2006.] Initially, a handful of other private equity firms and hedge funds had planned to follow KKR's lead but shelved those plans when KPE's performance continued to falter after its IPO. KPE's stock declined from an IPO price of €25 per share to €18.16 (a 27% decline) at the end of 2007 and a low of €11.45 (a 54.2% decline) per share in Q1 2008. [Anderson, Jenny. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/23/business/23insider.html Where Private Equity Goes, Hedge Funds May Follow] ." New York Times, June 23, 2006.] KPE disclosed in May 2008 that it had completed approximately $300 million of secondary sales of selected limitedpartnership interests in and undrawn commitments to certain KKR-managed funds in order to generate liquidity and repay borrowings. [Press Release: [http://www.kkrpei.com/pdfs/KKRPEI-PR_05_07_08.pdf KKR Private Equity Investors Reports Results for Quarter Ended March 31, 2008] , May 7, 2008]

On March 22, 2007, the Blackstone Group filed with the SEC [ [http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1404912/000104746907005446/a2178646zs-1.htm The Blackstone Group L.P., FORM S-1] , SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, March 22, 2007] to raise $4 billion in an initial public offering. On June 21, Blackstone swapped a 12.3% stake in its ownership for $4.13 billion in the largest U.S. IPO since 2002. Traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol BX, Blackstone priced at $31 per share on June 22, 2007. [SORKIN, ANDREW ROSS and DE LA MERCED, MICHAEL J. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/19/business/19blackstone.html News Analysis Behind the Veil at Blackstone? Probably Another Veil] ." New York Times, March 19, 2007.] [Anderson, Jenny. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/12/business/12blackstone.html Blackstone Founders Prepare to Count Their Billions] ." New York Times, June 12, 2007.]

Less than two weeks after the Blackstone Group IPO, rival firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts filed with the SEC [ [http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1404912/000104746907005446/a2178646zs-1.htm KKR & CO. L.P., FORM S-1] , SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, July 3, 2007] in July 2007 to raise $1.25 billion by selling an ownership interest in its management company. [JENNY ANDERSON and MICHAEL J. de la MERCED. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/04/business/04kkr.html Kohlberg Kravis Plans to Go Public] ." New York Times, July 4, 2007.] KKR had previously listed its KKR Private Equity Investors (KPE) private equity fund vehicle in 2006. The onset of the credit crunch and the shutdown of the IPO market would dampen the prospects of obtaining a valuation that would be attractive to KKR and the flotation was repeatedly postponed.

Meanwhile, other private equity investors were seeking to realize a portion of the value locked into their firms. In September 2007, the Carlyle Group sold a 7.5% interest in its management company to Mubadala Development Company, which is owned by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) for $1.35 billion, which valued Carlyle at approximately $20 billion. [Sorkin, Andrew Ross. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/21/business/worldbusiness/21carlyle.html Carlyle to Sell Stake to a Mideast Government] ." New York Times, September 21, 2007.] Similarly, in January 2008, Silver Lake Partners sold a 9.9% stake in its management company to CalPERS for $275 million. [Sorkin, Andrew Ross. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/business/09deal.html California Pension Fund Expected to Take Big Stake in Silver Lake, at $275 Million] ." New York Times, January 9, 2008]

Additionally, Apollo Management completed a private placement of shares in its management company in July 2007. By pursuing a private placement rather than a public offering, Apollo would be able to avoid much of the public scrutiny applied to Blackstone and KKR. [SORKIN, ANDREW ROSS and de la MERCED, MICHAEL J. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/18/business/18place.html Buyout Firm Said to Seek a Private Market Offering] ." New York Times, July 18, 2007.] [SORKIN, ANDREW ROSS. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/business/05deal.html Equity Firm Is Seen Ready to Sell a Stake to Investors ] ." New York Times, April 5, 2007.] In April 2008, Apollo filed with the SEC [ [http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411494/000119312508077312/ds1.htm APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, FORM S-1] , SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, April 8, 2008] to permit some holders of its privately traded stock to sell their shares on the New York Stock Exchange. [de la MERCED, MICHAEL J. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/14apollo.html Apollo Struggles to Keep Debt From Sinking Linens ’n Things] ." New York Times, April 14, 2008.] In April 2004, Apollo raised $930 million for a listed business development company, Apollo Investment Corporation (NASDAQ: AINV), to invest primarily in middle-market companies in the form of mezzanine debt and senior secured loans, as well as by making direct equity investments incompanies. The Company also invests in the securities of public companies. [FABRIKANT, GERALDINE. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C03E4DD133BF934A25757C0A9629C8B63 Private Firms Use Closed-End Funds To Tap the Market] ." New York Times, April 17, 2004.]

Historically, in the United States, there had been a group of publicly traded private equity firms that were registered as business development companies (BDCs) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. [Companies must elect to be treated as a "business development company" under the terms of the Investment Company Act of 1940 ( [http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/InvCoAct/sec54.html Investment Company Act of 1940: Section 54 -- Election to Be Regulated as Business Development Company] )] Typically, BDCs are structured similar to real estate investment trusts (REITs) in that the BDC structure reduces or eliminates corporate income tax. In return, REITs are required to distribute 90% of their income, which may be taxable to its investors. As of the end of 2007, among the largest BDCs (by market value, excluding Apollo Investment Corp, discussed earlier) are: American Capital Strategies (NASDAQ: ACAS), Allied Capital Corp((NASDAQ:ALD), Ares Capital Corporation (NASDAQ:ARCC),Gladstone Investment Corp (NASDAQ:GAIN) and Kohlberg Capital Corp (NASDAQ:KCAP).

econdary market and the evolution of the private equity asset class

In the wake of the collapse of the equity markets in 2000, many investors in private equity sought an early exit from their outstanding commitments. [Cortese, Amy. " [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9406E7D81231F936A25757C0A9679C8B63 Business; Private Traders See Gold in Venture Capital Ruins] ." New York Times, April 15, 2001.] The surge in activity in the secondary market, which had previously been a relatively small niche of the private equity industry, prompted new entrants to the market, however the market was still characterized by limited liquidity and distressed prices with private equity funds trading at significant discounts to fair value.

Beginning in 2004 and extending through 2007, the secondary market transformed into a more efficient market in which assets for the first time traded at or above their estimated fair values and liquidity increased dramatically. During these years, the secondary market transitioned from a niche sub-category in which the majority of sellers were distressed to an active market with ample supply of assets and numerous market participants. [ [http://www.circlepeakcapital.com/press/probitas_market_overview.pdf Private Equity Market Environment: Spring 2004] , Probitas Partners] By 2006 active portfolio management had become far more common in the increasingly developed secondary market and an increasing number of investors had begun to pursue secondary sales to rebalance their private equity portfolios. The continued evolution of the private equity secondary market reflected the maturation and evolution of the larger private equity industry. Among the most notable publicly disclosed secondary transactions(it is estimated that over two-thirds of secondary market activity is never disclosed publicly): California Public Employees Retirement System (2008), Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation (2007), MetLife (2007), Bank of America (2006 and 2007), Mellon Financial Corporation (2006), American Capital Strategies (2006), JPMorgan Chase, Temasek Holdings, Dresdner Bank and [http://www.dplinc.com Dayton Power & Light] .

The Credit Crunch and post-modern private equity (2007 – 2008)

In July 2007, turmoil that had been affecting the mortgage markets, spilled over into the leveraged finance and high-yield debt markets. [SORKIN, ANDREW ROSS and de la MERCED, MICHAEL J. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/business/26place.html Private Equity Investors Hint at Cool Down] ." New York Times, June 26, 2007] [SORKIN, ANDREW ROSS. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/business/yourmoney/12deal.html Sorting Through the Buyout Freezeout] ." New York Times, August 12, 2007.] The markets had been highly robust during the first six months of 2007, with highly issuer friendly developments including PIK and PIK Toggle (interest is "P"ayable "I"n "K"ind") and covenant light debt widely available to finance large leveraged buyouts. July and August saw a notable slowdown in issuance levels in the high yield and leveraged loan markets with only few issuers accessing the market. Uncertain marketconditions led to a significant widening of yield spreads, which coupled with the typical summer slowdown led to many companies and investment banks to put their plans to issue debt on hold until the autumn. However, the expected rebound in the market after Labor Day 2007 did not materialize and the lack of market confidence prevented deals from pricing. By the end of September, the full extent of the credit situation became obvious as major lenders including Citigroup and UBS AG announced major writedowns due to credit losses. The leveraged finance markets came to a near standstill. [ [http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9566005 Turmoil in the markets] The Economist July 27, 2007] As a result of the sudden change in the market, buyers would begin to withdraw from or renegotiate the deals completed at the top of the market, most notably in transactions involving: Harman International (announced and withdrawn 2007), Sallie Mae (announced 2007 butwithdrawn 2008), Clear Channel Communications (2007) and BCE (2007).

Additionally, the credit crunch has prompted buyout firms to pursue a new group of transactions in order to deploy their massive investment funds. These transactions have included Private Investment in Public Equity (or PIPE) transactions as well as purchases of debt in existing leveraged buyout transactions. Some of the most notable of these transactions completed in the depths of the credit crunch include Apollo Management's acquisition of the Citigroup Loan Portfolio (2008) and TPG Capital's PIPE investment in Washington Mutual (2008).

Responses to private equity

1980s reflections of private equity

Although private equity rarely received a thorough treatment in popular culture, several films did feature stereotypical "corporate raiders" prominently. Among the most notable examples of private equity featured in motion pictures included:
* "Wall Street" – The Notorious "corporate raider" and "greenmailer" Gordon Gekko represents a synthesis of the worst features of various famous private equity figures intends to manipulate an ambitious young stockbroker to takeover failing but decent airline. Although Gekko makes a pretense of caring about the airline, his intentions prove to be to destroy the airline, strip its assets and lay off its employees before raiding the corporate pension fund. Gekko would become a symbol in popular culture for unrestrained greed (with the signature line, "Greed, for lack of a better word, is good") that would be attached to the private equity industry.
* "Other People's Money" – A self-absorbed corporate raider "Larry the Liquidator" (Danny DeVito), sets his sights on New England Wire and Cable, a small-town business run by family patriarch Gregory Peck who is principally interested in protecting his employees and the town.
* "Pretty Woman" – Although Richard Gere's profession is incidental to the plot, the selection of the corporate raider who intends to destroy the hard work of a family run business by acquiring the company in a hostile takeover and then sell off the company's parts for a profit (compared in the movie to an illegal chop shop). Ultimately, the corporate raider is won over and chooses not to pursue his original plans for the company.

Contemporary reflections of private equity and private equity controversies

Carlyle group featured prominently in Michael Moore's 2003 film Fahrenheit 9-11. The film suggested that The Carlyle Group exerted tremendous influence on U.S. government policy and contracts through their relationship with the president’s father, George H. W. Bush, a former senior adviser to the Carlyle Group. Additionally, Moore cited relationships with the Bin Laden family. The movie quotes author Dan Briody claiming that the Carlyle Group "gained" from September 11 because it owned United Defense, a military contractor, although the firm’s $11 billion Crusader artillery rocket system developed for the U.S. Army is one of the only weapons systems canceled by the Bush administration. [Pratley, Nils. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5127052-103676,00.html Fahrenheit 9/11 had no effect, says Carlyle chief] , The Guardian, February 15, 2005.]

Over the next few years, attention intensified on private equity as the size of transactions and profile of the companies increased. The attention would increase significantly following a series of events involving The Blackstone Group: the firm's initial public offering and the birthday celebration of its CEO. The Wall Street Journal observing Blackstone Group's Steve Schwarzman's 60th birthday celebration in February 2007 described the event as follows:Sender, Henny and Langley, Monica. " [http://schwert.ssb.rochester.edu/f423/WSJ070613_Blackstone.pdf Buyout Mogul: How Blackstone's Chief Became $7 Billion Man – Schwarzman Says He's Worth Every Penny; $400 for Stone Crabs] ." The Wall Street Journal, June 13, 2007.]

The Armory's entrance hung with banners painted to replicate Mr. Schwarzman's sprawling Park Avenue apartment. A brass band and children clad in military uniforms ushered in guests. A huge portrait of Mr. Schwarzman, which usually hangs in his living room, was shipped in for the occasion.

The affair was emceed by comedian Martin Short. Rod Stewart performed. Composer Marvin Hamlisch did a number from "A Chorus Line." Singer Patti LaBelle led the Abyssinian Baptist Church choir in a tune about Mr. Schwarzman. Attendees included Colin Powell and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. The menu included lobster, baked Alaska and a 2004 Louis Jadot Chassagne Montrachet, among other fine wines.

Schwarzman received a severe backlash from both critics of the private equity industry and fellow investors in private equity. The lavish event which reminded many of the excesses of notorious executives including Bernie Ebbers (WorldCom) and Dennis Kozlowski (Tyco International). David Bonderman, the founder of TPG remarked, "We have all wanted to be private – at least until now. When Steve Schwarzman's biography with all the dollar signs is posted on the web site none of us will like the furor that results – and that's even if you like Rod Stewart."Sender, Henny and Langley, Monica. " [http://schwert.ssb.rochester.edu/f423/WSJ070613_Blackstone.pdf Buyout Mogul: How Blackstone's Chief Became $7 Billion Man – Schwarzman Says He's Worth Every Penny; $400 for Stone Crabs] ." The Wall Street Journal, June 13, 2007.]

Rubinstein's fears would be confirmed when in 2007, the Service Employees International Union launched a campaign against private equity firms, specifically the largest buyout firms through public events, protests as well as leafleting and web campaigns. [Sorkin, Andrew Ross. " [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/business/yourmoney/20deal.html Sound and Fury Over Private Equity] ." The New York Times, May 20, 2007.] [Heath, Thomas. " [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/17/AR2008041704239.html Ambushing Private Equity: As SEIU Harries New Absentee Owners, Buyout Firms Dispute the Union's Agenda] " The Washington Post, April 18, 2008] [Service Employees International Union's " [http://www.behindthebuyouts.org/ Behind the Buyouts] " website] A number of leading private equity executives were targeted by the union members [DiStefano, Joseph N. [http://www.philly.com/inquirer/business/homepage/20080118_Union_hecklers_disrupt_Phila__conference.html Hecklersdelay speech; Carlyle CEO notes private-equity ‘purgatory’] The Philadelphia Inquirer, Jan. 18, 2008.] however the SEIU's campaign was non nearly as effective at slowing the buyout boom as the credit crunch of 2007 and 2008 would ultimately prove to be.

In 2008, the SEIU would shift part of its focus from attacking private equity firms directly toward the highlighting the role of sovereign wealth funds in private equity. The SEIU pushed legislation in California that would disallow investments by state agencies (particularly CalPERS and CalSTRS) in firms with ties to certain sovereign wealth funds. [ [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120873771821130001.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks California's Stern Rebuke] . The Wall Street Journal, April 21, 2008; Page A16.] Additionally, the SEIU has attempted to criticize the treatment of taxation of carried interest. The SEIU, and other critics, point out that many wealthy private equity investors pay taxes at lower rates (because the majority of their income is derived from carried interest, payments received from the profits on a private equity fund's investments) than many of the rank and file employees of a private equityfirm's portfolio companies. [ [http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/10/protesting-private-equity-with-piles-of-money/ Protesting a Private Equity Firm (With Piles of Money)] The New York Times, October 10, 2007.]

ee also

* (category)
* (category)
* (category)
*Financial sponsor
*Private equity firm
*Private equity fund
*Private equity secondary market
*Mezzanine capital
*Private investment in public equity
*Taxation of Private Equity and Hedge Funds
*Investment banking
*Mergers and acquisitions



*Ante, Spencer. Creative capital : Georges Doriot and the birth of venture capital. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2008
*Bance, A. (2004). [http://www.evca.com/pdf/Invest.pdf Why and how to invest in private equity] . European Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (EVCA). Accessed May 22, 2008.
*Bruck, Connie. "Predator's Ball". New York: Simon and Schuster, 1988.
*Burrill, G. Steven, and Craig T. Norback. The Arthur Young Guide to Raising Venture Capital. Billings, MT: Liberty House, 1988.
*Burrough, Bryan. "Barbarians at the Gate." New York : Harper & Row, 1990.
*Craig. Valentine V. [http://www.fdic.gov/bank/analytical/banking/2001sep/br2001v14n1art2.pdf Merchant Banking: Past and Present] . FDIC Banking Review. 2000.
*Fenn, George W., Nellie Liang, and Stephen Prowse. December, 1995. The Economics of the Private Equity Market. Staff Study 168, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
*Gibson, Paul. "The Art of Getting Funded." Electronic Business, March 1999.
*Gladstone, David J. Venture Capital Handbook. Rev. ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.
*Hsu, D., and Kinney, M (2004). [http://brie.berkeley.edu/~briewww/publications/WP163.pdf Organizing venture capital: the rise and demise of American Research and Development Corporation] , 1946-1973. Working paper 163. Accessed May 22, 2008
*Littman, Jonathan. "The New Face of Venture Capital." Electronic Business, March 1998.
*Loos, Nicolaus. [http://www.unisg.ch/www/edis.nsf/wwwDisplayIdentifier/3052/$FILE/dis3052.pdf Value Creation in Leveraged Buyouts] . Dissertation of the University of St. Gallen. Lichtenstein: Guttenberg AG, 2005. Accessed May 22, 2008.
*National Venture Capital Association, 2005, The 2005 NVCA Yearbook.
*Schell, James M. "Private Equity Funds: Business Structure and Operations." New York: Law Journal Press, 1999.
*Sharabura, S. (2002). [http://media.www.chibus.com/media/storage/paper408/news/2002/02/18/GsbBusiness/Equity.Past.Present.And.Future-187504.shtml Private Equity: past, present, and future] . GE Capital Speaker Discusses New Trends in Asset Class. Speech to GSB 2/13/2002. Accessed May 22, 2008.
*Trehan, R. (2006). [http://www.4hoteliers.com/4hots_fshw.php?mwi=1757 The History Of Leveraged Buyouts] . December 4, 2006. Accessed May 22, 2008.
*Cheffins, Brian. " [http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/pdf/wp339.pdf THE ECLIPSE OF PRIVATE EQUITY] ". Centre for Business Research, University Of Cambridge, 2007.

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Early history of private equity — The early history of private equity relates to one of the major periods in the history of private equity and venture capital. Within the broader private equity industry, two distinct sub industries, leveraged buyouts and venture capital… …   Wikipedia

  • Private equity in the 21st century — relates to one of the major periods in the history of private equity and venture capital. Within the broader private equity industry, two distinct sub industries, leveraged buyouts and venture capital experienced growth along parallel although… …   Wikipedia

  • Private equity in the 1980s — relates to one of the major periods in the history of private equity and venture capital. Within the broader private equity industry, two distinct sub industries, leveraged buyouts and venture capital experienced growth along parallel although… …   Wikipedia

  • Private equity in the 1990s — relates to one of the major periods in the history of private equity and venture capital. Within the broader private equity industry, two distinct sub industries, leveraged buyouts and venture capital experienced growth along parallel although… …   Wikipedia

  • Venture capital — (also known as VC or Venture) is a type of private equity capital typically provided to immature, high potential, growth companies in the interest of generating a return through an eventual realization event such as an IPO or trade sale of the… …   Wikipedia

  • Private equity fund — is a pooled investment vehicle used for making investments in various equity (and to a lesser extent debt) securities according to one of the investment strategies associated with private equity. Private equity funds are typically limited… …   Wikipedia

  • Private equity 2007 — Private Equity Deals of 2007 in the United Statesee also*Private equity *Private equity firm * *Private equity fund *History of private equity and venture capitalReferences …   Wikipedia

  • Private equity — In finance, private equity is an asset class consisting of equity securities in operating companies that are not publicly traded on a stock exchange. There is a wide array of types and styles of private equity and the term private equity has… …   Wikipedia

  • Private equity secondary market — In finance, the private equity secondary market (also often called private equity secondaries or secondaries) refers to the buying and selling of pre existing investor commitments to private equity and other alternative investment funds. Sellers… …   Wikipedia

  • Private equity firm — A private equity firm is an investment manager that makes investments in the private equity, i.e. an equity security class that are not publicly traded, of operating companies through a variety of loosely affiliated investment strategies… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”