Neutron electric dipole moment

"NEDM" redirects here. For the Sussex experiment, see Sussex/RAL/ILL neutron EDM experiment.

The neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM) is a measure for the distribution of positive and negative charge inside the neutron. A finite electric dipole moment can only exist if the centers of the negative and positive charge distribution inside the particle do not coincide. So far, no neutron EDM has been found. The current best upper limit amounts to |d_n| < 2.9×10⁻²⁶e·cm.^[1]

Theory

Parity (P) and time reversal (T) violation due to an electric dipole moment

A permanent electric dipole moment of a fundamental particle violates both parity (P) and time reversal symmetry (T). This can be understood by examining the neutron with its magnetic dipole moment and hypothetical electric dipole moment. Under time reversal, the magnetic dipole moment changes its direction, whereas the electric dipole moment stays unchanged. Under parity, the electric dipole moment changes its direction but not the magnetic dipole moment. As the resulting system under P and T is not symmetric with respect to the initial system, these symmetries are violated in the case of the existence of an EDM. Having also CPT symmetry, the combined symmetry CP is violated as well.

Standard Model prediction

As seen above, in order to generate a finite nEDM one needs processes that violate CP symmetry. CP violation has been observed in weak interactions and is included in the Standard Model of particle physics via the CP-violating phase in the CKM matrix. However, the amount of CP violation is very small and therefore also the contribution to the nEDM: |d_n| ~ 10^–32e·cm.^[2]

Matter–antimatter asymmetry

Main article: Baryogenesis

Unsolved problems in physics

Why does the universe have so much more matter than antimatter?

From the asymmetry between matter and antimatter in the universe, one suspects that there must be a sizeable amount of CP-violation. Measuring a neutron electric dipole moment at a much higher level than predicted by the Standard Model would therefore directly confirm this suspicion and improve our understanding of CP-violating processes.

Strong CP problem

Main article: CP-violation

Unsolved problems in physics

Why is the strong nuclear interaction force CP-invariant?

As the neutron is built up of quarks, it is also susceptible to CP violation stemming from strong interactions. Quantum chromodynamics - the theoretical description of the strong force - naturally includes a term which breaks CP-symmetry. The strength of this term is characterized by the angle θ. The current limit on the nEDM constrains this angle to be less than 10⁻¹⁰ rad. This fine-tuning of the θ-angle, which is naturally expected to be of order 1, is the strong CP problem.

SUSY CP problem

Supersymmetric extensions to the Standard Model, such as the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, generally lead to a large CP-violation. Typical predictions for the neutron EDM arising from the theory range between 10^–25e·cm and 10^–28e·cm.^[3][4] As in the case of the strong interaction, the limit on the neutron EDM is already constraining the CP violating phases. The fine-tuning is, however, not as severe yet.

Experimental technique

In order to extract the neutron EDM, one measures the Larmor precession of the neutron spin in the presence of parallel and antiparallel magnetic and electric fields. The precession frequency for each of the two cases is given by

$h\nu = 2\mu_B B \pm 2d_n E$,

the addition or subtraction of the frequencies stemming from the precession of the magnetic moment around the magnetic field and the precession of the electric dipole moment around the electric field. From the difference of those two frequencies one readily obtains a measure of the neutron EDM:

$d_n = \frac{h\Delta\nu}{4E}$

The biggest challenge of the experiment (and at the same time the source of the biggest systematic false effects) is to ensure that the magnetic field does not change during these two measurements.

History

Measured upper limits of the neutron EDM. Given are also the predictions stemming from Supersymmetry and the Standard Model

The first experiments searching for the electric dipole moment of the neutron used beams of thermal (and later cold) neutrons to conduct the measurement. It started with the experiment by Smith, Purcell and Ramsey in 1951 (and published in 1957) obtaining a limit of |d_n| < 5×10⁻²⁰e·cm.^[5] Beams of neutrons were used until 1977 for nEDM experiments. At this point, systematic effects related to the high velocities of the neutrons in the beam became insurmountable. The final limit obtained with a neutron beam amounts to |d_n| < 3×10⁻²⁴e·cm.^[6]

After that, experiments with ultracold neutrons took over. It started in 1980 with an experiment at the Leningrad Nuclear Physics Institute obtaining a limit of |d_n| < 1.6×10⁻²⁴e·cm.^[7] This experiment and especially the experiment starting in 1984 at the Institut Laue-Langevin pushed the limit down by another two orders of magnitude yielding the above quoted best upper limit in 2006.

During these 50 years of experiments, six orders of magnitude have been covered thereby putting stringent constraints on more theoretical models than probably any other experimental value.^[8]

Current experiments

Currently, there are at least four experiments aiming at improving the current limit (or measuring for the first time) on the neutron EDM with a sensitivity down to 10^–28e·cm over the next 10 years, thereby covering the range of prediction coming from Supersymmetric extensions to the Standard Model.

• Cryogenic neutron EDM experiment being set up at the Institut Laue-Langevin^[9]
• nEDM experiment under construction at the new UCN source at the Paul Scherrer Institute^[10]
• nEDM experiment being envisaged at the Spallation Neutron Source^[11]
• nEDM experiment being built at the Institut Laue-Langevin^[12]

References

1. ^ Baker, C. A.; et al. (2006). "Improved Experimental Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron". Physical Review Letters 97 (13): 131801. Bibcode 2006PhRvL..97m1801B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.131801. PMID 17026025. 
2. ^ Dar, S. (2000). "The Neutron EDM in the SM : A Review". arXiv:hep-ph/0008248 [hep-ph]. 
3. ^ Abel, S.; Khalil, S.; Lebedev, O. (2001). "EDM constraints in supersymmetric theories". Nuclear Physics B 606: 151–182. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00233-4. 
4. ^ Pospelov, M.; Ritz, A. (2005). "Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics". Annals of Physics 318: 119–169. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.04.002. 
5. ^ Smith, J. H.; Purcell, E. M.; Ramsey, N. F. (1957). "Experimental Limit to the Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron". Physical Review 108: 120–122. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.108.120. 
6. ^ Dress, W. B.; et al. (1977). "Search for an electric dipole moment of the neutron". Physical Review D 15: 9–21. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.9. 
7. ^ Altarev, I. S.; et al. (1980). "A search for the electric dipole moment of the neutron using ultracold neutrons". Nuclear Physics A 341 (2): 269–283. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(80)90313-9. 
8. ^ Ramsey, N. F. (1982). "Electric-Dipole Moments of Particles". Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 32: 211–233. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.32.120182.001235. 
9. ^ hepwww.rl.ac.uk Cryogenic EDM
10. ^ nedm.web.psi.ch
11. ^ p25ext.lanl.gov on EDM
12. ^ nrd.pnpi.spb.ru Neutron EDM page