- Proto-Greek language
The Proto-Greek language is the assumed last common ancestor of all known varieties of Greek, including Mycenaean, the classical Greek dialects (Attic-Ionic, Aeolic, Doric and Northwest Greek), and ultimately Koine, Byzantine and
modern Greek . Most scholars would include the fragmentaryancient Macedonian language , either as descended from an earlier "Proto-Hellenic" language, or by definition including it among the descendants of Proto-Greek as a "Hellenic" language and/or a Greek dialect. [http://linguistlist.org/forms/langs/get-familyid.cfm?CFTREEITEMKEY=IEG]Proto-Greek would have been spoken in the late
3rd millennium BC , most probably in theBalkans . The unity of Proto-Greek would have ended as Hellenic migrants, speaking the predecessor of theMycenaean language , entered the Greek peninsula either around the21st century BC , or in the17th century BC at the latest. They were separated from the Dorian Greeks, who entered the peninsula roughly one millennium later (seeDorian invasion ,Greek Dark Ages ), speaking a dialect that had in some respects remained more archaic.The evolution of Proto-Greek should be considered with the background of an early Palaeo-Balkan
sprachbund that makes it difficult to delineate exact boundaries between individual languages. The characteristically Greek representation of word-initiallaryngeals by prothetic vowels is shared by theArmenian language , which also shares other phonological and morphological peculiarities of Greek. The close relatedness of Armenian and Greek sheds light on theparaphyletic nature of theCentum-Satem isogloss .Close similarities between
Ancient Greek andVedic Sanskrit suggest that both Proto-Greek and Proto-Indo-Iranian were still quite similar to either late Proto-Indo-European, which would place the latter somewhere in the late4th millennium BC , or a post-PIEGraeco-Aryan proto-language. Graeco-Aryan has little support among linguists, since both geographical and temporal distribution of Greek and Indo-Iranian fit well with theKurgan hypothesis of Proto-Indo-European.Phonology
Greek is a
Centum language, which would place a possible Graeco-Aryan protolanguage before Satemization, making it identical to late PIE. Proto-Greek does appear to have been affected by the general trend ofpalatalization characteristic of the Satem group, evidenced for example by the (post-Mycenaean) change of labiovelars into dentals before "e" (e.g. "kwe" > "te" "and"), but the Satemizing influence appears to have reached Greek only after it had lost the palatovelars (i.e. after it had already become a Centum language).The primary sound changes separating Proto-Greek from the
Proto-Indo-European language included:
*Aspiration of /s/ -> /h/ intervocalically
*De-voicing of voiced aspirates.
*Dissimilation of aspirates (Grassmann's law ), possibly post-Mycenaean.
*word-initial "y-" (not "Hy-") is strengthened to "dy-" (later ζ-)The loss of prevocalic "*s" was not completed entirely, famously evidenced by "sus" "sow", "dasus" "dense"; "sun" "with" is another example, contaminated with PIE "*kom" (Latin "cum", Proto-Greek "*kon") to Homeric / Old Attic "ksun".
Sound changes between Proto-Greek and Mycenaean include:
*Loss of final stop consonants; final /m/ -> /n/.
*Syllabic /m/ and /n/ -> /am/, /an/ before resonants; otherwise /a/.
*Vocalization of laryngeals between vowels and initially before consonants to /e/, /a/, /o/ from h₁, h₂, h₃ respectively.
*The sequence CRHC (C = consonant, R = resonant, H = laryngeal) becomes CRēC, CRāC, CRōC from H = h₁, h₂, h₃ respectively.
*The sequence CRHV (C = consonant, R = resonant, H = laryngeal, V = vowel) becomes CaRV.
*loss of "s" in consonant clusters, with supplementary lengthening of the preceding vowel: "esmi" -> "ēmi"
*creation of secondary "s" from clusters, "ntia" -> "nsa". Assibilation "ti" -> "si" only in southern dialects.These sound changes are already complete in Mycenaean.For changes affecting most or all later dialects see
Ancient Greek .Morphology
Noun
The PIE dative, instrumental and locative cases are syncretized into a single dative case. Some desinences are innovated (dative plural "-si" from locative plural -"su").
Nominative plural "-oi", "-ai" replaces late PIE "-ōs", "-ās".
The superlative on "-tatos" becomes productive.
The peculiar oblique stem "gunaik-" "women", attested from the
Thebes tablets is probably Proto-Greek; it appears, at least as "gunai-" also in Armenian.Pronoun
The pronouns "houtos", "ekeinos" and "autos" are created. Use of "ho, hā, ton" as articles is post-Mycenaean.
Verb
An isogloss between Greek and the closely related Phrygian is the absence of "r"-endings in the Middle Voice in Greek, apparently already lost in Proto-Greek.
Proto-Greek inherited the augment, a prefix "é-" to verbal forms expressing past tense. This feature it shares only with Indo-Iranian and Phrygian (and to some extent, Armenian), lending some support to an "Graeco-Aryan" or "Inner PIE" proto-dialect. However, the augment down to the time of Homer remained optional, and was probably little more than a free sentence particle meaning "previously" in the proto-language, that may easily have been lost by most other branches.
The first person middle verbal desinences "-mai", "-mān" replace "-ai", "-a". The third singular "pherei" is an innovation by analogy, replacing the expected Doric "*phereti", Ionic "*pheresi" (from PIE *PIE|"bhéreti").
The future tense is created, including a future passive, as well as an aorist passive.
The suffix "-ka-" is attached to some perfects and aorists.
Infinitives in "-ehen", "-enai" and "-men" are created.
Numerals
*"one": nominative *"hens", genitive *"hemos"; feminine *"mhiā" (> Myc. "e-me" /"hemei"/(dative); Att./Ion. Polytonic|εἷς (ἑνός), μία, "heis" ("henos"), "mia").
*"two": *"duwō" (> Myc. "du-wo" /"duwō"/; Hom. Polytonic|δύω, "dyō"; Att.-Ion. Polytonic|δύο, "dyo")
*"three": nominative *"trees", accusative "trins" (> Myc. "ti-ri" /"trins"/; Att./Ion. Polytonic|τρεῖς, "treis"; Lesb. Polytonic|τρής, trēs; Cret. Polytonic|τρέες, "trees")
*"four": nominative *"kwetwores", genitive *"kweturōn" (> Myc. "qe-to-ro-we" /"kwetrōwes"/ "four-eared"; Att. Polytonic|τέτταρες, "tettares"; Ion. Polytonic|τέσσερες, "tesseres"; Boeot. Polytonic|πέτταρες, "pettares"; Thess. Polytonic|πίτταρες, "pittares"; Lesb. Polytonic|πίσυρες, "pisyres"; Dor. Polytonic|τέτορες, "tetores")
*"five": *"penkwe" (> Att.-Ion. Polytonic|πέντε, "pente"; Lesb., Thess. Polytonic|πέμπε, "pempe")
Example text
Eduard Schwyzer in his "Griechische Grammatik" (1939, I.74-75) has translated famous lines of Classical Greek into Proto-Greek. His reconstruction was ignorant of Mycenaean and assumes Proto-Greek loss of labiovelars and syllabic resonants, among other things. Thus, Schwyzer's reconstruction corresponds to an archaic but post-Mycenaean dialect rather than actual Proto-Greek.Notes: The reconstruction assumes that the old combinations of
sonorant s + "s" in either sequence (PIE|*ns, *ms, *rs, *ls, *u̯s, *i̯s, *sn, *sm, PIE| *sr, *sl, *su̯, *si̯ ) were pronounced as unvoiced sonorants (IPA| [n̥, m̥, r̥, l̥, ʍ, ç] ) before they were simplified as short voiced sonorants with compensatory lengthening Polytonic|ν, μ, ρ, λ, (ϝ), (ι) in most dialects or as long voiced sonorants Polytonic|νν, μμ, ρρ, λλ, υ(ϝ), ι in Aeolic. It is also assumed that the PIE syllabic nasals (PIE|*n̥, *m̥) was pronounced as nasal IPA| [ã] , before it split into Polytonic|α in most dialects and Polytonic|ο as a variant in some dialects (Mycenaean, Arcadian, Aeolic).ee also
*
Proto-language
*Hellenes
*Ancient Macedonian language
*Paleo-Balkan languages
*Pre-Greek substrate
*Proto-Indo-European language
*Kafkania pebble
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.