- Huastec people
Infobox ethnic group
Mexico:approx 66,000(INAH) - (Alternative figure 150,000 (Ethnologue 1990))
San Luis Potosí( Veracruz)
Maya peoples:"This article is about the Huastec people, whose native language Wastek (Huastec) is a Mayan language. The Huastec inhabit a region of Mexico known as La Huasteca, and neighboring variants of the Nahuatllanguage are also known as La Huasteca Nahuatl, unrelated linguistically to Wastek."
The Huastec, also rendered as Huaxtec, Wastek and Huastecos, are an indigenous people of
Mexico, historically based in the states of Hidalgo, Veracruz, San Luis Potosíand Tamaulipasconcentrated along the route of the Pánuco Riverand along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. The Huastec people call themselves Teenek.
Huastecs call their language “Teenek” (also spelled “Tenek” or “Tenec”), which means “those who live in the field”. There are approximately 66,000 Huastec speakers today, of which two-thirds are in
San Luis Potosíand one-third in Veracruz(INAH, p. 56), although their population was probably much higher, as much as half a million, when the Spanish arrived in 1529 (Ariel de Vidas, p. 57).
The ancient Huastec culture is one of the
pre-Columbian Mesoamerican cultures. Judging from archaeological remains, they are thought to date back to approximately the 10th century BCE, although their most productive period of civilization is usually considered to be the Postclassic era between the fall of Teotihuacanand the rise of the AztecEmpire. The Pre-Columbian Huastecs constructed temples on step-pyramids, carved independently-standing sculptures, and produced elaborately painted pottery. The Huastecs were unusual as one of the few cultures that attained civilizationand built cities, yet usually wore no clothing. They were admired for their abilities as musicians by other Mesoamerican peoples.
1450, the Huastecs were defeated by Aztecarmies under the leadership of Moctezuma I; the Huastecs henceforth paid tribute to the Aztec Empire but retained a large degree of local self government.
The Huastecs were conquered by the Spanish between 1519 and the 1530s. With the imposition of the
Roman Catholicfaith, they were required to don clothing.
The first grammatical and lexical description of the Huastec language accessible to Europeans was by Fray
Andrés de Olmos, who also wrote the first such grammars of Nahuatland Totonac.
Huastec migration history
When did the Huastecs split from the rest of the Maya?
Studies of language change, especially lexical statistics (i. e., words changing their form or being replaced by borrowed synonyms), have given linguists the tools to estimate the time depth at which many pairs of languages diverged from their common ancestral tongue. The procedure depend on assuming that language change, in the absence of widespread literacy, is constant over time.
Of all the languages descended from
Proto-Mayan, the proto-Huastecan language was the first to split from Mayan proper. (The second split, in the non-Huastecan main branch, was between proto-Yucatecan, now spoken across the Yucatán Peninsula, and the ancestors of all other Maya languages. The only other language besides Huastec which arose from proto-Huastecan was Chicomuceltec(also called Cotoque), which once spoken in Chiapasnear Comitánbut which is now extinct.
Linguists have approximated that the precursor to the language of the Huastecs diverged from the
Proto-Mayanlanguage between 2200 and 1200 BCE. Linguist Morris Swadeshposited the later date as the latest possible time for this split to have occurred, and gave the Huastec/ Chicomuceltec"inik" (“man”) versus other-Maya "winik" as a typical contrast (Wilkerson, p. 928). McQuown suggests 1500 BCE, Manrique Castaneda 1800 BCE, and Dahlin 2100 BCE as the most likely dates for the split (Ochoa, p. 40; Dahlin, p. 367). Kaufman’s proposed date of about 2200 BCE would require two regular phonological (sound) changes that are attested in all Maya languages, “r” changing to “y” and “q” to “k”, to have happened independently after the split, in both the Huastec/Chicomuceltec branch and in the branch of all other Mayan languages(Campbell and Kaufman, p.195).
Robertson’s work on verb
affixes in the Mayan languages implies that the Huastecs were in contact with proto- Tzeltalbranch of Mayan. In Proto-Mayan, absolutives could be marked either by a prefixor a suffix, depending on the presence of a tense/ aspectmarker. This feature was retained in Q'anjob'al(a Maya language, spoken in the Cuchumatanesmountains of Guatemala), but lost in other branches (Yucatecan always uses a suffix for absolutives, while K'iche' always uses a prefix). Huastec appears to have been influenced by proto-Tzeltal, resulting in such innovations as the preposition"ta", used with the object of a verbin the third person (Robertson, p. 307). If, as seems likely, the Huastec-Maya split occurred ca. 2000 BCE, the Huastecs did not probably travel far from the Guatemala-Chiapas borderlands until after about 1100 BCE, by which time the proto-Tzeltalans had been established as a separate branch.
When did the Huastecs arrive in the Huasteca region?
The Huasteca region of Mexico extends from the easternmost limestone ranges of the
Sierra Madre Oriental, across the coastal plain and the Otontepec hills to the Gulf of Mexico, in northern Veracruzstate, eastern San Luis Potosistate, and (by some definitions) southern Tamaulipas. At least three indigenous languages are spoken in parts of the region today: Nahuatl (a Uto-Aztecan language), spoken especially in Veracruz, but also in San Luis Potosí; Pame (an Oto-Manguean language). spoken in the hilly borderlands of San Luis Potosí and Querétaro; and Huastec (Wastek) (a Maya language), spoken in San Luis Potosi and northernmost Veracruz, and formerly in Tamaulipas. Some would include the Totonac-speaking area, in north-central Veracruz, as part of the Huasteca. The Huastec region was known to the Aztecs (ancestors of today’s Nahuatl speakers, who arrived in the Huasteca around 1450) for its fertile abundance (Campbell and Kaufman, p. 188), and includes the northernmost patches of tropical moist forest and cloud forest in the Americas.
The Huastecs arrived in the Huasteca between 1500 BCE (Kaufman, p. 106) and 900 BCE (Stresser-Pean). The linguistic evidence is corroborated by archaeological discoveries. In 1954,
Richard Stockton MacNeishfound ceramics and figurines in the Middle Formative period, called “Pavon de Panuco” in the Panuco River sites of the Huasteca, which resemble Preclassic objects from Uaxactun, a Petén-region Maya site (Ochoa, p. 42). A date of no earlier than 1100 BCE for the Huastecs’ arrival at their present location seems most likely, since they probably had not arrived at the north-central Veracruz site of Santa Luisa until about 1200 BCE, the phase at the end of the Early Formative period known locally as the “Ojite phase” (Wilkerson, p. 897). Artifacts of the period include Panuco-like basalt "manos" and "metates" (Wilkerson, p. 892). (The Huastecs remained in Santa Luisa, located east of Papantla near the Gulf coast, until supplanted or absorbed by the Totonacs around AD 1000).
One nexus of carved iconographic traditions, the “yoke-palm-axe” complex, was found from Jaina Island in coastal
Campecheto the Huasteca (and in between, in Aparicio, Veracruz), in association with the pelota ballgame, decapitation, and tooth mutilation (Ochoa, p. 43); however, this may reflect coastal trade contacts after the Huastecs were established in the Huasteca.
Where did the Huastec-Maya separation occur, and why?
Proto-Maya, the common ancestor of all Maya tongues, was probably spoken in west-central Guatemala, around the highland pine-oak forests of the Cuchumatanes mountain chain: north of the Motagua and Grijalva river valleys, through patches of cloud forest, and down to the edge of the tropical forest lowlands near the Ixcan and Chixoy (Negro) rivers, which flow into the
Usumacinta River(Campbell and Kaufman, p. 191). Evidence that this region was the Maya “heartland” include its being located near the center of present-day language diversity within the Maya phylum (and therefore requiring the minimum number of moves to place the languages in their current locations), the fact that proto-Maya included words for flora and fauna from both highland and lowland areas, and the debatable idea that it is easier for a group of people to spread from a highland region to a lowland one than vice-versa (Dahlin, p. 370). Not all archaeological evidence agrees with this conclusion: there are older, unbroken ceramic traditions from Loltun Cavein Yucatán, as well as Cuelloin Belize, which suggest alternative Maya homelands (Dahlin, p. 371).
Whether the proto-Huastecs split from the rest of the Maya in 2200 or in 1200 BCE, the separation occurred at least a millennium before the rise of classic Maya culture. It is no surprise, therefore, that the word “to write” is different in proto-Huastec "(θuc-)" and in the other Maya language branch "(c’ib)" (Kaufman, p. 102).
If we consider 2000 BCE as a reasonable date for the Huastec/Maya split, and the slopes of the Cuchumatanes range as a reasonable location for the speakers of proto-Maya, it seems likely that the split occurred after these proto-Maya speakers (or a portion of them) began to migrate north, probably along the
Usumacinta River, and before the two groups resulting from the split began to move in opposite directions: the proto-Huastec speakers moving northwest (and, soon thereafter, the proto- Chicomuceltecwest into the Chiapas highlands), and the proto-Yucatec/other Maya-speakers spreading northeast (one branch of which became Chontal, presumed by many from its widespread loan words and hieroglyphic evidence to be the dominant language of the classic Peten Maya heartland) (see Fig. 1). While we have no direct archaeological evidence to explain the split itself, we can assume by linguistic evidence that contact was soon cut off between the two groups, despite there being no geographical feature that would automatically isolate them from each other.
The intervening feature, then, was likely a powerful linguistic-cultural group. What group occupied the Usumacinta River-Gulf Coast lowlands (mainly in today’s Mexican state of Tabasco) between 2000 BCE (when the proto-Huastecs began their journey) and 1000 BCE (by which time the proto-Yucatecs had arrived in Yucatán, the Chicomuceltecs had been isolated from the Huastecs (Kaufman, p. 111), and the Huastecs were arriving in central Veracruz)? Most scholars propose that this region was inhabited by speakers of the Mixe-Zoque phylum. While speakers of
Mixe-Zoquean languagesare today confined to the mountains of northeast Oaxaca, along the backbone of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, and into extreme western Chiapas, it is likely that they once occupied the entire Gulf Coast lowland from the isthmus to the Tuxtla mountains – in other words, the Olmecheartland, soon dominated by the presumably Mixe-Zoque-speaking Olmec civilization of about 1400 to 500 BC. One line of evidence that the Olmecs spoke Mixe-Zoque are the words that the proto-Huastecs borrowed from proto-Mixe-Zoque as they passed through the southern Gulf lowlands (Campbell and Kaufman, p. 191); for example, "ciw", meaning “squash” (Robertson, p. 309).
Thus, there is some reason to ascribe the linguistic isolation of early Huastecs from other Maya speakers to proto-Olmecs speaking a Mixe-Zoque language, themselves recently arrived after migrating northward from the Soconusco region of the Pacific coast and across the isthmus of Tehuantepec (Malstrom, p.28). There is much stronger evidence that the push for the Huastecs’ further migration up the Gulf coast was caused by the active presence of the early Olmecs (c. 1400 to 1100 BCE) of San Lorenzo and associated sites. If this is true, most of the distance that the Huastecs migrated during their entire history, from Guatemala to the Huasteca, was traveled in only a century or two at most: the portion between the Olmec heartland around San Lorenzo, and the environs of San Luisa.
The Huastecs and the Yucatán Maya were reunited, in a way, during the late nineteenth century, when Huastec
chicle-tappers and lumbermen were transported to the state of Campeche to work the similar forests there, mainly employed by U.S.-based companies. A cross-Gulf steamship trade developed at the same time, with products such as salt exported from Campeche to Tuxpan (a Huastec-region port), and items such as sugar from Tuxpan to Campeche (Vadillo Lopez and Riviera Ayala, p. 96).
*Ariel de Vidas, A. 2003. “Ethnicidad y cosmologia: La construccion cultural de la diferencia entre los teenek (huaxtecos) de Veracruz”, in UNAM, "Estudios de Cultura Maya." Vol. 23.
*Campbell, L. and T. Kaufman. 1985. “Maya linguistics: Where are we now?,” in" Annual Review of Anthropology." Vol. 14, pp. 187-98
*Dahlin, B. et al. 1987. “Linguistic divergence and the collapse of Preclassic civilization in southern Mesoamerica”. "American Antiquity." Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 367-82.
*INAH. 1988. " Atlas cultural de Mexico: Linguistica." Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia.
*Kaufman, T. 1976. “Archaeological and linguistic correlations in Mayaland and associated areas of Mesoamerica,” in "World Archaeology." Vol. 8, pp. 101-18
*Malstrom, V. 1985. “The origins of civilization in Mesoamerica: A geographic perspective”, in L. Pulsipher, ed. "Yearbook of the Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers." Vol. 11, pp. 23-29.
*Ochoa, L. 2003. “La costa del Golfo y el area maya: Relaciones imaginables o imaginadas?”, in UNAM, "Estudios de Cultura Maya." Vol. 23.
*Robertson, J. 1993. “The origins and development of Huastec pronouns.” "International Journal of American Linguistics." Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 294-314
*Stresser-Pean, G. 1989. “Los indios huastecos”, in Ochoa, L., ed. "Huastecos y Totonacas." Mexico City: CONACULTA.
*Vadillo Lopez, C. and C. Riviera Ayala. 2003. “El trafico maratimo, vehiculo de relaciones culturales entre la region maya chontal de Laguna de Terminos y la region huaxteca del norte de Veracruz, siglos XVI-XIX”, in UNAM, "Estudios de Cultura Maya." Vol. 23.
*Wilkerson, J. 1972. "Ethnogenesis of the Huastecs and Totonacs." PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, Tulane University, New Orleans.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.