- Tel Hazor
Infobox World Heritage Site
WHS = Biblical Tells – Megiddo, Hazor, Beer Sheba
State Party = ISR
Type = Cultural
Criteria = ii, iii, iv, vi
ID = 1108
Region = Europe and North America
Year = 2005
Session = 29th
Link = http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1108Tel Hazor ( _he. תל חצור)(also, Hatzor) is a
tell above the site of ancient Hazor, whose archeological remains are the largest and richest known in modernIsrael . Hazor was an ancient city located in theUpper Galilee , north of theSea of Galilee , between Ramah andKadesh , on the high ground overlooking LakeMerom . In modern times, the site has been subject to several excavations, beginning in 1955 with those funded byJames A. de Rothschild , which were published in a dedicated five volume set of books by theIsrael Exploration Society . In2005 , the remains of Hazor were designated aWorld Heritage Site byUNESCO as part of the "Biblical Tels - Megiddo, Hazor, Beer Sheba".Canaanite Hazor
During the Egyptian
Second Intermediate Period and earlyNew Kingdom s (together running between 18th century BC and 13th century BC),Canaan was an Egyptianvassal state, and thus 14th century documents, from theEl Amarna archive inEgypt , describe the king of Hazor-(inAmarna letters called "Hasura"),Abdi-Tirshi , as swearing loyalty to the Egyptian Pharaohess. In these documents Hazor is described as an important city in Canaan. Hazor is also mentioned in 18th century BCE documents found in Mari on theEuphrates River.According to the
Book of Joshua Hazor was the seat ofJabin , a powerful Canaanite king that led a Canaanite confederation againstJoshua , but was defeated by Joshua, who burnt Hazor to the ground. [Joshua 11:1-5, 11:10-13] According to theBook of Judges Hazor was the seat of Jabin, the king of Canaan, whose commander,Sisera , led a Canaanite army againstBarak , but was ultimately defeated. [Judges 4] Textual scholars believe that the prose account of Barak, which differs from the poetic account in theSong of Deborah , is a conflation of accounts of two separate events, one concerning Barak and Sisera like the poetic account, the other concerning Jabin's confederation and defeat."Peake's commentary on the Bible "] In addition, textual scholars think that the Book of Judges and Book of Joshua are parallel accounts, referring to the same events, rather than describing different time periods, ["Jewish Encyclopedia", "Book of Joshua", "Book of Judges"] and thus that they refer to the same Jabin, a powerful king based in Hazor, whose Canaanite confederation was defeated by anIsraelite army. ["Jewish Encyclopedia", "Jabin"]Some archaeologists believe that the Israelites emerged simply as a subculture within Canaanite society, and thus that the Israelite conquest of Canaan did not happen as detailed in the Bible;
Israel Finkelstein , "The Bible Unearthed "] most biblical scholars believe that the Book of Joshua conflates several independent battles between disparate groups, over multiple centuries, and artificially attributes them to a single leader - Joshua. Nevertheless, one archaeologicalstratum , dating from around 1200BC, shows signs of catastrophic fire, and cuneiform tablets found at the site refer to monarchs named "Ibni Addi", where "Ibni" may be the etymological origin of "Yavin" ("Jabin"). [http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/History/Early%20History%20-%20Archaeology/Hatzor%20-%20The%20Head%20of%20all%20those%20Kingdoms] The city also show signs of having been a magnificent Canaanite city prior to its destruction, with great temples and opulent palaces, split into an upperacropolis , and lower city; the town evidently had been a major Canaanite city.However, the cuneiform tablets mentioning "Ibni" date from the Middle Bronze (2000-1550BC) age, much earlier than the destruction layer, which itself differs substantially in date from the Late Bronze Age destructions of Aphek (
Antipatris ),Lachish , and Megiddo; thus these cities cannot have been destroyed by a single army led by a single individual in a single campaign (as the Book of Joshua would have it), due to the time period involved. Archaeologists suspect that the real reason for the destruction of Hazor could simply be civil strife, attacks by theSea Peoples , and/or a result of the general collapse of civilisation across the whole eastern Mediterranean in the Late Bronze Age.Israelite Hazor
The archaeological remains suggest that some time after its destruction, the city of Hazor was rebuilt as minor village. According to the
Books of Kings , the town, along with Megiddo, andGezer , was later substantially fortified and expanded bySolomon . [1 Kings 9:15] Like those at Megiddo, and Gezer, the remains at Hazor show that during the Early Iron Age the town gained a highly distinctive "six chambered"gate , as well as a characteristic style to its administration buildings; archaeologists have become convinced that these constructions at Hazor were built by the same leadership as those at Megiddo and Gezer. By reference to the Books of Kings, archaeologists initially concluded that these remains verified the Biblical claims - that they were constructed on the orders of Solomon - though this has since been criticised as determining history by ideology, rather than by thefacts on the ground .More recent analysis of the architectural style and pottery features in the archaeological levels associated with the "six chambered" gates, and administration buildings, at these three sites, has caused some archaeologists to date these structures to the early 9th century BC, during the reign of the
Omrides rather than Solomon. An archaeologist has proposed that due to religious prejudice by the Biblical authors against the Omrides (who werepolytheist ), the great achievements of the Omrides were instead ascribed to a mythical or semi-mythical "Solomon".Yigael Yadin , one of the earliest archaeologists to have worked on the site, saw certain features as clearly being Omride; Megiddo, Gezer, and Hazor, all feature deep rock cut pits, from the base of which were rock cut tunnels leading to a well that reached thewater table , as water-supply systems, which Yadin attributed to the rule ofAhab ; Yadin also attributed to Ahab a citadel, measuring 25 x 21 m, with two-meter thick walls, which was erected in the western part of Hazor. However, Yadin's dating was based on the assumption that the layer connected with the gates and administration buildings were built by Solomon, and thus most archaeologists now date the citadel and rock cut water system much later.Archaeological remains indicate that towards the later half of the 9th century BC, when the king of Israel was
Jehu , Hazor fell into the control ofAram Damascus . Most archaeologists suspect that subsequent to this conquest, unmentioned by the Bible, was a sustained period of occupation by the Aramaean forces; the remains indicate that Hazor was rebuilt shortly after its conquest by Aram, probably as an Aramaean city. When theAssyria ns later defeated the Aramaeans, Hazor seemingly returned to Israelite control; Assyrian records indicate that Joash, the king of Israel at the time, had paid tribute to Assyria and Israel had become an Assyrian vassal. Subsequently, the town, along with the remainder of the kingdom of Israel, entered a period of great prosperity, particularly during the rule ofJeroboam II ; most archaeologists now attribute the later large scale constructions at Hazor, Megiddo, and Gezer, including the rock cut water supply systems, to this era.Israel's attempted rebellion against Assyrian domination resulted in an invasion by the forces of the Assyrian ruler,
Tiglath-Pileser III ; the evidence on the ground suggests that hasty attempts were made to reinforce the defences of Hazor. Despite the defences, in732 BC Hazor was captured, its population deported, [2 Kings 15:29] and the city was burnt to the ground.Museum
Findings form the dig are housed in a museum at
Ayelet HaShahar .In 2008, artifacts in the museum were damaged in an earthquake. [http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/images/printed/P020308/a.a.0203.430.1.9.jpg]Citations and notes
* "The James A. de Rothschild Expedition at Hazor. An Account of the Second Season of Excavation, 1956".
Y.Yadin et al. (editors)
* "The James A. de Rothschild Expedition at Hazor. An Account of the Third and Fourth Seasons of Excavation, 1957-1958".A. Ben-Tor
* "The James A. de Rothschild Expedition at Hazor. An Account of the Fifth Season of Excavations, 1968".A. Ben-Tor and R. Bonfil (editors)External links
* [http://www.yadinproductions.com/yadin_archeology.html "Yadin photographs & footage of the excavations"]
* [http://hazor.huji.ac.il/hazorbooks.htm The Hazor Excavation Reports] -Hebrew University of Jerusalem
* [http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1108 UNESCO World Heritage site for Hazor]
* [http://ebibletools.com/israel/hazor/ Photos of the archaeological site at Hazor]
* [http://www.pbase.com/rdavid/galilee/ Photos of the archaeological site at Hazor]
* [http://www.kingsolomonsgate.com/Hz/Hazor21.htm Amnon Ben-Tor at Hazor's Solomonic Gate ]
* [http://www.tapuz.co.il/blog/ViewEntry.asp?EntryId=1195698 Tel Hatzor shown in Israeli maximum card]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.