Monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force

Monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force

The monopoly on the legitimate use of violence ("Gewaltmonopol des Staates", also known as monopoly on legitimate violence and monopoly on violence) is the definition of the state expounded by Max Weber in "Politics as a Vocation", and has been predominant in philosophy of law and political philosophy in the twentieth century. It defined a single entity, the state, exercising legitimate authority or violence over a given territory as territory was also deemed by Weber a characteristic of state. Monopoly on the simple use of violence, as discussed below, is different.

Max Weber's theory

Max Weber said in "Politics as a Vocation" that a necessary condition of an entity being a state is that it retain such a monopoly. He said, something is "a 'state' if and insofar as its administrative staff successfully upholds a claim on the "monopoly" of the "legitimate" use of violence in the enforcement of its order." [Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (1964). p. 154] According to Weber, the state was to be the source of legitimacy for any use of violence: if the police and the military were its main instruments, this did not mean only public force could be used. Private forces (as in private security) could be used, but its legitimacy derived from the state.

There are several caveats which apply to this basic principle:
*Weber intended his statement as an observation, stating that it has not always been the case that the connection between the state and the use of violence has been so close. He uses the example of feudalism (where private warfare was permitted under certain conditions), or of the Catholic Church (which in the past claimed the right to use violence against its own disobedient members, independent from secular authorities).Fact|date=November 2007
*The actual application of violence is delegated or permitted by the state. Weber's theory is not taken to mean that only the government uses violence, but that the individuals and organizations which can legitimately use violence or adjudicate on its legitimacy are precisely those authorized to do so by the state. So, for example, the law might permit individuals to use violence in defense of self or property - in this case the ability to use force has been granted by the state, and only by the state.Fact|date=November 2007
*The word "legitimate" is subject to controversy. To some, it has normative meaning, i.e., that the state "should" monopolize violence. To others, it has positive meaning, i.e., that the people accept the "legitimacy" of the state monopoly. However, Weber's conceptualization opposed both: he did not claim that the people "accepted" the legitimacy, nor that the state should monopolize the legitimate use of violence, but simply defined the state as such. Suspending any moral judgment when doing sociological observations, an imperative of neutral axiology exposed in "Science as a Vocation", leads to the conclusion that Weber did not consider this monopoly good or bad, but only considered it a realist description of the state and of its formation (which was not uncommon in German circles at the time — a close definition was provided by Rudolf von Jhering in "Zweck im Recht", as did Rudolph Somh in 1911 or Georg Jellinek [ On this point, see Andreas Anter, "Max Webers Theories des moderneen Staates", Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1995 ] ).

upport for the monopoly on the use of force

Generally speaking, those who support the existence of the state believe that there should be a monopoly on the use of violence, or at least a near monopoly. That is, they believe private violence should be prevented or punished unless it is used solely in immediate self-defense from violence. Supporters of the state monopoly argue that if a monopoly on the use of violence does not exist, private individuals or groups will, inevitably, arm themselves and use violence against each other and others; thus they claim that anarchy results in more violence than found in even the most violent state. In support of such reasoning, supporters sometimes point to areas and periods where, on their reading of events, this monopoly did not exist (or, in some sense, where there existed close to a "free market" in violence and security), such as modern Somalia, or Europe during the Dark Ages. They contend that such instances show that the attainment by any government of a monopoly on violence would have improved the lives of the inhabitants.

The philosopher Thomas Hobbes strongly supported a centralized practitioner of force, as he believed that that is the only way an orderly society could be maintained. As Hobbes writes in The Leviathan:

:"For the laws of nature, as justice, equity, modesty, mercy, and, in sum, doing to others as we would be done to, of themselves, without the terror of some power to cause them to be observed, are contrary to our natural passions, that carry us to partiality, pride, revenge, and the like. And covenants, without the sword, are but words and of no strength to secure a man at all. Therefore, notwithstanding the laws of nature (which every one hath then kept, when he has the will to keep them, when he can do it safely), if there be no power erected, or not great enough for our security, every man will and may lawfully rely on his own strength and art for caution against all other men."

Alternatives and Objections to Weber's theory

In some western constitutional democracies, the government may not have an absolute monopoly on the use of violence. In the United States, for example, the Second Amendment to the Constitution is frequently read to authorize the existence of armed civilian militias, which could theoretically challenge the government (cf. rebellion) or assist in law enforcement (cf. "Posse comitatus"). However, in most of the rest of the western world, the government alone is responsible for the maintenance of the civil order.

Market anarchists are supportive of the use of legitimate violence (defensive and punitive violence), but they oppose a compulsory monopoly on the use of that violence. They believe the private sector should be allowed to provide its own police, jails, and courts when crimes take place on private property. They may justify this on moral grounds or on pragmatic ones - that if these security services were supplied in a competitive market, like other services are in a market economy, service would be better and cheaper.

There have been historical records of functional market anarchy in various times, such as medieval Iceland, [cite journal|last=Solvason|first=Birgir Þór Runólfsson|authorlink=|coauthors=|title =Ordered Anarchy: Evolution of the Decentralized Legal Order in the Icelandic Commonwealth|journal=Constitutional Political Economy|volume=4|issue =1|pages =97–125|publisher =Univ of Iceland|date=December 1993|url=|doi=10.1007/BF02393284|id=ISSN 1043-4062|accessdate=2007-01-29] Ireland, [cite book|last=Rothbard|first=Murray|authorlink=|coauthors=|title=For a New Liberty|publisher=Collier- MacMillan - Mises Inst|date=1978, 2006| location=|pages =Ch 12|url =|doi=|id=ISBN 978-0945466475] and even what is known as the Wild West. [cite book|last=Anderson|first=Terry|authorlink=|coauthors =Hill, Peter| title =The Not So Wild, Wild West|publisher=Stanford Univ Press|date=2004|location=|pages=|url=|doi=|id=ISBN 0804748543] In addition, violence in Somalia actually increased with the establishment of a 'legitimate' government.Fact|date=February 2008 Therefore, it could be seen that a monopoly on violence may not be necessary for society to function.

ee also

*State inside a state


External links

* [ Politics as a Vocation] (translation)

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Legitimate use of force — can refer to:* the right of a state to exercise legitimate authority or violence over a given territory. See monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force. * the right of civilians acting on their own behalf to engage in violence for the sake… …   Wikipedia

  • Use of force — The term use of force refers to the right of an individual or authority to settle conflicts or prevent certain actions by applying measures to either: a) dissuade another party from a particular course of action, or b) physically intervene to… …   Wikipedia

  • Monopoly (disambiguation) — In Economics, a monopoly exists when a specific individual or enterprise has sufficient control over a particular product or service to determine significantly the terms on which other individuals shall have access to it. Monopoly may also refer… …   Wikipedia

  • Force (law) — In the field of law, the word force has two main meanings: unlawful violence and lawful compulsion. Forced entry is an expression falling under the category of unlawful violence; in force or forced sale would be examples of expressions in the… …   Wikipedia

  • Justification for the state — The justification of the state is a term that refers to the source of legitimate authority for the state or government. Typically, a justification of the state explains why the state should exist, and what a legitimate state should or should not… …   Wikipedia

  • Propaganda of the deed — (or propaganda by the deed , from the French propagande par le fait ) is a concept that promotes physical violence against political enemies as a way of inspiring the masses and catalyzing revolution. It is based on the principles of anarchy and… …   Wikipedia

  • Austria at the Time of National Socialism — describes in particular the period of Austrian history from March 12, 1938 when the German annexation of Austria made Austria part of the German Third Reich until the end of World War II in spring 1945. Early history In 1918, at the end of World… …   Wikipedia

  • History of the world — The history of the world [Williams, H. S. (1904). The historians history of the world; a comprehensive narrative of the rise and development of nations as recorded by over two thousand of the great writers of all ages. New York: The Outlook… …   Wikipedia

  • State — A state is a political association with effective sovereignty over a geographic area and representing a population. These may be nation states, sub national states or multinational states. A state usually includes the set of institutions that… …   Wikipedia

  • Max Weber — Max Weber …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”