Soldier settlement (Australia)

Soldier settlement refers to the occupation and settlement of land throughout parts of Australia by returning discharged soldiers under schemes administered by the State Governments after world Wars I and II.

World War I

Such settlement plans initially began during World War I, with South Australia first enacting legislation in 1915 but the whole of Australia gaining significant impetus to also move in that direction when in February 1916 a conference of representatives of both the Commonwealth and the States was held in Melbourne to consider a report prepared by the Federal Parliamentary War Committee regarding the settlement of returned soldiers on the land. The report focused specifically on a Commonwealth-State cooperative process of selling or leasing Crown land to soldiers who had been demobilised following the end of their service in this first global conflict. [ [http://investigator.records.nsw.gov.au/Details/Agency_Detail.asp?Id=3836 State Records NSW] ] The meeting agreed that it was the Commonwealth Government's role to select and acquire land whilst the State government authorities would process applications and grant land allotments. [cite web | year = 2005 | url = http://www.naa.gov.au/The_collection/family_history/armed_services.html | title = Defence service records| work = | publisher = National Archives of Australia | accessdate =2007-02-26 ]

Crown land was used where possible, but much land was acquired. By 1924, just over 24 million acres (97,000 km²) had been acquired or allocated. Of this nearly 6.3 million acres (25,000 km²) was purchased and 18 million acres (73,000 km²) was crown land set aside. 23.2 million acres (93,900 km²) had been allotted 23,367 farms across Australia.cite web | year = 1925 | url = http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/featurearticlesbyCatalogue/72BB159FA215052FCA2569DE0020331D?OpenDocument | title = Special Article - Settlement of returned soldiers 1914-18 | work = 1301.0 - Year Book Australia, 1925 | publisher = Australian Bureau of Statistics | accessdate = 2007-03-02 ]

Other than supporting soldiers and sailors that were returning from those wars the various governments also saw the opportunity of attracting both Australians and specific groups of allied service personnel to some of the otherwise little inhabited, remote areas of Australia. Although the Commonwealth held responsibility for defence, and thus might have taken responsibility for demobilised soldiers, it was the States which took responsibility for land settlement and thus enacted separate soldier settlement schemes. The States also wished to take an active role in recognising the contribution of soldiers.cite web | last = Keneley | first = Monica | authorlink = | coauthors = | year = 2000 | url = http://www.jcu.edu.au/aff/history/articles/keneley2.htm | title = Land of Hope: Soldier Settlement in the Western District of Victoria 1918-1930| publisher = The Electronic Journal of Australian and New Zealand History | accessdate = 2007-02-28]

Areas that gained such settlement included places such as Merbein and Mortlake in Victoria; Griffith and Dorrigo in New South Wales; Murray Bridge and Kangaroo Island in South Australia, and the Atherton Tableland in Queensland. [ [http://www.australiandiggers.com/users/anzacs/settlement.htm australiandiggers.com Soldier Settlement] ]

By June 30, 1924 a total of 23,367 returned soldiers and sailors had taken up settlement farms on 23,275,380 acres (94,192 km²) across Australia as per the following breakdown:

World War II

The procedure of supporting such soldiers was repeated after World War II with all Australian state governments using the previous and amended forms of such acts of parliament to reinvigorate the program for this new generation of returned soldiers.

Rules of holding soldier settlement land

In most cases Crown land was set apart for returning soldiers who in order to buy or lease such a block were required to be certified as qualified and to remain in residence on that land for 5 years. In this way remote rural areas set aside for such settlement were guaranteed a population expansion which remained to increase infrastructure in the area.

Soldiers who were successful in gaining such a block of land had the opportunity to start a farming life in a number of rural activities including as wool, dairy, cattle, pigs, fruit, fodder and grain. These initial land allotments resulted in triumph for some and despair for others. Indeed specifically following World War I, in some cases these new farmers, unable to cope with the climatic variances of Australia and devoid of the capital to increase stock or quality of life, simply walked off the land back to the large towns and cities from whence they had come. [ [http://www.abc.net.au/rural/nsw/stories/s1018098.htm Soldier settlers Pt 1 ABC Rural Radio] ]

The success of the program increased after World War II when the infrastructure required for these new farmers was improved as a direct result of learning from the mistakes that came during and after the first attempts at such settlement.

Settlement by state

South Australia

Following World War I, soldiers who had previously worked on irrigation activities along the Murray River during the years leading up to the war returned to find that their previous jobs were no longer available.

The South Australian government responded as early as 1915 with the first of the acts of parliament designed to both repatriate and compensate returning servicemen, and to meet the political and economic need to 'sponsor' the development of intensively productive agriculture pursuits. Soldiers were informed of the availability of the scheme via the media and in the material provided in both recruitment packages and general information forwarded to men serving overseas.

Settlement schemes during and after the conclusion of World War I saw properties specialising in dairy, grapes, vegetables, grains, and grazing develop along the River in Cobdogla, Waikerie, Berri, Cadell, Chaffey and near Renmark. [ [http://www.slsa.sa.gov.au/murray/content/europeanSettlement/soldierIntro.htm State Library of South Australia] ]

Following a number of acts that dealt with Soldier Settlement the South Australian government introduced the "Discharged Soldier Settlement Act 1934" which consolidated acts such as the "Crown Lands Act 1929" and the "Irrigation Act 1930" for the benefit of any discharged soldier who had served in connection with the Great War and had been a member of the British Army or Navy or of the Australian Imperial Force or of any other naval or military force raised in any part of the British Empire for service in that War, or to the widow (who had children) of any such who had died or dies from wounds inflicted, accident occurring, or disease contracted whilst on service. [ [http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/C/A/DISCHARGED%20SOLDIERS%20SETTLEMENT%20ACT%201934/CURRENT/1934.2152.UN.PDF Discharged Soldiers Settlement Act 1934] ]

Settlement schemes after World War II expanded to include the Loxton Irrigation Area, which became the largest such scheme in South Australia, and to another part of the previously developed area of Chaffey. The Returned Services League (RSL) lobbied the state government to open up more land for returned soldiers at Loxton, and returning soldiers were informed of the scheme at the RSL through handout material. Settlement schemes after World War II also led to the establishment of the new towns of Parndana on Kangaroo Island and Padthaway in the south east of the state. [cite paper|url=http://environment.sa.gov.au/heritage/pdfs/surveys/20_century/stage_1.pdf|title=Twentieth Century Heritage Survey - Stage 1:Post Second World War (1946 -1959)|author=Susan Marsden|publisher=Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia|date=2004|accessdate=2007-07-12]

However whilst the first world war settlers had achieved only a modicum of success the benefit of that previous experience helped the second world war veterans, particularly in Loxton, to avoid some past mistakes and with the assistance of the Department of Lands, the community worked together in order to survive and prosper. Irrigation schemes that eventually arrived saw the advent of the productive orchard and vineyard concerns that became so important to the overall region as it exists today. [ [http://www.slsa.sa.gov.au/murray/content/europeanSettlement/soldierIntro.htm State Library of South Australia - op cit] ]

New South Wales

The State Government of New South introduced the Returned Soldiers Settlement Act, 1916 shortly after the combined Commonwealth and State meeting held in Melbourne earlier that year (see above). Soldiers who had served outside of Australia either as a part of the Australian Imperial Forces or as a part of the British Defence Service and who had been honourably discharged were eligible to apply for Crown Lands. This was land that the Commonwealth Government had acquired under either the Closer Settlement Acts, Murrumbidgee Irrigation Act, or was available as a part of general disposal under the Crown Lands Consolidation Act. [ [http://investigator.records.nsw.gov.au/Details/Agency_Detail.asp?Id=3836 State Records NSW op cit] ]

Ex-servicemen were required to apply for such land via completion of appropriate paperwork and if successful a soldier could gain additional financial assistance for the purpose of clearing, fencing, drainage, water supply and other improvement of the land as well as for the erection of buildings and the purchase of stock, seeds, implements, plants and similar material necessary for the occupation and development of the land.

By 1917 the state government saw fit to enact the Returned Soldiers Settlement (Amendment) Act, which broadened the definition of returned soldiers to include those who had not enlisted in Australia and those who had not served overseas, as well as providing for potential further categories of soldiers.

In the period October 1917 – June 1917, twelve (12) soldier settlement projects were commenced. Projects areas included Glen Innes, Hillston, and Batlow. Industries commenced included poultry, horticulture, pig, fruit, and market gardening.

New South Wales also repeated the process following World War II with settlements commencing in areas including Dareton.

Victoria

The "Discharged Soldiers' Settlement Act" of 1917 established the scheme. Between 1918 and 1934, 11,639 returned servicemen were allocated blocks under the soldier settlement scheme. Most settled in the Mallee, South Gippsland, the Western District and the irrigation areas of the North West, Central Gippsland near Maffra and Sale and in the Goulburn Valley.cite web | year = 2006 | url = http://www.nre.vic.gov.au/virtualexhibition/settle/index.htm| title = Settlement: Introduction| work = The Virtual Exhibition | publisher = Victorian Department of Primary Industries | accessdate = 2007-03-02]

During the 1920s soldier settlers struggled and of those allocated blocks under the scheme, only sixty-one per cent were on blocks in 1934. By 1939 60% had left their blocks. The scheme was criticised by a Victorian Royal Commission in 1925 and a later Commonwealth inquiry. The Royal Commission identified four main reasons for the failure of soldier settlers:
*The selection of inexperienced settlers
*Lack of capital
*The size of blocks allocated
*Prices received for agricultural products.

It was also claimed that returned soldiers were allocated blocks of land without having established their ability to manage a farm.

After World War II, the Soldier Settlement Scheme was refined in the light of past failures. Blocks were bigger, were more carefully selected and roads, housing and fences were supplied to prospective settlers.

Western Australia

In Western Australia, the War Service Settlement program settled hundreds of soldiers, mostly in the Wheatbelt. Initially, fully and partially developed farms were bought, improved and subdivided by the government, then sold to returned soldiers. In 1949, the price of land rose sharply, so the government began to develop virgin crown land in the south of the state. By 1958, demand for land by ex-servicemen had declined, but the scheme had been so successful that the government was reluctant to end it, so it instead opened it up to all civilians. This continued until 1969, when a wheat glut forced the government to impose quotas on wheat planting.cite book | author = Jarvis, N. T. (ed.) | title = Western Australia:An Atlas of Human Endeavour: 1829–1979 | year = 1979 | publisher = Western Australian Government]

References

Further reading

*Australia. Rural Reconstruction Commission.(1944) "Settlement and employment of returned men on the land : the Commission's second report to the Honorable J.B. Chifley, M.P., Minister for Post-war Reconstruction, dated 18th day of January, 1944". Canberra : L.F. Johnston, Commonwealth Govt. Printer.
*Hawkins, H.S. and A.S. Watson, A.S.(1972) "Shelford : a preliminary report of a social and economic study of a Victorian soldier settlement area" Melbourne : University of Melbourne, School of Agriculture. ISBN 0858730030
*Lake, Marilyn.(1987) "The limits of hope : soldier settlement in Victoria, 1915-38" Melbourne: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195546660
*Lloyd, Clem and Rees, Jacqui (1994) "The last shilling : a history of repatriation in Australia" Carlton, Melbourne University Press. ISBN 0522845088
*Western Australia (1923). Royal Commission on Repatriated Soldiers of the A.I.F. under the Discharged Soldiers' Settlement Act, 1918. "Report of the Royal Commission on Repatriated Soldiers of the A.I.F., under "The Discharged Soldiers' Settlement Act, 1918"."Perth, W.A.: Govt. Printer.

External links

* [http://www.australiandiggers.com/users/anzacs/settlement.htm Australiandiggers.com]
* [http://investigator.records.nsw.gov.au/asp/photosearch/search.asp?series=8095&B1=Search NSW Images related to Soldier Settlers]
* [http://www.archives.qld.gov.au/downloads/BriefGuides/BG35SoldierSettlement.pdf QLD Archives Soldier Settlement]