Astrology and astronomy

Astrology and astronomy are historically one and the same discipline (Latin: "astrologia"), and were only gradually recognized as separate in western 17th century philosophy (the "Age of Reason").

Since the 18th century they have come to be regarded as completely separate disciplines. Astronomy, the study of objects and phenomena beyond the Earth's atmosphere, is accepted as a science [ [http://concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9356013/astronomy astronomy - Britannica Concise ] ] [ [http://www.ontariosciencecentre.ca/school/clc/visits/glossary.asp Ontario Science Centre: Glossary of Useful Scientific Terms ] ] [ [http://library.thinkquest.org/5014/glossary.html Outer Space Glossary ] ] and is a widely studied academic discipline. Astrology, which uses the apparent positions of celestial objects as the basis for psychology, prediction of future events, and other esoteric knowledge, is not widely regarded as science and is typically defined as a form of divination [ [http://skepdic.com/astrolgy.html The Skeptic Dictionary's entry on astrology] ] [ [http://www.astrosociety.org/education/astro/act3/astrology3.html Activities With Astrology] ] [ [http://www.randi.org/encyclopedia/astrology.html An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural] ] [ [http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s1266452.htm Astrology or Star Struck] ] [ [http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=astrology WordNet Search - 3.0 ] ] [ [http://concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9356010/astrology astrology - Britannica Concise ] ] [ [http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/astrology.html#summary Bad Astronomy: Astrology] ] .

Overview

Historically, most cultures have not made a clear distinction between the two disciplines, lumping them both together as one. In ancient Babylonia, famed for its astrology, there were not separate roles for the astronomer as predictor of celestial phenomena, and the astrologer as their interpreter; both functions were performed by the same person. This overlap does not mean that astrology and astronomy were always regarded as one and the same. In ancient Greece, presocratic thinkers such as Anaximander, Xenophanes, Anaximenes, and Heraclides speculated about the nature and substance of the stars and planets. Astronomers such as Eudoxus (contemporary with Plato) observed planetary motions and cycles, and created a geocentric cosmological model that would be accepted by Aristotle -- this model generally lasted until Ptolemy, who added epicycles to explain certain motions. However, around 250 B.C., Aristarchus of Samos postulated a proto-heliocentric theory, which would not be reconsidered for nearly two millennia (Copernicus), as Aristotle's geocentric model was favored. The Platonic school promoted the study of astronomy as a part of philosophy because the motions of the heavens demonstrate an orderly and harmonious cosmos. In the third century B.C.E., Babylonian astrology began to make its presence felt in Greece. Astrology was criticized by Hellenistic philosophers such as the Academic Skeptic Carneades and Middle Stoic Panaetius. However, the notions of the Great Year (when all the planets complete a full cycle and return to their relative positions) and eternal recurrence were Stoic doctrines that made divination and fatalism possible.

While the Greek words "astrologia" and "astronomia" were often used interchangeably, they were conceptually not the same. Both words more often than not referred to astronomy. The words for astrology proper, were more typically "apotelesma" and "katarkhê".Fact|date=November 2007

The earliest to differentiate between the terms "astronomy" and "astrology" was Isidore of Seville in the 7th century, while the earliest semantic distinction between astronomy and astrology was given by the Persian astronomer and astrologer Abu Rayhan al-Biruni "circa" 1000. [S. Pines (September 1964). "The Semantic Distinction between the Terms Astronomy and Astrology according to al-Biruni", "Isis" 55 (3), p. 343-349.] Astrology was also refuted by al-Biruni and other medieval Muslim astronomers such as Al-Farabi (Alpharabius), Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen), Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī, Avicenna and Averroes. Their reasons for refuting astrology were often due to both scientific (the methods used by astrologers being conjectural rather than empirical) and religious (conflicts with orthodox Islamic scholars) reasons. [Harvard reference |last=Saliba |first=George |authorlink=George Saliba |year=1994b |title=A History of Arabic Astronomy: Planetary Theories During the Golden Age of Islam |publisher=New York University Press |isbn=0814780237 |pages=60 & 67-69] Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyya (1292-1350), in his "Miftah Dar al-SaCadah", used empirical arguments in astronomy in order to refute astrology and divination. [citation|title=Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah: A Fourteenth Century Defense against Astrological Divination and Alchemical Transmutation|first=John W.|last=Livingston|journal=Journal of the American Oriental Society|volume=91|issue=1|date=1971|pages=96-103]

Astrology was widely accepted in medieval Europe as astrological texts from Hellenistic and Arabic astrologers were translated into Latin. In the late Middle Ages, its acceptance or rejection often depended on its reception in the royal courts of Europe. Not until the time of Francis Bacon was astrology rejected as a part of scholastic metaphysics rather than empirical observation. A more definitive split between astrology and astronomy the West took place gradually in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, when astrology was increasingly thought of as an occult sciencel or superstition by the intellectual elite. Because of their lengthy shared history, it sometimes happens that the two are confused with one another even today. Many contemporary astrologers, however, do not claim that astrology is a science, but think of it as a form of divination like the I-Ching, an art, or a part of a spiritual belief structure (influenced by trends such as Neoplatonism, Neopaganism, Theosophy, and Hinduism).

Distinguishing characteristics

* The primary goal of astronomy is to understand the physics of the universe. Astrologers use astronomical calculations for the positions of celestial bodies along the ecliptic and attempt to correlate celestial events (astrological aspects, sign positions) with earthly events and human affairs. Astronomers consistently use the scientific method, naturalistic presuppositions and abstract mathematical reasoning to investigate or explain phenomena in the universe. Astrologers use mystical/religious reasoning as well as traditional folklore, symbolism and superstition blended with mathematical predictions to explain phenomena in the universe. The scientific method is not consistently used by astrologers.
* Astrologers practice their discipline geocentricically [ [http://www.skyviewzone.com/astrology/dictionary.htm Astrology Terminology Dictionary ] ] and they consider the universe to be harmonious, changeless and static, while astronomers believe that the universe is without a center and is dynamic, expanding outward. [ [http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/bigbang.html The Big Bang and the Expansion of the Universe ] ]
* Astrologers are generally working on the assumption that the universe is deterministic and fully or mostly predictable; either that events occur orderly, predictable and predetermined, or that some process in the solar system give a frame for partial predeterminedness within the individual free will be able to work. Astronomers, on the contrary, generally adher to the scientific indetermination concept, claiming that nothing can actually be predetermined nor predicted, except in a shorter run and as a prognosis. Astronomers also adher to the strict philosophy of providing explanations according to established knowledge, and therefore generally reject astrology for erecting prognoses or exact divinations without connection to any known real world phenomenon.
* Both astrologers and astronomers see Earth as being an integral part of the universe, that Earth and the universe are interconnected as one "cosmos" (not as being separate and distinct from each other). However, astrologers philosophically and mystically portray the cosmos as having a supernatural, metaphysical and divine essence that actively influences world events and the personal lives of people. [http://wisdomsgoldenrod.org/public_offerings/features/Levels%20of%20Reality%20in%20Astrology.htm Realities in Astrology] . Astronomers, as members of the scientific community, cannot use religious nor mystical explanations in their scientific articles, irrespective of their religious convictions and non-convictions. Scientific discources must provide explanations based on known measurable laws of nature, so that the image provided explain that Earth is an integral part of the universe, celestial objects are just as humbly natural as terrestrial objects, being composed of exactly the same substances, and controlled by exactly the same forces, as objects on Earth.
* As regards to constellations, their usage is yet one point that separate astrologers and astronomers. Astrologers did originally prepare horoscopes based on stars, but this is relatively uncommon today, and the signs of the zodiac are symbolic representations of 30° sectors measured from the vernal equinox. Those sectors names originated in real constellations, but because of the precession, the distance between the sector and the real constellation have increased during thousands of years, making the sign of Aries differ from the constellation of Aries by some 20° degrees. Astronomers, on the other hand, regard constellations as kind of old-fashioned memorizing patterns subdividing the sky into conventional areas to which immobile astronomical objects are members. Not all kinds of objects get an object designation according to the constellation pattern, most astronomical object catalogues disregard constellation as a name part of the designation, but in general discussions about an object, the constellations are mentioned as a general direction where the object can be seen. Short constellation myths are preserved and retold, as a "cultural extra", providing some insignificant "mysticism" in an otherwise technical and dry intellectual culture.

Historical divergence

Astrology and astronomy stayed together for a very long time - the funding from astrology supported some astronomical research, which was in turn used to make more accurate ephemerides for use in astrology. In Medieval Europe the word "Astronomia" was often used to encompass both disciplines as this included the study of astronomy and astrology jointly and without a real distinction; this was one of the original Seven Liberal Arts. Kings and other rulers generally employed court astrologers to aid them in the decision making in their kingdoms, thereby funding astronomical research. University medical students was taught astrology as it was generally used in medical practice.

The separation of astronomy from astrology occurred gradually from about the 17th century up to the beginning of the 19th. While Copernicus himself didn't practice astrology, the most important celestial mechanicans before Isaac Newton were astrologers by profession Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler, and the general father of modern physics, Galileo Galilei studied astrology as part of his education. Newton, however, allegedly rejected astrology [ [http://www.skepticreport.com/predictions/newton.htm Rebuttal of Newton's astrology interests] ] [(D.T. Whiteside, M.A. Hoskin & A. Prag (eds.), The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967), vol. 1, pp. 15-19)] [It is a commonly held belief among astrologers that Isaac Newton had an interest in astrology. However, Newton's writings fail to mention the subject and the handful of books in his possession that contained references to astrology were primarily concerned with other subjects such as the writings of Hermes Trismegistus (and mentioned astrology only in passing.) In an interview with John Conduitt, Newton said that as a young student, he had read a book on astrology, and was "soon convinced of the vanity & emptiness of the pretended science of Judicial astrology".] . Since these fathers of celestial mechanism was paralleled by the emergence of Rationalism, Empiricism and the development of observational science, they may be regarded as founders of a mechanist world view, that explains the universe as a machine and gives no room for the mystical explanations commonly used to explain the ground for astrology.

At the same time other technologies required the attentions of the astronomers, for example time keeping and navigation.

Astrology and astronomy diverged paths the fastest during the rise of the and the scientific method in the Western World. This period is defined as the beginning of the scientific revolution, leading on into The Age of Enlightenment, sometimes referred to as The Age of Reason -- the two fields finally diverged "completely" in the West around the later part of the 18th century.

References

See also

* History of astrology
* History of astronomy
* Horoscope
* Natal chart
* "Treatise on the Astrolabe"

External links

* [http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~chaucer/special/science/astro/index.html Astrology & Astronomy in Chaucer's Time] - Information from Harvard University
* [http://www.billyandcharlie.com/planets/astronomy.html Astrology/Astronomy in the Middle Ages]