- Principal components analysis
Principal component analysis (PCA) is a
vector spacetransform often used to reduce multidimensional data sets to lower dimensions for analysis. Depending on the field of application, it is also named the discrete Karhunen-Loève transform (KLT), the Hotelling transform or proper orthogonal decomposition (POD).
PCA was invented in 1901 by
Karl Pearson[ cite journal
author = Pearson, K.
year = 1901
title = On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space
journal = Philosophical Magazine
volume = 2 | issue = 6 | pages = 559–572
url = http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/R/liens/pearson1901.pdf ] . Now it is mostly used as a tool in
exploratory data analysisand for making predictive models. PCA involves the calculation of the eigenvalue decomposition of a data covariance matrixor singular value decompositionof a data matrix, usually after mean centering the data for each attribute. The results of a PCA are usually discussed in terms of component scores and loadings (Shaw, 2003).
PCA is the simplest of the true eigenvector-based multivariate analyses. Often, its operation can be thought of as revealing the internal structure of the data in a way which best explains the variance in the data. If a multivariate dataset is visualised as a set of coordinates in a high-dimensional data space (1 axis per variable), PCA supplies the user with a lower-dimensional picture, a "shadow" of this object when viewed from its (in some sense) most informative viewpoint.
PCA is closely related to
factor analysis; indeed, some statistical packages deliberately conflate the two techniques. True factor analysis makes different assumptions about the underlying structure and solves eigenvectors of a slightly different matrix.
PCA is mathematically defined [Jolliffe I.T. [http://www.springer.com/west/home/new+%26+forthcoming+titles+%28default%29?SGWID=4-40356-22-2285433-0 Principal Component Analysis] , Series: [http://www.springer.com/west/home/statistics/statistical+theory+and+methods?SGWID=4-10129-69-173621571-0 Springer Series in Statistics] , 2nd ed., Springer, NY, 2002, XXIX, 487 p. 28 illus. ISBN 978-0-387-95442-4] as an orthogonal
linear transformationthat transforms the data to a new coordinate systemsuch that the greatest variance by any projection of the data comes to lie on the first coordinate (called the first principal component), the second greatest variance on the second coordinate, and so on. PCA is theoretically the optimum transform for a given data in least square terms.
PCA can be used for
dimensionality reductionin a data set by retaining those characteristics of the data set that contribute most to its variance, by keeping lower-order principal components and ignoring higher-order ones. Such low-order components often contain the "most important" aspects of the data. However, depending on the application this may not always be the case.
For a data matrix, XT, with zero
empirical mean(the empirical mean of the distribution has been subtracted from the data set), where each row represents a different repetition of the experiment, and each column gives the results from a particular probe, the PCA transformation is given by:
::: where V Σ WT is the
singular value decomposition(svd) of XT.
PCA has the distinction of being the optimal
linear transformationfor keeping the subspace that has largest variance. This advantage, however, comes at the price of greater computational requirement if compared, for example, to the discrete cosine transform.
Though most derivations and implementations fail to identify the importance of mean subtraction, data centering is carried out because it is part of the solution towards finding a basis that minimizes the mean square error of approximating the data [A.A. Miranda, Y.-A. Le Borgne, and G. Bontempi. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/w6114741w8728567 New Routes from Minimal Approximation Error to Principal Components] , Volume 27, Number 3 / June, 2008, Neural Processing Letters, Springer] . Assuming zero
empirical mean(the empirical mean of the distribution has been subtracted from the data set), the principal component "w"1 of a data set "x" can be defined as:
arg maxfor the notation.) With the first components, the -th component can be found by subtracting the first principal components from "x"::and by substituting this as the new data set to find a principal component in:
The Karhunen-Loève transform is therefore equivalent to finding the
singular value decompositionof the data matrix "X",
and then obtaining the reduced-space data matrix Y by projecting X down into the reduced space defined by only the first "L" singular vectors, WL:
The matrix W of singular vectors of X is equivalently the matrix W of eigenvectors of the matrix of observed covariances C = X XT,
eigenvectorswith the largest eigenvaluescorrespond to the dimensions that have the strongest correlationin the data set (see Rayleigh quotient).
PCA is equivalent to
empirical orthogonal functions(EOF).
autoencoderneural network with a linear hidden layer is similar to PCA. Upon convergence, the weight vectors of the "K" neurons in the hidden layer will form a basis for the space spanned by the first "K" principal components. Unlike PCA, this technique will not necessarily produce orthogonalvectors.
PCA is a popular technique in
pattern recognition. But it is not optimized for class separability [cite book | author=Fukunaga, Keinosuke | title = Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition |publisher=Elsevier | year = 1990 | url=http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0122698517] . An alternative is the linear discriminant analysis, which does take this into account. PCA optimally minimizes reconstruction error under the L2 norm.
Table of symbols and abbreviations
Properties and Limitations of PCA
PCA is theoretically the optimal linear scheme, in terms of least mean square error, for compressing a set of high dimensional vectors into a set of lower dimensional vectors and then reconstructing the original set. It is a non-parametric analysis and the answer is unique and independent of any hypothesis about data
probability distribution. However, the latter two properties are regarded as weakness as well as strength, in that being non-parametric, no prior knowledge can be incorporated and that PCA compressions often incur loss of information.
The applicability of PCA is limited by the assumptions [ Jon Shlens, [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~elaw/papers/pca.pdf A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis.] ] made in its derivation. These assumptions are:
* Assumption on Linearity
We assumed the observed data set to be linear combinations of certain basis. Non-linear methods such as kernel PCA have been developed without assuming linearity.
* Assumption on the statistical importance of mean and covariance
PCA uses the
eigenvectors of the covariancematrix and it only finds the independent axes of the data under the Gaussian assumption. For non-Gaussian or multi-modal Gaussian data, PCA simply de-correlates the axes. When PCA is used for clustering, its main limitation is that it does not account for class separability since it makes no use of the class label of the feature vector. There is no guarantee that the directions of maximum variance will contain good features for discrimination.
* Assumption that large variances have important dynamics
PCA simply performs a coordinate rotation that aligns the transformed axes with the directions of maximum variance. It is only when we believe that the observed data has a high signal-to-noise ratio that the principal components with larger variance correspond to interesting dynamics and lower ones correspond to noise.
Essentially, PCA involves only rotation and scaling. The above assumptions are made in order to simplify the algebraic computation on the data set. Some other methods have been developed without one or more of these assumptions; these are briefly described below.
Computing PCA using the Covariance Method
Following is a detailed description of PCA using the covariance method. The goal is to transform a given data set X of dimension "M" to an alternative data set Y of smaller dimension "L". Equivalently, we are seeking to find the matrix Y, where Y is the Karhunen-Loeve transform (KLT) of matrix X:
Organize the data set
Suppose you have data comprising a set of observations of "M" variables, and you want to reduce the data so that each observation can be described with only "L" variables, "L" < "M". Suppose further, that the data are arranged as a set of "N" data vectors with each representing a single grouped observation of the "M" variables.
* Write as column vectors, each of which has "M" rows.
* Place the column vectors into a single matrix X of dimensions "M" × "N".
Calculate the empirical mean
* Find the empirical mean along each dimension "m" = 1..."M".
* Place the calculated mean values into an empirical mean vector u of dimensions "M" × 1.
Calculate the deviations from the mean
Mean subtraction is an integral part of the solution towards finding a principal component basis that minimizes the mean square error of approximating the data [A.A. Miranda, Y.-A. Le Borgne, and G. Bontempi. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/w6114741w8728567 New Routes from Minimal Approximation Error to Principal Components] , Volume 27, Number 3 / June, 2008, Neural Processing Letters, Springer] . Hence we proceed by centering the data as follows:
* Subtract the empirical mean vector u from each column of the data matrix X.
* Store mean-subtracted data in the "M" × "N" matrix B.
::::where h is a 1 x "N" row vector of all 1's:
Find the covariance matrix
* Find the "M" × "M" empirical covariance matrix C from the
outer productof matrix B with itself:::::where ::: is the expected valueoperator,::: is the outer productoperator, and::: is the conjugate transposeoperator. Note that if B consists entirely of real numbers, which is the case in many applications, the "conjugate transpose" is the same as the regular transpose.
* Please note that the information in this section is indeed a bit fuzzy. See the covariance matrix sections on the discussion page for more information.
Find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the covariance matrix
* Compute the matrix V of
eigenvectors which diagonalizes the covariance matrix C:
:where D is the
diagonal matrixof eigenvalues of C. This step will typically involve the use of a computer-based algorithm for computing eigenvectors and eigenvalues. These algorithms are readily available as sub-components of most matrix algebrasystems, such as MATLAB[ [http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/ref/eig.html#998306 eig function] Matlab documentation] , Mathematica[ [http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/Eigenvalues.html Eigenvalues function] Mathematica documentation] , SciPy, or IDL( Interactive Data Language).
* Matrix D will take the form of an "M" × "M"
diagonal matrix, where::
:is the "m"th eigenvalue of the covariance matrix C, and
* Matrix V, also of dimension "M" × "M", contains "M" column vectors, each of length "M", which represent the "M" eigenvectors of the covariance matrix C.
* The eigenvalues and eigenvectors are ordered and paired. The "m"th eigenvalue corresponds to the "m"th eigenvector.
Rearrange the eigenvectors and eigenvalues
* Sort the columns of the eigenvector matrix V and eigenvalue matrix D in order of "decreasing" eigenvalue.
* Make sure to maintain the correct pairings between the columns in each matrix.
Compute the cumulative energy content for each eigenvector
* The eigenvalues represent the distribution of the source data's energy among each of the eigenvectors, where the eigenvectors form a basis for the data. The cumulative energy content "g" for the "m"th eigenvector is the sum of the energy content across all of the eigenvectors from 1 through "m":
Select a subset of the eigenvectors as basis vectors
* Save the first "L" columns of V as the "M" × "L" matrix W:
* Use the vector g as a guide in choosing an appropriate value for "L". The goal is to choose as small a value of "L" as possible while achieving a reasonably high value of "g" on a percentage basis. For example, you may want to choose "L" so that the cumulative energy "g" is above a certain threshold, like 90 percent. In this case, choose the smallest value of "L" such that
Convert the source data to z-scores
* Create an "M" × 1 empirical standard deviation vector s from the square root of each element along the main diagonal of the covariance matrix C:::
* Calculate the "M" × "N" z-score matrix::: (divide element-by-element)
* Note: While this step is useful for various applications as it normalizes the data set with respect to its variance, it is not integral part of PCA/KLT!
Project the z-scores of the data onto the new basis
* The projected vectors are the columns of the matrix
* The columns of matrix Y represent the Karhunen-Loeve transforms (KLT) of the data vectors in the columns of matrix X.
"Derivation" of PCA using the covariance method
Let X be a "d"-dimensional random vector expressed as column vector. Without loss of generality, assume X has zero empirical mean.We want to find a orthonormal transformation matrix P such that
with the constraint that
: is a
By substitution, and matrix algebra, we obtain:
We now have:
Rewrite P as d column vectors, so
Substituting into equation above, we obtain:
Notice that in , "P"i is an
eigenvectorof "X′"s covariance matrix. Therefore, by finding the eigenvectors of "X′"s covariance matrix, we find a projection matrix "P" that satisfies the original constraints.
Relation to K-means clustering
It has been shown recently [H. Zha, C. Ding, M. Gu, X. He and H.D. Simon."Spectral Relaxation for K-means Clustering",Neural Information Processing Systems vol.14 (NIPS 2001). pp. 1057-1064, Vancouver, Canada. Dec. 2001.] [C. Ding and X. He. "K-means Clustering via Principal Component Analysis".Proc. of Int'l Conf. Machine Learning (ICML 2004), pp 225-232. July 2004.] that the relaxed solution of
K-means clustering, specified by the cluster indicators, is given by the PCA principal components, and the PCA subspace spanned by the principal directions is identical to the cluster centroid subspace specified by the between-class scatter matrix. Thus PCA automatically projects to the subspace where the global solution of K-means clustering lie, and thus facilitate K-means clustering to find near-optimal solutions.
Correspondence analysis was developed by
J.-P. Benzecri[ cite book
author = Benzécri, J.-P.
publisher=Dunod |location= Paris, France
year = 1973
title = L'Analyse des Données. Volume II. L'Analyse des Correspondences ] and is conceptually similar to PCA, but scales the data (which must be positive) so that rows and columns are treated equivalently. It is traditionally applied to contingency tables. Correspondence analysis decomposes the
Chi-squarestatistic associated to this table into orthogonal factors [ cite book
author = Greenacre, Michael
publisher=Academic Press |location= London
year = 1983
title = Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis
ISBN = 0-12-299050-1 ] .Because correspondence analysis is a descriptive technique, it can be applied to tables for which the Chi-square statistic is appropriate or not.
Most of the modern methods for
nonlinear dimensionality reductionfind their theoretical and algorithmic roots in PCA or K-means. The original Pearson's idea was to take a straight line (or plane) which will be "the best fit" to a set of data points. Principal curves and manifolds give the natural geometric framework for PCA generalization and extend the geometric interpretation of PCA by explicitly constructing an embedded manifold for data approximation, and by encoding using standard geometric projection onto the manifold [A. Gorban, B. Kegl, D. Wunsch, A. Zinovyev (Eds.), [http://pca.narod.ru/contentsgkwz.htm Principal Manifolds for Data Visualisation and Dimension Reduction,] LNCSE 58, Springer, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York, 2007. ISBN 978-3-540-73749-0] .See principal geodesic analysis.
N-way principal component analysis may be performed with models like
PARAFACand Tucker decomposition.
* [http://www.coloritto.com "Spectramap"] is software to create a
biplotusing principal components analysis, correspondence analysis or spectral map analysis.
* [http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencvlibrary/ Computer Vision Library]
* [http://astro.u-strasbg.fr/~fmurtagh/mda-sw/ Multivariate Data Analysis Software]
* in Matlab, the function "princomp" gives the principal component
* in Octave, the free software equivalent to Matlab, the function [http://octave.sourceforge.net/doc/statistics.html princomp] gives the principal component
* in the open source statistical package R, the functions [http://rweb.stat.umn.edu/R/library/stats/html/princomp.html "princomp"] and [http://rweb.stat.umn.edu/R/library/stats/html/prcomp.html "prcomp"] can be used for principal component analysis; prcomp uses
singular value decompositionwhich generally gives better numerical accuracy.
* [http://www.datascope.be/spm_page.htm "spm"] is a generic package developed in R for multivariate projection methods that allows principal components analysis, correspondence analysis, and spectral map analysis
* In "XLMiner", the Principles Component tab can be used for principal component analysis.
* [http://www.scilab.org SciLab]
* In IDL, the principal components can be calculated using the function pcomp.
*Shaw PJA (2003). Multivariate statistics for the Environmental Sciences. Hodder-Arnold.
*Patra sk et al. (1999). J- Photochemistry & Photobiology A:Chemistry, 122:23-31
Geometric data analysis
Independent component analysis
Nonlinear dimensionality reduction
PCA applied to yield curves
Point Distribution Model(PCA applied to morphometry and computer vision)
Principal component regression
* Singular spectrum analysis
Singular value decomposition
Weighted least squares
Dynamic Mode Decomposition
* [http://neon.otago.ac.nz/chemlect/chem306/pca/index.html Spectroscopy and PCA]
* [http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stfacan.html An introductory explanation of PCA from StatSoft]
* [http://www.snl.salk.edu/~shlens/pub/notes/pca.pdf A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis] (PDF)
* [http://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/cosc453/student_tutorials/principal_components.pdf A tutorial on PCA by Lindsay I. Smith] (PDF)
* [http://www.umetrics.com/default.asp/pagename/methods_MVA_intro/c/1 A layman's explanation from Umetrics]
* [http://blog.peltarion.com/2006/06/20/the-talented-drhebb-part-2-pca/ Principal Component Analysis using Hebbian learning tutorial]
* [http://brandon-merkl.blogspot.com/2006/04/principal-components-analysis.html Presentation of Principal Component Analysis used in Biomedical Engineering]
* [http://public.lanl.gov/mewall/kluwer2002.html Application to microarray and other biomedical data]
* [http://feinsteinneuroscience.org/ PCA in functional neuroimaging, free software]
* [http://www.chemometry.com/Research/PCA.html Uncertainty estimation for PCA]
* [http://factominer.free.fr/ FactoMineR, an R package dedicated to exploratory multivariate analysis]
* [http://www.datascope.be/ A web-site with presentations and open source software on exploratory multivariate data analysis]
* [http://transp-or2.epfl.ch/pagesPerso/javierFiles/software.php EasyPCA, a very simple and small PCA program under the GPL license]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.