- John II Komnenos
Infobox Monarch
name =John II Komnenos
Polytonic|Ίωάννης Β΄ Κομνηνός
title =Emperor of theByzantine Empire
caption =Mosaic of John II at theHagia Sophia .
reign =1118 – 1143
predecessor =Alexios I Komnenos
successor =Manuel I Komnenos
spouse =Empress Eirene
issue =Alexios Komnenos
Maria Komnene
Andronikos Komnenos
Anna Komnene
Isaac Komnenos
Theodora Komnene
Eudokia KomneneManuel I Komnenos
father =Alexios I Komnenos
mother =Irene Doukaina
date of birth =death date|1087|9|13|df=y
place of birth =Constantinople
date of death =death date|1143|4|8|df=y
place of death =Cilicia |John II Komnenos or Comnenus ( _el. Polytonic|Ίωάννης Β΄ Κομνηνός, "Iōannēs II Komnēnos") (
September 13 ,1087 –April 8 ,1143 ) wasByzantine emperor from 1118 to 1143. Also known as "Kaloïōannēs" ("John the Beautiful"), he was the eldest son of emperorAlexios I Komnenos andIrene Doukaina . The second emperor of theKomnenian restoration of the Byzantine Empire, John was a pious and dedicated emperor who was determined to undo the damage his empire had suffered at thebattle of Manzikert , half a century earlier.In the course of his twenty-five year reign, John made alliances with the
Holy Roman Empire in the west, decisively defeated thePechenegs in theBalkans , and personally led numerous campaigns against the Turks inAsia Minor . John's campaigns fundamentally changed the balance of power in the east, forcing the Turks onto the defensive and restoring to the Byzantines many towns, fortresses and cities right across the peninsula. In the southeast, John extended Byzantine control from the Maeander in the west all the way toCilicia and Tarsus in the east. In an effort to demonstrate the Byzantine emperor's role as the leader of theChristian world, John marched into theHoly Land at the head of the combined forces of Byzantium and theCrusade r states; yet despite the great vigour with which he pressed the campaign, John's hopes were disappointed by the treachery of his Crusader allies, who deliberately failed to fight against theMuslim enemy at the crucial moment. Also under John, the empire's population recovered to about 10 million people.W. Treadgold, "A History of the Byzantine State and Society", 700]The
Latin historianWilliam of Tyre described John as short and unusually ugly, with eyes, hair and complexion so dark he was known as 'the Moor'. Yet despite his physical appearance, John was known as "Kaloïōannēs", "John the Handsome" or "John the Beautiful". The epithet referred not to his body but to his soul. Both his parents had been unusually pious and John surpassed them. Members of his court were expected to restrict their conversation to serious subjects only. The food served at the emperor's table was very frugal and John lectured courtiers who lived in excessive luxury. Despite his austerity, John was loved. His principles were sincerely held and his integrity great.John was famed for his piety and his remarkably mild and just reign. He is an exceptional example of a moral ruler, at a time when cruelty was the norm. He never condemned anyone to death or mutilation. Charity was dispensed lavishly. For this reason, he has been called the Byzantine
Marcus Aurelius . By the personal purity and piety of his character he effected a notable improvement in the manners of his age. Gifted with great self control and personal courage, John was an excellent strategist and an expert "imperator" in the field, and through his many campaigns he devoted himself to the preservation of his empire.uccession
He succeeded his father in 1118, but had already been proclaimed co-emperor by Alexios I on
September 1 ,1092 . Niketas Choniates alone tells of the actions by which John II secured his own succession. Alexios I had favoured John to succeed him over his wife Irene's favourite, the "kaisar" (Caesar) Nikephoros Brynennios, who was married to their daughterAnna Komnene . Alexios resorted to dissimulation in order to avert Irene's criticism of his choice and her demands that Nikephoros should succeed. As Alexios lay on his deathbed in the monastery of the Mangana on15 August 1118, John, consorting with relatives whom he could trust, among whom was his brother, the "sebastokratōr" Isaac Komnenos, stole into the monastery and removed the imperial signet ring from his dying father. Then, taking up arms, he rode to the Great Palace, gathering the support of the citizenry who acclaimed him emperor. Irene was taken by surprise and was unable either to persuade her son to desist, or to induce Nikephoros to act against him. Although the palace guard at first refused to admit John without proof of his father's wishes, the mob surrounding the new emperor simply forced entry.Alexios died the following night. John refused to join the funeral procession, in spite of his mother's urging, because his hold on power was so tenuous. However, in the space of a few days, his position was secure. In 1119, John II uncovered a conspiracy to overthrow him which implicated his mother and sister, who were duly relegated to monasteries. To safeguard his own succession, John crowned his own young son Alexios co-emperor in 1122.
John's government
These political intrigues probably contributed to John's style of rule, which was to appoint men from outside the imperial family to help him govern the empire. John's closest adviser was his closest friend,
John Axuch , a Turk who had been given as a gift to John's father. Alexios had thought him a good companion for John, and so he had been brought up alongside John, who immediately appointed him as Grand Domestic upon his accession. The Grand Domestic was the commander in chief of the Byzantine armies. This was an extraordinary move, and a departure from the nepotism that had characterised the reign of his father Alexios. The imperial family harboured some degree of resentment at this decision, which was reinforced by the fact that they were required to makeobeisance to John Axouch whenever they met him. Yet the emperor had complete confidence in his appointees, many of whom had been chosen on merit rather than their relation to him by blood. John's unwillingness to allow his family to interfere too much in his government was to remain constant for the rest of his reign.Reign
Conflict with Venice
After his accession, John II had refused to confirm his father's 1082 treaty with the
Republic of Venice , which had given the Italian republic unique and generous trading rights within the Byzantine Empire. Yet the change in policy was not motivated by financial concerns. An incident involving the abuse of a member of the imperial family by Venetians led to a dangerous conflict, especially as Byzantium had depended on Venice for its naval strength. After a Byzantine retaliatory attack on Kerkyra, John exiled the Venetian merchants from Constantinople. But this produced further retaliation, and a Venetian fleet of 72 ships plunderedRhodes ,Chios ,Samos ,Lesbos ,Andros and capturedKefalonia in theIonian Sea .J. Norwich, "Byzantium: The Decline and Fall", 70] Eventually John was forced to come to terms; the war was costing him more than it was worth, and he was not prepared to transfer funds from the imperial land forces to the navy for the construction of new ships. John re-confirmed the treaty of 1082. Nevertheless, this embarrassment was not entirely forgotten, and it seems likely that it played a part in inspiring John's successor (Manuel I Komnenos ) to re-establish a powerful Byzantine fleet some years later.uccesses against the Pechenegs and Hungarians
In 1119–1121 John defeated the
Seljuk Turks , establishing his control over southwesternAnatolia . However, immediately afterwards, in 1122, John quickly transferred his troops to Europe to fight off a Pecheneg invasion intoMoesia . These invaders had been auxiliaries of the Prince ofKiev . John surrounded the Pechenegs as they burst intoThrace , tricked them into believing that he would grant them a favourable treaty, and then launched a devastating surprise attack upon their larger camp. The ensuingBattle of Beroia was hard fought, but by the end of the day John's army of 20,000 men had won a crushing victory. This put an end to Pecheneg incursions into Byzantine territory, and many of the captives were settled asfoederati within the Byzantine frontier.John then launched a punitive raid against the
Serbs , many of whom were rounded up and transported toNicomedia in Asia Minor to serve as military colonists. This was done partly to cow the Serbs into submission (Serbia was, at least nominally, a Byzantine protectorate), and partly to strengthen the Byzantine frontier in the east against the Turks. However, John's marriage to the Hungarian princess Piroska involved him in the dynastic struggles of theKingdom of Hungary . Giving asylum to a blinded claimant to the Hungarian throne (called Álmos), John aroused the suspicion of the Hungarians, and was faced with an invasion in 1128. The Hungarians attackedBelgrade ,Braničevo ,Nish ,Sofia , and penetrated south as far as the outskirts ofPhilippopolis .J. Norwich, "Byzantium: The Decline and Fall", 71] After a challenging campaign lasting two years, the emperor managed to defeat the Hungarians at the fortress ofHaram and theirSerbia n allies, and peace was restored.Campaigns against the Turks
John was then able to concentrate on Asia Minor, which became the focus of his attention for most of his remaining years. The Turks were pressing forward against the Byzantine frontier in western Asia Minor, and John was determined to drive them back. In 1119, the Seljuks had cut off
Antalya from the empire, John II led an army to capture Laodicea andSozopolis , therefore reestablishing the land links to the city.J. Norwich, "Byzantium: The Decline and Fall", 68] He undertook a campaign against theDanishmendid emirate inMalatya on the upperEuphrates from 1130 to 1135. Thanks to John's energetic campaigning, Turkish attempts at expansion in Asia Minor were halted, and John prepared to take the fight to the enemy. In order to restore the region to Byzantine control, John led a series of well planned and executed campaigns against the Turks, one of which resulted in the reconquest of the ancestral home of the Komneni atKastamonu , then he left a garrison of 2,000 men atGangra .J. Norwich, "Byzantium: The Decline and Fall", 74] John quickly earned a formidable reputation as a wall-breaker, taking stronghold after stronghold from his enemies. Regions which had been lost to the empire ever since theBattle of Manzikert were recovered and garrisoned. Yet resistance, particularly from the Danishmends of the north-east, was strong, and the difficult nature of holding down the new conquests is illustrated by the fact that Kastamonu was recaptured by the Turks even as John was in Constantinople celebrating its return to Byzantine rule. John persevered, however, and Kastamonu soon changed hands once more. John advanced into north eastern Anatolia, provoking the Turks to attack his army. Yet once again John's forces were able to maintain their cohesion, and the Turkish attempt to inflict a second Manzikert on the emperor's army backfired when the Sultan, discredited by his failure to defeat John, was murdered by his own people. In 1139, the Emperor marched one final time against the Danishmend Turks, his army marched along the southern coast of theBlack Sea throughBithynia , andPaphlagonia . Turning south atTrebizond , he besieged but failed to take the city ofNeocaesarea .J. Norwich, "Byzantium: The Decline and Fall", 82]Campaigns in the Holy Land
The emperor then directed his attention to the Levant, where he sought to re-inforce Byzantium's suzerainty over the
Crusader State s. In 1137 he conquered Tarsus,Adana , andMopsuestia from theArmenian Kingdom of Cilicia , and in 1138 PrinceLevon I of Armenia and most of his family were brought as captives to Constantinople.J. Norwich, "Byzantium: The Decline and Fall", 76] This opened the route to thePrincipality of Antioch , where Prince Raymond of Poitiers recognized himself the emperor's vassal in 1137, and John arrived there in triumph in 1138. There followed a joint campaign as John led the armies of Byzantium, Antioch and Edessa against Muslim Syria. Although John fought hard for the Christian cause in the campaign in Syria, his allies Prince Raymond of Antioch and CountJoscelin II of Edessa sat around playing dice instead of helping John to press the siege ofShaizar . These Crusader Princes were suspicious of each other and of John, and neither wanted the other to gain from participating in the campaign, while Raymond also wanted to hold on to Antioch, which he had agreed to hand over to John if the campaign was successful in capturingAleppo ,Shaizar ,Homs , andHama . While the emperor was distracted by his attempts to secure a German alliance against theNormans ofSicily , Joscelin and Raymond conspired to delay the promised handover of Antioch's citadel to the emperor.Premature death
John planned a new expedition to the East, including a pilgrimage to Jerusalem on which he planned to take his army with him. King
Fulk of Jerusalem , fearing an invasion, begged the emperor to only bring an army of 10,000 men with him.J. Harris, "Byzantium and The Crusades", 86] This resulted in John II deciding not to go. However, onMount Taurus inCilicia , onApril 8 ,1143 , he was accidentally infected by a poisoned arrow while out hunting. The poison set in, and shortly afterwards he died. John's final action as emperor was to choose his youngest son Manuel Komnenos to be his successor. John cited two main reasons for choosing Manuel over his older surviving son Isaac Komnenos: these were Isaac's irascibility, and the courage that Manuel had shown on campaign atNeocaesareia . Another theory alleges that the reason for this choice was theAIMA prophecy which foretold that John's successor should be one whose name began with an "M". John's eldest son, the co-emperor Alexios, had died in the summer of 1142. [Choniates p.22]John's achievement
Historian J. Birkenmeier has recently argued that John's reign was the most successful of the Komnenian period. In "The development of the Komnenian army 1081-1180," he stresses the wisdom of John's approach to warfare, which focused on siege warfare rather than risky pitched battles. Birkenmeier argues that John's strategy of launching annual campaigns with limited, realistic objectives was a more sensible one than that followed by his son Manuel I. According to this view, John's campaigns benefited the Byzantine Empire because they protected the empire's heartland from attack while gradually extending its territory in Asia Minor. The Turks were forced onto the defensive, while John kept his diplomatic situation relatively simple by allying with the Western Emperor against the Normans of Sicily.
Overall, what is clear is that John II Komnenos left the empire a great deal better off than he had found it. Substantial territories had been recovered, and his successes against the invading Pechenegs, Serbians and Seljuk Turks, along with his attempts to establish Byzantine suzerainty over the Crusader States in Antioch and Edessa, did much to restore the reputation of his empire. His careful, methodical approach to warfare had protected the empire from the risk of sudden defeats, while his determination and skill had allowed him to rack up a long list of successful sieges and assaults against enemy strongholds. By the time of his death he had earned near universal respect, even from the Crusaders, for his courage, dedication and piety. His early death meant his work went unfinished — his last campaign might well have resulted in real gains for Byzantium and the Christian cause.
Family
John II Komnenos married Princess
Piroska of Hungary (renamed Eirene), a daughter of KingLadislaus I of Hungary in 1104; the marriage was intended as compensation for the loss of some territories to KingColoman of Hungary . She played little part in government, devoting herself to piety and their large brood of children. Eirene died onAugust 13 ,1134 and was later venerated as Saint Eirene. John II and Eirene had 8 children:
# Alexios Komnenos, co-emperor from 1122 to 1142
# Maria Komnene (twin to Alexios), who married John Roger Dalassenos
# Andronikos Komnenos (died 1142)
# Anna Komnene, who married Stephanos Kontostephanos
# Isaac Komnenos (died 1154)
# Theodora Komnene, who married Manuel Anemas
# Eudokia Komnene, who married Theodoros Vatazes
#Manuel I Komnenos (died 1180)Citations
ources
Primary
*cite book|last=Choniates |first=Niketas |authorlink=Niketas Choniates |others=transl. by H. Magoulias |title=O City of Byzantium: Annals of Niketas Choniates |year=1984 |location=Detroit |isbn=0-814-31764-2 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=O8arrZPM8moCSecondary
* John Julius Norwich, "A short history of Byzantium", Penguin, 1998.
*Michael Angold , "The Byzantine Empire 1025-1204, a political history", Longman, 1997 (Second Edition)
* "TheOxford Dictionary of Byzantium ", Oxford University Press, 1991.
* Paul Magdalino, "The Empire of Manuel I Komnenos 1143–1180", Cambridge University Press, 1993.
* K. Varzos, "Ē genealogia tōn Komnēnōn", Thessalonikē, 1984.ee also
* The
Komnenian army
* [http://homepage.mac.com/paulstephenson/trans/cinnamus.html John II Comnenus' Hungarian campaigns]
* [http://www.roman-emperors.org/johncomn.htm An Online Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors]s-ttl|title=Byzantine Emperor|years=1118–1143
regent1=his son Alexios Komnenos|years1=1122–1142
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.