- Leblanc process
The Leblanc process was the industrial process for the production of "soda ash" (
sodium carbonate ) used throughout the 19th century, named after its inventor,Nicolas Leblanc . It involved two stages: Production ofsodium sulfate fromsodium chloride , followed by reaction of the sodium sulfate withcoal andcalcium carbonate to produce sodium carbonate. The process gradually became obsolete after the invention of theSolvay process .Background
Soda ash (sodium carbonate ) andpotash (potassium carbonate ), collectively termed "alkali", are vital chemicals in theglass ,textile ,soap , andpaper industries. The traditional source of alkali in western Europe had been potash obtained fromwood ashes. However, by the 1700s,deforestation had rendered this means of production uneconomical, and alkali had to be imported. Potash was imported fromNorth America ,Scandinavia , andRussia , where large forests still stood. Soda ash was imported fromSpain and theCanary Islands , where it was produced from coastal plants calledbarilla , or fromEgypt , where the mineralnatron was mined from dry lakebeds. Especially in Britain, the only local source of alkali was fromkelp , which washed ashore inScotland andIreland .Clow, Archibald and Clow, Nan L. (1952). "Chemical Revolution," (Ayer Co Pub, June 1952), pp. 65-90. ISBN 0836919092.] cite online journal|author=Kiefer, David M.|year=2002|url=http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/tcaw/11/i01/html/01chemchron.html|title=It was all about alkali|publisher=Today's Chemist at Work|volume=11|issue=1|pages=45-6|accessdaymonth=22 April|accessyear=2007]In 1783, King
Louis XVI of France and theFrench Academy of Sciences offered a prize of 2400livre s for a method to produce alkali from sea salt (sodium chloride ). In 1791,Nicolas Leblanc , physician toLouis Philip II, Duke of Orléans , patented a solution. That same year he built the first Leblanc plant for the Duke atSaint-Denis , and this began to produce 320ton s of soda per year.cite book | first = Fred | last = Aftalion | title = A History of the International Chemical Industry | location = Philadelphia | publisher = University of Pennsylvania Press | year = 1991 | pages = 11-13 | isbn = 0-8122-1297-5] Sadly, he never received his prize money, as a result of theFrench Revolution .cite book | title = A History of the International Chemical Industry ]"For more recent history, see industrial history below."
Chemistry
The Leblanc process was a
batch process in which sodium chloride was subjected to a series of treatments, eventually producing sodium carbonate. In the first step, the sodium chloride was heated withsulfuric acid to producesodium sulfate (called the "salt cake") and hydrochloric acid gas according to thechemical equation :2 NaCl + H2SO4 → Na2SO4 + 2 HCl
This
chemical reaction had been discovered in 1772 by the Swedish chemistCarl Wilhelm Scheele . Leblanc's contribution was the second step, in which the salt cake was mixed with crushedlimestone (calcium carbonate ) andcoal and fired. In the ensuing chemical reaction, the coal (carbon ) was oxidized tocarbon dioxide , reducing thesulfate tosulfide and leaving behind a solid mixture of sodium carbonate andcalcium sulfide , called "black ash".:Na2SO4 + CaCO3 + 2 C → Na2CO3 + CaS + 2 CO2
Because sodium carbonate is soluble in water, but neither calcium carbonate nor calcium sulfide is, the soda ash was then separated from the black ash by washing it with water. The wash water was then evaporated to yield solid sodium carbonate. This extraction process was termed lixiviation.
Process detail
The sodium chloride is initially mixed with sulfuric acid solution and the mixture exposed to low heat. Much of the hydrogen chloride gas (and virtually all of the economically recoverable HCl gas) escapes at this point. This continues until all that is left is a fused mass. This mass still contains enough chloride to contaminate the later stages of the process. The mass is then exposed to direct flame, which evaporates nearly all of the remaining chloride.cite web|url=http://www.lenntech.com/Chemistry/Hydrochloric-Acid-Sodium-Sulphate.htm|publisher=Lenntech| title=Hydrochloric Acid and Sodium Sulphate|accessdaymonth=22 April|accessyear=2007]
The coal used in the next step must be low in nitrogen to avoid the formation of
cyanide . The calcium carbonate, in the form of limestone or chalk, should be low in magnesia and silica. The weight ratio of the charge is 2:2:1 of salt cake, calcium carbonate, and carbon respectively. It is fired in areverberatory furnace at about 1000°C.cite web|url=http://www.lenntech.com/Chemistry/Soda-%20industries.htm|publisher=Lenntech|title=The Soda Industries|accessdaymonth=22 April|accessyear=2007]The black-ash product of firing must be lixiviated right away to prevent oxidation of sulfides back to sulfate. In the lixiviation process, the black-ash is completely covered in water, again to prevent oxidation. To optimize the leaching of soluble material, the lixiviation is done in cascaded stages. That is, pure water is used on the black-ash that has been already been through prior stages. The liquor from that stage is used to leach an earlier stage of the black-ash, and so on.
The final liquor is treated by blowing
carbon dioxide through it. This precipitates dissolved calcium and other impurities. It also volatilizes the sulfide, which is carried off as H2S gas. Any residual sulfide can be subsequently precipitated by addingzinc hydroxide . The liquor is separated from the precipitate and evaporated using waste heat from the reverberatory furnace. The resulting ash is then redissolved into concentrated solution in hot water. Solids that fail to dissolve are separated. The solution is then cooled to recrystallize nearly pure sodium carbonate decahydrate.Industrial history
Leblanc established the first Leblanc process plant in 1791 in
St. Denis . However, theFrench Revolution seized the plant, along with the rest of Louis Philip's estate, in 1794, and publicized Leblanc'strade secret s.Napoleon I returned the plant to Leblanc in 1801, but lacking the funds to repair it and compete against other soda works that had been established in the meantime, Leblanc committedsuicide in 1806.cite book | title = A History of the International Chemical Industry ]By the early 1800s, French soda ash producers were making 10,000 - 15,000 tons annually. However, it was in Britain that the Leblanc process became most widely practiced.cite book | first = Fred | last = Aftalion | title = A History of the International Chemical Industry | location = Philadelphia | publisher = University of Pennsylvania Press | year = 1991 | pages = 14-16 | isbn = 0-8122-1297-5] The first British soda works using the Leblanc process was built by the Losh family of iron founders on the
River Tyne in 1816, but steep Britishtariff s on salt production hindered the economics of the Leblanc process and kept such operations on a small scale until 1824. Following the repeal of the salt tariff, the British soda industry grew dramatically, and the chemical works established byJames Muspratt inLiverpool andCharles Tennant nearGlasgow became some of the largest in the world. By 1852, annual soda production had reached 140,000 tons in Britain and 45,000 tons in France.cite book | title = A History of the International Chemical Industry ] By the 1870s, the British soda output of 200,000 tons annually exceeded that of all other nations in the world combined.Pollution issues
The Leblanc process plants were quite damaging to the local environment. The process of generating salt cake from salt and sulfuric acid released hydrochloric acid gas, and because this acid was industrially useless in the early 1800s, it was simply vented into the atmosphere. Also, an insoluble, smelly solid waste was produced. For every 8 tons of soda ash, the process produced 5.5 tons of
hydrogen chloride and 7 tons of calcium sulfide waste. This solid waste (known as galligu) had no economic value, and was piled in heaps and spread on fields near the soda works, where it weathered to releasehydrogen sulfide , the toxic gas responsible for the odor of rotten eggs.Because of their noxious emissions, Leblanc soda works became targets of lawsuits and legislation. An 1839 suit against soda works alleged, "the gas from these manufactories is of such a deleterious nature as to blight everything within its influence, and is alike baneful to health and property. The herbage of the fields in their vicinity is scorched, the gardens neither yield fruit nor vegetables; many flourishing trees have lately become rotten naked sticks. Cattle and poultry droop and pine away. It tarnishes the furniture in our houses, and when we are exposed to it, which is of frequent occurrence, we are afflicted with coughs and pains in the head ... all of which we attribute to the Alkali works."
In 1863, the British Parliament passed the first of several
Alkali Act s, the first modernair pollution legislation. This act allowed that no more than 5% of the hydrochloric acid produced by alkali plants could be vented to the atmosphere. To comply with the legislation, soda works passed the escaping hydrogen chloride gas up through a tower packed withcharcoal , where it was absorbed by water flowing in the other direction. The chemical works usually dumped the resultinghydrochloric acid solution into nearby bodies of water, killingfish and other aquatic life.The Leblanc process also meant very unpleasant working conditions for the operators. It originally required careful operation and frequent operator interventions (some involving heavy manual labour) into processes giving off hot noxious chemicals [Russell. Colin Archibald, Chemistry, society and environment: a new history of the British chemical industry, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2000. ISBN 0854045996] . This improved somewhat later as processes were more heavily mechanised to improve economics and uniformity of product
By the 1880s, methods for converting the hydrochloric acid to
chlorine gas for the manufacture of bleaching powder and for reclaiming the sulfur in the calcium sulfide waste had been discovered, but the Leblanc process remained more wasteful and more polluting than theSolvay process . The same is true when it is compared with the later electrolytical processes which eventually replaced it for chlorine production.Obsolescence
In 1861, the Belgian chemist
Ernest Solvay developed a more direct process for converting producing soda ash from salt and limestone through the use ofammonia . The only waste product of thisSolvay process wascalcium chloride , and so it was both more economical and less polluting than the Leblanc method. From the late 1870s, Solvay-based soda works on theEurope an continent provided stiff competition in their home markets to the Leblanc-based British soda industry. Additionally theBrunner Mond Solvay plant which opened in 1874 atWinnington nearNorthwich provided fierce competition nationally. Leblanc producers were unable to compete with Solvay soda ash, and their soda ash production was effectively an adjunct to their still profitable production of chlorine, bleaching powder etc. (The unwanted by-products had become the profitable products). The development of electrolytic methods ofchlorine production removed that source of profits as well, and there followed a decline moderated only by "gentlemens' agreements" with Solvay producers [Reader W J "Imperial Chemical Industries; A History Volume 1 The Forerunners 1870-1926" Oxford University Press 1970 SBN 19 215937 2 ] . By 1900, 90% of the world's soda production was through the Solvay method, or on the North American continent, through the mining oftrona , discovered in 1938, which caused the closure of the last North American Solvay plant in 1986. The last Leblanc-based soda ash plant closed in the early 1920s. However, because of solubility of the bicarbonate, the Solvay process does not work for the manufacture ofpotassium carbonate , and the Leblanc process continued in limited use for its manufacture until much later.Biodiversity
Ironically there is a strong case for arguing that Leblanc process waste is the most endangered habitat in the UK, since only 4 sites have survived the new millennium; 3 are protected as local nature reserves of which one (the biggest, at Moses Gate country park) is an SSSI largely for its sparse orchid-calcicole flora, most unusual in an area with acid soils. This alkaline island contains within it an acid island, where acid boiler slag was deposited, which now shows up as a zone dominated by heather Calluna vulgaris Shaw, PJA & Halton W. (1998). Classic sites: Nob End, Bolton. "British Wildlife" 10, 13-17.]
References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.