Misclassification of employees as independent contractors

Part of a series on Taxation
Taxation in the United States
Federal taxation
Authority · History Internal Revenue Service (Court • Forms • Code • Revenue) Taxpayer standing Income tax · Payroll tax Alternative Minimum Tax Estate tax · Excise tax Gift tax · Corporate tax Capital gains tax
State and local taxation
State income tax State tax levels Sales tax · Use tax Property tax Land value tax
Federal tax reform Automated payment transaction tax Competitive Tax Plan Efficient Taxation of Income Hall–Rabushka flat tax Taxpayer Choice Act USA Tax · Value Added Tax FairTax · Flat tax
Tax protesting History America: Freedom to Fascism The Law that Never Was Cheek v. United States Tax protesters Irwin Schiff Richard M. Simkanin Robert Clarkson Tom Cryer Vivien Kellems Wayne C. Bentson Wesley Snipes Tax protester arguments Constitutional 16th Amendment Statutory · Conspiracy
Taxation by country Australia British Virgin Islands Canada · China Colombia · France Germany · Hong Kong India · Indonesia Ireland · Netherlands New Zealand · Peru Russia · Singapore Switzerland · Tanzania United Kingdom United States European Union Tax rates around the world Tax revenue as % of GDP v · d · e
v · d · e

IRS reclassification as an employee occurs where persons claimed as (or claiming to be) independent contractors are recategorized by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), or by state tax authorities, as W-2 employees. The reclassification can result in the imposition of fines, penalties, and back-taxes for which the employer is generally liable. These amounts could cost a business large sums of money. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (formerly known as the General Accounting Office) reports that the IRS claims to lose millions of dollars in uncollected taxes because of misclassification of independent contractors by taxpayers.[1] According to IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson in a statement made November 3, 2005, IRS audits of small businesses organized as corporations increased from 7,294 in 2004 to 17,867 in 2005. [2]

Who is being classified?

Employers must report the incomes of employees and independent contractors using the IRS form W-2 and 1099, respectively. Employers pay different taxes (i.e. Social Security and Medicare taxes, unemployment taxes, etc.) on the wages of a worker that is classified as an employee. However, these same taxes are generally not paid by the employer on the compensation of a worker classified as an independent contractor. If an employer intentionally or mistakenly classifies an employee as an independent contractor, the employer is then at risk for being heavily fined and paying back-taxes.^[1]

Being classified as an independent contractor also affects whether an employee can receive unemployment benefits. In many states, independent contractors are not eligible for unemployment benefits because nothing has been paid into the unemployment insurance fund on their behalf. Employers who have no W-2 employees are not required to make payments to the unemployment insurance fund, and since no one can file a claim for benefits, they don't have to worry about their accounts being charged any extra. So should a misclassified employee lose his job through no fault of his own, that employee has no recourse with the Department of Labor and no unemployment benefits upon which to fall back.

Construction workers are often the most misclassified workers in the industry of the United States, Europe, and the Middle East. Workers are misclassified for the employers to reap a different benefit, such as paying fewer taxes and paying less benefit, and workers are paid incorrectly. Organizations fighting against this fraud are shown below.

Employee vs. independent contractor

According to the IRS, an employee is anyone who performs services for an employer if the employer can control what will be done and how it will be done. This was codified in revenue ruling 87-41, and is generally called "the twenty factor test". [3][4][5] Independent contractors are defined so if the payer or employer has the right to control or direct only the result of the work done, and not the means and methods of accomplishing the result. There are also other categories such as non-employees, which include direct sellers.[6]

Mitigating IRS reclassification risk

One must determine if an evaluation of a worker’s classification is necessary. Independent contractors on an approved vendor list, or whose services are on an exempt services list, may not require an evaluation. Also, independent contractors immediately willing to become W-2 employees through a Portable Employer of Record will not require an evaluation. If the analysis is necessary, a qualified Compliance Officer attempts to produce an accurate judgment of the workers classification, and delivers his or her written recommendation to the employer.

A Compliance File, including all necessary supporting documentation for the compliant independent contractor, is kept on file in the event of an audit.

Organizations Working Against Misclassification

• Construction Citizen^[2]

External links and resources

• "Independent Contractors vs. Employees", irs.gov
• "IRS Offers Tips on How to Correct Reporting of Misclassified Employees", irs.gov, March 27, 2006
• "Avoiding IRS reclassification of workers as employees.", Tracy A. Freeman, The Tax Adviser, February 1 1996
• "FedEx Drivers Fight for ‘Employee’ Status, Rights", Megan Tady, The NewStandard, July 18, 2006
• "Sebelius Announces Campaign to Ensure Fairness for Kansas Workers and Businesses", infozine.com, July 11, 2006
• "Waxman: Blackwater may have evaded millions in taxes", Justine Redman, CNN, October 23, 2007

References

1. ^ http://constructioncitizen.com/
2. ^ http://constructioncitizen.com/search/node/misclassification