Netiquette

Netiquette (short for "network etiquette" or "Internet etiquette") is a set of social conventions that facilitate interaction over networks, ranging from Usenet and mailing lists to blogs and forums. These rules were described in IETF RFC 1855.^[1] However, like many Internet phenomena, the concept and its application remain in a state of flux, and vary from community to community. The points most strongly emphasized about USENET netiquette often include using simple electronic signatures, and avoiding multiposting, cross-posting, off-topic posting, hijacking a discussion thread, and other techniques used to minimize the effort required to read a post or a thread. Netiquette guidelines posted by IBM for employees utilizing Second Life in an official capacity, however, focus on basic professionalism, amiable work environment, and protecting IBM's intellectual property.^[2] Similarly, some Usenet guidelines call for use of unabbreviated English^[3][4] while users of instant messaging protocols like SMS occasionally encourage just the opposite, bolstering use of SMS language. However, many other online communities frown upon this practice.

History

Netiquette's (from "network" "etiquette") origins pre-date the start of the World Wide Web. Text-based e-mail, Telnet, Usenet, Gopher, Wais, and FTP from educational and research bodies dominated Internet traffic. At that time, it was considered somewhat indecent to make commercial public postings, and the limitations of insecure, text-only communications demanded that the community have a common set of rules. The term "netiquette" has been in use since at least 1983, netiquette newsgroup post regarding revision of the "Netiquette" document] Jerry Schwarz. net.general. Oct 15, 1983. as evidenced by posts of the satirical "Dear Emily" Postnews column. Dear Emily Postnews (An alternate USENET netiquette guide)] Evidence of use of "netiquette" from 1988

Common characteristics

Common rules for e-mail^[5] and USENET such as avoiding flamewars and spam are constant across most mediums and communities. Another rule is to avoid typing in all caps or grossly enlarging script for emphasis, which is considered to be the equivalent of shouting or yelling. Other commonly shared points, such as remembering that one's posts are (or can easily be made) public, are generally intuitively understood by publishers of Web pages and posters to USENET, although this rule is somewhat flexible depending on the environment. On more private protocols, however, such as e-mail and SMS, some users take the privacy of their posts for granted. One-on-one communications, such as private messages on chat forums and direct SMSs, may be considered more private than other such protocols, but infamous breaches surround even these relatively private media. For example, Paris Hilton's Sidekick PDA was cracked in 2005, resulting in the publication of her private photos, SMS history, address book, etc.^[6]

More substantially, a group e-mail sent by Cerner CEO Neal Patterson to managers of a facility in Kansas City concerning "Cerner's declining work ethic" read, in part, "The parking lot is sparsely used at 8 A.M.; likewise at 5 P.M. As managers - you either do not know what your EMPLOYEES are doing; or YOU do not CARE ... In either case, you have a problem and you will fix it or I will replace you."^[7] After the e-mail was forwarded to hundreds of other employees, it quickly leaked to the public. On the day that the e-mail was posted to Yahoo!, Cerner's stock price fell by over 22%^[8] from a high of US$1.5 billion.^[9]

Beyond matters of basic courtesy and privacy, e-mail syntax (defined by RFC 2822) allows for different types of recipients. The primary recipient, defined by the To: line, can reasonably be expected to respond, but recipients of carbon copies cannot be, although they still might.^[10] Likewise, misuse of the CC: functions in lieu of traditional mailing lists can result in serious technical issues. In late 2007, employees of the United States Department of Homeland Security used large CC: lists in place of a mailing list to broadcast messages to several hundred users. Misuse of the "reply to all" caused the number of responses to that message to quickly expand to some two million messages, bringing down their mail server.^[11] In cases like this, rules of netiquette have to do with efficient sharing of resources and ensuring that the associated technology continues to function rather than more basic etiquette.

"When someone makes a mistake – whether it's a spelling error or a spelling flame, a stupid question or an unnecessarily long answer – be kind about it. If it's a minor error, you may not need to say anything. Even if you feel strongly about it, think twice before reacting. Having good manners yourself doesn't give you license to correct everyone else. If you do decide to inform someone of a mistake, point it out politely, and preferably by private email rather than in public. Give people the benefit of the doubt; assume they just don't know any better. And never be arrogant or self-righteous about it. Just as it's a law of nature that spelling flames always contain spelling errors, notes pointing out Netiquette violations are often examples of poor Netiquette."^[12]

Due to the large variation between what is considered acceptable behavior in various professional environments and between professional and social networks, codified internal manuals of style can help clarify acceptable limits and boundaries for user behavior. For instance, failure to publish such a guide for e-mail style was cited among the reasons for a NZ$17,000 wrongful dismissal finding against a firm that fired a woman for misuse of all caps in company-wide e-mail traffic.^[13][14]

See also

• Eternal September

References

1. ^ "RFC 1855: Netiquette Guidelines". http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855. Retrieved 2009-10-18. 
2. ^ IBM Issues Employee Conduct Rules For Second Life – IBM – InformationWeek
3. ^ "Zen and the Art of the Internet – Usenet News". http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/zen/zen-1.0_6.html#SEC44. Retrieved 2007-08-18. 
4. ^ "Links to Prof. Timo Salmi's FAQ material". http://lipas.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/tsfaq.html. Retrieved 2007-08-18. 
5. ^ The Complete Idiot's Guide to... Writing Well By Laurie Rozakis, http://books.google.com/books?id=YFIEfqL48AMC&pg=PA348&dq=netiquette&ie=ISO-8859-1&sig=t9ZuKcbWOymIy9oNrRAy9ZfAikI#PPA348,M1
6. ^ Paris Hilton's hacked Sidekick releases unedited tell-all – Engadget
7. ^ "Zero to billion". CNN. 2006-04-26. http://money.cnn.com/2006/04/26/smbusiness/zerocover_fsbbillion_fsb/. Retrieved 2010-05-20. 
8. ^ ITworld.com – Unix security: Proprietary e-mail
9. ^ E-Mail Rules: A Business Guide to Managing Policies, Security, and Legal Issues for E-Mail and Digital Communications By Randolph Kahn & Nancy Flynn http://books.google.com/books?id=Q9CbhiflZh0C&pg=PA45&dq=netiquette&ie=ISO-8859-1&sig=5jsrxx0u3qWX1_d4KXCl-_4Tc_4#PPA47,M1
10. ^ http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-1043085.html Electronic office etiquette
11. ^ DHS flunks e-mail administration 101, causes mini-DDoS
12. ^ Shea. V, Netiquette. (1997) http://www.albion.com/netiquette/book/index.html
13. ^ Lewis, Rebecca (August 30, 2009). "Emails spark woman's sacking". The New Zealand Herald. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10594014. Retrieved October 30, 2011. 
14. ^ Moore, Matthew. "Office worker sacked for writing emails in block capitals". Daily Telegraph, Sep 1, 2009. Accessed May 20, 2010.

External links

• "Bootcamp 71: newsgroups part 2, netiquette" Telegraph, 2002
• "A new sort of online protocol" CNET, 1997
• "Miss Manners, Up Yours!" Salon.com, 1997
• Software Reference Netiquette: Internet etiquette in the age of the blog (extract), 2009
• Why it is sensible to observe the Netiquette
• Virginia Shea Netiquette (online ed.) book

This article was originally based on material from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, which is licensed under the GFDL.