- Severn Barrage
The Severn Barrage is the name of a number of ideas for building a barrage from the English
coastto the Welsh coast over the Severn tidal estuary. Ideas for damming or barraging the Severn estuary(and Bristol Channel) have existed since the 19th century. The purposes of such a project has typically been one, or several of: transport links, floodprotection, harbourcreation, or tidal powergeneration. In recent decades it is the latter that has grown to be the primary focus for barrage ideas, and the others are now seen as useful side-effects. The UK Government is currently undertaking a Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Studywhich will consider all tidal range technologies (including barrages, lagoons and others) in the Severn estuary.
The building of such a barrage would be a huge engineering feat, comparable with some of the world's biggest construction projects. The huge size and cost of most of the ideas over the years are what have kept plans firmly on the drawing board.
There have been numerous proposed projects over the years, initially to provide a safe harbour and more recently to generate electricity.
In 1849 Thomas Fulljames, a civil engineer and the county surveyor for
Gloucestershireproposed a barrage from Beachleyto Aust(now the site of the first Severn Bridge), a span of just over convert|1|mi|km|1|lk=on. Since this was before serious electricity demand, the first proposals were based on the desire for a large shipping harbour in the Severn Estuary, and also road and railway transport and flood protection. [cite journal|last=Carne|first=Brian|date=1995|title=Thomas Fulljames 1808-74|journal=Transactions of the Bristol & Gloucestershire Archeological Society|volume=CXIII|pages=16-17|url=http://www2.glos.ac.uk/bgas/tbgas/v113/bg113007.pdf]
No action was on Fulljames proposals and three quarters of a century later, in 1925, an official study group was commissioned. An awareness of the large
tidal rangeof convert|15|m|ft|0|lk=on, [cite web | url= http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/commondata/acrobat/severnpositionmay2006_1508223.pd | format= PDF | work= UK Environment Agency | title= Severn Estuary Barrage | date= 31 May 2006| accessdate= 2007-09-03 ] second only to Bay of Fundyin Eastern Canada, [cite book | title= Extreme Depositional Environments: Mega End Members in Geologic Time
first= Marjorie A. last= Chan | coauthors= Archer, Allen William | pages= pp. 151 | location=
Boulder, Colorado| isbn= 0813723701 | publisher= Geological Society of America| year= 2003 | url=http://books.google.com/books?id=b3_1Ry0gDqEC&pg=PA152&lpg=PA152&dq=bristol+channel&source=web&ots=TQTXZ-PIhu&sig=SWfR3iDDyDCkMnAjdxboRxBZI2I#PPA151,M1 ] [cite web | url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/bristol/content/articles/2005/07/04/bristolchannel_feature.shtml | title= Coast: Bristol Channel | work= BBC | accessdate= 2007-08-27 ] led to a proposal to generate 800 Megawatt(MW) of electricity at English Stonesand although considered technically possible, it was prevented on economic grounds (then costing £25 million). [cite web|url=http://www.burnham-on-sea.com/news/2006/brean-down-barrage-04-03-06.shtml|title=£650 Million barrage plan unvieled|date=4 March 2006|publisher=Burnham on Sea.com|accessdate=2008-08-10] The viability was tested a few years later in 1931 when Paul Shishkoff, a Russian immigrant, demonstrated a 300 horsepowerprototype tidal generator at Avonmouth.cite web|url=http://www.raeng.org.uk/events/pdf/Severn%20Barrage%20transcript.pdf|title=The Severn Barrage|publisher=Royal Academy of Engineering|accessdate=2008-08-10] It included a novel mechanism for spreading the power output over 24 hours. The full barrage was estimated at £5 million at the time.
In 1933 the Severn Barrage Committee Report (HMSO) from a committee chaired by
Lord Brabazonrecommended that a 800MW barrage across the English Stones area would be the best option. [cite web|url=http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications/downloads/TidalPowerUK3-Severn_barrage_proposals.pdf|title=Research Report 3 - Severn Barrage Proposals|publisher=Sustainable Development Commission|pages=17|accessdate=2008-08-10] The work was interupted by World War IIand then revived in 1945 when engineers predicted an output of 2.2 terawatt hours ( TWh) per year. [cite web|url=http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/the_severn_barrage.pdf|title=The Severn Barrage|date=September 2007|publisher=Friends of the Earth|pages=27|accessdate=2008-08-10] A further government study looked at barrage options in 1948 and estimated the construction costs at £60 million. By the time of the next study in 1953 the estimated cost had risen to £200 million.
In 1971 a report by Dr Tom Shaw, a tidal Power expert and advocate proposed a barrage from
Brean Downto Lavernock Point. The scheme was estimated to cost £500 million.Fact|date=August 2008 In 1975 the Central Electricity Generating Board ( CEGB), published a study with evidence from Bristol and Salford universities for the Secretary of State’s Advisory Council on Research and Development for Fuel and Power. [cite web|url=http://r-energy.co.uk/history.html|title=History of Severn Barrage proposals|last=Bryant|first=Paul|publisher=r-energy|accessdate=2008-08-11] As this was the era of cheap oil, the council established that a barrage could not be economically viable unless the energy situation deteriorated significantly.
Bondi Committee - 1981
After just such a deterioration (due to the Iranian Revolution and oil shock) the plans were reinvestigated by the "Severn Barrage Committee" in 1981. This committee was known as the "Bondi Committee" (after Professor Sir
Hermann Bondi). The committee investigated 6 possible barrage locations, from English Stones at the top of the estuary, down to a location largely at sea in the Bristol Channel between Lynmouthin North Devon and Porthcawlin South Wales. It produced a major energy paper, [cite book|title=Tidal power from the Severn Estuary"-Volume 1|publisher=HMSO|date=1981|series=Energy Paper 46] which recommended a convert|10|mi|km|0 long barrage of concrete powerhouse between Brean Down and Lavernock Point, sluice and plain caissons together with sand and rock-fill embankments. It would have generated 7200 MW on the flow of the tides (the largest barrage considered could have produced double that power output). This set of plans was strongly built on a few years later by the Severn Tidal Power Group.
In 1984 Wimpey Atkins proposed a smaller barrage at English Stones, in the hope of creating a smaller more economically viable project that would avoid the environmental impact of a large barrage. [cite book|last=Institution of Civil Engineers (Great Britain)|title=Developments in Tidal Energy|publisher=Thomas Telford|pages=3|isbn=9780727715715|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YhuVRwhvKLcC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3&dq=Severn+Barrage+Wimpey+Atkins&source=web&ots=gZoHCnShlW&sig=8TdTaRXhzze5EHBCYr7zd0N8-RI&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result#PPA3,M1]
Hooker or Shoots Barrage - 1987
This Wimpey Atkins 1984 study was criticised because it did not tackle the issue of
siltingand in 1987 Arthur HookerOBE (a former partner of WS Atkins) in conjunction with Parsons Brinckerhoffprepared a revised barrage proposed at English Stones to better tackle this issue.
Parsons Brinckerhoff further updated their earlier proposal in 2006 and current estimates for this barrage (now known as the "Shoots Barrage") would cost £1.4 to £1.8 billion to build, and generate 2.75 TWh of power per year. At the highest tidal range, it would develop a peak output of 1050 MW, and 313 MW output on average throughout the year. Thus the Shoots Barrage is about 1/7th of the size and cost of the STPG proposals.Fact|date=August 2008
The barrage would be located just below the
Second Severn Crossing– i.e. above Cardiffand Bristolon the estuary – and so much smaller locks would be needed for upstream access to Sharpnessand Gloucesterdocks as the large ports of Portburyand Avonmouthwould be unaffected.
Like the STPG proposal, Hooker generates only on the ebb tide. Construction time would be four years. It would be built of rock fill embankment at the coastal sides (more like the proposals for "Tidal Lagoons"), but like the STPG would be sluice caissons and turbines with powerhouse in the middle section.
evern Tidal Power Group - 1989
The £4.2 million study by Severn Tidal Power Group (STPG) built on the work of the Severn Barrage Committee, but also examined other possible barrages, and produced another major energy paper. [cite book|title=The Severn Barrage Project: General Report|publisher=HMSO|date=1989|series=Energy Paper 57] They concluded that the 1981 plans were the best location for a barrage, but calculated that the power output could be larger, at 8640 MW during flow, or 2000 MW average power. This would provide 17 TWh of power per year (about 6% of UK consumption), equivalent to about 18 million tons of coal or 3 nuclear reactors. The cost in 1989 was calculated to be about £8 billion (£12 billion in 2006 money – about the same as 6 nuclear reactors, but different lifespan), and running costs would be £70 million per year (about the same as 1.5 nuclear reactors).Fact|date=August 2008
The barrage would use existing technology as used in the Rance tidal barrage in
France, the Annapolis Royal Generating Stationin Canadaand the Dutch sea barrages. Power would be most efficiently generated only in the flow direction, and this effect on tidal range would mean that the tidal extent would be halved by losing the low tide rather than the high tide. That is, that the tide would only go out as far as the current tidal mid-point, but high tides would be unaffected (unless the barrage was deliberately closed to prevent flooding).
The barrage would contain 216 x 40 MW
turbinesfor the 8640 MW total. Arrays of sluiceswould let the tidein and then close to force it out through the turbinesafter the tidehas gone out some distance outside the barrage. This deliberate building of a "head" on the water builds pressure that makes the turbines more efficient.Fact|date=August 2008
The barrage would contain a set of shipping locks, designed to handle the largest container vessels. Construction would take about 8 years and would require 35,000 employees at peak build time. The minimum lifespan of the barrage would be 120 years (about 3 times that of a nuclear reactor), but could easily be 200 years if decent maintenance was performed.Fact|date=August 2008
The STPG appraisal concluded that the
electricitygenerated from the barrage would make the scheme economically viable if given certain "green" advantages, and that the environmental impact was acceptable.Fact|date=August 2008 Margaret Thatcher's governmentdid not accept this, and shelved the plans. However, since then global warminghas radically altered the public perception of environmental damage; and soaring oil, gas and energy costs have made the economicsof the barrage much more favourable. The advent of renewable energy discounts favours electricity generated from "green" sources; and in addition, much lower interest ratesmake the cost of loans much lower, and long-term financing of such massive projects is now more viable. Consequently, there have been renewed calls for these plans to be re-appraised. However, there is the question of the applicability of the term "renewable energy" to tidal power, as the root energy source is the rotational kinetic energy of the earth, which is not renewed.
Gareth Woodham - 2006
In 2006 Gareth Woodham, a businessman from
Neathin Wales, submitted plans to SedgemoorDistrict Council in the name of Combined Innovations Ltd for a barrage from Brean Downnear Weston-super-Mare, to Lavernock Pointnear Cardiff. [cite web|url=http://www.severnlake.co.uk/index.htm|title=The Severn Lake|publisher=The Severn Lake|accessdate=2008-08-11] According to Woodham, the barrage would feature 14 electricity generating turbines, a dual carriageway, a light railway, four marinas, and two lock gates to give ships passage. It would supply electricity for the whole of the South West, and according to Woodham it would cost about £650 million and take up to 20 years to complete.
However, it is not clear how Woodham's plans, which are more ambitious than those of the STPG, could be delivered for 1/20th of the cost.
ustainable Development Commission - 2007
1 October 2007, the UK's Sustainable Development Commission(SDC) published a report looking at the potential of tidal powerin the UK, [cite web|url=http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/tidal.html|title=Tidal Power|publisher=Sustainable Development Commission|accessdate=2008-08-11] [cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7021835.stm|title=Advisers endorse tidal power plan|date=2007-10-01|work=BBC News|publisher=BBC|accessdate=2008-08-11] including proposals for a Severn barrage. The report draws on a series of five evidence-based reports, one of which summarises all the available evidence from previous studies on a number of Severn barrage options, but focusing on the Cardiff-Weston and the Shoots schemes. The SDC also commissioned a programme of public and stakeholder engagement, which included a national opinion poll and a series of local and regional workshops. [cite web|url=http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications/downloads/Tidal-Public_Stakeholder_Engagement.pdf|title=Engagement report - Public and stakeholder engagement programme|date=October 2007|publisher=Sustainable Development Commission|accessdate=2008-08-11]
The SDC gave its support to the building of a Severn barrage, providing a number of strict conditions were met. These include:
* A Severn barrage should be publicly led as a project and publicly owned as an asset to avoid short-term decisions and ensure the long-term public interest
* Full compliance with the EU Habitats and Birds Directives is vital, as is a long-term commitment to creating compensatory habitats on an unprecedented scale
* Development of a Severn barrage must not divert Government attention away from much wider action on climate change
The SDC also raised the challenge of viewing the requirement for compensatory habitat as an "environmental opportunity", through the potential to combine a climate change mitigation project with the adaptation that will be required to respond to the effects of climate change. A publicly led project would enable the use of a low
discount rate(2%), which would result in a competitive cost of electricity, and would limit the economic impact of even a very large-scale compensatory habitats package. Electricity production costs are not competitive if a commercial discount rate is applied.
UK Government study announced - 2007
A two year feasibility study was launched in 2007 [cite web |url=http://nds.coi.gov.uk/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=317256&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=True |title=John Hutton calls for open minds on the future of the Severn barrage |accessdate=2008-08-27 |format= |work=
BERR] and the terms of reference were announced on 22 January 2008 [cite web |url=http://nds.coi.gov.uk/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=346694&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=True |title=Severn tidal power study could unlock massive renewable potential |accessdate=2008-08-28 |format= |date= 22 January 2008| work= BERR] following the report from the Sustainable Development Commission. This study focuses on a variety of tidal range technologies including barrages, lagoons, a tidal fence and a tidal reef in the estuary and builds upon past studies. It aims to provide an up-to-date analysis of all the key issues involved. The study led by John Hutton, Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform(BERR) has strong support from Jane Davidson, Minister for Environment, Sustainability and Housing in the Welsh Assembly Governmentas well as other government departments. [cite web |url=http://www.wales.gov.uk/severntidal |title=Severn Tidal Power |accessdate=2008-08-27 |work=Welsh Assembly Government] [cite web |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7202413.stm |title=Severn barrage details unveiled |accessdate=2008-08-27 |work=BBC | date= 22 January 2008]
The study aims to gather and assess evidence to enable Government to decide whether it could support a tidal power scheme in the Severn Estuary. The study will be taking advice as necessary and will be engaging with
stakeholdersand the public on a regular basis.
Key work areas involved are:
* The environmental impacts on biodiversity and wildlife; flood management; geomorphology (the study of the evolution and configuration of rocks and land forms); water quality; landscape and compensatory habitat;
* Engineering and technical areas such as options appraisal; costs; design and construction and links to the National Grid;
* Economic considerations - financing; ownership and energy market impacts;
* The regional social, economic and business impacts;
* Planning and consents - regulatory compliance; and
* Stakeholder engagement and communication. [cite web |url=http://www.berr.gov.uk/energy/sources/renewables/explained/severntidalpower/thefeasibilitystudy/page46182.html |title=The Feasibility Study |accessdate=2008-08-27 |work=
Part of the study includes a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) [cite web |url=http://www.berr.gov.uk/energy/sources/renewables/explained/severntidalpower/strategicenvironmentalassessment/page47489.html |title=Strategic Environmental Assessment |accessdate=2008-08-27 |work=
BERR] , which is a formal environmental assessment of plans or programmes which are likely to have significant effects on the environment. A consortiumled by Parsons Brinckerhoff(PB) has been appointed to manage this part of the project. The process is guided by a stakeholder steering group.
The feasibility study will be a two-phase process with two public consultations. The first phase is likely to run until late 2008 and will reach an initial view on whether there are any fundamental issues that would prevent a tidal scheme in the Severn Estuary. Subject to the decision, the second phase will look at the issues in more detail and culminate in a full public consultation late 2009 to early 2010. [cite web|url=http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file43809.pdf|title=Severn Tidal Power Q&A|publisher=Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform|accessdate=2008-08-11]
Benefits and Disadvantages
*Predictable source of "green" energy during lifetime of barrage
*Home-grown facility, independent of foreign uncertainties
Floodprotection for the vulnerable Severnestuary, including against global warmingsea level rises
Transportlinks for road and/or rail
shippingand boatingconditions behind the barrier
*Boost to local
economy- construction industry in the short term, tourism and infrastructure in the long term Fact|date=May 2007
*Reduced turbidity (cloudiness) of water will improve the density and spread of invertebrate colonies in the estuary. This should lead to better carrying capacity for migratory fish and birds. (evidence needed to substantiate this statement as a barrage would lead to large losses of intertidal mudflats (bird feeding grounds) and a barrage could be a physical obstacle to migratory fish)
ecosystemswould be heavily altered, with new speciesmoving in and perhaps dominating old species
*Some of the low-tide mud-flats would be lost, displacing some of the
wading birdsthat make the estuary a protected area
*Lack of industry skill in the UK of a project of this size.
*Likely to stimulate silting in some areas and coastal erosion in others
*Enhance flood risk on the seaward side because only a proportion of the water that presently flows up stream will pass through the barrage leaving the remainder to rise up outside possibly raising levels by as much as a metre.
Shippingwould have to navigate locks
*Costs associated with navigating the locks would impact trade and commerce
*Severn bore weakened
*All industrial discharges into the River Severn (e.g. from
Avonmouth) will have to be reassessed.
*Negative visual impact upon the landscape (subjective, c.f.
*Huge amount of concrete (etc.) needed - quarrying of stone likely to inpact on other areas.
*Cost of build would mean the buy back time would be considerable and the barrage may only have a finite life span due to silting up behind barrage negating the "green" element.Fact|date=July 2008
dams, there is no danger associated with collapse of a tidal barrage. If a freak earthquake(or a ship collision) were to break the barrage, the water would flow out (or in) at the speed of the tide, just as it does now, and just as it would during construction. This would only represent a danger to those caught directly in the current, as it does now.Fact|date=October 2007
The Severn Estuary is a
Special Area of Conservationdue to the European importance of its ecology. The inter-tidal area provides food for over 85,000 migratory and wintering water birds, and represents 7% of the UK's total estuaries. [cite web|url=http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/severn_barrage_is_not_the_11042006.html|title=Severn Barrage is not the answer|date=2006-04-11|work=Press Release|publisher=Friends of the Earth|accessdate=2008-08-11] There are nature reserves and Site of Special Scientific Interest(SSSI) on the islands of Flat Holmcite web | url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/southeast/sites/flatholm/pages/overview.shtml | publisher= BBC | title= Flat Holm - About the island | date= 3 April 2008| accessdate= 2008-04-12] and Steep Holm. [cite web | title=Steep Holm | url=http://www.english-nature.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1002935.pdf | format= PDF | work= English Nature | title= Citation - Steep Holm | accessdate= 2007-09-06]
The Barrage was not supported in the 2003 Energy Review due to "strong environmental concerns" (The same paper also described nuclear power as "an unattractive option"). [cite web|url=http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file10719.pdf|title=Energy White Paper - Our Energy Future - creating a low carbon economy|date=February 2003|publisher=Department of Trade and Industry|accessdate=2008-08-11]
RSPBopposes any Severn Barrage because of the effect it will have the feeding grounds 85,000 birds depend on, stating "The impact a barrage would have is huge. This is one of the most important sites in the UK for wild birds and the chances of them surviving if it went ahead are fairly slim. There wouldn't be enough room left for all the birds and there wouldn't be enough food for those that remained. The estuary is one of the UK's most important sites for water birds and its wildlife value must be taken fully into account."cite web|url=http://www.edie.net/news/news_story.asp?id=11703&channel=0|title=Barrage bad for birds|publisher=Edie (Environmental Data Interactive Exchange)|accessdate=2008-08-10]
The present strong
tidalcurrents in the estuary serve to lift up silt sedimentand so keep the water thick with fine particles. This blocks light-penetration and means that the Severn Estuary marine environment is actually a relative desert, in terms of both plant and fishlife. [cite journal|last=Kirby|first=R.|coauthors=T. Shaw|date=March 2005|title=Severn Barrage, UK–environmental reappraisal.|journal=Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 2005: Engineering Sustainability|publisher=Institution of Civil Engineers|volume=158|issue=3|pages=31-39]
The barrage will not create a "
lagoon" - as both opponents and supporters have sometimes claimed. Tidal power stations by definition require that the tide flows through the barrage, but the tidal range in the Severn would be halved. DEFRAclaims that the environmental effects of the barrage still need more analysis before final conclusions can be drawn. The Sustainable Development Commissionis investigating UK tidal resources, including tidal power in the Severn Estuary and its environmental impact, and should report mid-2007. [cite web|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/ministers/speeches/ben-bradshaw/bb070316.htm|title=Speech by Ben Bradshaw MP to the Wave and Tidal Conference of the British Wind Energy Association |last=Bradshaw|first=Ben|date=2007-03-15|publisher=Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs|accessdate=2008-08-11]
Tidal lagoon alternative
Friends of the Earthsupport the idea of tidal power, but oppose barrages because of the environmental impact. They have proposed their own plans based on the concept of " tidal lagoons",cite web | url= http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/severn_barrage_lagoons.pdf | format= PDF | title= A Severn barrage or tidal lagoons? A comparison | work= Friends of the Earth Cymru | date= January 2004 | accessdate=2007-10-01] whereby man-made lagoons in the estuary would fill and drain through turbines. Their proposals would include lagoons covering up to 60% of the area covered by the barrage, which in some smaller configurations would not impound water in the ecologically sensitive inter-tidal areas of the estuary. The lagoons could be sub-divided so power would be generated at more states of the tide than a barrage, with lower peak output, giving economic advantages to set against the higher construction cost of longer barriers. This idea is based on a prototype now being designed at Swanseabay. However leading figures in the construction industry are sceptical that the lagoons can be economic.cite web | url= http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file30617.pdf | format= PDF | title= Tidal Lagoon Power Generation Scheme in Swansea Bay | work= Department of Trade and Industry and the Welsh Development Agency | date= April 2006 | accessdate= 2007-10-01] [cite web|url=http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications/downloads/TidalPowerUK2-Tidal_technologies_overview.pdf|title=Research Report 2 - Tidal technologies overview|date=October 2007|publisher=Sustainable Development Commission|accessdate=2008-08-11]
A set of Tidal lagoons known as the "Russell Lagoon concept" were studied and dismissed by the 1981 Bondi Committee report, rejected on the grounds of both economics and environmental damage. Studies suggested that tidal currents around and between the lagoons would become extremely fierce and damaging.
Effects of different site locations
One of the complicating factors in assessing the impacts of a barrage is the large number of possible locations and sizes for the barrage. Generally, the larger the barrage the bigger its environmental impact, and the bigger the amount of energy it could create - and therefore the bigger
carbon offsetit could have by way of its renewable power generation.
The largest barrages (sited beyond
Hinkley Pointand towards Mineheadon the English side and Aberthawon the Welsh side) would significantly affect the entire Severn Estuary and much of the Bristol Channel, but could generate 15 GW peak power and protect the whole of the Somerset levels against flooding and sea-level rise caused by Global Warming. The smallest barrages (sited at Aust/ Chepstow) would affect only the river and estuary in Gloucestershire, but would also only generate perhaps 0.75 GW peak power.
The estimated costs of the most recent plans are huge. Figures are generally in the £10-15 billion range, but have gone as high as £23 billion. [cite news|url=http://www.qsweek.com/nav?page=qsweek.gen_obj_redirects.news&fixture_news=7151930&resource=7151930&view_resource=7151930|title= Severn barrage cost hits £23bn|date=
2008-05-19|publisher=QS Week|accessdate=2008-05-23] However, the recent plans have assumed that the project would be privately financed, and so in effect the matter of cost becomes a private one between the building consortiumand their banks. If the banks feel that the project is viable and decide to lend the money then the projects will go ahead. None of this cost would directly fall on the tax-payer. There would though be secondary knock-on costs from the barrage that might be met by the tax-payer, such as modifying existing portsand dealing with environmental change. However, these would be offset by the positive knock-on effects, such as transportlinks and floodprotection - which would have otherwise also cost tax-payer money. Whether the parties actually decided to exchange monies for these knock-on effects would be a matter for Governmentnegotiation.
It has been suggestedWho|date=July 2008 that powerful
construction industrybased vested interestsare the main force behind Severn Barrage proposals. Clearly, any project with a budget of several billion pounds will rouse numerous vested interests both for and against it. However, in order to understand where the vested interests might lie, it is necessary to see the wider picture. The alternative to any Severn Barrage would probably be three nuclear power stations; and these are huge facilities that would have to be built by someone - the same construction industry that stands to gain from the barrage. Friends of the Earthstate that their proposals for "lagoons" would require 20 times as much construction material as the Barrage to build, and so should be even more desirable for the construction industry if driven by vested interests. In the end, the vested interests of those wanting the Barrage built will come up against the vested interests of those who do not want it built; and these include not only bird protection and environmental groups, but also the nuclear and oil industries.
Trans-barrage transport links
It is likely that a barrage would be used for transport links between England and Wales, and more specifically the areas around
Bristoland Cardiff. Various proposals include a dual carriagewayroad giving a further crossing in addition to the Second Severn Crossingand the Severn Bridge. The road would have to be taken over the sea locks on a bridge at a height of the Bridge of the Americas(i.e. with a clearance of 61.3m) if the locks are Panamax-sized.
Some proposals also include a double track
railwayline across the barrage. A railway would have a longer approach up to a fixed bridge over the locks. The approach would be greatest for non- electrifiedheavy railway capable of taking freight, slightly less for non-electrified passenger line, and less still for electrified passenger line. However, there is no electrification in the Bristol or Cardiff areas. An alternative to a fixed bridge would be a swing bridge, though there is concern expressed at this reducing capacity through the locks and on the railway. However, two swing bridges, one at either end of the lock would mean that one bridge could be kept open to railway traffic at all times. The double track could be reduced to single track at this point without creating too much of a bottleneck, or if double track is required this could be worked around by grade separating the two lines and having double-decked bridges. The line could then be used to partially relieve the Severn Tunnel.
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Tony Blair[ [http://thisisbristol.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=144936&command=displayContent&sourceNode=144919&contentPK=17565890&moduleName=InternalSearch&formname=sidebarsearch BLAIR BACKS SEVERN BARRAGE] ] (who backed it in the last weeks of his tenure)
Secretary of State for Wales, Peter Hain
*The Welsh Assembly
Welsh Affairs Select Committee
*Welsh First Minister,
Rhodri Morgan[ [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/5039918.stm BBC NEWS | Wales | Experts disagree on river barrage ] ]
*The South West Regional Assembly
*Weston Super Mare MP,
John Penrose[ [http://www.epolitix.com/EN/MPWebsites/John+Penrose/46df5559-c191-4af4-bf06-4a53a0192893.htm#7 ePolitix.com - John Penrose ] ]
*Cardiff Central MP,
Jenny Willott[ [http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=30613%09%09%09%09%09%09%09&SESSION=875 UK Parliament - Early Day Motions By Details ] ]
Steve Webb[ [http://thisisbristol.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=144936&command=displayContent&sourceNode=144919&contentPK=16976765&moduleName=InternalSearch&formname=sidebarsearch thisisbristol.co.uk] ] [ [http://webbsteve.blogspot.com/2007/03/time-to-put-some-energy-into-power-from.html The Webb log: Time to put some energy into power from the Severn ] ]
*Ogmore MP and Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Wales,
Huw Irranca-Davies[ [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmhansrd/vo030204/halltext/30204h05.htm House of Commons Hansard Debates for 4 Feb 2003 (pt 5) ] ]
Roger Berry[ [http://thisisbristol.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=144936&command=displayContent&sourceNode=144919&contentPK=17372301&moduleName=InternalSearch&formname=sidebarsearch BACKING FOR £14BN TIDAL BARRAGE BID] ]
BristolCity Council has passed a motion calling for an urgent reappraisal [ [http://politics.guardian.co.uk/green/story/0,,1761552,00.html Estuary energy plan makes waves | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics ] ]
* Bristol West MP, Stephen Williams has also said that the project must be urgently investigated, and has proposed an EDM on the subject [ [http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=33263 UK Parliament - Early Day Motions By Details ] ] [ [http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=30352 UK Parliament - Early Day Motions By Details ] ]
North SomersetCouncil has also called for a new appraisal [ [http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/cairo/docs/doc8174.htm Agendas, Minutes and Reports ] ]
*Scientist and "Gaia" theorist, Dr
James LovelockCBE [ [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/5039918.stm BBC NEWS | Wales | Experts disagree on river barrage ] ]
*The Minister for Local Environment, Marine and Animal Welfare at
Defra, Ben Bradshaw[ [http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/ministers/speeches/ben-bradshaw/bb070316.htm Defra, UK - About Defra - Ministers' speeches: Speech by Ben Bradshaw MP ] ]
Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, David Miliband, has said that the project "Has to be worthy of very serious consideration" [ [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/21/nbrown221.xml Tide turns in favour of Severn Barrage electricity - Telegraph ] ]
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, Alistair Darling[ [http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0200wales/tm_headline=ministers-support-severn-barrage&method=full&objectid=19140299&siteid=50082-name_page.html Ministers support Severn Barrage] ]
*Severn Barrage - Why it should not be built (Save our Severn) [http://saveoursevern.org/]
*Free Sabrina [http://freesabrina.org]
*Former UK Science Minister, Lord Sainsbury
*MP for Woodspring,
*Bristol Green Party [ [http://www.bristolgreenparty.org.uk/nr/060307severnbarrage.htm Greens welcome Severn Barrage bid - but not for its merits ] ]
*Gloucestershire Green Party [ [http://www.glosgreenparty.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1807&Itemid=2 Gloucestershire Green Party - towards a just, equitable and sustainable society ] ]
*South West Green Party [ [http://southwest.greenparty.org.uk/southwest_greens_support_tidal_power_in_severn_estuary Green Party South West - Southwest Greens support Tidal Power in Severn Estuary ] ]
RSPBWales [http://politics.guardian.co.uk/green/story/0,,1761552,00.html Estuary energy plan makes waves] , The Guardian, April 26 2006]
Friends of the EarthWales
World Wildlife FundWales [ [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4898514.stm BBC NEWS | Wales | Concern over Severn barrage plan ] ]
*Gwent Wildlife Trust [ [http://thisisbristol.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=144936&command=displayContent&sourceNode=144919&contentPK=14355106&moduleName=InternalSearch&formname=sidebarsearch thisisbristol.co.uk] ]
*Avon Wildlife Trust [ [http://www.wildlifetrust.org.uk/avon/wildlife/78-severn_estuary.htm The Severn Estuary a very special place ] ]
George Monbiot[ [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6696915.stm BBC NEWS | Wales | Monbiot attacks Welsh energy plan ] ]
Energy policy of the United Kingdom
Energy use and conservation in the United Kingdom
* [http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications/downloads/TidalPowerUK3-Severn_barrage_proposals.pdf SDC paper "Tidal Power in the UK: Research Report 3 - Severn barrage proposals"]
* [http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/severn_barrage_lagoons.pdf Friends of the Earth "Tidal Lagoons" Plans]
** [http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file30617.pdf Independent report on "Tidal Lagoons" for the DTI and the Welsh Development Agency]
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/gloucestershire/content/articles/2006/10/30/barrage_feature.shtml BBC Gloucestershire background videos and information]
* [http://www.severnlake.co.uk Severn Lake Official Website]
* [http://www.wwf.org.uk/filelibrary/pdf/turningthetide_full.pdf World Wildlife Fund "Turning the Tide"]
* [http://www.dti.gov.uk/renewables/publications/pdfs/severnbarragemainreport.pdf Severn Tidal Power Group report for UK Government DTI]
** [http://www.dti.gov.uk/renewables/publications/pdfs/t0900212ra.pdf Appendices to - Severn Tidal Power Group report for UK Government DTI]
* [http://www.ice.org.uk/downloads//Severn%20Barrage(1).pdf Institute of Civil Engineers Severn Barrage environmental reappraisal]
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,1761578,00.html Estuary energy plan makes waves The Guardian 26th April 2006]
* [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel1/2224/1659/00043328.pdf Institute of Electronic Engineers Severn Barrage Tidal power appraisal]
* [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmenvtra/171/171m22.htm Memorandum by the Severn Tidal Power Group to Parliamentary Committee]
* [http://www.severnestuary.net/scosla Standing Conference on Severnside Local Authorities (SCOSLA)]
* [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2007-04-24a.262.0 Westminster Hall Debate on the Severn Barrage]
* [http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/tidal.html Sustainable Development Commission project looking at 'Tidal Power in the UK']
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.