- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
-
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
Supreme Court of the United StatesArgued January 11, 1971
Decided March 2, 1971Full case name Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, et al. v. Volpe, Secretary of Transportation, et al. Citations 401 U.S. 402 (more)
91 S. Ct. 814; 28 L. Ed. 2d 136; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 96Prior history Summary judgment for defendant, injunction denied, 309 F. Supp. 1189 (W.D. Tenn. 1970); aff'd, 432 F.2d 1307 (6th Cir. 1970); certiorari granted, 400 U.S. 939 (1970) Subsequent history On remand to 335 F. Supp. 873 (W.D. Tenn. 1972) Holding The Secretary of Transportation can only approve use of federal funds for construction of a highway in a public park if no (a) feasible and prudent alternative exists, and (b) after undertaking all possible planning to minimize harm. Court membership Chief Justice
Warren E. BurgerAssociate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan, Jr
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry BlackmunCase opinions Majority Marshall, joined by Burger, Harlan, Stewart, White, Blackmun Concurrence Black, joined by Brennan Concurrence Blackmun Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Laws applied Administrative Procedure Act; Department of Transportation Act § 4(f), codified at 49 U.S.C. § 1653(f); Federal-Aid Highway Act § 138, codified at 23 U.S.C. § 138 Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 (1971)[1], is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that established the basic legal framework for judicial review of the actions of administrative agencies. It also stands as a notable example of the power of litigation by grassroots citizen movements to block government action.
Contents
Background
The case concerned the decision by the Secretary of Transportation John A. Volpe to construct Interstate 40 through Overton Park in Memphis, Tennessee.
During the interstate highway system's late 1950s and early 1960s building boom, public parks had been viewed as a desirable path. Building through them didn't require the federal government to use the power of eminent domain. That changed in the mid-1960s, under § 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, a federal statute commonly called "Section 4(f)." It required the government to demonstrate that there were no "feasible and prudent" alternatives to building through public lands.
Procedural History
After Secretary Volpe approved the Tennessee Department of Highway's proposal to construct the highway through Overton Park, a group called Citizens to Preserve Overton Park brought suit against him in the Western District of Tennessee. They claimed that the Secretary had not complied with §4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. The Secretary responded by filing a summary judgment motion, which was granted by the court. On appeal, the 6th Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.
Decision
On March 3, 1971, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, upholding the "feasible and prudent" clause. The Court held that summary judgment was improperly granted. While the Secretary was not required to make formal findings, the Secretary's sole reliance on litigation affidavits was inadequate. The Secretary's decision did not fall into the Administrative Procedure Act's exception for action "committed to agency discretion."[1]
In the decision, Justice Thurgood Marshall stated that Section 4(f) "is a plain and explicit bar to the use of federal funds for construction of highways through parks; only the most unusual situations are exempted."[2] The court recognized the place of cost, directness of route, and community disruption in highway routing, but the existence of the statute "indicates that protection of parkland was to be given paramount importance."[3]
Concurrence
Justice Black, joined by Justice Brennan, concurred. Black and Brennan would have remanded the case to the Secretary of Transportation, rather than the district court.[4]
See also
References
External links
- Text of Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 (1971) is available from: Justia · Findlaw
United States administrative law Supreme Court decisions Londoner v. Denver (1908) • Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1915) • NLRB v. Hearst Publications (1944) • Skidmore v. Swift & Co. (1944) • Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB (1951) • Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) • Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe (1971) • Mathews v. Eldridge (1976) • Vermont Yankee v. NRDC (1978) • Chevron v. NRDC (1984) • United States v. Mead Corp. (2001) • Whitman v. ATA (2001) • National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services (2005)Federal legislation Administrative Procedure Act (1946) • Freedom of Information Act (1966) • Government in the Sunshine Act (1976) • Regulatory Flexibility Act (1980)Concepts Categories:- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States administrative case law
- 1971 in United States case law
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.