Battle of Heligoland Bight

Battle of Heligoland Bight

Infobox Military Conflict
conflict=First Battle of Heligoland Bight
partof=the First World War

caption=SMS "Ariadne" in action at Heligoland Bight
date=28 August 1914
place=Heligoland Bight, North Sea
result=British victory
commander1=Vc. Adl. David Beatty
Com. Reginald Tyrwhitt
Com. Roger Keyes
commander2=Rr. Adl. Franz Hipper
Rr. Adl. Leberecht Maass
strength1=5 battlecruisers
8 light cruisers
33 destroyers
8 submarines
strength2=6 light cruisers
19 torpedo boats
12 minesweepers
casualties1=35 killed
55 wounded
1 light cruiser badly damaged

casualties2=712 killed
149 wounded
336 captured
3 light cruisers sunk
2 torpedo boats sunk
1 destroyer sunk
3 destroyers heavily damaged
1 light cruiser heavily damaged
2 light cruisers moderately damaged

The First Battle of Heligoland Bight was the first naval battle of the First World War, fought on 28 August 1914, after the British planned to attack German patrols off the north-west German coast.

The German High Seas Fleet remained largely in safe harbours on the north German coast while the British Grand Fleet remained in the northern North Sea. Both sides engaged in long distance sorties with cruisers and battlecruisers, and close reconnaissance of the area of sea near the German coast, the Heligoland Bight, by destroyer. A plan was devised by the British to ambush some of these destroyers on their regular daily patrols, and a fleet of 31 destroyers and two cruisers under Commodore Reginald Tyrwhitt and of submarines commanded by Commodore Roger Keyes was dispatched for this purpose. This was supported at longer range by an additional six light cruisers commanded by William Goodenough, and five battlecruisers commanded by vice Admiral David Beatty.

Three German light cruisers and one destroyer were sunk. Three more light cruisers were damaged, 712 sailors killed, 530 injured and 336 taken prisoner. The British suffered one light cruiser and three destroyers damaged, 35 killed and 40 wounded. The battle was regarded as a great victory in Britain, where the returning ships were met by cheering crowds. Publicly, Admiral Beatty was regarded as a hero, although he had taken little part in the action or planning of the raid, which was led by Commodore Tyrwhitt and conceived by him and Keyes, who had persuaded the Admiralty to adopt it. However, the raid might have led to disaster had not the additional forces under Beatty been sent by Admiral John Jellicoe at the last minute.

The effect upon the German government and in particular the Kaiser was to restrict the freedom of action of the German fleet, instructing it to remain in port and avoid any contact with superior forces.


The battle took place only a month after the declaration of war against Germany on 5 August 1914. Initially the war on land went badly for Britain, with German forces invading France and an urgent need to gather all possible troops to send to France to resist them. The government was in a position of having nothing but bad news, and looked to the navy, the largest in the world and traditionally the mainstay of British military power, for some success to report. British naval tactics had typically involved a close blockade of enemy ports, taking the fight to the enemy, and this had been the British plan for war against Germany up to 1913. Such an approach was still expected by the British population. However, it was realised that the advent of submarines armed with torpedoes and mines hidden in open sea meant that any operations involving stationing capital ships near enemy ports would place them at great risk of surprise attack and loss. Then, there was the issue of fuel for the ships: traditional sail powered ships did not need refueling, but powered ships obliged to keep moving to reduce their vulnerability as sitting targets, were continuously using fuel, and had to return to home ports every few days.'Castles' pp. 72–3.]

The German fleet had expected that Britain would adopt its traditional approach, and had prepared by investing in submarines and coastal defences. The main body of the German navy, the High Seas Fleet, was smaller than the British Grand Fleet stationed around home waters and could not expect victory in a head to head fight. It therefore adopted a tactic of waiting in defended home ports for opportunities to attack the larger British force when the anticipated attack came. The British, appreciating this situation chose to adopt a tactic of patrolling the North Sea rather than waters close to Germany. Any German ships seeking to leave their home ports on the German coast must either pass the 20 mile wide Straits of Dover, defended by British submarines and mines, or the North Sea, where the British fleet was stationed around its main wartime base at Scapa Flow in Scotland, defending the 200 mile wide narrowest point between Britain and Norway. This led to a standoff with neither fleet doing more than hold the other endlessly waiting. The German ships were contained in an area where they could not attack merchant shipping arriving on the west of Britain, which was vital for British survival. To encourage the German fleet to stay at home, the British would make occasional forays with the Grand Fleet and patrol with smaller cruiser and battlecruiser squadrons. ['Castles' p. 73.]

The bulk of the British Expeditionary Force was transported to France between 12 and 21 August. This operation was protected from German attack by British destroyers and submarines patrolling Heligoland Bight, which German ships would have to cross when leaving their home ports. The Grand Fleet remained in the centre of the North Sea ready to move south should any German attack commence, but none came. Although the German army had anticipated a rapid transfer of the British army to aid France, German naval planning had anticipated it would take longer for the British to organise. Thus they were caught by surprise when it commenced, with submarines which might have been ordered to attack the British transports away on patrols seeking the main British fleet. ['Castles' p. 80.]

Plan of attack

Two British officers believed they had determined an opening to carry the war to the German fleet. Commodore Roger Keyes commanded a squadron of long range submarines which regularly patrolled Heligo Bight, while Commodore Reginald Tyrwhitt commanded a destroyer patrol, both operating from Harwich. They had observed that German destroyers had adopted a regular pattern of patrols where each evening cruisers would escort out destroyers, which would patrol for British ships during the night before being met and escorted home each morning. Their idea was to send in a superior force during darkness to catch the German destroyers as they returned. Three British submarines would surface in a position to draw the destroyers back out to sea while a larger British force of thirty one destroyers accompanied by nine submarines would cut them off from Germany. Other submarines would wait for any larger German ships leaving the Jade estuary to help. Keyes impressed First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill by the daring of his plan which was adopted, but not without changes. An attack at 8.00am on the German daytime patrol was preferred. Keyes and Tyrwhitt requested support for their operation, in particular bringing the Grand Fleet south and the support of the squadron of six light cruisers commanded by Commodore William Goodenough. This was refused by the Chief of Staff, vice-admiral Doveton Sturdee, who instead agreed to place only lighter forces, "Cruiser Force K" under Rear Admiral Moore consisting of two battlecruisers "New Zealand" and "Invincible" 40 miles to the northwest, and "Cruiser Force C" a squadron of five Cressy class armoured cruisers, "Cressy", "Aboukir", "Bacchante", "Hogue" and "Euryalus" one hundred miles west. ['Castles' pp. 98–9.] It was decided that the attack would take place on 28 August. The submarines were to leave to take up their positions on 26 August, while Keyes would travel on the destroyer "Lurcher". The surface ships would depart at dawn on 27 August. Tyrwhitt onboard the brand new light cruiser "Arethusa" would command the 3rd Flotilla of sixteen modern L-class destroyers, whilst his subordinate, Captain Wilfred Blunt, onboard the light cruiser "Fearless" commanded the 1st flotilla of sixteen older destroyers. Tyrwhitt had for some time been requesting replacement of his previous cruiser HMS "Amethyst" because she was too slow to keep up with his destroyers, but "Arethusa" only arrived on 26 August. Her crew were inexperienced and it was discovered that some of her guns jammed when fired. ['Castles' p. 99.]

Although the plan had been agreed by the Admiralty, Admiral John Jellicoe commanding the Grand Fleet was not informed until 26 August. Jellicoe immediately requested permission to send reinforcements to join the raid and to move the fleet closer to the action, but received permission only to send battle cruisers in support. He dispatched Vice Admiral David Beatty with three battle cruisers, "Lion", "Queen Mary" and "Princess Royal", and Goodenough with the 1st Light Cruiser squadron of six modern Town class light cruisers: "Southampton", "Birmingham", "Falmouth", "Liverpool", "Lowestoft" and "Nottingham". He then sailed south from Scapa Flow with the remainder of the fleet. ['Castles' p. 100 ]

Jellicoe despatched a message advising Tyrwhitt that he should expect reinforcements, but this was delayed at Harwich and never received. Tyrwhitt only discovered the additional forces when Goodenough’s ships appeared through the mist, leading to immediate concern whether they were friend or foe at a time when he was expecting to meet only enemy vessels. ['Castles' p. 101]

British submarines were deployed. E class submarines "E4", "E5" and "E9" were ordered to attack reinforcing or retreating German vessels. "E6", "E7" and "E8" were positioned 40 miles further out to draw the German destroyers out to sea. "D2" and "D8" were stationed off Ems to attack reinforcements should they come from that direction.


At around 7.00 a.m. "Arethusa" steaming south towards the anticipated position of the German ships sighted a German destroyer, G-194. Accompanying her were the sixteen destroyers of the 3rd flotilla. Two miles behind were "Fearless" with the 3rd flotilla of fifteen destroyers, and eight miles behind them Goodenough with his six cruisers. Visibility was three miles or less. G-194 immediately turned towards Heliogoland, radioing Rear Admiral Leberecht Maass, commander of the German destroyer squadron. Maass informed Rear Admiral Franz Hipper who commanded the German battlecruiser squadron, and who was responsible for local defense. Hipper was unaware of the scale of the attack, but ordered the light cruisers "Stettin" and "Frauenlob" to defend the destroyers. Six other light cruisers were ordered to raise steam and join the defense as soon as they could: "Mainz" moored on the Ems River; "Strassburg", "Köln", "Ariadne", "Stralsund" and "Kolberg" from the Jade River; Danzig and München from Brunsbüttelkoog on the Elbe. ['Castles' pp. 102–3.]

Tyrwhitt ordered four destroyers to detach and attack G-149. The sound of firing alerted the remaining German destroyers, who had been moving north, but turned south towards home. Before they could complete the turn, they were sighted by British destroyers who commenced firing. The trailing destroyer V-1 was hit, followed by Destroyer-minesweepers D-8 and T-33. German destroyer G-9 called for fire against the attacking ships from coastal artillery, but the mist meant the artillery were unable to determine which ships were which. At 7.26 a.m. Tyrwhitt turned east, attempting to follow the sound of gunfire and his four destroyers. He sighted ten German destroyers which he chased through increasing mist for half an hour until the ships reached Heligoland and he was forced to turn away. At 7.58 a.m. "Stettin" and "Frauenlob" arrived, reversing the situation so that the British destroyers were obliged to retreat toward their own cruisers "Arethusa" and "Fearless". "Stettin" withdrew, since the German destroyers had now escaped, but "Frauenlob" was engaged by "Arethusa". While "Arethusa" was theoretically the better armed ship, two of her four four-inch guns were jammed, while another was damaged by fire. "Frauenlob", armed with ten four-inch guns was able to cause considerable damage before a shell from the two six inch guns on "Arethusa" destroyed her bridge, killing 37 men including the captain, and forcing her to withdraw. Although badly damaged, she returned to Wilhelmshaven. ['Castles' pp. 103–4.]

At 8:12 a.m. Tyrwhitt returned to the original plan, which was to sweep across the area from east to west. Six returning German destroyers were sighted but turned to flee, when one, V-187 turned back. The German ship had seen two cruisers, "Nottingham" and "Lowestoft" from Goodenough's squadron ahead of her and turned back in the hope of passing through the British destroyers by surprise. This was partially successful, but V-187 was surrounded by eight destroyers and sunk. As British ships attempted to rescue survivors from the water, the German light cuiser "Stettin" approached and opened fire, forcing the British to abandon the rescue, leaving behind British sailors. The British submarine E-4 had observed the action and fired a torpedo at "Stettin", but missed. "Stettin" attempted to ram the submarine, which dived to escape. When she resurfaced all the larger ships had gone, and the submarine rescued the British crewmen, still afloat in small boats together with German sailors. The Germans were left behind with a compass and direction toward the mainland as the submarine was too small to take them. ['Castles' p. 105.]

Confusion of ships

At 8.15 am Keyes, with "Lurcher" and another destroyer sighted two four-funneled cruisers. Still unaware that any additional British ships had been sent to support the action, he signalled "Invincible" that he was chasing two German cruisers. Goodenough received the signal and abandoning his own search for enemy vessels to attack, steamed to assist Keyes against his own ships, "Lowestoft" and "Nottingham". Keyes, seeing he was now being chased by four more enemy cruisers attempted to lead them towards "Invincible" and "New Zealand", reporting them as enemy ships. Eventually Keyes recognised "Southampton", and the ships attempted to rejoin Tyrwhitt. However, the danger to Goodenough's ships was not over, since the British submarines were still unaware the additional ships were present. At 9.30 a.m. one of the British submarines attacked "Southampton" with two torpedoes, fortunately missing and in turn escaping when "Southampton" tried to ram. "Lowestoft" and "Nottingham" remained out of communication range, and separated from the rest of their squadron took no further part in the action. ['Castles' p. 106.]

Tyrwhitt turned back to assist Keyes on receipt of the signal that he was being chased. He sighted "Stettin", but lost her in the mist before coming upon "Fearless" and her destroyer squadron. "Arethusa" was badly damaged, so at 10.17 a.m. "Fearless" came alongside and both cruisers were stopped for 20 minutes while repairs were made to the boilers. ['Castles' p. 107.]

Actions with German cruisers

By now "Köln", "Strassburg" and "Ariadne" had sailed from Wilhelmshaven to join the German defence, while "Mainz" was approaching from a different direction. Admiral Maass was still unaware of the nature of the attack, so spread his ships in search of the enemy. "Strassburg" was first to find "Arethusa" and attacked with shells and torpedoes, but was driven off by torpedo attacks from the destroyers. As Tyrwhitt turned away to the west, "Köln" with Admiral Maass approached from the southeast, and was also chased away by torpedoes. Tyrwhitt signalled Beatty requesting reinforcements, and Goodenough with the four cruisers remaining with him came to assist. The force turned west. ['Castles' pp. 107–8.]

Beatty had been following the events by radio forty miles to the north west. By 11.35 a.m. the British ships had still not completed their mission and withdrawn, and with the rising tide larger German ships would be able to leave harbour and join the engagement. He decided to intervene and took his five battlecruisers southeast at maximum speed, an hour away from the engagement. While the advantages of using his more powerful ships to rescue the others was clear, this had to be weighed against the possibility of mischance by torpedo or of meeting German dreadnoughts once the tide permitted them to sail, and losing one or more of the important battlecruisers.

At 11.30 a.m. Tyrwhitt's squadron came upon another German cruiser, "Mainz". The ships engaged for twenty minutes, before the arrival of Goodenough caused "Mainz" to attempt escape. Goodenough gave chase, but in attempting to lose him "Mainz" came back across the path of "Arethusa" and her destroyers. Her steering was damaged, causing her to turn back into the path of Goodenough's ships and she was hit by shells and torpedo. At 12.20 her captain ordered his ship to be scuttled and the crew to abandon ship. Keyes had now joined the main body of ships and brought "Lurcher" alongside "Mainz" to take off the crew. Three British destroyers had been seriously damaged in the engagement.

"Strassburg" and "Köln" now attacked together, but the battle was interrupted by the further arrival of Beatty and the battlecruisers. An officer on one of the destroyers described the moment, "There straight ahead of us in lovely procession, like elephants walking through a pack of... dogs came Lion, Queen Mary, Princess Royal, Invincible and New Zealand...How solid they looked, how utterly earthquaking. We pointed out our latest aggressor to them... and we went west while they went east... and just a little later we heard the thunder of their guns." ['Castles' p. 112, citing Chalmers p. 146.]


"Strassburg" managed to disengage and escape when the battlecruisers approached, but "Köln" was not so fortunate. Cut off from escape she was quickly disabled by the much larger guns of the battlecruisers. She was saved from immediate sinking by the sighting of another German light cruiser, "Ariadne", to which Beatty gave chase and again quickly overcame. "Ariadne" was left to sink, which she eventually did at 3.10 pm, attended by the German ships "Danzig" and "Stralsund" who took off survivors. At 1.10 pm Beatty turned northwest and ordered all the British ships to withdraw since the tide had now risen sufficiently for larger German ships to pass out through the Jade estuary. Passing the "Köln" again he opened fire sinking her. Attempts to rescue the crew were interrupted by the arrival of a submarine: one survivor was rescued by a German ship two days later out of some 250 who had survived the sinking. The survivor was not Rear Admiral Maass, who perished with his ship.

Four German cruisers survived the engagement, which they would not have done except for the mist. "Strassburg" nearly approached the battlecruisers, but saw them in time and turned away. She had four funnels, like the Town-class British cruisers, which caused sufficient confusion to allow her time to disappear into the mist. The German battlecruisers "Moltke" and "Von der Tann" left the Jade at 2.10 p.m. and began a cautious search for other ships. Rear Admiral Hipper arrived with "Seydlitz" at 3.10 pm, but by then the battle was over. ['Castles' pp. 112–4.]


The battle was a clear British victory. Germany had lost the three light cruisers "Mainz", "Köln" and "Ariadne" and the destroyer "V 187" sunk, and the light cruiser "Frauenlob" had been severely damaged. The light cruisers "Strassburg" and "Stettin" had also been damaged. German casualties were 1,242 with 712 men killed, including Rear Admiral Maass, and 336 prisoners of war. The Royal Navy had lost no ships and only 35 men killed, with 40 wounded.

The most significant result of the battle was the effect on the attitude of the Kaiser. To preserve his ships the Kaiser determined that the fleet should, "hold itself back and avoid actions which can lead to greater losses." Admiral Pohl, Chief of the German Naval Staff, wired Ingenohl that, "in his anxiety to preserve the fleet [William] ... wished you to wire for his consent before entering a decisive action."

Tirpitz was outraged by this decision. He wrote after the war, "The Emperor did not wish for losses of this sort ... Orders [were] issued by the Emperor ... after an audience with Pohl, to which I as usual was not summoned, to restrict the initiative of the Commander-in-Chief of the North Sea Fleet. The loss of ships was to be avoided; fleet sallies and any greater undertakings must be approved by His Majesty in advance. I took the first opportunity to explain to the Emperor the fundamental error of such a muzzling policy. This step had no success, but on the contrary there sprang up from that day forth an estrangement between the Emperor and myself which steadily increased." [cite book | last=Tirpitz | first=Grand Admiral Alfred von | year=1919 | title=My Memoirs | publisher=Dodd, Mead | location= New York | pages= Volume II p. 91]

Churchill after the war observed:

But he also observed: "‘The Germans knew nothing of our defective staff work or the risks we had run’".


Both sides had lessons to learn from the battle. The Germans had assumed that their cruisers, leaving port one by one, would not meet larger ships or major forces. They failed to keep their ships together so they might have better odds in any engagement. Beatty, when faced with the choice of leaving one of his ships to finish off disabled enemies had elected to keep his squadron together and only later return in force to finish off those ships. Goodenough, on the other hand, had managed to lose track of two cruisers, which therefore played no further part in the battle. ['Castles' p. 118–9.]

German light cruisers armed with larger numbers of faster firing four inch guns proved inferior to similar British cruisers with fewer but more powerful six inch guns. However, their ships proved difficult to sink despite severe damage and impressed the British with the quality of their firing. Both British and German sources reported the determination and bravery of the defeated German ships when overwhelmed. ['Castles' p. 119]

No one reported the presence of British cruisers to Admiral Hipper until 2.35 P.M.. Had he known, he could have brought his own battlecruisers to sea faster and consolidated his fleet, possibly preventing the German losses and instead inflicting some on the departing British ships. The British operation had dragged out longer than anticipated so that the large German ships would have had sufficient high water to join the battle. ['Castles' p. 114.]

The British side also suffered from poor communications, with ships failing to report engagement with the enemy to each other. The initial failure to include Jellicoe in planning the raid could have led to disaster had he not sent reinforcements, although the subsequent communications failures which meant British ships were unaware of the new arrivals could then have led to British ships attacking each other. There was no way to warn off British submarines which might have targeted their own ships. It had been the decision of Admiral Sturdee, Admiralty chief of staff, not to inform Jellicoe and also not to send additional larger ships which had originally been requested by Keyes. Jellicoe in effect countermanded this decision once he knew of the raid by sending ships which were part of his command. Keyes was disappointed that the opportunity for a greater success had been lost by not including the additional cruisers properly into the plan as he had originally intended. Jellicoe was disturbed by the Admiralty failure to discuss the raid with their commander in chief of the fleet at sea. ['Castles' pp. 99, 116–7.]

The Germans appreciated that constant patrols by destroyers was both wasteful of time and resources of those ships, and left them open to attack. Instead they designed defensive minefields to prevent enemy ships approaching and freed up the destroyers for duties escorting larger ships. In future, ships were never to be sent out one by one. ['Castles' p. 120.] The British realised it was foolish to have sent "Arethusa" into battle with inadequate training and jammed guns. British ships were criticised for having fired considerable ammunition and torpedoes with little effect: this criticism later proved counter-productive when at the Battle of Dogger Bank, ships became overly cautious of wasting ammunition and thus missed opportunities to damage enemy vessels. ['Castles' p. 118.]

External links

* [ Battle of Heligoland Bight]

ee also

*Battle of Heligoland, 9 May 1864
*Second Battle of Heligoland Bight, 1917

Notes and References

*cite book|author=Robert Massie |title=Castles of Steel: Britain, Germany and the winning of the Great War at sea|publisher=Johnathan Cape, part of Random House |isbn=0224 040928 |year=2004
*cite book|author=Rear Admiral W.S. Chalmers |title=The life and letters of David Earl Beatty |location=London |year=1951 |publisher=Hodder and Stoughton
*citation| newspaper=The Times |title=Contemporary report of Battle of Heligoland Bite | issue=40619 |pages=8 |date=1914-8-29

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Second Battle of Heligoland Bight — Infobox Military Conflict conflict=Second Battle of Heligoland Bight partof=the First World War caption= date=17 November 1917 place=Heligoland Bight, North Sea result= German victory combatant1= combatant2= commander1=Charles Napier… …   Wikipedia

  • Battle of Heligoland — may refer to*Battle of Heligoland (1849) *Battle of Heligoland (1864) *Battle of Heligoland (1914) or Battle of Heligoland Bight *Battle of Heligoland (1917) or Second Battle of Heligoland Bight …   Wikipedia

  • Heligoland Bight — The Heligoland Bight (also known as Helgoland Bight) is the southern part of the German Bight, itself a bay of the North Sea, located at the mouth of the Elbe river. Named after the Heligoland Island, it was the location of the Battle of… …   Wikipedia

  • Battle of Heligoland (1864) — Infobox Military Conflict conflict=Battle of Heligoland caption=The Battle of Heligoland by Josef Carl Barthold Puettner partof=the Second War of Schleswig date=May 9 1864 place=Off Heligoland, German Bight result=Tactical Danish victory… …   Wikipedia

  • Battle of Heligoland (1849) — Infobox Military Conflict conflict=Battle of Heligoland caption=RMS Britannia before being converted to SMS Barbarossa , Brommy s flagship partof=the First War of Schleswig date=4 June 1849 place=Off Heligoland, German Bight result=inconclusive… …   Wikipedia

  • Heligoland — Infobox German Location German name = Helgoland image photo = Wappen = Helgoland Wappen.png lat deg = 54 |lat min = 10 |lat sec = 57 lon deg = 7 |lon min = 53 |lon sec = 07 Bundesland = Schleswig Holstein Kreis = Pinneberg Höhe = 61 Fläche = 4.2… …   Wikipedia

  • Battle of France — Part of the Western Front of the Second World War Clockwise from top left: German …   Wikipedia

  • Battle of the Scheldt — Part of World War II Buffalo amphibious vehicles taking Canadians across the Scheldt in Zeeland, 1944 …   Wikipedia

  • Battle of Overloon — Part of World War II Date 30 September–18 October 1944 Location Overloon, Netherlands Res …   Wikipedia

  • Battle of Britain — This article is about the Second World War battle. For other uses, see Battle of Britain (disambiguation). Battle of Britain Part of the Second World War …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”