- Electric field screening
**Screening**is the damping ofelectric field s caused by the presence of mobile charge carriers. It is an important part of the behavior of charge-carryingfluid s, such as ionized gases (classical plasmas) and conductionelectron s insemiconductor s andmetal s. Inastrophysics , electric field screening is important because it makes electric fields largely irrelevant. However, because the fluids involved have charged particles, they can generate and are affected bymagnetism which is a very relevant and complex area of astrophysics.In a fluid composed of electrically charged constituent particles, each pair of particles interact through the Coulomb force,

:$mathbf\{F\}\; =\; frac\{q\_1\; q\_2\}\{4piepsilon\_0\; left|mathbf\{r\}\; ight|^2\}hat\{mathbf\{r$.

This interaction complicates the theoretical treatment of the fluid. For example, a naive quantum mechanical calculation of the ground-state energy density yields infinity, which is unreasonable. The difficulty lies in the fact that even though the Coulomb force diminishes with distance as 1"/r²", the average number of particles at each distance "r" is proportional to "r²", assuming the fluid is fairly isotropic. As a result, a charge fluctuation at any one point has non-negligible effects at large distances.

In reality, these long-range effects are suppressed by the flow of the fluid particles in response to electric fields. This flow reduces the "effective" interaction between particles to a short-range "screened" Coulomb interaction.

For example, consider a fluid composed of electrons. Each electron possesses an electric field which repels other electrons. As a result, it is surrounded by a region in which the density of electrons is lower than usual. This region can be treated as a positively-charged "screening hole". Viewed from a large distance, this screening hole has the effect of an overlaid positive charge which cancels the electric field produced by the electron. Only at short distances, inside the hole region, can the electron's field be detected.

**Electrostatic screening**The first theoretical treatment of screening, due to Debye and Hückel (1923), dealt with a stationary point charge embedded in a fluid. This is known as

**electrostatic screening**.Consider a fluid of electrons in a background of heavy, positively-charged ions. For simplicity, we ignore the motion and spatial distribution of the ions, approximating them as a uniform background charge. This is permissible since the electrons are lighter and more mobile than the ions, provided we consider distances much larger than the ionic separation. In

condensed matter physics , this model is referred to asjellium .Let "ρ" denote the

number density of electrons, and "φ" theelectric potential . At first, the electrons are evenly distributed so that there is zero net charge at every point. Therefore, "φ" is initially a constant as well.We now introduce a fixed point charge "Q" at the origin. The associated

charge density is "Qδ"("r"), where "δ"("r") is theDirac delta function . After the system has returned to equilibrium, let the change in the electron density and electric potential be "Δρ"("r") and "Δφ"("r") respectively. The charge density and electric potential are related by the first ofMaxwell's equations , which gives:$-\; abla^2\; [Deltaphi(r)]\; =\; frac\{1\}\{epsilon\_0\}\; [Qdelta(r)\; -\; e,\; Delta\; ho(r)]$.

To proceed, we must find a second independent equation relating "Δρ" and "Δφ". There are two possible approximations, under which the two quantities are proportional: the Debye-Hückel approximation, valid at high temperatures, and the Fermi-Thomas approximation, valid at low temperatures.

**Debye-Hückel approximation**In the Debye-Hückel approximation, we maintain the system in thermodynamic equilibrium, at a temperature "T" high enough that the fluid particles obey Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics. At each point in space, the density of electrons with energy "j" has the form

:$ho\_j\; (r)\; =\; ho\_j^\{(0)\}(r)\; ;\; exp!left\; [frac\{ephi(r)\}\{k\_B\; T\}\; ight]$

where "k

_{B}" isBoltzmann's constant . Perturbing in "φ" and expanding the exponential to first order, we obtain:$e\; Delta\; ho\; simeq\; epsilon\_0\; k\_0^2\; Deltaphi$

where

:$k\_0\; stackrel\{mathrm\{def\{=\}\; sqrt\{frac\{\; ho\; e^2\}\{epsilon\_0\; k\_B\; T$

The associated length λ

_{D}≡ 1/"k_{0}" is called theDebye length . The Debye length is the fundamental length scale of a classical plasma.**Fermi-Thomas approximation**In the Fermi-Thomas approximation, we maintain the system at a constant

chemical potential and at low temperatures. (The former condition corresponds, in a real experiment, to keeping the fluid in electrical contact at a fixedpotential difference with ground.) The chemical potential "μ" is, by definition, the energy of adding an extra electron to the fluid. This energy may be decomposed into a kinetic energy "T" and the potential energy -"eφ". Since the chemical potential is kept constant,:$Deltamu\; =\; Delta\; T\; -\; e\; Delta\; phi\; =\; 0$.

If the temperature is extremely low, the behavior of the electrons comes close to the quantum mechanical model of a

free electron gas . We thus approximate "T" by the kinetic energy of an additional electron in the free electron gas, which is simply theFermi energy "E_{F}". The Fermi energy is related to the density of electrons (including spin degeneracy) by:$ho\; =\; 2\; frac\{1\}\{(2pi)^3\}\; frac\{4\}\{3\}\; pi\; k\_F^3\; quad\; ,\; quad\; E\_F\; =\; frac\{hbar^2\; k\_F^2\}\{2m\}$.

Perturbing to first order, we find that

:$Delta\; ho\; simeq\; frac\{3\; ho\}\{E\_F\}\; Delta\; E\_F$.

Inserting this into the above equation for "Δμ" yields

:$e\; Delta\; ho\; simeq\; epsilon\_0\; k\_0^2\; Deltaphi$

where

:$k\_0\; stackrel\{mathrm\{def\{=\}\; sqrt\{frac\{3e^2\; ho\}\{epsilon\_0\; E\_F\; =\; sqrt\{frac\{m\; e^\{2\}\; k\_\{f\{epsilon\; \_\{0\}\; pi\; ^\{2\}\; hbar\; ^\{2\}$

is called the

Fermi-Thomas screening wave vector .It should be noted that we used a result from the free electron gas, which is a model of non-interacting electrons, whereas the fluid which we are studying contains a Coulomb interaction. Therefore, the Fermi-Thomas approximation is only valid when the electron density is high, so that the particle interactions are relatively weak.

**Screened Coulomb interactions**Our results from the Debye-Hückel or Fermi-Thomas approximation may now be inserted into the first Maxwell equation. The result is

:$left\; [\; abla^2\; -\; k\_0^2\; ight]\; phi(r)\; =\; -\; frac\{Q\}\{epsilon\_0\}\; delta(r)$

which is known as the

screened Poisson equation . The solution is:$phi\; (r)\; =\; frac\{Q\}\{4piepsilon\_0\; r\}\; e^\{-\; k\_0\; r\}$

which is called a

screened Coulomb potential . It is a Coulomb potential multiplied by an exponential damping term, with the strength of the damping factor given by the magnitude of "k_{0}", the Debye or Fermi-Thomas wave vector. Note that this potential has the same form as theYukawa potential .**Quantum-mechanical screening**In real metals, electrical screening is more complex than described above in the Fermi-Thomas theory. This is because Fermi-Thomas theory assumes that the mobile charges (electrons) can respond at any

wave-vector . However, it is not energetically possible for an electron within or on aFermi surface to respond at wave-vectors shorter than theFermi wave-vector . This is related to theGibbs phenomenon , where fourier series for functions that vary rapidly in space are not good approximations unless a very large number of terms in the series are retained. In physics this is known asFriedel oscillation s, and applies both to surface and bulk screening. In each case the net electric field does not fall off exponentially in space, but rather as an inverse power law multiplied by a oscillatory term. The area ofmany-body physics devotes considerable effort to quantum-mechanical screening, which is very relevant to condensed matter physics.**See also***

Electromagnetic shielding **External links*** [

*http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/plasma/lectures/node7.html lecture notes from the University of Texas*]

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*