Interstate Income Act of 1959

Part of a series on Taxation
Taxation in the United States
Federal taxation
Authority · History Internal Revenue Service (Court • Forms • Code • Revenue) Taxpayer standing Income tax · Payroll tax Alternative Minimum Tax Estate tax · Excise tax Gift tax · Corporate tax Capital gains tax
State and local taxation
State income tax State tax levels Sales tax · Use tax Property tax Land value tax
Federal tax reform Automated payment transaction tax Competitive Tax Plan Efficient Taxation of Income Hall–Rabushka flat tax Taxpayer Choice Act USA Tax · Value Added Tax FairTax · Flat tax
Tax protesting History America: Freedom to Fascism The Law that Never Was Cheek v. United States Tax protesters Irwin Schiff Richard M. Simkanin Robert Clarkson Tom Cryer Vivien Kellems Wayne C. Bentson Wesley Snipes Tax protester arguments Constitutional 16th Amendment Statutory · Conspiracy
Taxation by country Australia British Virgin Islands Canada · China Colombia · France Germany · Hong Kong India · Indonesia Ireland · Netherlands New Zealand · Peru Russia · Singapore Switzerland · Tanzania United Kingdom United States European Union Tax rates around the world Tax revenue as % of GDP v · d · e
v · d · e

The Interstate Income Act of 1959, also known as Public Law 86-272,^[1] is a United States statute that allows a business to go, or send representatives, into a state to solicit orders for goods without being subject to a net income tax.^[2] It is currently codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 381–384.

History

Public Law 86-272 was enacted in response to outcries from business over the decision held in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U.S. 450 (1959).^[3] In Northwestern States, the Supreme Court upheld the imposition of a Minnesota tax on an Iowa corporation that solicited orders and maintained a leased office in Minnesota.^[4] However, the Court did not make clear whether the maintenance of employees in the state (who solicited orders that were delivered and accepted outside the state) would have been enough to give rise to the state’s power to impose its tax.

Public Law 86-272 addressed that circumstance by acting as a 'stopgap'^[5] by restricting a state from collecting income tax on solicited sales within its borders, as long as the orders are filled or shipped outside of the state.^[2]

Provisions of the Act

Personal property

Public Law 86-272 protects only solicitation of orders for tangible personal property.^[5]

Solicitation

Protection applies to activities that are limited to:

• Solicitation by employees of orders that are approved outside the state and shipped from outside the state.^[2]
• Solicitation by independent contractors if the sales are shipped from outside the state.^[6]

Exclusions

Public Law 86-272 does not protect a corporation in the state where it is incorporated.^[7] Likewise, it does not protect sellers of services or intangibles. In addition, it provides protection only from taxes measured by income. Taxes measured by net worth or gross receipts, or sales and use taxes, are not covered.^[8]

References

1. ^ Mudford, Scott. "A case for updating P.L. 86-272.(Interstate Income Tax Act of 1959)". The Tax Adviser. 
2. ^ ^{a b c} Garrett, Jr., Joe; Roshto,Ladonna; Vandevender,Christy. "810-27-1-4-.19 Public Law 86-272 Exemption from Income Tax". http://www.ador.alabama.gov/incometax/1webreghold/810_27_1_4_19.htm. Retrieved 2008-11-14. 
3. ^ "Linear Films, Inc. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Com'n". Oklahoma Tax Commission. http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=20148. Retrieved 2008-11-14. 
4. ^ "NORTHWESTERN CEMENT CO. v. MINN., 358 U.S. 450 (1959)". FindLaw. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=358&invol=450. Retrieved 2008-11-15. 
5. ^ ^{a b} Nellen, Annette. "The 50th Anniversary of Public Law 86-272". AICPA. http://www.cpa2biz.com/Content/media/PRODUCER_CONTENT/Newsletters/Articles_2008/CorpTax/Public_Law032708.jsp. Retrieved 2008-11-14. 
6. ^ "RULE §3.554". Texas Administrative Code. http://info.sos.state.tx.us/pls/pub/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=T&app=9&p_dir=N&p_rloc=3837&p_tloc=&p_ploc=1&pg=5&p_tac=&ti=34&pt=1&ch=3&rl=552. Retrieved 2008-11-15. 
7. ^ "Application and Interpretation of Public Law 86-272". State of California – Franchise Tax Board. http://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/misc/1050.pdf. Retrieved 2008-11-15. 
8. ^ "Letter Ruling 86-10: Nexus and Public Law 86-272: Solicitation of Sales Non-Resident Salesperson; Automobile Leased by Corporation". Commonwealth of Massachusetts. http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=dorterminal&L=7&L0=Home&L1=Businesses&L2=Help+%26+Resources&L3=Legal+Library&L4=Letter+Rulings&L5=Letter+Rulings+-+By+Year(s)&L6=(1985-1989)+Rulings&sid=Ador&b=terminalcontent&f=dor_rul_reg_lr_lr_86_10&csid=Ador. Retrieved 2008-11-15. 

External links

• Title 15, Chapter 10B, Subchapter I--current text of the Act from the Legal Information Institute