- Monotype System
-
The Monotype system is a set of two machines, the Monotype keyboard and the Monotype caster, which are used to typeset printed matter.
A Monotype operator enters text on a Monotype keyboard, on which characters are arranged in the QWERTY arrangement of a conventional typewriter, but with this arrangement repeated multiple times. Thus, the typesetter moves his hands from one group of keys to another to type uppercase or lowercase, small capitals, italic uppercase or italic lowercase, and so on.
When the text nears the right margin, a drum on the keyboard indicates codes which are punched on the paper tape with special keys to indicate how the line is to be justified. The tape is then taken to the Monotype caster, which reads the tape and produces a column of justified type from which the text entered on the keyboard can be printed.
Contents
History
Part of a series on the History of printing Woodblock printing (200) Movable type (1040) Printing press (1454) Etching (ca. 1500) Mezzotint (1642) Aquatint (1768) Lithography (1796) Chromolithography (1837) Rotary press (1843) Offset printing (1875) Hectograph (19th century) Hot metal typesetting (1886) Mimeograph (1890) Screen printing (1907) Spirit duplicator (1923) Dye-sublimation (1957) Phototypesetting (1960s) Dot matrix printer (1964) Laser printing (1969) Thermal printing (ca. 1972) Inkjet printing (1976) Stereolithography (1986) Digital press (1993) 3D printing (ca. 2003) In 1885, the American inventor Tolbert Lanston applied for a patent on a typesetting system which included the basic Monotype keyboard, but which produced a printing surface through a cold-stamping method. In 1890, he filed a subsequent patent which covered the Monotype caster.
In 1897, the Lanston Monotype Corporation opened a branch in England, which later became an independent company.
Design
Keyboard
A Monotype keyboard allows a keyboard operator to prepare a paper tape which will direct the casting of type separately from its actual casting. The actual keyboard on which the operator types, as well as a set of keybars under the keys which determine which holes will be punched in the tape corresponding to each key that is pressed, are removable. During operation, two sets of keys and keybars are placed in two side-by-side trays on the keyboard.
The keybars are adjustable so that the coding of the keys can be changed. Keytops are replaceable as well, so that the keyboard can be configured
Matrix-Case
In order for the Monotype caster to produce types with the shape of the desired character on their face, a matrix with that character incised in it needs to be moved to the top of the mold in which the type slug will be cast. This is achieved by placing a rectangular array of brass matrices, each of which is one-fifth of an inch square, in a holder called the matrix-case. Originally, it contained 225 matrices in 15 rows and 15 columns; later versions of the Monotype caster expanded that first to 15 rows and 17 columns, and then to 16 rows and 17 columns.
The paper tape that controls casting contains 14 columns of holes which indicate the row of the matrix-case to be used, and 14 columns of holes which indicate the column of the matrix-case to be used. Originally, one row and one column of the matrix-case were indicated by the absence of a hole, and each of the others was indicated by a single hole. When the matrix-case was enlarged, some columns or rows of the matrix-case were indicated by combinations of two holes instead.
The row of the matrix-case on which the matrix for a character is contained also indicated the width of that character. This was one major reason why the keyboard needed to be easily reconfigured, since the arrangement of characters in the matrix case would vary depending on the typeface in use. A part called the "wedge" indicated the width corresponding to each row of the matrix-case.
Justification
The width of a type slug cast on the Monotype varied from 3 to 18 units. (A special attachment was required to reduce the minimum from 4 units to 3 units.) 18 units corresponded to the "set width" of the typeface in use. Thus, if a typeface was described as "12 set", 18 units would correspond to one pica em. (A "pica em" is a technical term used by printers to refer to a horizontal distance equal to 12 points.)
The 12 point size of a typeface could also be 12 set, the 11 point size could be 11 set, and so on. But this was not necessarily always true. Some typefaces could be somewhat wider or narrower than the standard; also, many typefaces were modified to be slightly wider in smaller sizes. The set size could be varied in units of 1/4 point.
Thus, while the Monotype unit system was normally referred to as one of 18 units to the em, it was 18 units to the em of the set size, not necessarily the em of the actual type size in use.
When text was typed on the Monotype keyboard, the keyboard kept track of the number of units taken up by the characters in the line, and also the number of "justifying spaces" in the line. When the right margin was approached, this information was indicated to the operator on a rotating drum on the keyboard. As part of finishing a line of text, this information was punched on the tape using two rows of special keys on the keyboard.
In order that the Monotype caster would know ahead of time how wide to make the spaces in a given line of text, the tape was placed on the caster so as to be read in the reverse order from that in which the text was typed.
Justification wedges
Justification was obtained with a system of wedges. The caster has an accuracy of 2000 parts of an inch, in modern terms: 2000dpi.
- the wedge belonging to the layout of the diecase or matrix-case
-
- This wedge made a similar movement as the diecase, and the rows are polished according to the layout and the set of the used font.
- 0005-justification wedge
-
- This wedge can be laid in 15 different positions, the difference between two positions is .0005 inch
- 0075-justification wedge
-
- This wedge can be laid in 15 different positions, the difference between two positions is .0075 inch
- unit-adding wedge
-
- Using this wedge added 1, 2 or 3 units to the cast character. The attachment used for this, did need some extra coding.
- the upper transfer-wedge
-
- This wedge was used when the justification were in use.
- the lower transfer-wedge
The actions of all these wedges combined did govern the opening of the mould-blade, and in this way the width of the character or space to be cast was adjusted.
The position of the 0005- and 0075-wedges was put onto the right position during the codes that marked the start of casting the line. Two codes were used during a procedure that was called:
Double-justification.
- The first code - with three holes in the ribbon - caused the following actions:
- the pump was stopped
- both justification-wedges moved to the position of 0005
- the previous line already cast was transferred to the galley
- the second code - with two holes in the ribbon - was needed for:
- to halt the pump for this machine-cycle
- activating the pump-mechanism for the next machine cycle
- to bring the 0075-wedge in the desired position
The 3/8-position was called "neutral". In this position the 0075-wedge was at row 3, and the 0005-wedge at row 8. In this position no width was added tot the space or character to be cast. The minimum was 1/1. In this position the width of the cast would be 2 * .0075" + 7 * .0005" = 0.0185" less. The maximum 15/15 would add a lot more to the cast: 12 * .0075" + 7 * .0005" = .00935 ". The operator had to be aware that the opening of the mould should always be smaller than .2" because otherwise the matrix could not seal the mould, and a splash of molten lead would occur.
Single justifcation was used to change the position of the justification wedges whenever needed, without transferring the line to the galley. This procedure was also used to be able to adjust the spaces in more than one segments within a line. In this way it was possible to cast complete time-tables.
- The first code - with two holes in the ribbon - caused the following actions:
- the pump was stopped, and halted
- the 0005-justification-wedge moved to its desired position
- the second code - with two holes in the ribbon - was needed for:
- no the pump-action during this machine-cycle
- activating the pump-mechanism for the next machine cycle
- to bring the 0075-wedge in the desired position
Besides this, there was also the possibility to cast "high-spaces". Those high-spaces could support any overhanging character. When a character could not cast at the desired width at the place it was put into the matrix-case, the character could be cast. A part of the sign would not be supported by the ingot. Directly after the character was cast, one or more "high-spaces" of 5 or 6 units were cast, to add to the desired width and to support the sign, in order to resist the pressure during the printing-process.
On top of this, there was the possibility of "Unit-shift". With this attachment it became possible to use matrix-case with an extra row: 16 * 17 positions. The wedge still had only 15 positions. The matrix-case was - when needed - forced to go to the next row. The matrix was cast at the width of the wedge 1 position higher. This system made it possible to place more matrices in the matrix-case. Another advantage for Monotype was, that it made it possible to change the layout of the matrix-case, in such a way, that any customer could get its own "personalized" layout.
There has been a second 16 * 17 system, where both the matrix-case and the wedge had 16 possible positions. This system was rather expensive, because all the extra wedges needed, that could not be used on other machines. The 16th row was coded with a code of two or three letters. Of this system there have been two variants: the extra row was coded with either MNH or MNK.[1]
See also
References
- ^ The Monotype Keyboard operator's manual, 1950, The National Committee of Monotype user's Association, London, UK
- Printing Industries of America (1953). A Composition Manual. Brooklyn, NY.
- Lanston Monotype Machine Co. (1912). The Monotype System. Philadelphia.
- Lucien Alphonse Legros, John Cameron Grant (1916). Typographical Printing-Surfaces.
Categories:
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.