Model lipid bilayer

A model lipid bilayer is any bilayer assembled in vitro, as opposed to the bilayer of natural cell membranes or covering various sub-cellular structures like the nucleus. A model bilayer can be made with either synthetic or natural lipids. The simplest model systems contain only a single pure synthetic lipid. More physiologically relevant model bilayers can be made with mixtures of several synthetic or natural lipids.

There are many different types of model bilayers, each having experimental advantages and disadvantages. The first system developed was the black lipid membrane or “painted” bilayer, which allows simple electrical characterization of bilayers but is short-lived and can be difficult to work with. Supported bilayers are anchored to a solid substrate, increasing stability and allowing the use of characterization tools not possible in bulk solution. These advantages come at the cost of unwanted substrate interactions which can denature membrane proteins.

Black lipid membranes (BLM)

Schematic of a painted bilayer experiment. A sheet of plastic with a small hole in the center separates the two sides of the chamber. The bilayer is formed across this hole, separating the two chambers. The electrical properties of the bilayer can be measured by putting an electrode into each side of the chamber.

The earliest model bilayer system developed was the “painted” bilayer, also known as a “black lipid membrane.” The term “painted” refers to the process by which these bilayers are made. First, a small aperture is created in a hydrophobic material such as Teflon. Typically the diameter of this hole is a few tens of micrometers. A solution of lipids dissolved in an organic solvent is then applied with a brush or a syringe across the aperture.^[1] The solvent used must have a very low partition coefficient in water and must be relatively viscous to prevent immediate rupture. The most common solvent used is a mixture of decane and squalene. A lipid monolayer spontaneously forms at the interface between the organic and aqueous phases on either side of the lipid/solvent droplet. Because the walls of the aperture are hydrophobic the lipid/solvent solution wets this interface, thinning the droplet in the center. Once the two sides of the droplet come close enough together, the lipid monolayers fuse, rapidly excluding the small remaining volume of solution. At this point a bilayer is formed in the center of the aperture, but a significant annulus of solvent remains at the perimeter. This annulus is required to maintain stability by acting as a bridge between the ~5 nm bilayer and the 10's of micrometer thick sheet in which the aperture is made.^[2]

The term “black” bilayer refers to the fact that they are dark in reflected light because the thickness of the membrane is only a few nanometers, so light reflecting off the back face destructively interferes with light reflecting off the front face. Indeed, this was one of the first clues that this technique produced a membrane of molecular-scale thickness.^[3] Black lipid membranes are also well suited to electrical characterization because the two chambers separated by the bilayer are both accessible, allowing simple placement of large electrodes. For this reason, electrical characterization is one of the most important methods used in conjunction with painted lipid bilayers. Simple measurements indicate when a bilayer forms and when it breaks, as an intact bilayer has a large resistance (>GΩ) and a large capacitance (~2µF/cm2). More advanced electrical characterization has been particularly important in the study of voltage gated ion channels. Membrane proteins such as ion channels typically cannot be incorporated directly into the painted bilayer during formation because immersion in an organic solvent would denature the protein. Instead, the protein is solubilized with a detergent and added to the aqueous solution after the bilayer is formed. The detergent coating allows these proteins to spontaneously insert into the bilayer over a period of minutes. First experiments have been performed to combine electrophysiological and structural investigations of Black Lipid Membranes.^[4]

The main problems associated with painted bilayers are residual solvent and limited lifetime. Some researchers believe that pockets of solvent trapped between the two bilayer leaflets can disrupt normal protein function. To overcome this limitation, Montal and Mueller developed a modified deposition technique that eliminates the use of a heavy non-volatile solvent. In this method, the aperture starts out above the water surface, completely separating the two fluid chambers. On the surface of each chamber, a monolayer is formed by applying lipids in a volatile solvent such as chloroform and waiting for the solvent to evaporate. The aperture is then lowered through the air-water interface and the two monolayers from the separate chambers are folded down against each other, forming a bilayer across the aperture.^[5] The stability issue has proven more difficult to solve. Typically, a black lipid membrane will survive for less than an hour, precluding long-term experiments. This lifetime can be extended by precisely structuring the supporting aperture^[6],chemically crosslinking the lipids or gelling the surrounding solution to mechanically support the bilayer.^[7] Work is ongoing in this area and lifetimes of several hours will become feasible.

Supported lipid bilayers (SLB)

Diagram of a supported bilayer

Unlike a vesicle or a cell membrane in which the lipid bilayer is rolled into an enclosed shell, a supported bilayer is a planar structure sitting on a solid support. Because of this, only the upper face of the bilayer is exposed to free solution. This layout has advantages and drawbacks related to the study of lipid bilayers. One of the greatest advantages of the supported bilayer is its stability. SLBs will remain largely intact even when subject to high flow rates or vibration and, unlike black lipid membranes, the presence of holes will not destroy the entire bilayer. Because of this stability, experiments lasting weeks and even months are possible with supported bilayers while BLM experiments are usually limited to hours.^[8] Another advantage of the supported bilayer is that, because it is on a flat hard surface, it is amenable to a number of characterization tools which would be impossible or would offer lower resolution if performed on a freely floating sample.

One of the clearest examples of this advantage is the use of mechanical probing techniques which require a direct physical interaction with the sample. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to image lipid phase separation,^[9] formation of transmembrane nanopores followed by single protein molecule adsorption,^[10] and protein assembly^[11] with sub-nm accuracy without the need for a labeling dye. More recently, AFM has also been used to directly probe the mechanical properties of single bilayers^[12] and to perform force spectroscopy on individual membrane proteins.^[13] These studies would be difficult or impossible without the use of supported bilayers since the surface of a cell or vesicle is relatively soft and would drift and fluctuate over time. Another example of a physical probe is the use of the quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) to study binding kinetics at the bilayer surface.^[14] Dual polarisation interferometry is a high resolution optical tool for characterising the order and disruption in lipid bilayers during interactions or phase transitions providing complementary data to QCM measurements ^[15].

Many modern fluorescence microscopy techniques also require a rigidly-supported planar surface. Evanescent field methods such as total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRF) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) can offer extremely sensitive measurement of analyte binding and bilayer optical properties but can only function when the sample is supported on specialized optically functional materials. Another class of methods applicable only to supported bilayers is those based on optical interference such as fluorescence interference contrast microscopy (FLIC) and reflection interference contrast microscopy (RICM). When the bilayer is supported on top of a reflective surface, variations in intensity due to destructive interference from this interface can be used to calculate with angstrom accuracy the position of fluorophores within the bilayer.^[16] Both evanescent and interference techniques offer sub-wavelength resolution in only one dimension (z, or vertical). In many cases, this resolution is all that is needed. After all, bilayers are very small only in one dimension. Laterally, a bilayer can extend for many micrometres or even millimeters. But certain phenomena like dynamic phase rearrangement do occur in bilayers on a lateral sub-micrometre lengthscale. A promising approach to studying these structures is near field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM).^[17] Like AFM, NSOM relies on the scanning of a micromachined tip to give a highly localized signal. But unlike AFM, NSOM uses an optical rather than physical interaction with the sample, potentially perturbing delicate structures to a lesser extent.

Fluorescence micrograph of a supported bilayer on a substrate that has been patterned with a corral. This substrate was then sequentially exposed two two different populations of lipids (dyed red and green). Although the populations were kept largely separated there was some intermixing at the interface as seen from the color gradient.

Another important capability of supported bilayers is the ability to pattern the surface to produce multiple isolated regions on the same substrate. This phenomenon was first demonstrated using scratches or metallic “corrals” to prevent mixing between adjacent regions while still allowing free diffusion within any one region.^[18][19] Later work extended this concept by integrating microfluidics to demonstrate that stable composition gradients could be formed in bilayers,^[20] potentially allowing massively parallel studies of phase segregation, molecular binding and cellular response to artificial lipid membranes. Creative utilization of the corral concept has also allowed studies of the dynamic reorganization of membrane proteins at the synaptic interface.^[21]

One of the primary limitations of supported bilayers is the possibility of unwanted interactions with the substrate. Although supported bilayers generally do not directly touch the substrate surface, they are separated by only a very thin water gap. The size and nature of this gap depends on the substrate material^[22] and lipid species but is generally about 1 nm for zwitterionic lipids supported on silica, the most common experimental system.^[23][24] Because this layer is so thin there is extensive hydrodynamic coupling between the bilayer and the substrate, resulting in a lower diffusion coefficient in supported bilayers than for free bilayers of the same composition.^[25] A certain percentage of the supported bilayer will also be completely immobile, although the exact nature of and reason for these “pinned” sites is still uncertain. For high quality liquid phase supported bilayers the immobile fraction is typically around 1-5%. To quantify the diffusion coefficient and mobile fraction, researchers studying supported bilayers will often report FRAP data.

Unwanted substrate interactions are a much greater problem when incorporating integral membrane proteins, particularly those with large domains sticking out beyond the core of the bilayer. Because the gap between bilayer and substrate is so thin these proteins will often become denatured on the substrate surface and therefore lose all functionality.^[26] One approach to circumvent this problem is the use of polymer tethered bilayers. In these systems the bilayer is supported on a loose network of hydrated polymers or hydrogel which acts as a spacer and theoretically prevents denaturing substrate interactions.^[27] In practice, some percentage of the proteins will still lose mobility and functionality, probably due to interactions with the polymer/lipid anchors.^[25] Research in this area is ongoing.

Tethered Bilayer Lipid Membranes (t-BLM)

The use of a tethered bilayer lipid membrane (t-BLM) further increases the stability supported membranes by chemically anchoring the lipids to the solid substrate providing a greatly enhanced stability .^[28]

Diagram showing formation of t-BLM.

Gold can be used as a substrate because of its inert chemistry and thiolipids for covalent binding to the gold. Thiolipids are composed of lipid derivatives, extended at their polar head-groups by hydrophilic spacers which terminate in a thiol or disulphide group that forms a covalent bond with gold, forming self assembled monolayers (SAM).

The limitation of the intra-membrane mobility of supported lipid bilayers can be overcome by introducing half-membrane spanning tether lipids ^[29]with benzyl disulphide (DPL) and synthetic archaea analogue full membrane spanning lipids with phytanoly chains to stabilize the structure and polyethyleneglycol units as a hydrophilic spacer. Bilayer formation is achieved either by exposure of the lipid coated gold substrate to outer layer lipids either in an ethanol solution or in liposomes ^[30]

. The advantage of this approach is that the because of the hydrophilic space of around 4 nm, the interaction with the substrate is minimal and the extra space allows the introduction of protein ion channels into the bilayer. Additionally the spacer layer creates an ionic reservoir .^[31] that readily enables ac electrical impedance measurement across the bilayer.

Vesicles

Main article: Liposome

Diagram of lipid vesicles showing a solution of molecules (green dots) trapped in the vesicle interior.

A vesicle is a lipid bilayer rolled up into a spherical shell, enclosing a small amount of water and separating it from the water outside the vesicle. Because of this fundamental similarity to the cell membrane, vesicles have been used extensively to study the properties of lipid bilayers. Another reason vesicles have been used so frequently is that they are relatively easy to make. If a sample of dehydrated lipid is exposed to water it will spontaneously form vesicles.^[32] These initial vesicles are typically multilamellar (many-walled) and are of a wide range of sizes from tens of nanometers to several micrometres.^[33] Methods such as sonication or extrusion through a membrane are needed to break these initial vesicles into smaller, single-walled vesicles of uniform diameter known as small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs). SUVs are typically between 50 and 200 nm diameter.^[34] Alternatively, rather than synthesizing vesicles it is possible to simply isolate them from cell cultures or tissue samples.^[35] Vesicles are used to transport lipids, proteins and many other molecules within the cell as well as into or out of the cell. These naturally isolated vesicles are composed of a complex mixture of different lipids and proteins so, although they offer greater realism for studying specific biological phenomena, simple artificial vesicles are preferred for studies of fundamental lipid properties.

Since artificial SUVs can be made in large quantities they are suitable for bulk material studies such as x-ray diffraction to determine lattice spacing^[36] and differential scanning calorimetry to determine phase transitions.^[37] Dual polarisation interferometry can measure unilamelar and multilamelar structures and insertion into and disruption of the vesciles in a label free assay format ^[38]. Vesicles can also be labeled with fluorescent dyes to allow sensitive FRET-based fusion assays.^[39] In spite of this fluorescent labeling it is often difficult to perform detailed imaging on SUVs simply because they are so small. To combat this problem researchers have developed the giant unilamellar vesicle (GUV). GUVs are large enough (several tens of micrometres) to study with traditional florescence microscopy. Many of the studies of lipid rafts in artificial lipid systems have been performed with GUVs for this reason.^[40] Compared to supported bilayers, GUVs present a more “natural” environment since there is no nearby solid surface to induce defects or denature proteins. However, GUVs are relatively fragile, time consuming to make and can only be produced in limited yield compared to SUVs.

To circumvent these problems a microfluidic assembly line approach to GUVs was reported.^[41]

Micelles, bicelles and Nanodiscs

Detergent micelles ^[42] are another class of model membranes that are commonly to purify and study membrane proteins, although they lack a lipid bilayer. In aqueous solutions, micelles are assemblies of amphipathic molecules with their hydrophilic heads exposed to solvent and their hydrophobic tails in the center. Micelles can solubilize membrane proteins by partially encapsulating them and shielding their hydrophobic surfaces from solvent.

Bicelles are a related class of model membrane ^[43], typically made of two lipids, one of which forms a lipid bilayer while the other forms an amphipathic, micelle-like assembly shielding the bilayer center from surround solvent molecules. Bicelles can be thought of as a segment of bilayer encapsulated and solubilized by a micelle. Bicelles are much smaller than liposomes, and so can be used in experiments such as NMR spectroscopy where the larger vesicles are not an option.

Nanodiscs ^[44] consist of a segment of bilayer encapsulated by an amphipathic protein coat, rather than a lipid or detergent layer. Nanodiscs are more stable than bicelles and micelles at low concentrations, and are very well-defined in size (depending on the type of protein coat, between 10 and 20 nm). Membrane proteins incorporated into and solubilized by Nanodiscs can be studied by a wide variety of biophysical techniques.

References

1. ^ P Mueller, D O Rudin, H I Tien, and W C Wescott."Reconstitution of cell membrane structure in vitro and its transformation into an excitable system." Nature. 194. (1962) 979-980.
2. ^ S H White."Analysis of the torus surrounding planar lipid bilayer membranes." Biophysical Journal. 12. (1972) 432-445.
3. ^ H T Tien, S Carbone, and E A Dawidowicz."Formation of "black" lipid membranes by oxidation products of cholesterol." Nature. 212. (1966) 718-719.
4. ^ A Beerlink, M Mell, M Tolkiehn, and T Salditt."Hard X-Ray Phase Contrast Imaging of Black lipid membranes." Applied Physics Letters. 95. (2009) 203703.
5. ^ M Montal and P Mueller."Formation of Bimolecular Membranes from Lipid Monolayers and a Study of Their Electrical Properties." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 69. (1972) 3561-3566.
6. ^ A Beerlink, P J Wilbrandt, E Ziegler, D Carbone, T H Metzger, and T Salditt."X-ray Structure Analysis of Free-Standing Lipid Membranes Facilitated by Micromachined Apertures." Langmuir. 24. (2008) 4952-4958.
7. ^ N Malmstadt, T J Jeon, and J J Schmidt."Long-Lived Planar Lipid Bilayer Membranes Anchored to an In Situ Polymerized Hydrogel." Advanced Materials. 20. (2007) 84-89.
8. ^ O Purrucker, H Hillebrandt, K Adlkofer, and M Tanaka."Deposition of highly resistive lipid bilayer on silicon-silicon dioxide electrode and incorporation of gramicidin studied by ac impedance spectroscopy." Electrochimica Acta. 47. (2001) 791-798.
9. ^ W C Lin, C D Blanchette, T V Ratto, and M L Longo."Lipid Asymmetry in DLPC/DSPC-Supported Lipid Bilayers: A Combined AFM and Fluorescence Microscopy Study." Biophysical Journal. 90. (2006) 228-237.
10. ^ Y. Roiter, M. Ornatska, A. R. Rammohan, J. Balakrishnan, D. R. Heine, and S. Minko, Interaction of Nanoparticles with Lipid Membrane, Nano Letters, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 941–944 (2008).
11. ^ A Engel and D J Muller."Observing single biomolecules at work with the atomic force microscope." Nature Structural Biology. 7. (2000)
12. ^ S Steltenkamp, M M Muller, M Deserno, C Hennesthal, C Steinem, and A Janshoff."Mechanical properties of pore-spanning lipid bilayers probed by atomic force microscopy." Biophysical Journal. 91. (2006) 217-226.
13. ^ F Oesterhelt, D Oesterhelt, M Pfeiffer, A Engel, H E Gaub, and D J Mueller."Unfolding pathways of individual bacteriorhodopsins." Science. 288. (2000) 143-146.
14. ^ Y Ebara and Y Okahata."A Kinetic Study of Concanavalin A Binding to Glycolipid Monolayers by Using a Quartz-Crystal Microbalance." Journal of the American Chemical Society. 116. (1994) 11209-11212.
15. ^ Mashaghi et al. "Optical anisotropy of supported lipid structures probed by waveguide spectroscopy and its application to study of supported lipid bilayer formation kinetics" Anal. Chem., 80 (10), 3666–3676 (2008)
16. ^ J M Crane, V Kiessling, and L K Tamm."Measuring lipid asymmetry in planar supported bilayers by fluorescence interference contrast microscopy." Langmuir. 21. (2005) 1377-1388.
17. ^ C W Hollars and R C Dunn."Submicron Structure in l--Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine Monolayers and Bilayers Probed with Confocal, Atomic Force, and Near-Field Microscopy." Biophysical Journal. 75. (1998) 342-353.
18. ^ J T Groves, N Ulman, and S G Boxer."Micropatterning fluid lipid bilayers on solid supports." Science. 275. (1997) 651-3.
19. ^ J T Groves, N U Ulman, P S Cremer, and S G Boxer."Substrate-Membrane Interactions: Mechanisms for Imposing Patterns on a Fluid Bilayer Membrane " Langmuir. 14. (1998) 3347 -50.
20. ^ L Kam and S G Boxer."Spatially Selective Manipulation of Supported Lipid Bilayers by Laminar Flow: Steps Toward Biomembrane Microfluidics." Langmuir. 19. (2003) 1624-1631.
21. ^ R Parthasarathy, B L Jackson, T J Lowery, A P Wong, and J T Groves."Nonequilibrium Adhesion Patterns at Lipid Bilayer Junctions." Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 108. (2004) 649-57.
22. ^ M D Mager, B A Almquist, and N A Melosh."Formation and Characterization of Fluid Lipid Bilayers on Alumina." Langmuir. 24. (2008) 12734-12737.
23. ^ B W Koenig, S Kruger, W J Orts, C F Majkrzak, et al."Neutron reflectivity and atomic force microscopy studies of a lipid bilayer in water adsorbed to the surface of a silicon single crystal." Langmuir. 12. (1996) 1343-1350.
24. ^ S J Johnson, T M Bayerl, D C McDermott, G W Adam, et al."Structure of an adsorbed dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer measured with specular reflection of neutrons." Biophysical Journal. 59. (1991) 289-94.
25. ^ ^{a b} M Kuhner, R Tampe, and E Sackmann."Lipid mono- and bilayer supported on polymer films: Composite polymer-lipid films on solid substrates." Biophysical Journal. 67. (1994) 217-226.
26. ^ E T Castellana and P S Cremer."Solid supported lipid bilayers: From biophysical studies to sensor design." Surface Science Reports. 61. (2006) 429-444.
27. ^ J Y Wong, C K Park, M Seitz, and J Israelachvili."Polymer-cushioned bilayers. II. An investigation of interaction forces and fusion using the surface forces apparatus." Biophysical Journal. 77. (1999) 1458-68.
28. ^ Naumann R, Jonczyk A, Kopp R, v.Esch J, Ringsdorf H, Knoll W, Gräber P (1995). "Incorporation of Membrane Proteins in Solid-Supported Lipid Layers". Angew. Chem. 34 (18): 2056. doi:10.1002/anie.199520561. 
29. ^ Cornell B, Braach-Maksvytis V, King L, Osman P, Raguse B, Wieczorek L, Pace R (1997). "A biosensor that uses ion-channel switches". Nature 387 (6633): 580–3. doi:10.1038/42432. PMID 9177344. 
30. ^ Lang H, Duschl C, Vogel H (1994). "A new class of thiolipids for the attachment of lipid bilayers on gold surfaces". Langmuir 10: 197. doi:10.1021/la00013a029. 
31. ^ Cornell B, Krishna G, Osman P, et al (2001). "Tethered-bilayer lipid membranes as a support for membrane-active peptides". Biochemical Society Transactions 29 (Pt 4): 613–617. doi:10.1042/BST0290613. PMID 11498038. 
32. ^ A D Bangham and R W Horne."Negative stainign of phospholipids and their structural modification by surface active agents as observed in the electron microscope." Journal of Molecular Biology. 8. (1964) 660-668.
33. ^ D D Lasic."The mechanism of vesicle formation." Biochemical Journal. 256. (1988) 1-11.
34. ^ F Szoka and D Papahadjopoulos."Comparative Properties and Methods of Preparation of Lipid Vesicles (Liposomes)." Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering. 9. (1980) 467-508.
35. ^ W S Trimble, D M Cowan, and R H Scheller."VAMP-1: a synaptic vesicle-associated integral membrane protein." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 85. (1988) 4538-4542.
36. ^ D Papahadjapoulos and N Miller."Phospholipid Model Membranes I. Structural characteristics of hydrated liquid crystals." Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 135. (1967) 624-638.
37. ^ H Trauble and D H Haynes."The volume change in lipid bilayer lamellae at the crystalline-liquid crystalline phase transition." Chem. Phys. Lipids. 7. (1971) 324-335.
38. ^ J Popplewell, M Swann, N Freeman, C McDonnell and R Ford, "Quantifying of the Effects of Mellitin on Liposomes." Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (2007) 1768 13-20
39. ^ L Guohua and R C Macdonald."Lipid bilayer vesicle fusion: Intermediates captured by high-speed microfluorescence spectroscopy." Biophysical Journal. 85. (2003) 1585-1599.
40. ^ C Dietrich, L A Bagatolli, Z N Volovyk, N L Thompson, et al."Lipid rafts reconstituted in model membranes." Biophysical Journal. 80. (2001) 1417-1428.
41. ^ Matosevic, S.; Paegel, B. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja109137s
42. ^ A M Seddon, P Curnow, P J Booth. "Membrane proteins, lipids and detergents: not just a soap opera." Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004 Nov 3;1666(1-2):105-17
43. ^ Silvia Cavagnero, H. Jane Dyson and Peter E. Wright. "Improved low pH bicelle system for orienting macromolecules over a wide temperature range." J Biomol NMR. 1999 Apr;13(4):387-91.
44. ^ T K Ritchie et al. "Reconstitution of Membrane Proteins in Phospholipid Bilayer Nanodiscs" Methods Enzymol. 2009;464:211-31.