Student–teacher ratio

Student–teacher ratio

Student-teacher ratio refers to the number of teachers in a school or university with respect to the number of students who attend the institution. For example, a student-teacher ratio of 10:1 indicates that there are 10 students for every one teacher. The term can also be reversed to create a teacher-student ratio.



A low student-teacher ratio is often used as a selling point to those choosing schools for tertiary education. On the other hand, high student-teacher ratio is often cited for criticizing proportionately underfunded schools or school systems, or as evidence of the need for legislative change or more funding for education.

In the United States, some states have enacted legislation mandating a maximum student-teacher ratio for specific grade levels, particularly kindergarten. When such figures are stated for schools, they often represent averages (means) and thus are vulnerable to skewing. For example, figures may be biased as follows: if one classroom has a 30:1 ratio and another has a 10:1 ratio, the school could thus claim to have a 20:1 ratio overall. In some cases Child care management software may be used to help monitor student-teacher ratios.

In schools, such ratios are indicative of possible staff changes. If the student-teacher ratio is 50:1, the school will probably consider hiring a few teachers. If the ratio is very low, classes could be combined and teachers fired. In extreme cases, the school may close, due to its apparent redundancy.

Classes with too many students are often disrupting to education. Also, too many students in a class results in a diverse field of students, with varying degrees of learning ability and information uptake. Consequently, the class will spend time for less academic students to assimilate the information, when that time could be better spent progressing through the curriculum. In this way, student-teacher ratios are compelling arguments for advanced or honors classes.

The issue of students' ability to work effectively in groups (as opposed to time-waste and chatting) and peer-teaching is a complex and controversial issue.

Numerous sources argue that lower student to teacher ratios are better at teaching students complex subjects such as physics, mathematics and chemistry, than those with a higher ratio of students to teachers. Commonly the schools with lower student to teacher ratios are more exclusive, have a higher attendance of non-blacks, are in non-inner urban areas and/or fee-paying (non-government) institutions.[1]

The manifold arguments and controversies of funding and student-teacher ratios have been the basis for a multitude of studies and debates. One view is illustrated below:

Many analysts have found that extra school resources play a negligible role in improving student achievement while children are in school. Yet many economists have gathered data showing that students who attend well-endowed schools grow up to enjoy better job market success than children whose education takes place in schools where resources are limited. For example, children who attend schools with a lower pupil-teacher ratio and a better educated teaching staff appear to earn higher wages as adults than children who attend poorer schools.[1]

Among the more popular studies on student-teacher ratio effects were those done in connection with Tennessee's Project Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR)[2] and Wisconsin's Student Achievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE) Program [3]. The researchers associated with both of these programs found significant cumulative benefits associated with smaller class size, with benefits being more impressive for African American students. However, others dispute these findings, most notably the Heritage Foundation.[4] The broader research literature also raises questions about the generalizability of these studies.[5] This conflicting research has led to a number of attempts to assess and reconcile the existing evidence.[6]

Criticism of emphasis

Governments tend to argue, perhaps with an eye on cost-savings and limiting public expenditure, that higher student-teacher ratios have no net negative on outcomes. This may be considered by some as not only cynical and counter-intuitive but disproven by certain facts. Furthermore, the complex inter-relationships of socio-economics, class, race, ethnicity, and achievement are all key factor in the debate. It remains a highly contentious debate and unlikely to be satisfactorily resolved.

See also


  1. ^ a b Card, David; Alan B. Krueger (1996). "School Quality and the Return to Education". In Gary Burtless. Does money matter?: the effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. pp. 118–119. ISBN 0-8157-1274-X. 
  2. ^ Finn, J.D., & Achilles, C.M. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: a statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3),557-577.
  3. ^ Molnar, A., Smith, P., Zahorik, J., Palmer, A., Halbach, A., & Ehrle, K. (1999). Evaluating the SAGE Program: a pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 165-177.
  4. ^ Rees, N. S., & Johnson, K. (2000, May 30). A lesson in smaller class sizes. Heritage Views 2000 [Online]. Available:
  5. ^ Hanushek, Eric A. 1999. "Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, no. 2 (Summer): 143-163; Hanushek, Eric A. 1999. "The evidence on class size." In Earning and learning: How schools matter, edited by Susan E. Mayer and Paul E. Peterson. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution: 131-168.
  6. ^ Ehrenberg, Ronald G., Dominic J. Brewer, Adam Gamoran, and J. Douglas Willms. 2001. "Class size and student achievement." Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2, no. 1 (May): 1-30; Mishel, Lawrence, and Richard Rothstein, eds. 2002. The class size debate. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

Further reading

  • Teachers: Supply and demand: United States.Erling E. Boe Dorothy M. Gilford. National Academies Press, 1992. ISBN 0-309-04792-7. (Examines policy issues, projection models, and data bases pertaining to the supply of, demand for, and quality of teachers in the United States from kindergarten to twelfth grade. This book identifies additional data needed to clarify policy issues or for use in projection models.)
  • Bold Plans for School Restructuring: The New American Schools Designs. Sam Stringfield, Steven M. Ross, Lana Smith. Routledge, 1996. ISBN 0-805-82340-9.
  • Bridging the Achievement Gap. John E. Chubb, Tom Loveless. Brookings Institute Press, 2002. ISBN 0-815-71400-9.
  • Projections of Education Statistics to 2008. Debra E. Gerald. DIANE Publishing, 1999. ISBN 0-788-18364-8.
  • Does Money Matter?: The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement. Michael, H editor. Brookings Institute Press, 1996. ISBN 0-815-71274-X.

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Student-teacher ratio — refers to the number of teachers in a school or university with respect to the number of students who attend the institution. For example, a student teacher ratio of 10:1 indicates that there are 10 students for every one teacher. The term can… …   Wikipedia

  • student-teacher ratio — noun The ratio of students to teachers at a school …   Wiktionary

  • ratio — noun ADJECTIVE ▪ high, low ▪ gender, sex ▪ Some universities take steps to keep their gender ratio 50–50. ▪ staffing ▪ …   Collocations dictionary

  • ratio — /ray shoh, shee oh /, n., pl. ratios. 1. the relation between two similar magnitudes with respect to the number of times the first contains the second: the ratio of 5 to 2, written 5:2 or 5/2. 2. proportional relation; rate: the ratio between… …   Universalium

  • Ratio Studiorum — • The educational system of the Jesuits Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Ratio Studiorum     Ratio Studiorum     † …   Catholic encyclopedia

  • People to People Student Ambassador Program — Infobox Organization name = People to People Student Ambassador Program image border = size = 150px caption = People to People Seal and logo formation = 1956 type = Youth Peace Ambassador/Travel headquarters = Spokane, Washington location = Motto …   Wikipedia

  • ratio — ra|tio [ reıʃou ] noun count *** a relationship between two things expressed by two numbers or amounts: a teacher student ratio of 1:20 (=1 teacher for every 20 students) the ratio of something to something: The ratio of expenditure to revenue… …   Usage of the words and phrases in modern English

  • ratio */*/*/ — UK [ˈreɪʃɪəʊ] / US [ˈreɪʃoʊ] noun [countable] Word forms ratio : singular ratio plural ratios maths a relationship between the sizes of two numbers or amounts a teacher student ratio of 1:20 (= 1 teacher for every 20 students) the ratio of… …   English dictionary

  • ratio*/ — [ˈreɪʃiəʊ] noun [C] a relationship between two things that is expressed as two numbers or amounts a teacher student ratio of 1: 20 (= 1 teacher for every 20 students)[/ex] The ratio of men to women was 4: 1.[/ex] …   Dictionary for writing and speaking English

  • Test (student assessment) — A test or an examination (or exam ) is an assessment, often administered on paper or on the computer, intended to measure the test takers or respondents (often a student) knowledge, skills, aptitudes, or classification in many other topics (e.g …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”