- George Fox
caption = Supposed portrait [This picture, reputedly by
Peter Lely, is in the collection of Swarthmore College. Its authenticity is questioned (see for example, Fenn, W. W. (April 1926). "The American Historical Review", Vol.31 No.3 pp.513-515), together with all other supposed portraits of George Fox.]
birth_date = July 1624
Fenny Drayton, Leicestershire, England
death_date = death date|1691|1|13|df=y
occupation = Religious leader
spouse = Margaret Fell née Askew
parents = Christopher Fox, Mary Lago
children = None
George Fox (July 1624 – 13 January 1691) was an English Dissenter and a founder of the
Religious Society of Friends, commonly known as the Quakers.
The son of a weaver from rural
England, Fox was apprenticed to a cobbler. Living in a time of great social upheaval and war, he rebelled against the religious and political consensus by proposing an unusual and uncompromising approach to the Christian faith. Abandoning his trade, he toured Britain as a dissenting preacher, for which he was often persecuted by the authorities who disapproved of his beliefs.
Fox married the widow of one of his wealthier supporters,
Margaret Fell, who was also a leading Friend. His ministry expanded and he undertook tours of North America, and the Low Countries, between which he was imprisoned for over a year. He spent the final decade of his life working in London to organize the expanding Quaker movement.
Though his movement attracted disdain from some, others such as
William Pennand Oliver Cromwellviewed Fox with respect. His journal, first published after his death, is known even among non-Quakers for its vivid account of his personal journey.
George Fox was born in the strongly puritan village of Drayton-in-the-Clay,
Leicestershire, England (now known as Fenny Drayton), 15 miles (24 km) west-south-west of Leicester. He was the eldest of four children of Christopher Fox, a successful weaver, called "Righteous Christer" [Fox in Nickalls, p.1] by his neighbours, and his wife, Mary née Lago. Christopher Fox was a churchwarden and was relatively wealthy; when he died in the late 1650s he was able to leave his son a substantial legacy.Ingle (2004)] From childhood, Fox was of a serious, religious disposition. There is no record of any formal schooling but he learned to read and write. "When I came to eleven years of age," he said, "I knew pureness and righteousness; for, while I was a child, I was taught how to walk to be kept pure. The Lord taught me to be faithful, in all things, and to act faithfully two ways; viz., inwardly to God, and outwardly to man." [Fox in Nickalls, p.1–2 and Jones, chapter 1]
As he grew up, his relatives "thought to have made me a priest" but he was instead apprenticed to a local shoemaker and , George Gee of
Mancetter. [Nickalls, p.2 and Ingle (2004)] This suited his contemplative temperament, and he became well-known for his diligence among the wool traders who had dealings with his master. A constant obsession for Fox was the pursuit of "simplicity" in life, meaning humility and the abandonment of luxury, and the short time he spent as a shepherdwas important to the formation of this view. Toward the end of his life, he wrote a letter for general circulation pointing out that Abel, Noah, Abraham, Jacob, Mosesand Davidwere all keepers of sheep or cattle, and that a learned education should not therefore be seen as a qualification for ministry. [Marsh 1847, p. 364]
George Fox knew people who were "professors" (followers of the standard religion), but by the age of nineteen he had begun to look down on their behaviour, in particular their drinking of alcohol. He records that in prayer one night, after leaving two acquaintances at a drinking session, he heard an inner voice saying, "Thou seest how young people go together into vanity, and old people into the earth; thou must forsake all, young and old, keep out of all, and be as a stranger unto all." [Fox in Nickalls, p.3 and Jones, chapter 1]
For this reason, Fox left Drayton-in-the-Clay in September 1643, moving toward London in a state of mental torment and confusion. The
English Civil Warhad begun and troops were stationed in many of the towns through which he passed. While in Barnet, where he was torn by depression (perhaps from the temptations of this resort town near London), Fox would alternately shut himself in his room for days at a time, or go out alone into the countryside. After almost a year, he returned to Drayton, where he engaged Nathaniel Stephens, the clergyman of his hometown, in long discussions on religious matters. [Fox in Nickalls, p.5] Stephens considered Fox a gifted young man, but the two disagreed on so many issues that he later called Fox mad and spoke against him. [Fox in Nickalls, p.48]
Over the next few years, Fox continued to travel around the country as his particular religious beliefs took shape. At times, he actively sought the company of clergy, but found no comfort from them, as they too seemed unable to help with the matters that were troubling him. One clergyman in
Warwickshireadvised him to take tobacco(which Fox disliked) and sing psalms; another, in Coventry, lost his temper when Fox accidentally stood on a flower in his garden; a third suggested bloodletting. [Fox in Nickalls, pp.5–6] He became fascinated by the Bible, which he studied assiduously. [Fox in e.g. Nickalls, p.9]
Unique beliefs begin to form
Fox had more than a little experience among "
English Dissenters", groups of people who had broken away from practices of the state church because of their divergent beliefs. He had hoped that the dissenters would help his spiritual understanding, as those in the established church could not, but they did not: he fell out with one group, for example, because he maintained that women had souls. [Fox in Nickalls, pp.8–9, 11] From this comes the passage from his journal:
:"But as I had forsaken the priests, so I left the separate preachers also, and those esteemed the most experienced people; for I saw there was none among them all that could speak to my condition. And when all my hopes in them and in all men were gone, so that I had nothing outwardly to help me, nor could tell what to do, then, oh, then, I heard a voice which said, "There is one, even Christ Jesus, that can speak to thy condition"; and when I heard it my heart did leap for joy. Then the Lord let me see why there was none upon the earth that could speak to my condition, namely, that I might give Him all the glory; for all are concluded under sin, and shut up in unbelief as I had been, that Jesus Christ might have the pre-eminence who enlightens, and gives grace, and faith, and power. Thus when God doth work, who shall let [hinder or prevent] it? And this I knew experimentally." [Quaker Faith and Practice §19.02] [Fox in Nickalls, p.11]
He thought intensely about
Jesus's temptation in the desert, which he compared to his own spiritual condition, but drew strength from his conviction that God would support and preserve him. [Fox in Nickalls, p.12] In prayer and meditation, he came to a greater understanding of the nature of his faith and what it required from him; this process he called "opening". He also came to what he deemed a deep inner understanding of standard Christian beliefs. Among his ideas were:
*Rituals can be safely ignored, as long as one experiences a true spiritual conversion.
*The qualification for ministry is given by the
Holy Spirit, not by ecclesiastical study. This implies that anyone has the right to minister, assuming the Spirit guides them, including women and children.
*God "dwelleth in the hearts of his obedient people": religious experience is not confined to a church building. Indeed, Fox refused to apply the word "church" to a building, using instead the name "steeple-house", a usage maintained by many Quakers today. Fox would just as soon worship in fields and orchards, believing that God's presence could be felt anywhere. [Fox in e.g. Nickalls, pp.8, 24, 40, 85, 126]
*Though Fox used the Bible to support his views, Fox reasoned that, because God was within the faithful, believers could follow their own inner guide rather than rely on a strict reading of Scripture or the word of clerics. [See e.g. Fox in Nickalls, pp.145, 159]
*As the Bible makes no mention of the Trinity, Fox also made no clear distinction between Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
Religious Society of Friends takes shape
In 1647, Fox began to preach publicly: [Fox in Nickalls, pp.18–19] in market-places, in fields, in appointed meetings of various kinds, or even sometimes in "steeple-houses" after the priests had finished. His preaching was powerful, and he began to attract a minority following. It is not clear at what point the Society of Friends was formed but there was certainly a group of people who often travelled together. At first, they called themselves "Children of the Light" or "Friends of the Truth", and later simply "Friends". Fox seems, however, to have had no desire to found a sect, but only to proclaim what he saw as the pure and genuine principles of
Christianityin their original simplicity—though he afterward showed great prowess as a religious legislator, in the organization which he gave to the new society.
At the time, there were a great many rival
Christian denominations holding very diverse opinions; the atmosphere of dispute and confusion gave Fox an opportunity to put forward his own beliefs through his personal sermons. Fox's preaching was grounded in scripture, but was mainly effective because of the intense personal experience he was able to project. He was scathing about contemporary immorality, especially deceit and the exacting of tithes, and urged his listeners to lead lives without sin [Fox in e.g. Nickalls, p.91] —avoiding the Ranter (or Antinomian) view that all acts of a believer became automatically sinless. By 1651 he had gathered other talented preachers around him, and continued to roam the country seeking out new converts. They continued to do this despite a harsh reception from some listeners, who would whip and beat them to drive them away. [See e.g. Fox in Nickalls, pp.44, 48, 97–98, 120, 127–131] The worship of Friends, in the form of silent waiting, seems to have been well-established by this time, [Fox in Nickalls, p.79] though it is not recorded how this came to be.
An interest in social justice was slowly developing, marked by Fox's complaints to judges about decisions he considered morally wrong—for example, his letter on the case of a woman due to be executed for theft. [Fox in Nickalls, p.66] Oppression by the powerful was a very real concern for the English people, in the turmoil of the
English Civil Warfollowing the reign of Charles I (executed in 1649) and the beginnings of the Commonwealth of England. He campaigned against the paying of tithes, which funded the established church and often went into the pockets of absentee landlords or religious colleges far away from the paying parishioners. In his view, as God was everywhere and anyone could preach, the established church was unnecessary and a university qualification irrelevant for a preacher. Fox's conflict with civil authority was inevitable.
Fox was imprisoned several times, the first at
Nottinghamin 1649. [Fox in Nickalls, pp.40–43] At Derbyin 1650 he was imprisoned for blasphemy; a judge mocked Fox's exhortation to "tremble at the word of the Lord", calling him and his followers "Quakers"—now the common name of the Society of Friends. [Fox in Nickalls, pp.52–58 and Jones, chapter 4] He suffered harsh treatment in prison; following his refusal to fight against the return of the monarchy (or indeed to take up arms for any reason), his sentence was doubled. [Fox in Nickalls, pp.64–65]
The beginnings of persecution forced Fox to develop his position on
oaths and violence. Previously implicit in his teaching, the refusal to swear or take up arms came to be a much more important part of his public statements: he was determined that neither he nor his followers would give in under pressure. In a letter of 1652 ("That which is set up by the sword"), he urged Friends not to use "carnal weapons" but "spiritual weapons", saying "let the waves [the power of nations] break over your heads".
In June 1652, Fox felt that God led him to walk up
Pendle Hill. There he had a vision of many souls coming to Christ. From there he travelled to Sedberghin Westmorland, where he heard a group of Seekerswere meeting. He preached to a meeting of over a thousand people on the nearby Firbank Felland convinced many, including Francis Howgill, to accept his teachings on Christ being able to speak to people directly. [Nickalls, pp.103–108] At the end of the month he stayed at Swarthmoor Hall, near Ulverston, the home of Thomas Fell, vice-chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, and his wife, Margaret. Margaret became a Quaker, and although Thomas Fell himself did not convert his familiarity with the Friends proved influential when Fox was arrested for blasphemy in October. Fell was one of three presiding judges and had the charges dismissed on a legal technicality. At around this time the ad hoc meetings of the Friends began to be formalized, and a monthly meeting was set up in County Durham.
Fox remained at
Swarthmooruntil summer 1653, when he left for Carlisle, where he was arrested again for blasphemy; it was even proposed to put him to death, but Parliament requested his release rather than have "a young man … die for religion". [Fox in Nickalls, pp.159–164 and Jones, chapter 7] Further imprisonments came at Londonin 1654, Launceston in 1656, Lancaster in 1660, Leicesterin 1662, Lancaster and Scarborough in 1664–66, and Worcester in 1673–75. The various charges included causing a disturbance and travelling without a pass. Quakers fell foul of laws forbidding unauthorized worship, though these were very irregularly enforced. Actions motivated by belief in social equality—refusing to use or acknowledge titles, take hats off in court or bow to those who considered themselves socially superior—were seen as disrespectful. [Fox in e.g. Nickalls, pp.36–37, 243–244] Refusal to take oaths meant that Quakers could be prosecuted under laws compelling subjects to pledge allegiance, as well as making testifying in court problematic. While imprisoned at Launceston, Fox wrote, "Christ our Lord and master saith. 'Swear not at all, but let your communications be yea, yea, and nay, nay, for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.' ... the Apostle James saith, 'My brethren, above all things swear not, neither by heaven, nor by earth, nor by any other oath. Lest ye fall into condemnation.'" [Fox in e.g. Nickalls, pp.244–245]
Even in prison, George Fox continued writing and preaching. He felt that a benefit of being imprisoned was that it brought him into contact with people who needed his help—the jailers as well as his fellow prisoners. He also sought to set an example by his actions there, turning the other cheek when being beaten and refusing to show his captors any dejected feelings.
Encounters with Oliver Cromwell
The Commonwealth grew suspicious of monarchist plots, and fearful that the group travelling with Fox aimed to overthrow the government—by this time, his meetings were regularly attracting crowds of over a thousand. In early 1655, he was arrested at
Whetstone, Leicestershireand taken to London under armed guard. In March [Ingle (2004) says 9 March; Nickalls, p.199 says 6 March.] he was brought before the Lord Protector, Oliver Cromwell. After affirming that he had no intention of taking up arms, Fox was able to speak with Cromwell for most of the morning about the differences between Friends and members of the traditional denominations, and advised him to listen to God's voice and obey it. He records that on leaving, Cromwell "with tears in his eyes said, 'Come again to my house; for if thou and I were but an hour of a day together, we should be nearer one to the other'; adding that he wished [Fox] no more ill than he did to his own soul." Fox was at liberty again. [Fox in Jones, chapter 8 and Nickalls, p.199]
This episode was later recalled as an example of "speaking truth to power", a preaching technique by which subsequent Quakers hoped to influence the powerful. [Tolles, Frederick Barnes (1956). [http://www.quaker.org/pamphlets/ward1956a.html "The Ward Lecture 1956: Quakerism and Politics".] Quaker Pamphlets.] Although not used until the 20th century, the phrase is related to the ideas of plain speech and simplicity which Fox practiced, but motivated by the more worldly goal of eradicating war, injustice and oppression.
Fox petitioned Cromwell over the course of 1656, asking him to alleviate the persecution of Quakers. [Fox in Nickalls, pp.220–221, 254] Later that year, they met for a second time at Whitehall. On a personal level, the meeting went well; despite disagreements between the two men, they had a certain rapport. Fox felt moved to invite Cromwell to "lay down his crown at the feet of Jesus"—which, however, Cromwell declined to do. [Fox in Nickalls, p.274 and Jones, chapter 10] Fox met Cromwell again twice in March 1657. [Fox in Nickalls, p.289] Their last meeting was in 1658 at
Hampton Court, though they could not speak for long or meet again because of the Protector's worsening illness—Fox even wrote that "he looked like a dead man". [Fox in Jones, chapter 12 and Nickalls, p.350] Cromwell died in September of that year.
One early Quaker convert, the Yorkshireman
James Nayler, arose as a prominent preacher in London around 1655. A breach began to form between Fox's and Nayler's followers. As Fox was held prisoner at Launceston, Nayler moved south-westwards towards Launceston intending to meet Fox and heal any rift. On the way he was arrested himself and held at Exeter. After Fox was released from Launceston gaol in 1656, he preached throughout the West Country. Arriving at Exeter late in September, Fox was reunited with Nayler. Nayler and his followers refused to remove their hats while Fox prayed, which Fox took as both a personal slight and a bad example. When Nayler refused to kiss Fox's hand, Fox told Nayler to kiss his foot instead. Nayler was offended and the two parted acrimoniously. Fox wrote, "there was now a wicked spirit risen amongst Friends". [Ingle (2004) and Fox in Nickalls, p.268]
After Nayler's own release later the same year he rode into
Bristoltriumphantly playing the part of Jesus Christ in a re-enactment of Palm Sunday. He was arrested and taken to London, where Parliament defeated a motion to execute him by 96–82. Instead, they ordered that he be pilloried and whipped through both London and Bristol, branded on his forehead with the letter B (for blasphemer), bored through the tongue with a red-hot iron and imprisoned in solitary confinement with hard labour. [Jones, footnote 125, chapter 10] Nayler was released in 1659, but he was a broken man. On meeting Fox in London, he fell to his knees and begged Fox's forgiveness. Shortly afterward, Nayler was attacked by thieves while travelling home to his family, and died.
Suffering and growth
The persecutions of these years—with about a thousand Friends in prison by 1657—hardened George Fox's opinions of traditional religious and social practices. In his preaching, he often emphasized the Quaker rejection of
baptismby water; this was a useful way of highlighting how the focus of Friends on inward transformation differed from what he saw as the superstition of outward ritual. It was also deliberately provocative to adherents of those practices, providing opportunities for Fox to argue with them on matters of scripture. This pattern was also found in his court appearances: when a judge challenged him to remove his hat, Fox riposted by asking where in the Bible such an injunction could be found.
The Society of Friends became increasingly organized towards the end of the decade. Large meetings were held, including a three-day event in Bedfordshire, the precursor of the present
Britain Yearly Meetingsystem. [Fox in Nickalls, p.339] Fox commissioned two Friends to travel around the country collecting the testimonies of imprisoned Quakers, as evidence of their persecution; this led to the establishment in 1675 of Meeting for Sufferings, which has continued to the present day. [Quaker Faith and Practice §7]
The 1650s, when the Friends were most confrontational, was one of the most creative periods of their history. During the Commonwealth, Fox had hoped that the movement would become the major church in England. Disagreements, persecution and increasing social turmoil, however, led Fox to suffer from a severe depression, which left him deeply troubled at
Readingfor ten weeks in 1658 or 1659. [Nickalls, pp.353–355 and Ingle (2004)] In 1659, he sent parliament his most politically radical pamphlet, " Fifty nine Particulars laid down for the Regulating things", but the year was so chaotic that it never considered them; the document was not reprinted until the 21st century.
With the restoration of the monarchy, Fox's dreams of establishing the Friends as the dominant religion seemed at an end. He was again accused of conspiracy, this time against Charles II, and fanaticism—a charge he resented. He was imprisoned in Lancaster for five months, during which he wrote to the king offering advice on governance: Charles should refrain from war and domestic religious persecution, and discourage oath-taking, plays, and
maypolegames. These last suggestions reveal Fox's Puritanleanings, which continued to influence Quakers for centuries after his death. Once again, Fox was released after demonstrating that he had no military ambitions.
At least on one point, Charles listened to Fox. The seven hundred Quakers who had been imprisoned under
Richard Cromwellwere released, though the government remained uncertain about the group's links with other, more violent, movements. A revolt by the Fifth Monarchistsin January 1661 led to the suppression of that sect and the repression of other nonconformists, including Quakers. [Fox in Nickalls, pp.394–395 and Jones, chapter 14] In the aftermath of this attempted coup, Fox and eleven other Quakers issued a broadside proclaiming what became known among Friends in the 20th century as the "peace testimony": they committed themselves to oppose all outward wars and strife as contrary to the will of God. Not all his followers accepted this statement; Isaac Penington, for example, dissented for a time arguing that the state had a duty to protect the innocent from evil, if necessary by using military force. Despite the testimony, persecution against Quakers and other dissenters continued.
Penington and others, such as John Perrot and John Pennyman, were uneasy at Fox's increasing power within the movement. Like Nayler before them, they saw no reason why men should remove their hats for prayer, arguing that men and women should be treated as equals and if, as according to the apostle Paul, women should cover their heads, then so could men. Perrot and Penington lost the argument. Perrot emigrated to the New World, and Fox retained leadership of the movement.
Parliament enacted laws which forbade non-Anglican religious meetings of more than five people, essentially making Quaker meetings illegal. Fox counseled his followers to openly violate laws that attempted to suppress the movement, and many Friends, including women and children, were jailed over the next two and a half decades. Meanwhile, Quakers in
New Englandhad been banished (and some executed), and Charles was advised by his councillors to issue a mandamuscondemning this practice and allowing them to return. [Fox in Nickalls, pp.411–414] Fox was able to meet some of the New England Friends when they came to London, stimulating his interest in the colonies. Fox was unable to travel there immediately: he was imprisoned again in 1664 for his refusal to swear the oath of allegiance, and on his release in 1666 was preoccupied with organizational matters—he normalized the system of monthly and quarterly meetings throughout the country, and extended it to Ireland.
Visiting Ireland also gave him the opportunity to preach against what he saw as the excesses of the
Roman Catholic Church, in particular the use of ritual. More recent Quaker commentators have noted points of contact between the denominations: both claim the actual presence of God in their meetings, and both allow the collective opinion of the church to augment Biblical teaching. Fox, however, did not perceive this, brought up as he was in a wholly Protestant environment hostile to "Popery".
Margaret Fellof Swarthmoor Hall, a lady of high social position and one of his early converts, on 27 October 1669 at a meeting in Bristol. She was ten years his senior and had eight children (all but one of them Quakers) by her first husband, Thomas Fell, who had died in 1658. She was herself very active in the movement, and had campaigned for equality and the acceptance of women as preachers. As there were no priests at Quaker weddings to perform the ceremony, the union took the form of a civil marriage approved by the principals and the witnesses at a meeting. Ten days after the marriage, Margaret returned to Swarthmoor to continue her work there while George went back to London. [Margaret wrote in her testimony, published in Ellwood's 1694 edition of Fox's journal, "we were very willing, both of us, to live apart for some years upon God's account and his Truth's service, and to deny ourselves of that comfort which we might have had in being together, for the sake and service of the Lord and his Truth. And if any took occasion, or judged hard of us because of that, the Lord will judge them; for we were innocent."] Their shared religious work was at the heart of their life together, and they later collaborated on a great deal of the administration the Society required. Shortly after the marriage, Margaret was imprisoned at Lancaster; [Fox in Nickalls, p.557] George remained in the south-east of England, becoming so ill and depressed that for a time he lost his sight. [Fox in Nickalls, pp.569–571]
Travels in America and Europe
wikisource|Letter to the Governor of Barbados, 1671By 1671 Fox had recovered and Margaret had been released by order of the King. Fox resolved to visit the English settlements in America and the West Indies, remaining there for two years, possibly to counter any remnants of Perrot's teaching there. After a voyage of seven weeks, during which dolphins were caught and eaten, the party arrived in
Barbadoson 3 October 1671. [Diary of John Hull, quoted in Nickalls, pp.580–592] From there, Fox sent an epistle to Friends spelling out the role of women's meetings in the Quaker marriage ceremony, a point of controversy when he returned home. One of his proposals suggested that the prospective couple should be interviewed by an all-female meeting prior to the marriage to determine whether there were any financial or other impediments. Though women's meetings had been held in London for the last ten years, this was an innovation in Bristol and the north-west of England, which many there felt went too far.
Fox wrote a letter to the governor and assembly of the island in which he refuted charges that Quakers were stirring up the slaves to revolt and tried to affirm the orthodoxy of Quaker beliefs. After a stay in
Jamaica, Fox's first landfall on the North American continent was at Maryland, where he participated in a four-day meeting of local Quakers. He remained there while various of his English companions travelled to the other colonies, because he wished to meet some Native Americans who were interested in Quaker ways—though he relates that they had "a great dispute" among themselves about whether to participate in the meeting. Fox was impressed by their general demeanour, which he said was "courteous and loving". [Fox in Nickalls, p.618; Jones, chapter 18, using alternate sources, has "a great debate" and "carried themselves very courteously and lovingly".] He resented the suggestion (from a man in North Carolina) that "the Light and Spirit of God ... was not in the Indians", a proposition which Fox refuted. [Fox in Jones, chapter 18; Nickalls, p.642, has more complicated wording but the same meaning.] Fox left no record of encountering slaves on the mainland.
Elsewhere in the colonies, Fox helped to establish organizational systems for the Friends, along the same lines as he had done in Britain. [Fox in Nickalls, p.621] He also preached to many non-Quakers, some but not all of whom were converted.
Following extensive travels around the various American colonies, George Fox returned to England in June 1673 confident that his movement was firmly established there. Back in England, however, he found his movement sharply divided among provincial Friends (such as William Rogers, John Wilkinson and John Story) who resisted establishment of women's meetings and the power of those who resided in or near London. With
William Pennand Robert Barclayas allies of Fox, the challenge to Fox's leadership was eventually put down. But in the midst of the dispute, Fox was imprisoned again for refusing to swear oaths after being captured at Armscote, Worcestershire. [Though now in Warwickshire, until the re-arrangement of county boundaries in the twentieth century Armscote was in an outlying part of Worcestershire.] His mother died shortly after hearing of his arrest and Fox's health began to suffer. [Fox in Nickalls, pp.666–676] Margaret Fell petitioned the king for his release, [Fox in Nickalls, p.701] which was granted, [Fox in Nickalls, p.705] but Fox felt too weak to take up his travels immediately. Recuperating at Swarthmoor, he began dictating what would be published after his death as his journal and devoted his time to his written output: letters, both public and private, as well as books and essays. [Cadbury, Henry J. (1952) "George Fox's Later Years" in Nickalls, pp.713–756] Much of his energy was devoted to the topic of oaths, having become convinced of its importance to Quaker ideas. By refusing to swear, he felt that he could bear witness to the value of truth in everyday life, as well as to God, who he associated with truth and the inner light.
For three months in 1677 and a month in 1684, Fox visited the Friends in
the Netherlands, and organized their meetings for discipline. The first trip was the more extensive, taking him into what is now Germany, proceeding along the coast to Friedrichstadtand back again over several days. Meanwhile, Fox was participating in a dispute among Friends in Britain over the role of women in meetings, a struggle which took much of his energy and left him exhausted. Returning to England, he stayed in the south in order to try to end the dispute. He followed the foundation of the colony of Pennsylvania, where Penn had given him over a thousand acres of land, with interest. Persecution continued, with Fox arrested briefly in October 1683. Fox's health was becoming worse, but he continued his activities—writing to leaders in Poland, Denmark, Germany, and elsewhere about his beliefs, and their treatment of Quakers.
In the last years of his life, Fox continued to participate in the London Meetings, and still made representations to Parliament about the sufferings of Friends. The new King, James II, pardoned religious dissenters jailed for failure to attend the established church, leading to the release of about 1500 Friends. Though the Quakers lost influence after the
Glorious Revolution, which deposed James II, the 1689 Act of Tolerationput an end to the uniformity laws under which Quakers had been persecuted, permitting them to assemble freely.
Death and legacy
Two days after preaching, as usual, at the
Gracechurch StreetMeeting House in London, George Fox died between 9 and 10 p.m. on 13 January 1691. He was interred in the Quaker burying ground at Bunhill Fieldsin Londonthree days later in the presence of thousands of mourners. [Robert Barrow's account quoted in Nickalls, p.760 estimates four thousand; Ellwood says "a very great number"; Ingle (2004) says "thousands"]
His journal was first published in 1694, after editing by
Thomas Ellwood—a friend of John Milton—with a preface by William Penn. Like most similar works of its time the journal was not written contemporaneously to the events it describes, but rather compiled many years later, much of it dictated. Parts of the journal were not in fact by Fox at all but are constructed by its editors from diverse sources and written as if by him. [See for example, Nickalls, pp.536, 580, 594] The dissent within the movement and the contributions of others to the development of Quakerism are largely excluded from the narrative. Fox portrays himself as always in the right and always vindicated by God's interventions on his behalf. As a religious autobiography, Rufus Jonescompared it to such works as Augustine's "Confessions" and John Bunyan's "Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners". It is, though, an intensely personal work with little dramatic power that only succeeds in appealing to readers after substantial editing. Historians have used it as a primary source because of its wealth of detail on ordinary life in the 17th century, and the many towns and villages which Fox visited. [Jones, Rufus M. (1908) "Preface" in Jones's version of Fox's journal]
Hundreds of Fox's letters—mostly intended for wide circulation, along with a few private communications—were also published. Written from the 1650s onwards, with such titles as "Friends, seek the peace of all men" or "To Friends, to know one another in the light", they give enormous insight into the detail of Fox's beliefs, and show his determination to spread them. These writings, in the words of
Henry Cadbury, Professor of Divinity at Harvard Universityand a leading Quaker, "contain a few fresh phrases of his own, [but] are generally characterized by an excess of scriptural language and today they seem dull and repetitious". [Cadbury, Henry J. (1967). "Fox, George". "Collier's Encyclopedia". Crowell Collier and Macmillan, Inc. Vol.10 p.243] Others point out that "Fox's sermons, rich in biblical metaphor and common speech, brought hope in a dark time." [George Fox University (19 March 2008). [http://www.georgefox.edu/about/georgefox/leadership.html "Spiritual Leadership of George Fox"] . Accessed 12 May 2008.] Fox's aphorisms have found an audience beyond Quakers, with many other church groups using them to illustrate principles of Christianity.
Fox is described by Ellwood as "graceful in countenance, manly in personage, grave in gesture, courteous in conversation". Penn says he was "civil beyond all forms of breeding". We are told that he was "plain and powerful in preaching, fervent in prayer", "a discerner of other men's spirits, and very much master of his own", skilful to "speak a word in due season to the conditions and capacities of most, especially to them that were weary, and wanted soul's rest"; "valiant in asserting the truth, bold in defending it, patient in suffering for it, immovable as a rock". [1694 Journal front matter]
Fox's influence on the Society of Friends was of course tremendous, and his beliefs have largely been carried forward by that group. Perhaps his most significant achievement, other than his predominant influence in the early movement, was his leadership in overcoming the twin challenges of government prosecution after the Restoration and internal disputes that threatened its stability during the same period. Not all of his beliefs were welcome to all Quakers: his Puritan-like opposition to the arts [Fox in e.g. Nickalls, pp.37–38] and rejection of theological study, forestalled development of these practices among Quakers for some time. The name of George Fox is often invoked by traditionalist Friends who dislike modern liberal attitudes to the Society's Christian origins. At the same time, Quakers and others can relate to Fox's religious experience, and even those who disagree with him regard him as a pioneer.
Walt Whitman, who was raised in a Quaker home and always felt close to them, later wrote: "George Fox stands for something too—a thought—the thought that wakes in silent hours—perhaps the deepest, most eternal thought latent in the human soul. This is the thought of God, merged in the thoughts of moral right and the immortality of identity. Great, great is this thought—aye, greater than all else." [Whitman, Walt (1892). [http://www.bartleby.com/229/5022.html Essay in "November"] . "Prose Works". Philadelphia: David McKay] George Fox Universityin Oregon, founded as Pacific College in 1891, was renamed for him in 1949. Fox's relationship with Margaret Fell is novelized in Jan de Hartog's "".
List of people on stamps of Ireland
Notes and sources
Various editions of Fox's journal have been published from time to time since the first printing in 1694.
*Nickalls, John L. (editor) (1952). "The Journal of George Fox". Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted by the Philadelphia Yearly Meeting; ISBN 0-941308-05-7)
*Jones, Rufus M. (editor) (1908) "George Fox – An Autobiography", an annotated and slightly abridged text, is also available in print (e.g. Friends United Press, 2006; ISBN 0-913408-24-7 and Kessinger Publishing, 2006; ISBN 1425496369) and online ( [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/fox_g/autobio.html] [http://www.strecorsoc.org/gfox/notes.html] [http://www.jesus.org.uk/vault/library/fox_autobiog.pdf] ).
*Barclay, Robert (1678). "An Apology for the True Christian Divinity". A systematic treatment of Quaker theology at the end of the seventeenth century; [http://www.qhpress.org/texts/barclay/apology/ available online] .
*Emerson Wildes, Harry (1965). "Voice of the Lord: A Biography of George Fox" (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).
*Ingle, H. Larry (1994; repr. 1996). "First Among Friends: George Fox and the Creation of Quakerism" (Oxford University Press; ISBN 0-19-510117-0). First scholarly biography, showing how Fox's used his influence within the Society of Friends to ensure conformity to his views and the survival of the group.
*Ingle, H. Larry (2004). [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/10031 "Fox, George (1624–1691)"] . "Oxford Dictionary of National Biography" (Oxford University Press). Accessed 13 May 2008. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/10031 (Subscription required)
*Marsh, Josiah (1847). "A Popular Life of George Fox" (London: Charles Gilpin). Somewhat biased but thorough biography of Fox.
* " [http://quakersfp.live.poptech.coop/qfp/contents.html Quaker Faith and Practice] ", Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Britain. (ISBN 0-85245-307-8 [1999 revision] ). Shows a modern Quaker view of Fox, and a great deal of historical information about Friends and their institutions.
* [http://www.georgefoxwritings.com/ The Writings and Life of George Fox] . The Journal and the Epistles, edited and with commentary by Hall Worthington and Joan Worthington
* [http://www.wardsbookofdays.com/13january.htm The life's work of George Fox @ "Ward's Book of Days"]
* [http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=26194#s7 House of Commons Journal Volume 8,] 21 May 1660, see entry under Geo. Fox, &c., Order by the House that George Fox & Rob. Gressingham who "made a great Disturbance at
Harwich" and are to be handed over to the Serjeant-at-Arms.
NAME = Fox, George
ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
SHORT DESCRIPTION = English Dissenter
DATE OF BIRTH = July 1624
PLACE OF BIRTH =
DATE OF DEATH = 13 January 1691
PLACE OF DEATH =
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.