- Law of adoption
The law of adoption was a
ritual practiced in Latter Day Saint temples between 1843 and 1894 in whichmen who held the priesthood were sealed in a father–son relationship to other men who were not part of nor even distantly related to their immediatenuclear family .Practice
Some younger men who were sealed by the law of adoption were called “sons” and took the surname of the older man, who they called their “father”. In the law of adoption, “the sons were to give to the fathers the benefit of their labor while the fathers offered their children not only some measure of security but counsel and direction in the world as well.” [Irving, Gordon. "The Law of Adoption: One Phase of the Development of the Mormon Concept of Salvation," "BYU Studies", 14(3) (Spring 1974), pp. 291-314, at p. 296.] One sociological reason for the practice was because “ [a] t this early stage in the church's history the membership was dominated by adult converts, whose new religious beliefs and westward migration with the Saints often estranged them from their birth families. Intra-church adoption in some measure compensated for this.” [http://famous.adoption.com/famous/church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints.html The Law of Adoption in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints] ]
History
Early references to the "law of adoption"
The first known use of the term "law of adoption" within Mormon doctrine was by
Parley P. Pratt ; however, the doctrine Pratt referred to was not a sealing ordinance, but rather the means whereby Mormons, through baptism, were said to obtain a birthright as an "adopted" son of God and a member of the heavenly kingdom. [Parley P. Pratt, [http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=/MStar&CISOPTR=165&filename=166.pdf "The Law of Adoption"] , "The Latter Day Saints' Millennial Star" (June 1843) Volume 4, Pages 17–19; Parley P. Pratt (1837), "A Voice of Warning".] There is no surviving evidence that the "law of adoption" sealing practice was taught byJoseph Smith, Jr. or his contemporaries prior to Smith's death in 1844. However, adoptions appeared on the records of theNauvoo Temple in 1846, and scholars generally assume that the practice was instituted byBrigham Young .Brigham Young
Brigham Young had been sealed by the law of adoption to Joseph Smith, and in January and early February 1846 (before leaving for theRocky Mountains on15 February 1846), Young was sealed to 38 young men by the law of adoption in theNauvoo Temple . [ Brooks, Juanita "John Doyle Lee: Zealot, Pioneer Builder, Scapegoat". Utah State University Press, Logan, UT, reissue November 1992 (paperback, 404pp). ISBN 0-87421-162-X (First published in 1961) p. 73.] On23 February 1847 , Young “went to see Joseph” in adream and Young said that he spoke with Joseph about the law of adoption. [Manuscript History of Brigham Young, February 23, 1847.]On
April 6 ,1862 , Brigham Young said of the law of adoption: “By this power men will be sealed to men back to Adam, completing and making perfect the priesthood from this day to the winding up scene.” ["Journal of Discourses ", volume 9, [http://patriot.lib.byu.edu/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=/JournalOfDiscourses3&CISOPTR=3643&filename=100504_171553_dp269_Va_M230_J82_v09.pdf page 269] .] It is reported by Brigham Young’s grandson, Kimball Young (chairman of the Department ofSociology atNorthwestern University ) that in a letter Brigham Young stated that there will be a future time “when men would be sealed to men in the priesthood in a more solemn ordinance than that by which women were sealed to men, and in a room over that in which women were sealed to man.” [Young, Kimball "Isn’t One Wife Enough? The Story of Mormon Polygamy" (1954) pp. 278–280.]Wilford Woodruff
Wilford Woodruff , the fourth president of the LDS Church, stated in August 1896 that between 1843 and 1894 he “officiated in adopting 96 men to men”. [ "Wilford Woodruff’s Journal 1833-1898", typescript, edited by Scott G. Kenney, 1985, Volume 9, page 408.] Woodruff also stated that by 1885, he had “had 45 persons adopted to me”. ["Wilford Woodruff’s Journal 1833-1898", typescript, edited by Scott G. Kenney, 1985, Volume 8, Page 352] Woodruff recorded in his diary that when the sealing rooms of the St. George Temple were dedicated in January 1877, Woodruff—who was thetemple president —adopted two couples to Brigham Young. ["Diary of Wilford Woodruff" 22 March, 1877.] Of the seventeen LDS Church apostles who died in the faith prior to 1894, fourteen had persons adopted to them. [Irving, Gordon. "The Law of Adoption: One Phase of the Development of the Mormon Concept of Salvation," "BYU Studies", 14(3) (Spring 1974), pp. 291-314, at p. 309]Problems
The practice fell into disrepute partly because “in a few cases it led to jealousy and conflict between sons for their adoptive father's attentions, and because it had in some other cases caused a scramble for status between potential sons seeking adoption by higher-ranking elders, and between elders by accumulating large numbers of adoptive sons”. Another factor was that after the settlement of
Utah Territory , “fewer members of the church arrived separated from their birth families (because they were born into the church)”.Placed in abeyance
In a church general conference address on
6 April 1894 , Wilford Woodruff stated that “I have not felt satisfied, nor has any man since the Prophet Joseph Smith who has attended to the ordinance of adoption in the temples of our God. We have felt there was more to be revealed on this subject than we have received … and the duty that I want every man who presides over a Temple to see performed from this day henceforth, unless the Lord Almighty commands otherwise, is let every man be adopted to his father.” [Irving, Gordon. "The Law of Adoption: One Phase of the Development of the Mormon Concept of Salvation," "BYU Studies", 14(3) (Spring 1974), pp. 291-314, at p. 312.]Thus, as of 1894, the practice of the law of adoption ceased in the LDS Church.
ignificance today
There is no evidence to suggest that homosexual sex was involved as part of the original practice of the law of adoption in the 19th century. However, beginning in the 1970s, some members of began to suggest that the leadership of the LDS Church should restore the law of adoption in order to allow same sex couples to be sealed to each other in the temple in a kind of quasi-celestial marriage. It has been argued that this would preserve the primacy of heterosexual marriage but would allow an ecclesiastical equivalent of homosexual
civil union s—a homosexual ecclesiastical union.Fact|date=September 2007The restoration of the law of adoption was implemented when some members of Affirmation in 1985 established the
Restoration Church of Jesus Christ (commonly referred to as the "Gay Mormon Church") and the First Presidency of that church restored the law of adoption, citing it as the theological justification for their practice of homosexualcelestial marriage . [Antonio A. Feliz , "Out of the Bishop’s Closet" San Francisco:1988 Alamo Square Press.]ee also
*
Homosexuality and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
*List of Christian denominational positions on homosexuality
*Religion and sexuality References
Further reading
* Irving, Gordon. "The Law of Adoption: One Phase of the Development of the Mormon Concept of Salvation," "BYU Studies", 14(3) (Spring 1974), Pages 291-314
* Quinn, D. Michael "Same-Sex Dynamics Among Nineteenth-Century Americans: A Mormon Example" University of Illinois Press, 1996
* Tanner, Jerald and Sandra "Sealing Men to Men" "Salt Lake City Messenger" , Number 92, April 1997, Pages 4-8External links
* Ben Williams, [http://qsaltlake.com/2004/9/feature.shtml "Same Sex Temple Sealings: Did the Early LDS Church Embrace Homosexual Relationships?"] , "Salt Lake Metro", September 2004
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.