- Berengar I of Italy
Berengar of Friuli (c. 845 –
7 April 924 [Rosenwein, p. 270.] ) was theMargrave of Friuli from 874 until no earlier than 890 and no later than 896, [AF(M), 887 (p. 102 n3). AF(B), 896 (pp 134–135 and nn19&21).]King of Italy (as Berengar I) from 887 (with interruption) until his death, andHoly Roman Emperor from 915 until his death.Berengar rose to become one of the most influential laymen in the empire of
Charles the Fat before he was elected to replace Charles in Italy after the latter's deposition. His long reign of 36 years saw him opposed by no less than seven other claimants to the Italian throne. Though he is sometimes seen as a "national" king in Italian histories, he was in fact of Frankish birth. His reign is usually characterised as "troubled" because of the many competitors for the crown and because of the arrival ofMagyar raiders in Western Europe. He was the last emperor beforeOtto the Great was crowned in 962, after a 38-year interregnum.Margrave of Friuli, 874–887
His family was called the
Unruochings after his grandfather, Unruoch II. Berengar was a son ofEberhard of Friuli and Gisela, daughter ofLouis the Pious and his second wife Judith. He was thus of Carolingian extraction on his mother's side. He was born probably atCividale . His name in Latin is "Berengarius" or "Perngarius" and in Italian is "Berengario". Sometime during his margraviate, he married Bertilla, daughter ofSuppo II , thus securing an alliance with the powerfulSupponid family. [Rosenwein, p. 256.] She would later rule alongside him as a "consors", a title specifically denoting her informal power and influence, as opposed to a mere "coniunx", "wife." [Ibid, p. 257.]When his older brother Unruoch III died in 874, ["Annales Fuldenses" (Mainz tradition), 887 (p. 102 n3). The "Annales" are hereafter cited as "AF" with the post-882 tradition, Mainz or Bavarian, indicated by (M) or (B).] Berengar succeeded him in the
March of Friuli . [MacLean, p. 70 and n116. He was usually called "marchio", but once appears as "dux" in one charter of Charles the Fat. He was one of only three "marchiones" and six "consiliarii" who appear in the reign of Charles.] With this he obtained a key position in theCarolingian Empire , as the march bordered theCroats and other Slavs who were a constant threat to the Italian peninsula. He was a territorial magnate with lordship over several counties in northeastern Italy. He was an important channel for the men of Friuli to get access to the emperor and for the emperor to exercise authority in Friuli. He even had a large degree of influence on the church of Friuli. In 884–885, Berengar intervened with the emperor on behalf of Haimo,Bishop of Belluno . [Ibid, p. 71.]When, in 875, the
Emperor Louis II , who was alsoKing of Italy , died, having come to terms withLouis the German whereby the German monarch's eldest son, Carloman, would succeed in Italy,Charles the Bald ofWest Francia invaded the peninsula and had himself crowned king and emperor. [AF, 875 (p.77 and n8).] Louis the German sent firstCharles the Fat , his youngest son, and then Carloman himself, with armies containing Italian magnates led by Berengar, to possess the Italian kingdom. [Ibid. MacLean, p. 70.] This was not successful until the death of Charles the Bald in 877. The proximity of Berengar's march toBavaria , which Carloman already ruled under his father, may explain their cooperation.In 883, the newly-succeeded
Guy III of Spoleto was accused of treason at an imperial synod held atNonantula late in May. [AF(B), 883 (p. 107 and nn6&7).] He returned to theDuchy of Spoleto and made an alliance with theSaracens . The emperor, then Charles the Fat, sent Berengar with an army to deprive him of Spoleto. Berengar was successful before an epidemic of disease, which ravaged all Italy, affecting the emperor and his entourage as well as Berengar's army, forced him to retire. [Ibid.]In 886,
Liutward ,Bishop of Vercelli , took Berengar's sister from the nunnery of S. Salvatore atBrescia in order to marry her to a relative of his; whether or not by force or by the consent of the convent and Charles the Fat, her relative, is uncertain. [AF(M), 887 (p. 102), presents it as an invasion on Liutward's part.] Berengar and Liutward had a feud that year, which involved his attack onVercelli and plundering of the bishop's goods. [AF(B), 886 (p. 112 and n8).] Berengar's actions are explicable if his sister was abducted by the bishop, but if the bishop's actions were justified, then Berengar appears as the initiator of the feud. Whatever the case, bishop and margrave were reconciled shortly before Liutward was dismissed from court in 887. [Ibid.]By his brief war with Liutward, Berengar had lost the favour of his cousin the emperor. Berengar came to the emperor's assembly at
Waiblingen in early May 887. [AF(B), 887 (p. 113 and nn3&4).] He made peace with the emperor and compensated for the actions of the previous year by dispensing great gifts. [Ibid.] In June or July, Berengar was again at the emperor's side atKirchen , when Louis of Provence was adopted as the emperor's son. [MacLean, p. 113.] It is sometimes alleged that Berengar was pining to be declared Charles' heir and that he may in fact have been so named in Italy, where he was acclaimed (or made himself) king immediately after Charles' deposition by the nobles ofEast Francia in November that year (887). [Reuter, p. 119, suggests this, adding thatOdo, Count of Paris , may have had a similar purpose in visiting Charles at Kirchen.] On the other hand, his presence may merely have been necessary to confirm Charles' illegitimate son Bernard as his heir (Waiblingen), a plan which failed when the pope refused to attend, and then to confirm Louis instead (Kirchen). [MacLean, pp 167–168.]King of Italy, 887–915
Berengar was the only one of the "reguli" (petty kings) to crop up in the aftermath of Charles' deposition besides
Arnulf of Carinthia , his deposer, who was made king before the emperor's death. [Reuter, p. 121.] Charter evidence begins Berengar's reign atPavia between26 December 887 and2 January 888 , though this has been disputed. [AF(B), 888 (p. 115 and n3).] Berengar was not the undisputed leading magnate in Italy at the time, but he may have made an agreement with his former rival, Guy of Spoleto, whereby Guy would have West Francia and he Italy on the emperor's death. [Ibid, followingLiutprand of Cremona in his "Antapodosis".] Both Guy and Berengar were related to the Carolingians in the female line. They represented different factions in Italian politics: Berengar the pro-German and Guy the pro-French.In Summer 888, Guy, who had failed in his bid to take the West Frankish throne, returned to Italy to gather an army from among the Spoletans and Lombards and oppose Berengar. This he did, but the battle they fought near Brescia in the fall was a slight victory for Berengar, though his forces were so diminished that he sued for peace nevertheless. [AF(B), 888 (p. 117 and n12).] The truce was to last until
6 January 889 . [Ibid.]After the truce with Guy was signed, Arnulf of Germany endeavoured to invade Italy through Friuli. Berengar, in order to prevent a war, sent dignitaries (leading men) ahead to meet Arnulf. He himself then had a meeting, sometime between early November and Christmas, at
Trent . [Ibid.] He was allowed to keep Italy, as Arnulf's vassal, but the "curtes" of Navus and Sagus were taken from him. [Ibid, n13. "Navus" and "sagus" perhaps refer to royal rights or taxes, but more likely to as yet unidentified places. Reuter, p 122, considers Arnulf and Berengar's relationship to be one of suzerain and vassal.] Arnulf allowed his army to return to Germany, but he himself celebrated Christmas in Friuli, atKarnberg . [Ibid, n14.]Early in 889, their truce having expired, Guy defeated Berengar at the Battle of the Trebbia and made himself sole king in Italy, though Berengar maintained his authority in Friuli. [AF(B), 889 (p.119 and n2).] Though Guy had been supported by
Pope Stephen V since before the death of Charles the Fat, he was now abandoned by the pope, who turned to Arnulf. Arnulf, for his part, remained a staunch partisan of Berengar and it has even been suggested that he was creating a Carolingian alliance between himself and Louis of Provence,Charles III of France , and Berengar against Guy andRudolph I of Upper Burgundy . [AF(B), 894 (p. 128 and n12).]In 893, Arnulf sent his illegitimate son
Zwentibold into Italy. He met up with Berengar and together they cornered Guy at Pavia, but did not press their advantage (it is believed that Guy bribed them off). In 894, Arnulf and Berengar defeated Guy atBergamo and took control of Pavia andMilan . Berengar was with Arnulf's army that invaded Italy in 896. However, he left the army while it was sojourning in theMarch of Tuscany and returned toLombardy . [AF(B), 896 (p. 132 and nn1&2).] A rumour spread that Berengar had turned against the king and had broughtAdalbert II of Tuscany with him. [Ibid.] The truth or falsehood of the rumour cannot be ascertained, but Berengar was removed from Friuli and replaced with Waltfred, a former supporter and "highest counsellor" of Berengar's, who soon died. [Ibid, p. 134 and n19. MacLean, p. 71. The exact dates of Waltfred's rule in Friuli are unknown. Berengar was last confirmed in Friuli in 890.] The falling out between Berengar and Arnulf, who was crowned Emperor inRome byPope Formosus , has been likened to that between Berengar II and Otto I more than half a century later. [Reuter, p. 123.]Arnulf left Italy in the charge of his young son Ratold, who soon crossed
Lake Como to Germany, leaving Italy in the control of Berengar, who made a pact with Lambert, Guy's son and successor. [Ibid, p. 135 and nn20&21.] According to the "Gesta Berengarii Imperatoris ", the two kings met at Pavia in October and Novemer and agreed to divide the kingdom, Berengar receiving the eastern half between the Adda and the Po, "as if by hereditary right" according to the "Annales Fuldenses ". Bergamo was to be shared between them. This was a confirmation of the "status quo" of 889. It was this partitioning which caused the later chroniclerLiutprand of Cremona to remark that the Italians always suffered under two monarchs. As surety for the accord, Lambert pledged to marry Gisela, Berengar's daughter.The peace did not long last. Berengar advanced on Pavia, but was defeated by Lambert at
Borgo San Donnino and taken prisoner. Nonetheless, Lambert died within days, on15 October 898 . Days later Berengar had secured Pavia and become sole ruler. [Ibid, n21.] It was during this period that theMagyars made their first attacks on Western Europe. They invaded Italy first in 899. This first invasion may have been unprovoked, but some historians have suspected that the Magyars were either called in by Arnulf, no friend of Berengar's, or by Berengar himself, as allies. [Reuter, p. 128, suggests the former view.] Berengar gathered a large army to meet them and refused their request for an armistice. His army was surprised and routed near theBrenta River in the eponymousBattle of the Brenta (24 September 899 ). [AF(B), 900 (p. 141 and n4), with a loss of 20,000 men and many bishops. Corroborated by Liutprand, "Antapodosis".]This defeat handicapped Berengar and caused the nobility to question his ability to protect Italy. As a result, they supported another candidate for the throne, the aforementioned Louis of Provence, another maternal relative of the Carolingians. In 900, Louis marched into Italy and defeated Berengar; the following year he was crowned Emperor by
Pope Benedict IV . In 902, however, Berengar struck back and defeated Louis, making him promise never to return to Italy. When he broke this oath by invading the peninsula again in 905, Berengar defeated him atVerona , captured him, and ordered him to be blinded on21 July . [Previté Orton, p. 337. The "Gest Berengarii" andConstantine Porphyrogenitus ' "De administrando imperio" both show Berengar as declaiming responsibility for Louis's blinding.] Louis returned toProvence and ruled for another twenty years as Louis the Blind. Berengar thereby cemented his position as king and ruled undisputed, except for a brief spell, until 922. As king, Berengar made his seat at Verona, which he heavily fortified. [Ibid. Rosenwein, p. 259 and n47, which recalls that some historians have accused him of neglecting its defences.] During the years when Louis posed a threat to Berengar's kingship, his wife, Bertilla, who was a niece of the former empressEngelberga , Louis's grandmother, played an important part in the legitimisation of his rule. [Ibid, p. 257.] She later disappeared from the scene, as indicated by her absence in his charters post-905.In 904, Bergamo was subjected to a long siege by the Magyars. After the siege, Berengar granted the bishop of the city walls and the right to rebuild them with the help of the citizens and the refugees fleeing the Magyars. [Wickham. p. 175.] The bishop attained all the rights of a count in the city.
Emperor, 915–924
In January 915,
Pope John X tried forge an alliance between Berengar and the local Italian rulers in hopes that he could face the Saracen threat in southern Italy. Berengar was unable to send troops, but after the greatBattle of the Garigliano , a victory over the Saracens, John crowned Berengar as Emperor in Rome (December). [Llewellyn, 302.] Berengar, however, returned swiftly to the north, where Friuli was still threatened by the Magyars.As emperor, Berengar was wont to intervene outside of his "regnum" of Italy. He even dabbled in an episcopal election in the
diocese of Liège . [Rosenwein, p. 277.] After the death of the saintly Bishop Stephen in 920, Herman I,Archbishop of Cologne , representing the German interests inLotharingia , tried to impose his choice of the monks of the local cloister, one Hilduin, on the vacant see. He was opposed by Charles III of France, who convinced Pope John to excommunicate Hilduin. Another monk, Richer, was appointed to the see with the support of pope and emperor.In his latter years, his wife Bertilla was charged with infidelity, a charge not uncommon against wives of declining kings of that period. [AF(B), 889 (p. 139 and n2). Rosenwein, p. 258 and n46.] She was poisoned. [Rosenwein, p. 258.] He had remarried to one named Anna by December 915. [Ibid.] It has been suggested, largely for
onomastic reasons, that Anna was a daughter of Louis of Provence and his wife Anna, the possible daughter ofLeo VI the Wise ,Byzantine Emperor . [Previté Orton, p. 336.] In that case, she would have been betrothed to Berengar while still a child and only become his "consors" and "imperatrix" in 923. [Ibid.] Her marriage was an attempt by Louis to advance his children while he himself was being marginalised and by Berengar to legitimise his rule by relating himself by marriage to the house ofLothair I which had ruled Italy by hereditary right since 817.By 915, Berengar's eldest daughter, Bertha, was abbess of San Salvatore in Brescia, where her aunt had once been a nun. In that year, the following year, and in 917, Berengar endowed her monastery with three privileges to build or man fortifications. [Rosenwein, p. 255.] His younger daughter, Gisela, had married
Adalbert I of Ivrea as early as 898 (and no later than 910), but this failed to spark an alliance with theAnscarids . [Ibid, p. 274 and n140.] She was dead by 913, when Adalbert remarried. [Ibid.] Adalbert was one of Berengar's earliest internal enemies after the defeat of Louis of Provence. He called onHugh of Arles between 917 and 920 to take the Iron Crown. [Ibid, p. 274.] Hugh did invade Italy, with his brother Boso, and advanced as far as Pavia, where Berengar starved them into submission, but allowed them to pass out of Italy freely. [Previté Orton, pp 339–340, who also remarks on Berengar's "unrevengeful character."]Dissatisfied with the emperor, who had ceased his policy of grants and family alliances in favour of paying Magyar mercenaries, several Italian nobles — led by Adalbert and many of the bishops — invited Rudolph II of Upper Burgundy to take the Italian throne in 921. [Rosenwein, pp 262, 274, and "passim".] Moreover, his own grandson,
Berengar of Ivrea , rose up against him, incited by Rudolph. Berengar retreated to Verona and had to watch sidelined as the Magyars pillaged the country. [Ibid, p. 266. The Magyars were operating, nominally at least, on Berengar's behalf.] John,Bishop of Pavia , surrendered his city to Rudolph in 922 and it was sacked by the Magyars in 924. [Ibid.] On29 July 923 , the forces of Rudolph, Adalbert, and Berengar of Ivrea met those of Berengar and defeated him in theBattle of Fiorenzuola , nearPiacenza . [ [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9078716 Britannica] .] The battle was decisive and Berengar was "de facto" dethroned and replaced by Rudolf. Berengar was soon after murdered at Verona by one of his own men, possibly at Rudolph's instigation. He left no sons, only a daughter (the aforementioned Bertha) and an anonymous epic poem, the "Gesta Berengarii Imperatoris", about the many happenings of his troublesome reign.Berengar has been accused of having "faced [the] difficulties [of his reign] with particular incompetence," [Ibid, p. 248.] having "never once won a pitched battle against his rivals," [Ibid, who calls him "a terrible warrior."] and being "not recorded as having ever won a battle" in "forty years of campaigning." [Wickham, p. 171. This appears to be flatly contradicted, however, by the other sources. Reuter calls his a victory over Guy at the Trebbia in 888 and his campaign against Spoleto in 883 was initially successful.] Particularly, he has been seen as alienating public lands and "districtus" (defence command) to private holders, especially bishops, though this is disputed. [Rosenwein, p. 248 and n8.] Some historians have seen his "private defense initiatives" in a more positive light and have found a coherent policy of gift-giving. [Ibid, "passim".] Despite this, his role in inaugurating the "
incastellamento " of the succeeding decades is hardly disputed. [Ibid, p. 249.]References
*Rosenwein, Barbara H. " [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0038-7134%28199604%2971%3A2%3C247%3ATFPOBI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q The Family Politics of Berengar I, King of Italy (888-924).] " "Speculum", Vol. 71, No. 2. (Apr., 1996), pp 247-289.
*Previté Orton, C. W. " [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-8266%28191707%2932%3A127%3C335%3AIAP9%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F Italy and Provence, 900-950."] "The English Historical Review ", Vol. 32, No. 127. (Jul., 1917), pp 335-347.
*Reuter, Timothy (trans.) " [http://www.medievalsources.co.uk/fulda.htm The Annals of Fulda] ". (Manchester Medieval series, Ninth-Century Histories, Volume II.) Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992.
*Reuter, Timothy. "Germany in the Early Middle Ages 800–1056". New York: Longman, 1991.
*MacLean, Simon. "Kingship and Politics in the Late Ninth Century: Charles the Fat and the end of the Carolingian Empire". Cambridge University Press: 2003.
*Wickham, Chris. "Early Medieval Italy: Central Power and Local Society 400-1000". MacMillan Press: 1981.
*Tabacco, Giovanni. "The Struggle for Power in Medieval Italy: Structures and Political Rule". (Cambridge Medieval Textbooks.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
*Llewellyn, Peter. "Rome in the Dark Ages". London: Faber and Faber, 1970. ISBN 0 571 08972 0.
*" [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9078716 Berengar] ." (2007). "Encyclopædia Britannica". Retrieved14 May 2007 .Notes
----
-
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.