- Treaty of Georgievsk
The Treaty of Georgievsk ( _ru. Георгиевский трактат, "Georgievskiy traktat"; _ka. გეორგიევსკის ტრაქტატი, "georgievskis trak'tati") was a bilateral treaty concluded between the
Russian Empireand the east Georgian kingdom of Kartli-Kakhetion July 24, 1783. The treaty established Georgia as a protectorateof Russia, which guaranteed Georgia's territorial integrity and the continuation of its reigning Bagrationi dynastyin return for prerogatives in the conduct of Georgian foreign affairs. Georgia abjured any form of dependence on Persia or another power, and every new Georgian monarch would require the confirmation and investiture of the Russian tsar. As a result of the internal political unrest and continued pressure from Persia, king Giorgi XII petitioned Tsar Paul I's for a mediatized inclusion of Kartli-Kakheti into the Russian Empire cite book |title= Charters and other historical documents of the XVIII century regarding Georgia|last= Tsagareli|first= A|year= 1902|publisher= |location= |isbn=|pages= 287-288] . Paul I declared the annexation of Kartli-Kakheti in his manifesto of December 18, 1800, and on September 12, 1801, his successor, Alexander I, formally reaffirmed this determination. [" [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9036525 Georgievsk, Treaty of] ." Encyclopædia BritannicaPremium Service. 2008. Retrieved on 2008-06-16.]
Under articles I, II, IV, VI and VII of the treaty’s terms, Russia’s empress became the official and sole suzerain of Kartli-Kakheti’s rulers, guaranteeing the Georgians’ internal sovereignty and territorial integrity, and promising to "regard their enemies as Her enemies" [http://forum.alexanderpalace.org/YaBB.cgi?num=1137542322] . Each of the Georgian kingdom’s
tsars would henceforth be obliged to swear allegiance to Russia’s emperors, to support Russia in war, and to have no diplomatic communications with other nations without Russia’s prior consent.
Given Georgia’s history of invasions from the south, an alliance with Russia may have been seen as the only way to discourage or resist Persian and Ottoman aggression, while also establishing a link to
Western Europe. [http://iberiana.iatp.ge/georgia.htm#Georgia%20in%20the%20Beginning%20of%20Feudal%20Decomposition] In the past, Georgia’s kings had not only accepted formal domination by Turkish and Persian emperors, but had occasionally converted to Islam and sojourned at their capitals. Thus it was neither a break with Georgian tradition nor a unique capitulation of independence for Kartli-Kakheti to trade vassalage for peace with a powerful neighbor. However, in the treaty’s preamble and article VIII the bond of Orthodox Christianity between Georgians and Russians was acknowledged, and Georgia’s primate, the Catholicos, became Russia’s eighth, permanent archbishopand a member of Russia’s Holy Synod.
Other treaty provisions included mutual guarantees of an open border between the two
realms for travelers, emigrants and merchants (articles 10, 11), while Russia undertook to refrain from intervening, militarily or civilly, with Kartli-Kakheti’s internal affairs or taxing authority (article VI). Article III created an investitureceremony whereby the Georgian kings, upon swearing fealtyto Russia’s emperors, would receive in return such tokens of respect as a sword, scepterand erminemantle.
The treaty was negotiated on behalf of Russia by
Lieutenant-General Pavel Potemkin, commander of Russia’s troops in Astrakhan, a delegateand cousin of General Prince Grigori Alexandrovich Potemkin, who was the official Russian plenipotentiary. Kartli-Kakheti’s official delegation consisted of a Kartlian and a Kakhetian, both of high rank: Ioané (Bagrationi)- batonishvili(1755-1800), the 18th "Mukhranbatoni" ("Prince of Mukhrani", referred to in the Russian version of the treaty as "Prince Ivan Konstantinovich Bagration"), Constable of the Left-Hand Army and son-in-law of the Georgian king, [http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Georgia/mukhran2.htm] and Adjutant-General Garsevan Chavchavadze, Governor of Kazakhi ("aka" Prince Garsevan Revazovich Chavchavadze, member of a Kakhetian princely family of the third rank, vassals of the Abashidzeprinces). [http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Georgia/nobility.htm] These emissaries officially signed the treaty at the fortress of Georgievsk in the North Caucasuson July 24, 1783. It was then formally ratified by the Georgian King Erekle IIand Empress Catherine the Great in 1784.
The results of the Treaty of Georgievsk proved disappointing for the Georgians. [http://iberiana.iatp.ge/georgia.htm#Georgia%20in%20the%20Beginning%20of%20Feudal%20Decomposition] King Erekle’s adherence to it prompted Persia’s new ruler,
Agha Mohammad Khan, to invade. Russia did nothing to help the Georgians during the disastrous Battle of Krtsanisiin 1795, which left Tbilisisacked and Georgia ravaged (including the west Georgian kingdom of Imereti, ruled by Erekle II’s grandson, King Solomon II). Belatedly, Catherine declared war on Persia and sent an army to Transcaucasia. But her death shortly thereafter put an end to Russia’s Persian Expedition of 1796, as her successor, Paul, turned to other strategic objectives. Persia’s Shahanshahnext contemplated the removal of the Christian population from eastern Georgia and eastern Armenia, launching the campaign from Karabagh. His goal was frustrated not by Russian resistance, but by a Persian assassinin 1797.
On January 14, 1798, King Erekle II was succeeded on the throne by his eldest son, George XII (1746-1800) who, on February 22, 1799, recognized his own eldest son,
TsarevichDavid ("Davit Bagrationi-batonishvili"), 1767-1819, as official heir apparent. The same year the Russian troops were stationed in Kartli-Kakheti. Pursuant to article VI of the treaty, Emperor Paul confirmed David’s claim to reign as the next king on April 18, 1799. But strife broke out among King George’s many sons and those of his late father over the throne, Erekle II having changed the succession order at the behest of his third wife, Queen Darejan, to favor the accession of younger brothers of future kings over their own sons. The resulting dynastic upheaval prompted King George to secretly invite Paul I to invade Kartli-Kakheti, subdue the Bagratid princes, and govern the kingdom from St. Petersburg, on the condition that George and his descendants be allowed to continue to reignnominally – in effect, offering to mediatize the Bagratid dynasty under the Romanovemperorsref|Burke Burke page 59.
Paul tentatively accepted this offer, but before negotiations could be finalized changed his mind and issued a decree on January 18, 1801
annexing Kartli-Kakheti to Russia and deposing the Bagratids ref|Burke Burke page 59. Paul himself died shortly thereafter. It is said that his successor, Emperor Alexander I, considered retracting the annexation in favor of a Bagratid heir, but being unable to identify one likely to retain the crown, on September 12, 1801 Alexander proceeded to confirm annexation. Meanwhile, King George had died on December 28, 1800, before learning that he had lost his throne. By the following April, Russian troops took control of the country’s administration and in February 1803 Tsarevich David Bagrationi was escorted by Russian troops from Tbilisi to St. Petersburg. He was pensioned, joined the Russian Senate, and retained his royal style until May 6, 1833 when he was demoted from "tsarevich" (the Russian equivalent of " batonishvili") to "prince" (" Knyaz"), along with other members of the deposed dynasty, following an abortive uprising in Georgia led by David’s uncle, Prince Alexandre Bagrationi.
Paul’s annexation of east Georgia and exile of the Bagratids remains controversial: Soviet communists would later maintain that the treaty was an act of "brotherhood of the Russian and Georgian peoples" that justified annexation to protect Georgia both from its historical foreign persecutors and its "decadent" native dynasty. But there is no doubt that the Russian emperor was bound, according to article VI sections 2 and 3 of the Georgievsk treaty, "to preserve His Serene Highness Tsar Irakli Teimurazovich and the Heirs and descendants of his House, uninterrupted on the Throne of the Kingdoms of Kartli and Kakheti...forbidding [the Emperor’s] Military and Civil Authorities from intervention in any [domestic laws or orders] ." It is also clear, however, that many of the original provisions of the treaty were, in reality, left irrelevant by Giorgi XII's petition for the inclusion of Kartli-Kakheti into the Russian Empire.
Ironically, that clause of the treaty would also be recalled during obscure late twentieth century debates about restoration of the Russian monarchy. In 1948, Vladimir Kirilovich Romanov, (1917-1992), exiled claimant to Russia’s throne, married Princess
Leonida Georgievna Bagration-Moukhranskaya, (born 1914), a direct descendant of the "Mukhranbatoni" who negotiated the 1783 treaty, and thus a member of the once royal House of Bagrationi. The marriage produced an only child, Maria Vladimirovna, (born 1956), who has taken up her father’s claim as Russia’s "de jure" monarch. She and her son, George (by Prince Franz Wilhelm of Prussia), have pretended to the Romanovs’ old grand ducal title. Her supporters argue that her father’s marriage to Leonida, alone among those contracted by Romanov males in exile since 1917, complied with the Romanov house lawthat required marriage to a princess of a "royal or ruling family" in order for descendants to claim the throne. Upon extinction of all male dynasts, female Romanovs born of dynastic mothers became eligible to inherit the crown. Based on this rationale, Maria purports to have the strongest legal claim to the Russian throne in the unlikely event that Russia ever restores its monarchy.
Critics deny that Princess Leonida could be reckoned of royal rank by Romanov standards (the title of "
prince" was one of nobility, not dynastyin Russia, except in the imperial family). They point out that the Bagration-Mukhranskys were demoted from dynastic status and incorporated into Russia’s ordinary nobility by 1833-though the princess descended from a dynasty that had ruled as kings in Armenia and Georgia since the early Middle Ages, it had been reduced to the status of Russian nobility for over a century prior to the Russian Revolution — The Grand Duke's marriage to Princess Leonida is controversial; some consider it to be morganatic(though the princess descended from a dynasty that had ruled as kings in Armenia and Georgia since the early Middle Ages, it had been reduced to the status of Russian nobility for over a century prior to the Russian Revolution — Leonida's branch had not been regnant in the male line as Kings of Georgia since 1505. [ Cyril Toumanoff, "The Fifteenth-Century Bagratides and the Institution of Collegial Sovereignty in Georgia". Traditio. Volume VII, Fordham University Press, New York 1949-1951, pp. 169-221.] . Members of the family accepted court appointments under Russia's emperors incompatible with claims to dynastic dignity [http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Georgia/mukhran3.htm] . Moreover, when an imperial Romanov princess wed Prince Constantine Bagration-Mukhransky in 1911, the marriage was officially deemed non-dynastic [ [http://www.permonline.ru/~museum/romanov/fond/0006.htm] ] by Nicholas II, and the bride, Tatiana Konstantinova Romanova, was obliged to renounce her succession rights [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.royalty/msg/9639ea8d9cdea8c7] . These facts are admitted, but it is counter-argued that the demotion of the Bagratids, including the Mukhrani branch, violated the Treaty of Georgievsk and therefore failed to legally deprive any Bagrationi of royal rank. That fact, it is claimed, distinguishes Leonida from princesses of other sovereign families who married Romanovs. Nonetheless, it was the agnatic seniority of the "Mukhranbatoni"’s descent from Georgia’s former kings- later disproved as senior members of the family were living in Georgia at the time, rather than the broken treaty, that Vladimir Kirilovich cited in a 1946 decree recognizing the Bagration-Mukhranskys as dynastic for marital purposes, [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.royalty/msg/a32c7dfaeacbffaf?hl=en&] probably so as to avoid contradicting the old Russian Empire’s irredentist policy toward Georgia. The language of article VI guaranteed the Georgian throne not only to King Erekle II and his direct issue, but also embraced "the Heirs and descendants of his House" [http://forum.alexanderpalace.org/YaBB.cgi?num=1137542322] . On the other hand, article IX offered to extend no more than "the same privileges and advantages granted to the Russian nobility" to Georgia’s nobles. Yet first on the list of families submitted to Russia to enjoy noble ("not" royal) status was that of the "Mukhranbatoni". That list included twenty-one other princely families and a larger number of untitled nobles, most of whom were enrolled in Russia’s nobility during the 19th century. The claims made on Maria's behalf have long embittered the large group of Romanov descendants who belong to the Romanoff Family Association. Many of them descend from noble Russian princesses, some of whom were also of "dynastic" origin, but cannot claim that a Treaty of Georgievsk has "preserved" their "royalty".
In 1983, the Soviet authorities pompously celebrated a 200-year anniversary of the Treaty of Georgievsk, leading to the protests of
anti-SovietGeorgian dissidents. Georgia’s leading underground Samizdatpublication " Sakartvelo" (საქართველო) dedicated a special issue to the event, emphasizing Imperial Russia’s disregard of the key agreements in the treaty. Underground political groups disseminated leaflets calling the Georgians to boycott the celebrations, and several young Georgian activists were arrested by the Soviet police. [ru icon Алексеева, Людмила (1983), [http://www.memo.ru/history/diss/books/alexeewa/ Грузинское национальное движение] . In: [http://www.memo.ru/history/diss/books/alexeewa/ История Инакомыслия в СССР] . Accessed on April 3, 2007.]
*History of Georgia
List of treaties
* [http://forum.alexanderpalace.org/YaBB.cgi?num=1137542322 The Alexander Palace Time Machine: Some documents from the Reign of Catherine II]
*en icon [http://iberiana.iatp.ge/georgia.htm#Georgia%20in%20the%20Beginning%20of%20Feudal%20Decomposition Anchabadze, Dr. George. "History of Georgia"]
* [http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Georgia/georgia.htm Buyers, Christopher. "The Royal Ark", "Georgia"]
* Montgomery-Massingberd 1980:59 Montgomery-Massingberd, Hugh. "Burke’s Royal Families of the World: "Volume II Africa & the Middle East", (1980:59) ISBN 0-85011-029-7
David Marshall Lang: "The Last Years of the Georgian Monarchy: 1658-1832". Columbia University Press, New York 1957.
*Nikolas K. Gvosdev, "Imperial policies and perspectives towards Georgia: 1760-1819". Macmillan [u.a.] , Basingstoke [u.a.] 2000, ISBN 0312229909.
*"Traité conclu en 1783 3ntr Cathérine II. impératrice de Russie et Iracly II. roi de Géorgie". Receuil des lois russes, vol. XXI, No. 15835, Avec une péface de M. Paul Moriaud, Professeur de da Faculté de Droit de l’université de Genève, et commentaires de A. Okouméli, Genève 1909.
*Zurab Avalov, "Prisoedinenie Gruzii k Rossii". Montvid, S.-Peterburg 1906.
* [http://www.westminster.edu/staff/martinre/Treaty.html Treaty of Georgievsk]
* [http://forum.alexanderpalace.org/YaBB.cgi?num=1137542322 Treaty of Georgievsk and List of the Recognised Nobles of the Kingdom of Georgia]
* [http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Georgia/georgia.htm The Royal Ark "Georgia"]
*ru icon [http://www.istoria.ge/Documents/1783%20georgievskis%20traqtati.htm Георгиевский трактат] (full text of the treaty in Russian)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.