- Holtzmann's Law
Holtzmann's Law is a
Proto-Germanic sound law originally noticed byAdolf Holtzmann in1838 .The law affects the "doubling" or "Verschärfung" of
PIE "PIE|* -y-" and "PIE|* -w-" toProto-Germanic " _ge. * -jj-" and " _ge. * -ww-", which further "hardened" to " _ge. -ggj-"/" _ge. -ggv-" in Northern and to " _ge. -ddj-"/" _ge. -ggw-" in Eastern dialects, while inWest Germanic the group results in a diphthong.The conditions of the sound change were long debated, since there is a seemingly random distribution of affected and unaffected words. At first, dependence on word accent was assumed, parallel to
Verner's Law . One currently accepted solution, first proposed by Smith (1941), postulates dependency on the presence of a PIE laryngeal.According to Lehmann (2007), the lengthening occurs as in the contexts of PIE "PIE|* -VwH-", "PIE|* -iyH-", "PIE|* -ayH-", "PIE|* -aHy-" (where "V" is any short vowel, and "H" is any laryngeal).
An example is Old Norse "tryggva" "make trusty", Gothic "triggwa" "alliance", Old High German "treuwa" "faith", all from Proto-Germanic "* triwwō", PIE "* drewā".
The "" word is problematic: Gothic "* addjis" (Crimean Gothic "ada"), Old Norse "egg", Old High German "ei", Old English "ǣg"may be from Proto-Germanic "* ājjam", PIE "* oh₂yom". The plurals Old Norse "eigir", Old English "ǣgru" exhibit an "s"-stem, Proto-Germanic "* ajjaz-". [http://www.indoeuropean.nl/cgi-bin/startq.cgi?flags=endnnnl&root=leiden&basename=%5Cdata%5Cie%5Cpokorny]
Alternative views
Some linguists (e.g.
Joseph Voyles ) [Early Germanic Grammar, pp25-6] hold that Holtzmann's Law represents two separate and independent sound changes, one applying to Gothic and another toOld Norse , rather than being a common innovation. This is supported byJames Marchand 's [The sounds and phonemes of Wulfila's Gothic, p87] observation that a Runic inscription ("niuwila" on the Naesbjaerg bracteat of the 5th century) and an early loan into Finnish ("kuva" "picture", cf. Gothic "skuggwa") do not exhibit this change. If true, this would prevent Holtzmann's law being used as an example of earlyGotho-Nordic unity, in which context it is often cited. Voyles's explanations of the changes do not involvelaryngeal theory .References
* William M. Austin, "Germanic Reflexes of Indo-European -Hy- and -Hw-", Language (1958), 203-211.
* Winfred P. Lehmann, "Proto-Indo-European Phonology" (1955), chapter 4: 'Lengthened /w/ and /y/ in the Gmc. Dialects' [http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/lrc/books/piep04.html]
*James Marchand, "The sounds and phonemes of Wulfila's Gothic", The Hague: Mouton (1973)
*Henry Lee Smith, Jr., "The Verschärfung in Germanic", Language 17 (1941), 93-9
*L. C. Smith, "What's all the fuss about 16 words? A new approach to Holtzmann's law" Göttinger Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 1.
*L. C. Smith, "Holtzmann's law: getting to the hart of the Germanic verscharfung", University of Calgary thesis, ISBN 0-612-24623-X (1997).
*Joseph B. Voyles, "Early Germanic Grammar", San Diego: Harcourt Brace, ISBN 0-12-728270-X (1992).See also
*
Proto-Germanic
*Northwest Germanic
*Grimm's Law
*Verner's Law
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.