- PLATO (computer system)
PLATO was the first (circa 1960, on
ILLIAC I ) generalizedcomputer assisted instruction system. It was widely used starting in the early 1970s, with more than 1000 terminals worldwide. PLATO was originally built by the University of Illinois and ran in four decades, offering elementary through university coursework to UIUC students, local schools, and more than a dozen universities.The project was later taken over by
Control Data Corporation (CDC), who built the machines it ran on at the University. CDC PresidentWilliam Norris planned to make PLATO a major force in the computing world, and was a keystone of his ideas about corporate social responsibility. Although the project was economically a failure and supplanted by other technologies by the time the last production PLATO system was turned off in 2006, PLATO nevertheless pioneered key concepts such as online forums and message boards, online testing, email, chat rooms, picture languages, instant messaging, remote screen sharing, and multi-player online games.The acronym PLATO stands for "Programmed Logic for Automated Teaching Operations". [Email from
Don Bitzer ] [cite paper | title=Engineering for Education at the University of Illinois | date = circa 1965 ]Background
Prior to the 1944
G.I. Bill , which provided freecollege education to returningWorld War II veterans, higher education was limited to a minority of the U.S. population. The trend towards much larger enrollment in higher education was clear by the early 1950s, and the problem of providing for an influx of new students was a serious concern. A number of people proposed that if the computer could increase the capabilities of thefactory viaautomation , then surely it could do the same for education.In 1957 the
Soviet Union launchedSputnik I , and theUnited States suddenly felt a collective sense of educational inferiority. The result was massive spending on science and engineering education; computer-based education along with it. In 1958 theUS Air Force 'sOffice of Scientific Research held a conference on the topic at theUniversity of Pennsylvania , and a number of groups—notablyIBM —presented studies on the topic.PLATO's birth
Chalmers Sherwin, a
physicist at the University of Illinois, suggested a computerized learning system to William Everett, Dean of the College of Engineering. Everett recommended that Daniel Alpert, another physicist, convene a meeting on the topic that included engineers, educators, mathematicians, and psychologists. After several weeks of meetings the group was unable to suggest a single design for such a system. Alpert was unhappy with the results, but before announcing their failure he mentioned the meetings to a lab assistant,Donald Bitzer . Bitzer claimed that he had already been thinking about the problem, and suggested that he could build a demonstration system.Bitzer, regarded as the "father of PLATO", succeeded largely due to his rejection of "modern" educational thinking. Returning to a basic drill-based system, his team improved on existing systems by allowing students to bypass lessons they already understood. Their first system, PLATO I first ran on the locally-built
ILLIAC I computer in 1960. It included aTV for display and a special keyboard to navigate the system's menus. In 1961 they introduced PLATO II, which ran two users at once.Convinced of the value of the project, the PLATO system entered a major redesign between 1963 and 1969. The new PLATO III allowed "anyone" to design new lesson modules using their TUTOR programming language, conceived one night in the summer of 1967 by biology grad student Paul Tenczar. Built on a
CDC 1604 which had been given to them for free byWilliam Norris , PLATO III could run up to 20 lessons at once, and was used by a number of local facilities inChampaign-Urbana that could be attached to the system with their custom terminals.NSF involvement
PLATO I, II and III had been funded by small grants from a combined Army-Navy-Air Force funding pool, but by the time PLATO III was in operation everyone involved was convinced it was worthwhile to scale up the project. Accordingly, in 1967 the
National Science Foundation granted the team steady funding, allowing Bitzer to set up the "Computer-based Education Research Laboratory" (CERL) at the university.In 1972 a new system named PLATO IV was ready for operation. The PLATO IV terminal was a major innovation. It included Bitzer's orange
plasma display invention which incorporated both memory and bitmapped graphics into one display. This plasma display included fast vector line drawing capability and ran at 1260baud , rendering 60 lines or 180 characters per second. The display was a 512x512 bitmap, with both character and vector plotting done by hardwired logic. Users could provide their own characters to support rudimentary raster graphics. Compressed air powered a piston-drivenmicrofiche image selector that permitted colored images to be projected on the back of the screen under program control. The PLATO IV display also included a 16-by-16 grid infrared touch panel allowing students to answer questions by touching anywhere on the screen.It was also possible to connect the terminal to peripheral devices. One such peripheral was the
Gooch Synthetic Woodwind (named after inventorSherwin Gooch ), asynthesizer that offered 4 voice music synthesis to provide sound in PLATO courseware. This was later supplanted on the PLATO V terminal by theGooch Cybernetic Synthesizer , which had 16 voices that could be programmed individually or combined to make more complex sounds. This allowed for what today is known asmultimedia experiences. A PLATO-compatible music language was developed for these synthesizers, as well as a compiler for the language, two music text editors, a filing system for music binaries, programs to play the music binaries in real time, and many debugging and compositional aids. A number of interactive compositional programs have also been written.Another peripheral was the
Votrax speech synthesizer, and a "talk" instruction was added to the Tutor programming language to support it.The goal of this system was to provide tools for music educators to use in the development of instructional materials, which might possibly include music dictation drills, automatically graded keyboard performances, envelope and timbre ear-training, interactive examples or labs in musical acoustics, and composition and theory exercises with immediate feedback. [cite web | url=http://eric.ed.gov:80/ERICWebPortal/Home.portal?_nfpb=true&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_1=%22Gooch+Sherwin%22&ERICExtSearch_Operator_1=OR&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_1=au&_pageLabel=RecordDetails&objectId=0900000b80102360&accno=ED161421 | author=Sherwin Gooch | publisher= | title=PLATO Music Systems | date=1978-03 | accessdate=2006-04-13]
With the advent of microprocessor technology, new PLATO terminals were developed to be less expensive and more flexible than the PLATO IV terminals. At the University of Illinois, these were called PLATO V terminals, even though there never was a PLATO V system (the system continued to be called PLATO IV). The
Intel 8080 microprocessors in these terminals made them capable of executing programs locally, much like today'sJava applet s andActiveX controls, and allowed small software modules to be downloaded into the terminal to augment to the PLATO courseware with rich animation and other sophisticated capabilities that were not available otherwise using a traditional terminal-based approach.Early in 1972, researchers from
Xerox PARC were given a tour of the PLATO system at the University of Illinois. At this time they were shown parts of the system such as the Show Display application generator for pictures on PLATO (later translated into a graphics-draw program on theXerox Star workstation), and the Charset Editor for "painting" new characters (later translated into a "Doodle" program at PARC), and the Term Talk and Monitor Mode communications program. Many of the new technologies they saw were adopted and improved upon when these researchers returned toPalo Alto, California . They subsequently transferred improved versions of this technology toApple Inc. .By 1975 the PLATO System served almost 150 locations from a donated
CDC Cyber 73, including not only the users of the PLATO III system, but a number of grammar schools, high schools, colleges and universities, and military installations. PLATO IV offered text, graphics and animation as intrinsic components of courseware content, and included a shared-memory construct ("common" variables) that allowed TUTOR programs to send data between various users. This latter construct was used both for chat-type programs, as well as the first multi-userflight simulator .With the introduction of PLATO IV, Bitzer declared general success, claiming that the goal of generalized computer instruction was now available to all. However the terminals were very expensive (about $12,000), so as a generalized system PLATO would likely need to be scaled down for cost reasons alone.
The CDC years
As PLATO IV reached production quality, William Norris became increasingly interested in it as a potential product. His interest was twofold. From a strict business perspective, he was evolving Control Data into a service-based company instead of a hardware one, and was increasingly convinced that computer-based education would become a major market in the future. At the same time, Norris was upset by the unrest of the late 1960s, and felt that much of it was due to social inequalities that needed to be addressed. PLATO offered a solution by providing higher education to segments of the population that would otherwise never be able to afford university.
Norris provided CERL with machines on which to develop their system in the late 1960s. In 1971 he set up a new division within CDC to develop PLATO "courseware", and eventually many of CDC's own initial training and technical manuals ran on it. In 1974 PLATO was running on in-house machines at CDC headquarters in
Minneapolis , and in 1976 they purchased the commercial rights in exchange for a newCDC Cyber machine.CDC announced the acquisition soon after, claiming that by 1985 50% of the company's income would be related to PLATO services. Through the 1970s CDC tirelessly promoted PLATO, both as a commercial tool and one for re-training unemployed workers in new fields. Norris refused to give up on the system, and invested in several non-mainstream courses, including a crop-information system for farmers, and various courses for inner-city youth. CDC even went as far as to place PLATO terminals in some shareholder's houses, to demonstrate the concept of the system.
In the early 1980s CDC started heavily advertising the service, apparently due to increasing internal dissent over the now $600 million project, taking out print and even radio ads promoting it as a general tool. "The Minneapolis Tribune" was unconvinced by their ad copy and started an investigation of the claims. In the end they concluded that while it was not proven to be a better education system, everyone using it nevertheless enjoyed it at least. An official evaluation by an external testing agency ended with roughly the same conclusions, suggesting that everyone enjoyed using it, but it was essentially equal to an average human teacher in terms of student advancement.
Of course a computerized system equal to a human should have been a major achievement, the very concept that the early pioneers in CBT were aiming for. A computer could serve all the students in a school for the cost of maintaining it, and wouldn't go on strike. However CDC charged $50 an hour for access to their data center, in order to recoup some of their development costs, making it considerably more expensive than a human on a per-student basis. PLATO was therefore a failure in any real sense, although it did find some use in large companies and government agencies willing to invest in the technology.
An attempt to mass-market the PLATO system was introduced in 1980 as Micro-PLATO, which ran the basic TUTOR system on a CDC "Viking-721" terminal and various home computers. Versions were built for the
Texas Instruments TI-99/4A ,Atari 8-bit family , Zenith Z-100 and (later)Radio Shack TRS-80 &IBM PC . Micro-PLATO could be used stand-alone for normal courses, or could connect to a CDC data center for multiuser programs. To make the latter affordable, CDC introduced the Homelink service for $5 an hour.Norris continued to praise PLATO, announcing that it would be only a few years before it represented a major source of income for CDC as late as 1984. In 1986 Norris stepped down as CEO, and the PLATO service was slowly killed off. He later claimed that Micro-PLATO was one of the reasons PLATO got off-track. They had started on the TI-99/4A, but then TI pulled the plug and they moved to other systems like the Atari, who soon did the same. He felt that it was a waste of time anyway, as the system's value was in its online nature, which Micro-PLATO lacked (at least to start).
Bitzer was more forthright about CDC's failure, blaming their corporate culture for the problems. He noted that development of the courseware was averaging $300,000 per delivery hour, many times what the CERL was paying for similar products. This meant that CDC had to charge high prices in order to recoup their costs, prices that made the system unattractive. The reason, he suggested, for these high prices was that CDC had set up a division that had to keep itself profitable via courseware development, forcing them to raise the prices in order to keep their headcount up during slow periods.
PLATO in South Africa
During the period when CDC was marketing PLATO, the system began to be used internationally.
South Africa was one of the biggest users of PLATO in the early 1980s.Eskom , the South African electrical power company, had a large CDC mainframe atMegawatt Park in the northwest suburbs ofJohannesburg . Mainly this computer was used for management and data processing tasks related to power generation and distribution, but it also ran the PLATO software. The largest PLATO installation in South Africa during the early 1980s was at theUniversity of the Western Cape , which served a "coloured" population, and at one time had hundreds of PLATO IV terminals all connected by leased data lines back to Johannesburg. There were several other installations at educational institutions in South Africa, among themMadadeni College in theMadadeni township just outside of Newcastle.This was perhaps the most unusual PLATO installation anywhere. Madadeni had about 1,000 students, all of them black and 99.5% of
Zulu ancestry. The college was one of 10 teacher preparation institutions inkwaZulu , most of them much smaller. In many ways Madadeni was very primitive. None of the classrooms had electricity and there was only one telephone for the whole college, which one had to crank for several minutes before an operator might come on the line. So an air-conditioned, carpeted room with 16 computer terminals was a stark contrast to the rest of the college. At times the only way a person could communicate with the outside world was through PLATO term-talk.For many of the Madadeni students, most of whom came from very rural areas, the PLATO terminal was the first time they encountered any kind of electronic technology. (Many of the first year students had never seen a flush toilet before.) There initially was skepticism that these technologically-illiterate students could effectively use PLATO, but those concerns were not borne out. Within an hour or less most students were using the system proficiently, mostly to learn math and science skills, although a lesson that taught keyboarding skills was one of the most popular. A few students even used on-line resources to learn TUTOR, the PLATO programming language, and a few wrote lessons on the system in the Zulu language.
PLATO was also used fairly extensively in South Africa for industrial training.
Eskom successfully used PLM (PLATO learning management) and simulations to train power plant operators,South African Airways (SAA) used PLATO simulations for cabin attendant training, and there were a number of other large companies as well that were exploring the use of PLATO.The South African subsidiary of CDC invested heavily in the development of an entire secondary school curriculum (SASSC) on PLATO, but unfortunately as the curriculum was nearing the final stages of completion, CDC began to falter in South Africa—partly because of financial problems back home, partly because of growing opposition in the United States to doing business in South Africa, and partly due to the rapidly evolving
microcomputer , a paradigm shift that CDC failed to recognize.The PLATO Online Community
Although PLATO was designed for computer-based education, manyWho|date=May 2008 consider its most enduring legacy to be the online community spawned by its communication features. PLATO Notes, created by David Woolley in 1973, was among the world's first online
message board s, and years later became the direct progenitor ofLotus Notes . By 1976, PLATO had sprouted a variety of novel tools for online communication, including Personal Notes (e-mail ),Talkomatic (chat room s), Term-Talk (instant messaging ), monitor mode (remote screen sharing) andemoticon s. [See Smith and Sherwood, 1976, particularly the section entitled "PLATO as a Communication Medium]PLATO's plasma panels were well suited to gaming, although its I/O bandwidth (180 characters per second or 60 graphic lines per second) was relatively slow. By virtue of 1500 shared 60-bit variables per game (initially), it was possible to implement
online game s. Because it was an educational computer system, most of the user community was keenly interested in gaming.Many popular inter-terminal games were developed on PLATO during the 1970s and 1980s, such as "Empire" (a multiplayer game based on "
Star Trek "), "Airfight " (a precursor to "Microsoft Flight Simulator "), "Panther" (a vector graphics based tankwar game, earlier than, but similar in many respects to Atari's "BattleZone"), the originalFreecell , and several games inspired by therole-playing game "Dungeons & Dragons ", including "dnd" and "Rogue". "Moria", "Dry Gulch " (a western-style variation), and "Bugs-n-Drugs" (a medical variation) — these all presagedMUD s andMOO s as well as popular first-person shooters like "Doom" and "Quake " andMMORPG s like "Everquest " and "World of Warcraft ". "Avatar", PLATO's most popular game, is one of the world's first MUDs and has over 1 million hours of use.Fact|date=May 2008These communication tools and games formed the basis for an online community of thousands of PLATO users, which lasted for well over twenty years. [ [http://thinkofit.com/plato/dwplato.htm "PLATO: The Emergence of Online Community"] article by David Woolley.]
In September 2006 the
Federal Aviation Administration retired its PLATO system, the last system that ran the PLATO software system on a CDC Cybermainframe , from active duty. Existing PLATO-like systems now include NovaNET [ [http://www.pearsondigital.com/novanet Novanet website] ] and Cyber1.org.By early 1976, the original PLATO IV system had 950 terminals giving access to more than 3500 contact hours of courseware, and additional systems were in operation at CDC and
Florida State University . ["Science", Smith and Sherwood 192 (4237): 344.] . Eventually, over 12,000 contact hours of courseware was developed, much of it developed by university faculty for higher education.Fact|date=May 2008 PLATO courseware covers a full range of high-school and college courses, as well as topics such as reading skills, family planning,Lamaze training and home budgeting.Fact|date=May 2008 In addition, authors at theUniversity of Illinois School of Basic Medical Sciences (now, theCollege of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign ) devised a large number of basic science lessons and a self-testing system for first year students. [http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ209808] [http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED161424] However the most popular "courseware" remained their multi-user games andcomputer role playing games such as "dnd", although it appears CDC was uninterested in this market.Fact|date=May 2008 As the value of a CDC-based solution disappeared in the 1980s, interested educators ported the engine first to theIBM PC , and later to web-based systems. Today, however, even the web-based versions seem to have disappeared.Later efforts and other versions
One of CDC's greatest commercial successes with PLATO was an online testing system developed for
NASD , a private-sector regulator of the US securities markets. During the 1970s Michael Stein, E. Clarke Porter and PLATO veteran Jim Ghesquiere, in cooperation with NASD executive Frank McAuliffe, developed the first "on-demand" proctored commercial testing service. The testing business grew slowly and was ultimately spun off from CDC as Drake Training and Technologies in1990 . The system was later ported, with help fromNovell , to a LAN-based system. Known today as Thomson Prometric, the company has a number of proctored testing sites in the United States where PLATO-like courseware is used for automated testing. E. Clarke Porter left Thomson Prometric, and along with Steve Nordberg and Kirk Lundeen formed Pearson VUE in 1994. Similar to Thomson Prometric, VUE is internet based.A number of smaller testing-related companies also evolved from the PLATO system. One of the few survivors of that group is The Examiner Corporation. Dr. Stanley Trollip (formerly of the University of Illinois Aviation Research Lab) and Gary Brown (formerly of Control Data) developed the prototype of The Examiner System in 1984.
In the early 1970s, James Schuyler developed a system at Northwestern University called HYPERTUTOR as part of Northwestern's MULTI-TUTOR computer assisted instruction system. This ran on several CDC mainframes at various sites. [http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED111398&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED111398]
Between 1973 and 1980, a group under the direction of Thomas T. Chen at the Medical Computing Laboratory of the School of Basic Medical Sciences at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign ported PLATO's TUTOR programming language to the Modcomp IV minicomputer. [http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/modcomp/]
Douglas W. Jones , A.B. Baskin, Tom Szolyga, Vincent Wu and [http://www.phys.virginia.edu/Scripts/personal.asp?UID=lab3e Lou Bloomfield] did most of the implementation. This was the first port of TUTOR to a minicomputer and was largely operational by 1976 [http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/plato/#tutor] In 1980, Chen founded Global Information Systems Technology of Champaign Illinois to market this as the Simpler system. GIST eventually merged with the [http://www.defenset2.com/ Defense Training and Technologies division] of [http://Adayana.com Adayana Inc] .Vincent Wu went on to develop theAtari [http://atarimagazines.planetmirror.com/v3n3/platorising.html Plato cartridge] .CDC eventually sold the "PLATO" trademark and some courseware marketing segment rights to the newly-formed The Roach Organization (TRO) in 1989. In 2000 TRO changed their name to [http://www.plato.com/ PLATO Learning] and continue to sell and service PLATO courseware running on PCs.
CDC continued development of the basic system under the name CYBIS (CYber-Based Instructional System) after selling the trademarks to Roach, in order to service their commercial and government customers. CDC later sold off their CYBIS business to University Online, which was a descendant of IMSATT. University Online was later renamed to
VCampus .The University of Illinois also continued development of PLATO, eventually setting up a commercial on-line service called
NovaNET in partnership with University Communications, Inc. CERL was closed in 1994, with the maintenance of the PLATO code passing to UCI. UCI was later renamed NovaNET Learning, which was bought by National Computer Systems (NCS). Shortly after that, NCS was bought by Pearson, and after several name changes now operates as [http://www.pearsonschool.com/index.cfm?locator=PSZ1Aq Pearson Digital Learning] .Cyber1
In August 2004, a version of PLATO (see [http://www.cyber1.org Cyber1.org] ) corresponding to the final release from CDC was resurrected online, and word of its reincarnation spread rapidly. This version of PLATO runs on a software
emulation of the original CDC hardware calledDesktop CYBER . Within 6 months, by word of mouth alone, more than 500 former users had signed up to use the system. Many of the students who used PLATO in the 1970s and 1980s felt a special social bond with the community of users who came together using the powerful communications tools (talk programs, records systems and notesfiles) on PLATO.The PLATO software used on Cyber1 is the final release (99A) of CYBIS, by permission of VCampus. The underlying operating system is NOS 2.8.7, the final release of the NOS operating system, by permission of Syntegra (now British Telecom [BT] ), which had acquired the remainder of CDC's mainframe business. Cyber1 runs this software on the Desktop CYBER emulator. Desktop CYBER accurately emulates in software a range of CDC CYBER mainframe models and many peripherals.
Cyber1 offers free access to the system, which contains over 16,000 of the original lessons, in an attempt to preserve the original PLATO communities that grew up at CERL and on CDC systems in the 1980s.
Innovation
*
Plasma display , circa 1964, by Donald Bitzer for PLATO IV
*Touchscreen , circa 1964, by Donald Bitzer for PLATO IV
*Answer Judging Machinery, ?date?, a set of about 25 commands in TUTOR that made it easy to test a student's understanding of a complex concept.
*Show Display Mode, 1975, a graphics application generator for TUTOR software, precursor to Apple'sQuickDraw picture language editor.
*Charset Editor, an early precursor toMacPaint for drawing bitmapped pictures stored in downloadable fonts.
*Monitor Mode on PLATO, 1974, used by instructors to help students, precursor of Timbuktu screen-sharing software.
*Pad and a few months later, system-defined Notesfiles, 1973, the first general-purpose computer message board, and precursor to UnixNewsgroups , Digital DECnotes andLotus Notes .
*Talkomatic, 1974, a 6-person real-time chat room (text-based), precursor to Instant Messaging Conferences.
*Term-Talk, 1973, precursor toinstant messaging .
*Gooch Synthetic Woodwind , circa 1972, A music device for the terminal, precursor tosound cards andMIDI .
*Airfight , 1974, a 3-D flight simulator written for PLATO by Brand Fortner; this probably inspired UIUC studentBruce Artwick to startsubLOGIC which was acquired and later becameMicrosoft Flight Simulator .
*Empire, circa 1974, a 30 person multi-player inter-terminal 2-D real-time space simulation.
*Spasim , circa 1974, a 32-player first-person 3D space battle game
*Pedit5 , circa 1974, likely the first graphical dungeon computer game.
*dnd, 1974-1975, a dungeon crawl game that included the first video game boss.
*Panther, circa 1975 by John Haefeli, a 3-D tank simulation and forerunner of Atari'sBattlezone game.
*Build-Up , 1976 by Bruce Wallace, based on a story byJ. G. Ballard , the first 3-D walkthru maze game. The maze itself was also 3-D, having holes in the floor and ceiling.
*Think15 , circa 1977, 2-D outdoor wilderness quest simulation, like Trek with monsters, trees, treasures.
*Avatar, circa 1978, a 2.5-D graphical Multi-User Dungeon (MUD), a precursor toEverQuest .
*Freecell , 1979 by Paul Alfille, which probably spawned the Windows version.
*Mahjong solitaire , 1981 by Brodie Lockard, and was popularised in 1986 byActivision as "Shanghai".See also
*
References
External links
* [http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/univOfIllinoisUrbana/plato/X-20_The_Plato_IV_Architecture_May72.pdf The Plato IV Architecture] by Jack Stifle
* [http://thinkofit.com/plato/dwplato.htm "PLATO: The Emergence of Online Community"] by David R. Woolley
* [http://www.platopeople.com/index.html "PLATO People, A History Book Research Project"] by Brian L. Dear
* [http://www.cbi.umn.edu/iterations/vanmeer.html "PLATO: From Computer-Based Education to Corporate Social Responsibility"] by Elisabeth Van Meer
* [http://www.atarimagazines.com/v3n3/platorising.html "PLATO RISING - Online learning for Atarians"] by David & Sandy Small
* [http://www.cyber1.org/ Cyber1.org: An online preservation of the PLATO system]
* [http://www.classicgaming.com/features/articles/computergaminghistory/index5.shtml "The History of Computer Gaming Part 5 - PLATO Ain't Just Greek"] by Marty "Retro Rogue" Goldberg
* [http://www.xmn.com/images/plato%20article%20cons%20rept.pdf "Yes Computers can Revolutionize Education"] by Arthur Darak from the Sept/Oct 1977 issue of Consumer Digest
* [http://members.iinet.net.au/~tom-hunter "Desktop CYBER"] by Tom Hunter
* [http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/rapidpdf/192/4237/344 Stanley G. Smith and Bruce Arne Sherwood, Educational Uses of the PLATO Computer System, "Science 192", 4237 (April 1976), 344-352.]
* [http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/cdc/plato/97405900C_PLATO_Users_Guide_Apr81.pdf PLATO User's Guide] , Revised April, 1981, CDC Corporation.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.