- Whirlwind (computer)
The Whirlwind
computer was developed at theMassachusetts Institute of Technology . It is the first computer that operated inreal time , used video displays for output, and the first that was not simply an electronic replacement of older mechanical systems. Its development led directly to theUnited States Air Force 'sSemi Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE) system, and indirectly to almost all business computers andminicomputer s in the 1960s.Techno-historical background
During
World War II , theU.S. Navy approached MIT about the possibility of creating a computer to drive aflight simulator for trainingbomber crews. They envisioned a fairly simple system in which the computer would continually update a simulated instrument panel based on control inputs from the pilots. Unlike older systems like theLink Trainer , the system they envisioned would have a considerably more realisticaerodynamics model that could be adapted to any type of plane.A short study by the MIT Servomechanisms Laboratory concluded that such a system was certainly possible. The Navy decided to fund development under "Project Whirlwind", and the lab placed
Jay Forrester in charge of the project. They soon built a largeanalog computer for the task, but found that it was inaccurate and inflexible. Solving these problems would require a much larger system, perhaps one so large as to be impossible to construct.In 1945 Perry Crawford, another member of the MIT team, saw a demonstration of
ENIAC and suggested that a digital computer was the solution. Such a machine would allow the accuracy of the simulation to be improved with the addition of more code in thecomputer program , as opposed to adding parts to the machine. As long as the machine was fast enough, there was no theoretical limit to the complexity of the simulation.Up until this point all computers constructed were dedicated to single tasks, run in
batch mode . A series of inputs were set up in advance and fed into the computer, which would work out the answers and print them. This was not appropriate for the Whirlwind system, which needed to operate continually on an ever-changing series of inputs. Speed became a major issue, whereas with other systems it simply meant waiting longer for the printout, with Whirlwind it meant seriously limiting the amount of complexity the simulation could include.After Whirlwind was completed and running, a design for a larger and faster machine to be called Whirlwind II was begun. But the design soon became too much for MIT's resources. It was decided to shelve the Whirlwind II design without building it and concentrate MIT's resources on programming and applications for the original machine, now called Whirlwind I. When the Air Force decided to construct the SAGE
air defense system,IBM , the prime contractor for theAN/FSQ-7 computer based the machine's design more on the stillborn Whirlwind II design than on the original Whirlwind. Thus the AN/FSQ-7 is sometimes incorrectly referred to as "Whirlwind II", even though they were not the same machine or design.Technical description
Design and construction
By 1947, Forrester and collaborator Robert Everett [http://www.cs.stthomas.edu/faculty/resmith/papers/WhirlwindR-127.pdf completed the design] of a high-speed stored-program computer for this task. Most computers of the era operated in "bit-serial" mode, using single-bit arithmetic and feeding in large words, often 48 or 60 bits in size, one bit at a time. This was simply not fast enough for their purposes, so Whirlwind included sixteen such math units, operating on a complete 16-bit word every cycle in "bit-parallel" mode. Ignoring memory speed, Whirlwind was essentially sixteen times as fast as other machines. Today almost all CPUs do arithmetic in "bit-parallel"; some CPUs extend the idea to larger 32- or 64-bit words.
The word size was selected after some deliberation. The machine worked by passing in a single address with almost every instruction, thereby reducingFact|date=April 2008 the number of memory accesses. For operations with two operands, adding for instance, the "other" operand was assumed to be the last one loaded. Whirlwind operated much like a
reverse Polish notation calculator in this respect; except there was no operand stack, only an accumulator. The designers felt that 2000 words of memory would be the minimum usable amount, requiring 11 bits to represent an address, and that 16 to 32 instructions would be the minimum for another 5 bits -- and so it was 16-bits. Nevertheless the small word size ledJohn von Neumann to conclude the machine would be worthless.The Whirlwind design incorporated a
control store driven by a master clock. Each step of the clock selected a signal line in adiode matrix that enabled gates and other circuits on the machine. A special switch directed signals to different parts of the matrix to implement different instructions. The design inspiredMaurice Wilkes to develop the concept of microprogramming.Construction of the machine started the next year, an effort that employed 175 people including 70 engineers and technicians. Whirlwind took 3 years to build and first went online on April 20, 1951. The project's budget was $1 million a year, and after three years the Navy had already lost interest. The USAF picked up the work under "Project Claude".
The core of the machine
Speed of the original design (20 KIPS) turned out to be too slow to be very useful, and most of the problem was attributed to the fairly slow speed of the
Williams tube s (or, more accurately, Williams-Kilburn tubes) used formain memory of 256 words. Forrester started looking at replacements, first using magnetic tape formed into spirals, even at one time considering using a 3-D array ofneon lamp s, and eventually creatingcore memory . Speed was roughly doubled (40 KIPS) as a result of using core when the new version was completed in 1953. The addition time was 49microseconds and the multiplication time was 61 microseconds (before the main memory was converted to magnetic core).After the magnetic core memory was installed, the Whirlwind became the fastest computer of its time. With the change it had an addition time of 8 microseconds, a multiplication time of 25.5 microseconds, and a division time of 57 microseconds (excluding memory access time). The access time had been about 16 microseconds for the CRT memory which was reduced to only 8 microseconds with the magnetic core.
The "Cape Cod System" and SAGE
The "Cape Cod System" was designed to demonstrate a computerized
air defence system, covering southernNew England . Signals from three long range (AN/FPS-3) radars, eleven gap-filler radars, and three height-finding radars were converted from analog to digital format and transmitted overtelephone line s to the Whirlwind I computer inCambridge, Massachusetts .The first tests of the "Cape Cod System", beginning in September 1953, used only simulated data, but later tests used
U.S. Air Force B-47 Stratojet bombers as stand-ins for Soviet bombers, and real interceptors scrambled from four Air Force bases.The "Cape Cod System" verified that the new core-based machine was fast enough for use in SAGE, and an industrial effort was started in order to mass-produce the
AN/FSQ-7 computers for this role.RCA was a front-runner, but IBM was eventually selected instead. They started production in 1957, along with a massive construction project to build the buildings, power and communications network needed to feed the SAGE systems with data.What became of the Whirlwind?
Whirlwind I ran in a support role for SAGE until June 30, 1959. A member of the project team, Bill Wolf, then rented the machine for a dollar a year until 1973.
Ken Olsen and Robert Everett then saved the machine from the scrap heap and it became the basis for theDigital Computer Museum , which would later become The Computer Museum on Boston'sMuseum Wharf . Today it is in the collection of theComputer History Museum in Mountain View, California, and a portion of the machine is currently on display.The Whirlwind used approximately 5000
vacuum tube s. An effort was also started to convert the Whirlwind design to a transistorized form, led byKen Olsen and known as theTX-0 . TX-0 was very successful and plans were made to make an even larger version known as TX-1. However this project was far too ambitious and had to be scaled back to a smaller version known asTX-2 . Even this version proved troublesome, and Olsen left in mid-project to startDigital Equipment Corporation (DEC). DEC'sPDP-1 was essentially a collection of TX-0 and TX-2 concepts in a smaller package.References
*
*
* John F. Jacobs, "The SAGE Air Defense System: A Personal History" (MITRE Corporation, 1986) also contains much material on the Whirlwind
ee also
*
History of computing hardware
*Laning and Zierler system External links
* [http://www.cbi.umn.edu/oh/display.phtml?id=96 Oral history interview with Fernando J. Corbató] at
Charles Babbage Institute , University of Minnesota. Corbató discusses computer science research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), including the development of the Whirlwind computer.
* [http://www.cbi.umn.edu/oh/display.phtml?id=106 Oral history interview with Douglas T. Ross] atCharles Babbage Institute , University of Minnesota. Ross recounts some of his working on MIT's Whirlwind computer in the 1950s. He reports on his first use of Whirlwind for airborne fire control problems. Soon after that the Whirlwind was used for the Cape Cod early warning system, a precursor to the SAGE Air Defense System. Ross describes improvements made to Whirlwind, including the first light pen and photoelectric tape reader. Ross also discusses some of the programs he wrote or used on Whirlwind.
* [http://www.research.microsoft.com/~gbell/Computer_Structures__Readings_and_Examples/00000157.htm Computer Structures: Readings & Examples — The Whirlwind I computer]
* [http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/mit/whirlwind Whirlwind documentation] on Bitsavers.org
* [http://www.ll.mit.edu/news/journal/pdf/vol13_no1/13_1overview.pdf Overview of the Lincoln Laboratory Ballistic Missile Defense Program] (PDF)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.