- Kurgan stelae
Kurgan stelae (Turkic: _tr. balbal, Russian: _ru. каменные бабы, Ukrainian: _uk. Баби кам'яні "stone s") are
anthropomorphic stonestela e, orobelisks , images cut from stone, installed atopkurgan s in the kurgan cemeteries, around kurgans, and in a double line extending from a kurgan. The kurgan stelae arranged in a double line are also called "balbal" and "menhir".Kurgan obelisks were likely part ofCentral Asia n andEastern Europe an (Pontic-Caspian steppe ,Scythia ) memorials, funeral sanctuaries, from theEneolithic through to theMiddle Ages . Architecturally, they were a system of stone fences, frequently surrounded by a moat, with sacrificial hearths, sometimes tiled on the inside.Such stelae are found in large numbers in
Southern Russia ,Ukraine ,Prussia , southernSiberia ,Central Asia andMongolia .Spanning more than three millennia, they are clearly the product of various cultures. The earliest are associated with the
Kurgan culture .Iron Age specimens are identified with theScythians and medieval examples withTurkic peoples .History
The earliest stelae date to the
4th millennium BC , and are associated with the earlyBronze Age Yamna andKemi-Oba cultures (seeKurgan ). They number in the hundreds, most of them very crude stone slabs with a simple schematic protruding head and a few features such as eyes or breasts carved into the stone. Some twenty specimens are more complex, featuring ornaments, weapons, human or animal figures etc.The
Cimmerian s of the early1st millennium BC left a small number (about ten are known) of distinctive stone stelae. Another four or five "deer stelae" dating to the same time are known from the northern Caucasus.From the 7th century BC,
Scythian tribes began to dominate the Pontic steppe. They were in turn displaced by theSarmatian s from the 2nd century BC, except for in theCrimea , where they persisted for a few centuries longer. These peoples left carefully crafted stone stelae, with all features cut in deep relief.Stelae of early Slavic deities are again more primitive. There are some thirty sites of the middle
Dniestr region where such anthropomorphic idols were found. The most famous of these is the "Zbruch idol " (ca. 10th century), a post measuring about 3 meters, with four faces under a single pointed hat (c.f.Svetovid ).Boris Rybakov argued for identification of the faces with the godsPerun ,Makosh ,Lado and Veles.European traveler
William of Rubruck mentioned them for the first time in the 13th century, seeing them on kurgans in the Cuman (Kipchak ) country, he reported that Cumans installed these statues on tombs of their deceased. These statues are also mentioned in the 17th century "Large Drawing Book", as markers for borders and roads, or orientation points. In the 18th century information about some kurgan stelae was collected by Pallas, Falk, Guldenshtedt, Zuev, Lepekhin, and in first half of the 19th century by Klaprot, Duboa-de-Montpere and Spassky ("Siberian obelisks"). CountAleksey Uvarov , in the 1869 ‘‘Works of the 1st Archeological Congress in Moscow” (vol. 2), assembled all available at that time data about kurgan obelisks, and illustrated them with drawings of 44 statues.Later in the 19th century, data about these statues was gathered by A.I. Kelsiev, and in Siberia,
Turkestan and Mongolia by Potanin, Pettsold, Poyarkov,Vasily Radlov , Ivanov, Adrianov and Yadrintsev, in Prussia by Lissauer and Gartman.Distribution
The Historical museum in Moscow has 30 specimens (in the halls and in the courtyard); others are in
Kharkov ,Odessa ,Novocherkassk , etc. These are only a small part of examples dispersed in various regions of Eastern Europe, of which multitudes were already destroyed and used as construction material for buildings, fences, etc.In the 1850s Piskarev, summing all information about kurgan obelisks available in literature, counted 649 items, mostly in Ekaterinoslav province (428), in
Taganrog (54), inCrimea province (44), inKharkov (43), in theDon Cossacks land (37), inYenisei province, Siberia (12), inPoltava (5), inStavropol (5), etc.; but many statues remained unknown to him.The distribution of the stelae is limited in the west by the Odessa district, Podolsk province, Galicia, Kalisz province, Prussia; in the south by
Kacha River , Crimea; in the south-east by Kuma River in the Stavropol province and Kuban region; in the north byMinsk province and Oboyan district of the Kursk province (in some opinions even the Ryazan province), Ahtyr district in the Kharkov province, Voronej province, Balash and Atkar districts in the Saratov province to the banks ofSamara River in Buzuluk districts in the Samara province, in the east they are spread in the Kyrgyz (Kazakh) steppe to the banks of theIrtysh River and to Turkestan (nearIssyk Kul , Tokmak district), then in upper courses of rivers Tom and Yenisei, in Sagai steppe in Mongolia (according to Potanin and Yadrintseva).Aspect
Some kurgan
obelisks are found still standing on kurgans, others were found buried in the slopes. Not always can be stated if they were contemporary with the kurgans on which they stand, existed earlier, or were carved later and lifted onto the kurgan. Kurgan obelisks are ofsandstone ,limestone ,granite , etc. Their height is from 3.5 m to 0.7 m, but more often 1.5 - 2 m. Some of them are simple stone columns, with a rough image of a human face, on others the head (with the narrowed neck) is clearly depicted; in most cases not only the head is depicted, but also body, arms, and frequently both legs, and headdress, and dress. On more crude statues is impossible to dissern sex, but mostly it is expressed clearly: men are withmoustaches (sometimes with beard, one bearded kurgan obelisk is in the courtyard of the Historical Museum inMoscow ), in a costume with metalbreastplate s and belts, sometimes with asword , etc.; women are with bared breasts, wearing peculiar headdresses, withgirdle s ornecklace s on the neck, etc.Other obelisks show completely naked and usually only their head is covered, and legs are shoed. Kurgan statues are sitting (frequently females), and standing (mostly males); in both cases the legs are not depicted. If the legs are depicted, they are either barefoot, or more often shoed, in high or low
boots ('bashmaks'), sometimes with distinguishabletrousers with ornaments. Many female kurgan obelisks (and some male) are naked above the belt, but below a belt and dress are visible, sometimes two dresses, one longer underneath, and another on the top, as a semi-'kaftan ' or a short furcoat, with appliques and inserts (the ornaments of inserts consist of geometrical lines, double spirals, etc., or evencuirass ). Others have stripes on the shoulders, many have two stripes (seldom three, or one wide across), plates (apparently, metal) on the breast attached to a belt or, more often, to two belts. On the belt sometimes is possible to distinguish abuckle in the middle or thongs hanging from it with sometimes attached bag, a round metal pocketmirror ,knife ,comb , sometimes also is shown (male statues) adagger or a straight sword, a bow, a ‘kolchan’ (quiver ), ahook , anaxe . On the neck the men wear a metal band, women wear a necklace of beads or scales, sometimes even 2 or 3 are visible, some have a wide tape or a belt dropping from thenecklace , ending with a 4-corner cloth. On the hands, wrists and shoulders (especially for nude figures) arebracelet s (rings) and cuffs, in the ears, for women and men, areearrings , on the head (forehead) sometimes is an ornametal bandage or adiadem . The femalebraid s can not always be distinguished fromribbon s orbandage s, they also are depicted for men. In some cases the male hat undoubtedly represents a smallhelmet (‘misyurka’), sometimes with crossing metal strips. The femaleheaddress is more diverse, like a hat with curved brims, ‘bashlyk’, Kyrgyz (Kazakh) hat, etc.The type of the
face is not always depicted clearly: sometimes the face is flat, as though wigh prominent cheek-bones, but more often it is oval shape and more likely depict Turkic, rather than sharply Mongolian features. The vast majority of women join hands on the navel or at the bottom of the stomach, and hold a vessel, frequently cylindrical, like a cup or a glass. Sometimes it is so blurred that it can be taken for a foldedscarf . One male figurine holds abowl in the left hand, and a sword in the right; and another has hands simply joined together, without a bowl, one female figurine holds a ring, some hold arhyton (drinking horn).Dating and attribution
Rubruk attributed kurgan obelisks to
Cumans ; Klaprot and Spassky - to theHuns ; Guldenshtedt - to theNogais ; Pallas attributed the most ancient to theHuns , later to the Nogai Tatars orKyrgyz -Kaisaks ; Gentselman - to theGoths ; Fligie - to theAlans (attribution of kurgan obelisks toGoths andAlans was suggested because in Spain were also found kurgan statues holding a bowl in hands, but the type of the clothes, the dress of these statues are completely original [http://www.wikiznanie.ru/ru-wz/index.php/Каменные_бабы] ); Tereshchenko attributed kurgan obelisks to theScythians ; Count Uvarov pointed to testimony that some kurgan obelisks stood on the kurgans that after excavation turned out to be Scythian, with Greek goods of the 4th-3rd centuries BC. In the opinion of Count Uvarov, kurgan obelisks belong to various epochs: some of them were erected prior to the Iron Age, others in theEarly Iron Age , the third already in the beginning of theChristian era , for example an obelisk found by Guldenshtedt on the bank of Etaka River, tributary of Kuma River in the Stavropol province, had a cross on the neck, probably pointing to the Christian era which in theCaucasus began not earlier then the 4th century AD. The opinion about attribution of the some kurgan obelisks to the epoch preceding the Iron Age is supported by belt knives, mirrors and so forth which resemble respective goods of the SiberianEneolithic .In Mongolia and Turkestan, the kurgan obelisks are generally poorly trimmed and are rude carvings, with barely indicated face or head. Therefore it is plausible that kurgan obelisks were erected beginning in the
Copper Age by people spread fromcentral Asia toEuropean Russia . They were, probably, gravestone monuments, judging by the similar grave statues (only larger and better trimmed) later also erected by Mongols (in the remains of Karakorum are found many, mostly without head or fragmented) and Chinese. Ivanovovsky ("Congres internat. d'Archeologie prehistorique", Moscow, 1892, vol. 1) reported that Tarbagatai Torgouts (Kalmyks ) revered kurgan obelisks in their country as images of their ancestors, and that the bowl held by the statues were to deposit of a part of the ashes after thecremation of the deceased (another part was laid under the base of the statue). Still sometimes unil now after cremations, practised between Torgouts, a lama collects ashes into a small copper vessel, and the ash taken to amonastery , where from it, mixed withclay , is moulded a small statue of the deceased, a ‘kosha-chulu’. Torgouts call the kurgan obelisks by this same name, and they have a legend explaining why they switched from erection of kurgan obelisks to clay figurines. Torgouts also have explanations for various details of the dress, weaponry, and ornaments of stone sculptures in theirsteppe s.Balbals
Balbals are a type of kurgan burial obelisks. Balbals were erected as monuments to enemies killed in battle by the warrior buried in the kurgan [W.Radloff: "stone obelisk in honour of deceased."
Leonid Kyzlasov : "a vertically anchored stone near a memorial structure, symbolizing a killed enemy" (Kyzlasov, 1966, 207, 208) (cited after Shipova E.N., 'Dictionary of Turkisms In Russian', p. 55)] . They commonly depict a person holding a bowl in their upraised right hand. Some balbals show a warrior holding weapons, usually in the left hand.Writing about Altai kurgans, L.N. Gumilev states: "To the east from the tombs are standing chains of balbals, crudely sculpted stones implanted in the ground. Number of balbals at the tombs I investigated varies from 0 to 51, but most often there are 3–4 balbals per tomb". Similar numbers are also given by L.R. KyzlasovKyzlasov L.R. Tuva… p. 62.] . They are memorials to the feats of the deceased, every balbal represents an enemy killed by him. Many tombs have no balbals. Apparently, there are buried ashes of women and children.
Balbals have two clearly distinct forms: conic and flat, with shaved top. Considering the evidence of
Orkhon inscriptions that every balbal represented a certain person, such distinction cannot be by chance. Likely here is marked an important ethnographic attribute, a headdress. The steppe-dwellers up until present wear a conic 'malahai', and the Altaians wear flat round hats. The same forms of headdresses are recorded for the 8th century (Gumilev L.N. Statuettes…)." "We can note that fight against steppe was more successful, as from 486 balbals we investigated, 329 were conical, and 157 flat." "Sudden raids on the steppe pastures were more successfully than endless struggle with moutaineers, who knew each tree in the forest and each rock in the gorges. Maybe this is a reason why the flat-headed balbals, as a rule, are more massive than conical" [Gumilev L.N., "Ancient Türks", Moscow, 1993, p. 261] .Another observation of
Lev Gumilev : "From the Tsaidam salt lakes to the Kül-tegin monument leads a three-kilometer chain of balbals. To our time survived 169 balbals, apparently there were more. Some balbals are given a crude likeness with men, indicated are hands, a hint of a belt. Along the moat toward the east runs a second chain of balbals, which gave I. Lisi a cause to suggest that they circled the fence wall of the monument. However, it is likely that it is another chain belonging to another deceased buried earlier" [Gumilev L.N., "Ancient Türks", Moscow, 1993, p. 329] .References and notes
*Archeological Encyclopedia Catalogue of stone obelisks [http://sati.archaeology.nsc.ru/encyc_5/] ("In Russian")
*Arslanova F.Kh., Charikov A.A., "Stone obelisks of Upper Irtysh", Soviet Archeology No 3, 1974, ("In Russian")
*Bayar D. "Stone obelisks of Mongolia", Seoul, 1994 ("In Korean")
*Bayar D. "Stone statues in Central region of Mongolia", Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 1997 ("In Mongolian")
*Charikov A.A., "Early Middle Age sculptures in Eastern Kazakhstan", Soviet Archeology No 4, 1974, ("In Russian")
*Evtükhova L.A., "Stone obelisks of Northen Altai", Works of State Historical Museum, Vol. 16, Moscow, 1945, ("In Russian")
*Evtükhova L.A., "Stone obelisks of Southern Siberia and Mongolia", MIA, 1952, No 24 ("In Russian")
*Grach A.D., "Ancient Türkic obelisks in Tuva", Moscow, 1961 ("In Russian")
*Ismagulov, O. "Skulls from stone tiled kurgans (Central Kazakhstan)"/"Nomads", Vol. 1, Pavlodar EKO, 2006, ("In Russian") ISBN 9965-635-21-8
*Kazakevich V.A. "Grave statues in Darigang", Leningrad, 1930 ("In Russian")
*Khalilov M.Dj., "Stone obelisks of Azerbaijan (2nd half of 1st millennium BC - 1st millennium AD)", Moscow, 1988 ("In Azeri")
*Kubarev V.D. "Ancient obelisks in Altai. Deer slabs", Novosibirsk, 1979 ("In Russian")
*Kubarev V.D. "Ancient Türkic obelisks in Altai", Novosibirsk, 1984 ("In Russian")
*Kyzlasov L.R. "History of Tuva in Middle Ages", Moscow, 1969 ("In Russian")
*Novgorodova E., Pechersky A., "Early Middle Age sculptures of Kipchaks", Bulettin of International Association for Study of central Asian Cultures, Moscow, 1986 ("In Russian")
*Pletneva S.A. "Kipchak stone obelisks", Coll. of Archeological Sources, SAI, Issue E 4-2, Moscow, "Science", 1974 ("In Russian")
*Pletneva S.A. "Antiques of Black Klobuks (Oguzes)", Moscow, 1972 ("In Russian")
*Sher A.Ya., "Stone obelisks of Jeti-su", Moscow, 1966 ("In Russian")
*Telegin D. Ya., "The Anthropomorphic Stelae of the Ukraine", 1994, ("In Russian")
*Yudin, A.I., "Evolution of social organization of Timber-grave society in late cultural stage (example of Novopokrovka 2 kurgan burial)"/16th Ural archeological conference, Ekaterinburg, 2007, ("In Russian") ISBN 978-5-903594-04-7• 19th century publications •
*CountAleksey Uvarov , "Сведения о К. бабах" ("Overview of Stone Babas") in "Трудах I Моск. арх. съезда" (Proceedings of the 1st Moskow Archaeological Congress) (1869) with 2 tables)
*Hartman, "Becherstatuen in Ostpreussen und die Literatur der Becherstatuen", in ‘‘Archiv fur Anthropologie" (vol. 21, 1892).
*Brockhaus-Efron Small Encyclopaedic Dictionary (1890 - 1916) [http://www.cultinfo.ru/fulltext/1/001/007/047/47553.htm] "Note: Some of the material in this article is taken directly from the Brockhaus-Efron Small Encyclopaedic Dictionary (1890 - 1916) [http://www.cultinfo.ru/fulltext/1/001/007/047/47553.htm] , which is in the public domain; parts refer to Imperial Russiangeography and should be updated to reflect current states and boundaries."External links
* [http://www.wikiznanie.ru/ru-wz/index.php/Каменные_бабы Каменные бабы] ru icon
* [http://www.fantasticasia.net/?p=134 Balbals — Stone Sculptures]
* [http://ancientmongolia.com/ Ancient Mongolia]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.