Head tax (Canada)

Head tax (Canada)

The Chinese head tax was a fixed fee charged to each Chinese person entering Canada. The head tax was first levied after the Canadian parliament passed the Chinese Immigration Act of 1885 and was meant to discourage Chinese people from entering Canada after the completion of the Canadian Pacific Railway. The tax was abolished by the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923, which stopped Chinese immigration altogether, except for business people, clergy, educators, students, and other categories.[1]


The tax

Through the early 1880s, some 15,000 labourers were brought from China to do construction work on the Canadian Pacific Railway, though they were only paid a third or a half less than their coworkers.[2] This immigration into British Columbia (BC) was large enough — some 3,000 Chinese, when the 1871 census counted only 33,586 in the province — to arouse concern. The provincial legislature passed a strict law to virtually prevent Chinese immigration in 1878. However, this was immediately struck down by the courts as ultra vires [beyond the powers of] the provincial legislative assembly, as it impinged upon federal jurisdiction over immigration into Canada.[3]

As a Dominion of the British Empire, Canada could only try to discourage, not completely eliminate, Chinese immigration at its borders. To do so, the federal parliament passed in 1885 the Chinese Immigration Act,[4] which stipulated that all Chinese entering Canada must first pay a $50 fee,[5][6] later referred to as a head tax. This was amended in 1887,[7] 1892,[8] and 1900,[9] with the fee increasing to its maximum of $500 in 1903.[6] Not all Chinese arrivals had to pay the head tax, however; some were presumed to return to China after "sojourning" to Canada because of their transitory occupation or background (students, teachers, missionaries, merchants, members of the diplomatic corps) and were therefore exempt from paying this fee.[4][10]

Not only did the Crown in Right of Canada collect about $23 million ($300 million in 2011 dollars[11]) in face value from about 81,000 head tax payers,[2] but the tax system also had the effect of constraining Chinese immigration; it discouraged Chinese women and children from joining their men, so the Chinese community in Canada became a "bachelor society".[2] This, though, still did not meet the goal, articulated by contemporary politicians and labour leaders, of exclusion of Chinese immigration altogether.[10] That was achieved through the same law that ended the head tax: the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923, which stopped Chinese immigration entirely, though with certain exemptions for business owners and others permitted some continued immigration.[1] It is sometimes referred to by opponents as the Chinese Exclusion Act, a term also used for its American counterpart.[12]

Movement for redress

The modern era redress movement may be traced back to 1984, when Vancouver Member of Parliament (MP) Margaret Mitchell raised in the Canadian House of Commons the issue of repaying the Chinese Head Tax for two of her constituents.[13] Over 4,000 other head tax payers and their family members then approached the Chinese Canadian National Council (CCNC) and its member organizations across Canada to register their Head Tax certificates and ask CCNC to represent them to lobby the government for redress.[14][15] The redress campaign included holding community meetings, gathering support from other groups and prominent people, increasing the media profile, conducting research and published materials, making presentations at schools, etc.

In 1993, then prime minister Brian Mulroney made an offer of individual medallions, a museum wing, and other collective measures involving several other redress-seeking communities. These were rejected outright by the Chinese Canadian national groups. After Jean Chrétien, in the same year, replaced Mulroney as prime minister, the Cabinet openly refused to provide an apology or redress.[14] Still, the CCNC and its supporters continued to raise the issue whenever they could, including a submission to the United Nations Human Rights Commission and eventually undertaking court action against the Crown-in-Council, arguing that the federal Crown should not be profiting from racism and that it had a responsibility under both the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and international human rights law. In addition, the 1988 apology and compensation for the internment of Japanese Canadians during the Second World War was regarded as a precedent for redressing other racially motivated policies. The Ontario court declared in 2001 that the government of Canada had no obligation to redress the head tax levied on Chinese immigrants because the Charter had no retroactive application and the case of internment of Japanese Canadians was not a legal precedent. Two appeals in 2002 and 2003 were unsuccessful.[16]

When Paul Martin was appointed prime minister in 2003, there was a sense of urgency as it became clear that there were perhaps only a few dozen surviving Chinese Head Tax payers left and maybe a few hundred spouses or widows. Several national events were organised to revitalize the redress campaign:[17] In 2004, Doudou Diène, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, concluded that Canada should redress the head tax to Chinese Canadians and, in 2005, Gim Wong, an 82-year-old son of two head tax payers and a World War II veteran, conducted a cross-country Ride for Redress on his Harley Davidson motorcycle.[18]

Political campaigning

On November 17, 2005, a group calling itself the National Congress of Chinese Canadians announced that an agreement had been reached between 11 Chinese-Canadian groups and the federal Cabinet, wherein the Queen-in-Council would pay $12.5 million for the creation of a new non-profit foundation to educate Canadians about anti-Chinese discrimination, with a specific pre-condition that no apology would be expected from any government figure. This upset the CCNC and its affiliates, as this purported deal had been reached without their input, leading to the Department of Canadian Heritage's announcement on November 24, 2005, that the agreed upon funding would be reduced to $2.5 million. It was later revealed that Raymond Chan, the government official claiming to have negotiated the deal, had purposely misled both the ministers of the Crown and the public and some of the groups named as being party to the agreement stated publicly that their names had been used without permission; several other groups listed did not even exist. Regardless, bill C-333, a private member's bill, was tabled in the federal parliament in order to implement the deal in November, 2004, but this bill died when the government fell on November 28, 2005.

As they had done while campaigning for the federal election in 2004, the New Democratic Party and Bloc Québécois stated, during the leadup to the January 2006 election, their support for an apology and redress for the head tax.[citation needed] Similarly, on December 8, 2005, Conservative Party leader, Stephen Harper, released a press statement expressing his support for an apology for the head tax. As a part of his party platform, Harper promised to work with the Chinese community on redress, should the Conservatives be called to form the next government.[19] Before his party ultimately lost the election, Martin issued a personal apology on a Chinese language radio program. However, he was quickly criticized by the Chinese Canadian community for not issuing the apology in the House of Commons and for then trying to dismiss it completely in the English-speaking media on the very same day.[citation needed] Several Liberal candidates with significant Chinese-Canadian populations in their ridings, including Vancouver-Kingsway MP David Emerson and the Minister of State for Multiculturalism and Richmond MP Raymond Chan, also made futile attempts to change their positions in the midst of the campaign.


The 2006 federal election was won by the Conservative Party, though the government they formed was a minority one. Three days after the ballots had been counted on January 23, but before he had been appointed prime minister, Harper reiterated his position on the head tax issue in a news conference: "Chinese Canadians are making an extraordinary impact on the building of our country. They've also made a significant historical contribution despite many obstacles. That's why, as I said during the election campaign, the Chinese Canadian community deserves an apology for the head tax and appropriate acknowledgement and redress."[20]

Formal discussions on the form of apology and redress began on March 24, 2006, with a preliminary meeting between Chinese Canadians representing various groups (including some head tax payers), heritage minister Bev Oda, and Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister Jason Kenney resulting in the "distinct possibility" of an apology being issued before July 1, 2006, to commemorate the anniversary of the enacting of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1923.[21] The meeting was followed by the government's acknowledgement, in the Speech from the Throne delivered by Governor General Michaëlle Jean on April 4, 2006, that an apology would be given along with proper redress.[22]

From April 21 to April 30, 2006, the Crown-in-Council hosted public consultations across Canada, in cities most actively involved in the campaign: Halifax, Vancouver, Toronto, Edmonton, Montreal, and Winnipeg. They included the personal testimony of elders and representatives from a number of groups, among them the Halifax Redress Committee; the British Columbia Coalition of Head Tax Payers, Spouses and Descendants; ACCESS; the Ontario Coalition of Head Tax Payers and Families; the CCNC; the Edmonton Redress Committee of the Chinese Canadian Historical Association of Alberta; and the National Redress Alliance.

On June 22, 2006, Prime Minister Stephen Harper offered an apology and compensation only for the head tax once paid by Chinese immigrants.[23] Survivors or their spouses were paid approximately CAD$20,000 ($22 thousand in 2011 dollars[11]) in compensation. There were only an estimated 20 Chinese Canadians who paid the tax still alive in 2006.[24]


Currently, the major issues revolve around the content of any future settlement, with the leading groups demanding meaningful redress, not only for the handful of surviving "head tax" payers and widows/spouses, but first-generation sons/daughters who were direct victims.

Some[who?] have proposed that the redress be based on the number of "Head Tax" Certificates (or estates) brought forward by surviving sons and daughters who are still able to register their claims, with proposals for individual redress, ranging from $10,000 to 30,000 for an estimated 4,000 registrants.

As no mention of redress for those children was made, the Chinese Canadian community continues to fight for a redress from the Canadian government. A national day of protest was held on July 1, 2006 in major cities across Canada, with several hundred Chinese Canadians joining in local marches.

See also


  1. ^ a b James Morton. "In the Sea of Sterile Mountains: The Chinese in British Columbia". Vancouver, BC: J.J. Douglas, 1974.
  2. ^ a b c Canadiana.org (2005), "Asian Immigration", Canada in the Making, http://www.canadiana.org/citm/specifique/asian_e.html, retrieved 2007-09-01 
  3. ^ Todd, Alpheus (1894), Parliamentary Government in the British Colonies (Reprint ed.), The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., p. 194, ISBN 1-58477-617-X, http://books.google.com/?id=RG_rB9WVhngC&pg=PA194&lpg=PA194 
  4. ^ a b Canada. Dept. of Trade and Commerce (1885), Chinese Immigration Act, 1885, http://www.canadiana.org/ECO/PageView/9_02345/0019, retrieved 2007-09-01 
  5. ^ http://www.ccnc.ca/redress/history.html
  6. ^ a b http://www.vpl.ca/ccg/Head_Tax_Info.html
  7. ^ Canada. Dept. of Trade and Commerce (1887), An act to amend the Chinese Immigration Act, 1887, http://www.canadiana.org/ECO/PageView/9_02345/0024, retrieved 2007-09-01 
  8. ^ Canada. Dept. of Trade and Commerce (1892), An act to further amend the Chinese Immigration Act, 1892, http://www.canadiana.org/ECO/PageView/9_02345/0025, retrieved 2007-09-01 
  9. ^ Canada (1901), Act respecting and restricting Chinese immigration, http://www.canadiana.org/ECO/ItemRecord/9_03479, retrieved 2007-09-01 
  10. ^ a b Vancouver Public Library (2007), Chinese Head Tax, http://www.vpl.ca/ccg/Head_Tax_Info.html, retrieved 2007-09-01 
  11. ^ a b Canadian inflation numbers based on data available from Consumer Price Index, by province (monthly) (Canada) Statistics Canada. Retrieved August 21, 2011 and Consumer Price Index, historical summary Statistics Canada. Retrieved December 7, 2010
  12. ^ Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, Canada, April 18, 2005, page 1100.
  13. ^ Most head-tax families haven't gotten a penny | Straight.com
  14. ^ a b Chinese Canadian National Council
  15. ^ PRM 2005 - Redressing the Past of the Lo Wah Kui
  16. ^ CanLII - 2002 CanLII 45062 (ON C.A.)
  17. ^ Redress: Justice In Time - News
  18. ^ GungHaggisFatChoy :: Gim Wong completes his "Ride for Redress" in Montreal - flying back to Vancouver for Wednesday
  19. ^ Conservative Party Of Canada
  20. ^ CCNC Press Release - Chinese Canadians welcome New Year's promise on Head Tax Redress from PM Designate Stephen Harper
  21. ^ CTV.ca | Chinese-Cdns. hail promise for head tax apology
  22. ^ "Throne speech promises crime crackdown, GST cut". CBC News. April 4, 2006. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/04/04/throne-speech060404.html. 
  23. ^ Canada (2006). "Address by the Prime Minister on the Chinese Head Tax Redress". Government of Canada. http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=2&id=1220. Retrieved 2006-08-08. 
  24. ^ Sympatico / MSN : News : CTV.ca: PM apologizes in House of Commons for head tax

External links

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Tax — Taxation An aspect of fiscal policy …   Wikipedia

  • Human rights in Canada — Since signing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, the Canadian government has attempted to make universal human rights a part of Canadian law. There are currently four key mechanisms in Canada to protect human rights: the Canadian… …   Wikipedia

  • Tax avoidance and tax evasion — Tax avoidance is the legal utilization of the tax regime to one s own advantage, in order to reduce the amount of tax that is payable by means that are within the law. By contrast tax evasion is the general term for efforts to not pay taxes by… …   Wikipedia

  • Tax Freedom Day — is the first day of the year in which a nation as a whole has theoretically earned enough income to fund its annual tax burden. It is annually calculated in the United States by the Tax Foundation mdash;a Washington, D.C. based tax research… …   Wikipedia

  • Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 — Effective (Various dates for different provisions) Citations Public Law Public Law 111 312 Stat …   Wikipedia

  • cañada — /keuhn yah deuh, yad euh/, n. Chiefly Western U.S. 1. a dry riverbed. 2. a small, deep canyon. [1840 50; < Sp, equiv. to cañ(a) CANE + ada n. suffix] * * * Canada Introduction Canada Background: A land of vast distances and rich natural resources …   Universalium

  • Canada — /kan euh deuh/, n. a nation in N North America: a member of the Commonwealth of Nations. 29,123,194; 3,690,410 sq. mi. (9,558,160 sq. km). Cap.: Ottawa. * * * Canada Introduction Canada Background: A land of vast distances and rich natural… …   Universalium

  • Tax protester statutory arguments — Part of the Taxation in the United States series Tax protest in the United States …   Wikipedia

  • Canada — <p></p> <p></p> Introduction ::Canada <p></p> Background: <p></p> A land of vast distances and rich natural resources, Canada became a self governing dominion in 1867 while retaining ties to the… …   The World Factbook

  • Tax protester (United States) — Part of a series on Taxation Taxation in the United States …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”