- Triticale
Taxobox
name = Triticale
image_width = 240px
image_caption = Triticale
regnum =Plantae
divisio = Magnoliophyta
classis =Liliopsida
ordo =Poales
familia =Poaceae
tribus =Triticeae
genus = × "Triticosecale"
species =
binomial = × "Triticosecale"
binomial_authority = Wittm. ex A. Camus.
synonyms = × "Triticale" Tscherm.-Seys. ex MüntzingTriticale (× "Triticosecale") is a hybrid of
wheat ("Triticum") andrye ("Secale") first bred in laboratories during the late 19th century. The grain was originally bred inScotland andSweden . Commercially available triticale is almost always a 2nd generation hybrid, i.e. a cross between two kinds of triticale (primary triticales). As a rule, triticale combines the high yield potential and goodgrain quality ofwheat with the disease and environmental tolerance (including soil conditions) ofrye . Only recently has it been developed into a commercially viable crop. Depending on thecultivar , triticale can more or less resemble either of its parents. It is grown mostly for forage or animalfeed although some triticale-based foods can be purchased athealth food stores or are to be found in some breakfastcereals .The word 'triticale' is a fusion of the
latin words "triticum" (or wheat) and "secale" (rye). When crossingwheat andrye ,wheat is used as the female parent andrye as the male parent (pollen donor). The resulting hybrid is sterile and thus has to be treated with thealkaloid chemicalcolchicine to make it fertile and thus able to reproduce itself.The primary producers of triticale are
Germany ,France ,Poland ,Australia ,China andBelarus . In 2005, according to theFood and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 13.5 million tons were harvested in 28 countries across the world.The triticale hybrids are all
amphidiploid , which means the plant isdiploid for twogenomes derived from differentspecies , in other words triticale is anallotetraploid . In earlier years most work was done on octoploid triticale. Differentploidy levels have been created and evaluated over time. The tetraploids showed little promise, but hexaploid triticale was successful enough to find commercial application. (Oetler 2005)The
CIMMYT triticale improvement program wanted to improve food production and nutrition indeveloping countries . According to Villegas (1973) triticale has potential in the production of bread and other food products such aspasta and breakfastcereals . Theprotein content is higher than that ofwheat although theglutenin fraction is less. The grain has also been stated to have higher levels of lysine than wheat. [ [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0008131 Triticale ] ] Assuming increased acceptance, themilling industry will have to adapt to triticale, asmilling techniques used forwheat don't suit triticale. Sell "et al." (1962) delivered reports of triticale suitability as agrain feed and it is a betterruminant feed than othercereals due to its highstarch digestibility. (Bird "et al." 1999) As afeed grain triticale is already well established and of high economic importance. Triticale has received attention as a potentialenergy crop and research is currently being conducted on the use of the cropsbiomass inbioethanol production.Biology and genetics
Earlier work with
wheat -rye crosses was difficult due to low survival of the resulting hybridembryo and spontaneouschromosome doubling. (Oetler, 2005). These two factors were difficult to predict and control. To improve the viability of theembryo and thus avoid its abortion,in vitro culture techniques were developed. (Laibach, 925)Colchicine was used as a chemical agent to double thechromosomes . (Blakeslee & Avery 1937) After these developments a new era of triticale breeding was introduced. Earlier triticale hybrids had four reproductive disorders namely,meiotic instability, highaneuploid frequency, lowfertility and shriveledseed . (Muntzing 1939; Krolow 1966). Cytogenetical studies were encouraged and well funded to overcome these problems.It is especially difficult to see the expression of
rye genes in the background ofwheat cytoplasm and the predominantwheat nucleargenome . This makes it difficult to realise the potential ofrye in disease resistance and ecological adaptation. One of the ways to relieve this problem was to produce secalotricum in whichrye cytoplasm was used instead of that fromwheat .Triticale is essentially a self-fertilizing (naturally
inbred ) crop. This mode of reproduction results in a morehomozygous genome . The crop is however adapted to this form of reproduction from an evolutionary point of view. Cross-fertilization is also possible, but it is not the primary form of reproduction.Conventional breeding approaches
Agricultural production box
plant=Triticale
year=2005
country1=POL
amount1=3.7
country2=GER
amount2=2.7
country3=FRA
amount3=1.8
country4=CHN
amount4=1.3
country5=BEL
amount5=1.1
country6=AUS
amount6=0.6
country7=HUN
amount7=0.6
country8=CZE
amount8=0.3
country9=SWE
amount9=0.3
country10=DEN
amount10=0.2
world=13.5The aim of a triticale breeding programme mainly focuses on the improvement of quantitativetraits such asgrain yield, nutritional quality, plant height, as well astraits which are more difficult to improve such as earlier maturity and improved test weight (a measure of yield). Thesetraits are controlled by more than onegene . (Triticale Production and Utilization Manual 2005) However, problems arise because suchpolygenic traits involve the integration of several physiological processes in their expression. Thus the lack of single-gene control (or simple inheritance) results in lowtrait heritability. (Zumelzú "et al." 1998)Since the induction of the
CIMMYT triticale breeding programme in 1964, improvement in realizedgrain yield has been remarkable. In 1968, at Ciudad Obregon, Sonora State in NorthwestMexico , the highest yielding triticale line produced 2.4 t/ha. Today,CIMMYT has released high yielding spring triticale lines (e.g. Pollmer-2) which have surpassed the 10 t/ha yield barrier under optimum production conditions. (Hede 2000)Based on the commercial success of other hybrid crops, the use of hybrid triticales as a strategy for enhancing yield in favourable as well as marginal environments has proven successful over time. Earlier research conducted by
CIMMYT made use of a chemical hybridising agent in order to evaluateheterosis inhexaploid triticale hybrids. To select the most promising parents for hybrid production, testcrosses conducted in various environments are required. This is because the variance of their specific combining ability (sca) under differing environmental conditions is the most important component in evaluating their potential as parents to produce promising hybrids. The prediction of general combining ability (gca) of any triticale plant from the performance of its parents is only moderate with respect tograin yield. Commercially exploitable yield advantages of hybrid triticalecultivars is dependent on improving parentheterosis and on advances ininbred -line development. Triticale is useful as an animalfeed grain . However, it is necessary to improve itsmilling and bread-making quality aspects in order to increase its potential for human consumption. It was initially noted that the relationship between the constituentwheat andrye genomes produced meiotic irregularities and thatgenome instability and incompatibility presented numerous problems when attempts were made to improve triticale. This led to two alternative methods to study and improve the crops reproductive performance, namely the improvement of the number ofgrains per floral spikelet and its meiotic behaviour. The number ofgrains per spikelet has an associated lowheritability value. [de Zumelzú et al. 1998] In improving yield, indirect selection (the selection of correlated/relatedtraits other than that to be improved) is not necessarily as effective as direct selection. (Gallais 1984)Lodging (the toppling over of the plant stem especially under windy conditions) resistance is a complexly inherited (expression is controlled by many
genes )trait and has thus been an important breeding aim in the past. (Tikhnenko "et al." 2002) The use of dwarfinggenes (known as "Rht"genes ) which have been incorporated from both "Triticum" and "Secale" has resulted in a decrease of up to 20cm in plant height without causing any adverse side effects.Application of newer techniques
Abundant information exists concerning disease resistance (R)
genes forwheat and a continuously updated on-line catalogue (Catalogue of Gene Symbols) of thesegenes can be found at http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/wgc/98/. Another on-line database ofcereal rust resistancegenes is available at http://www.cdl.umn.edu/res_gene/res_gene.html. Unfortunately less is known aboutrye and particularly triticale R-genes . Many R-genes have been transferred towheat from its wild relatives and appear in the catalogue and are thus available to triticale breeding. The two mentioned databases are significant contributors to improving the genetic variability of the triticalegene pool throughgene (or more specifically, allele) provision. Genetic variability is essential for progress in breeding. In addition, genetic variability can also be achieved by producing new primary triticales (i.e. the reconstitution of triticale), the development of various hybrids involving triticale such as triticale-rye hybrids. In this way somechromosomes from the Rgenome have been replaced by some from the Dgenome . The resulting so-called substitution and translocation triticale facilitates the transfer of R-genes .Introgression
Introgression involves the crossing of closely related plant relatives and results in the transfer of ‘blocks’ of
genes , i.e. larger segments ofchromosomes compared to singlegenes . R-genes are generally introduced within such blocks, which are usually incorporated/translocated/introgressed into the distal (extreme) regions ofchromosomes of the crop being introgressed.Genes located in the proximal areas ofchromosomes may be completely linked (very closely spaced) thus preventing or severely hamperinggenetic recombination which is necessary to incorporate such blocks. (Chelkowski & Tyrka 2004) Molecular markers (small lengths ofDNA of a characterized/known sequence) are used to ‘tag’ and thus track such translocations. A weakcolchicine chemical solution has been employed to increase the probability ofrecombination in the proximalchromosome regions and thus the introduction of the translocation to that region. The resultant translocation of smaller blocks that indeed carry the R-gene /s of interest has decreased the probability of introducing unwantedgenes . (Lukaszewski 1995)Production of doubled haploids
Doubled
haploid (DH) plants have the potential to save much time in the development ofinbred lines. This is achieved in a single generation as opposed to many which would otherwise occupy much physical space/facilities. DHs also express deleterious recessivealleles that are otherwise masked by dominance effects in agenome containing more than one copy of eachchromosome . (And thus more than one copy of eachgene ) Various techniques exist to create DHs. Thein-vitro culture ofanthers andmicrospore s is most often used incereals including triticale. (Bernard & Charmet 1984; González and Jouve 2000; González "et al." 1997) These two techniques are referred to as androgenesis, which refers to the development ofpollen . Many plant species andcultivars within species including triticale are recalcitrant in that the success rate of achieving whole newly generated (diploid) plants is very low. GenotypeXculture medium interaction is responsible for varying success rates, as is a high degree ofmicrospore abortion during culturing. (Gonzalez & Jouve 2005; Johansson "et al." 2000) It is known that the response of parental triticale lines toanther culture is correlated (related) to the response of their progeny. (Anderson "et al." 1989; Gonzalez "et al." 1997; Konzak & Zhou 1992)Chromosome elimination is another method of producing DHs and involves hybridisation ofwheat withmaize ("Zea mays" L.) followed byauxin treatment and the artificial rescue of the resultanthaploid embryos before they naturally abort. This technique is applied rather extensively towheat . (Bennet "et al." 1990) Its success is in large part due to the insensitivity ofmaize pollen to the crossability inhibitorgenes known as Kr1 and Kr2 that are expressed in the floralstyle of manywheat cultivars . (Bennett & Laurie 1987) The technique is unfortunately less successful in triticale. (Marcinska "et al." 1998) However, "Imperata cylindrica " (a grass) was found to be just as effective asmaize with respect to the production of DHs in bothwheat and triticale. (Chaudhary "et al." 2005)Application of molecular markers
An important advantage of
biotechnology applied to plant breeding is the speeding up ofcultivar release that would otherwise take 8-12 years. It is the process ofselection that is actually enhanced, i.e. retaining that which is desirable or promising and ridding that which is not. This carries with it the aim of changing the genetic structure of the plant population. The website http://maswheat.ucdavis.edu/protocols/protocols.htm is a valuable resource forMarker assisted selection (MAS) protocols relating to R-genes inwheat . MAS is a form of indirectselection . The Catalogue ofGene Symbols mentioned earlier is an additional source ofmolecular and morphological markers. Again, triticale has not been well characterized with respect tomolecular markers although an abundance ofrye molecular markers makes it possible to trackrye chromosomes and segments thereof within a triticale background.Yield improvements of up to 20% have been achieved in hybrid triticale
cultivars due to a phenomenon described asheterosis . (Becker "et al." 2001; Burger "et al." 2003; Góral 2002; Góral "et al." 1999) This raises the question of whatinbred lines should be crossed (to produce hybrids) with each other as parents in order to maximize yield in their hybrid progeny. This is termed the ‘combining ability’ of the parental lines. The identification of good combining ability at an early stage in the breeding program can reduce the costs associated with ‘carrying’ a large number of plants (literally thousands) through the program and thus forms part of efficientselection . Combining ability is assessed by taking into consideration all available information ondescent (genetic relatedness), morphology, qualitative (simply inherited)traits andbiochemical andmolecular markers. There exists exceptionally little information on the use ofmolecular markers to predictheterosis in triticale. (Góral "et al." 2005) It is generally accepted thatmolecular markers are better predictors than morphological markers (agronomictraits ) due to their insensitivity to variation in environmental conditions.A useful
molecular marker known as a Simple Sequence Repeat (or SSR) is used in breeding with respect toselection . SSRs are segments of agenome composed of tandem repeats of a short sequence ofnucleotides , usually 2–6 bp. They are popular tools ingenetics and breeding because of their relative abundance compared to othermolecular marker types, high degree of polymorphism (number of variants), and easy assaying by PCR. However, they are expensive to identify and develop. Comparative genome mapping has revealed a high degree of similarity in terms of sequence co-linearity between closely related cropspecies . This allows the exchange of such markers within a group of relatedspecies such aswheat ,rye and triticale. One study established a 58% and 39% transferability rate to triticale fromwheat andrye respectively. (Baenziger "et al." 2004) ‘Transferability’ refers to the phenomenon where the sequence ofDNA nucleotides flanking the SSR loci (position on thechromosome ) is sufficiently homologous (similar) betweengenomes of closely relatedspecies . ThusDNA primers (a generally short sequence ofnucleotides are used to direct a copying reaction during PCR) designed for onespecies can be used to detect SSRs in relatedspecies . SSR markers are available inwheat andrye but very few if any are available for triticale. (Baenziger "et al." 2004)Genetic transformation
The
genetic transformation of crops involves the incorporation of ‘foreign’genes or rather, very smallDNA fragments compared to introgression discussed earlier. Amongst other uses transformation is a useful tool to introduce newtraits /characteristics into the transformed crop. Two methods are commonly employed, i.e infectiousbacteria (Agrobacterium ) -mediated andbiolistics with the last-mentioned being most commonly applied toallopolyploid cereals such as triticale.Agrobacterium -mediated transformation however holds several advantages such as a low level oftransgenic DNA rearrangement, low number of introduced copies of the transformingDNA , stable integration of a priory characterized T-DNA fragment (containing theDNA expressing thetrait of interest) and an expected higher level oftransgene expression. Triticale has until recently only been transformed viabiolistics with a 3.3% success rate. (Zimny "et al." 1995) Little has been documented onAgrobacterium -mediated transformation ofwheat while nothing exists with respect to triticale until a recent study by Binka "et al." (2005) in which the success rate was nevertheless low.Conclusion
Triticale holds much promise as a commercial crop as it goes a long way toward addressing specific problems within the
cereal industry. Research of a high standard is currently being conducted worldwide such as that atStellenbosch University inSouth Africa .Conventional breeding has helped establish triticale as a valuable crop and more particularly where conditions are less favourable for
wheat cultivation. Notwithstanding the fact that triticale is a man-synthesizedgrain , many initial limitations such as an inability to reproduce due toinfertility andseed shrivelling, low yield and poor nutritional value have greatly been eliminated.Tissue culture techniques with respect towheat and triticale have seen continuous improvements, but the isolation and culturing of individualmicrospore s seems to hold the most promise. Manymolecular markers can be applied to marker-assistedgene transfer, but the expression of R-genes in the new genetic background of triticale remains to be investigated. (Baenziger "et al." 2004) More than 750wheat microsatellite primer pairs are available in publicwheat breeding programs and could be exploited in the development of SSRs in triticale. (Baenziger "et al." 2004) Another type ofmolecular marker known as an SNP (SingleNucleotide Polymorphism) is likely to have a significant impact on the future of triticale breeding.Triticale in fiction
An episode of the popular TV series "", "
The Trouble with Tribbles ", revolved around the protection of a grain developed from triticale, i.e. 'quadrotriticale'. A later episode (in the animated series) dealt with 'quintotriticale'. These two grains exist only in the realm of "Star Trek ". In addition, the video game "Metroid Prime " makes referral to 'deca-triticale'. (There is an inexplicit link within these names to the cropsploidy level, i.e. a specific characteristic of thegenome .)References
*Andersen, S. B. (1989) Nuclear Genes Affecting Albinism in Wheat ("Triticum aestivum" L.) Anther Culture. "Theor. Appl. Genet"., 78, 879-883.
*Baenziger, P. S. "et al." (2004) Transferability of SSR Markers Among Wheat, Rye, and Triticale. "Theor. Appl. Genet"., 108, 1147-1150.
*Becker, H.C. "et al." (2001) Heterosis for Yield and Other Agronomic Traits of Winter Triticale F1 and F2 Hybrids. "Plant Breeding", 120, 351-353.
*Bennett, M. D. & Laurie, D. A. (1987) The Effect of Crossability Loci Kr1 and Kr2 on Fertilization Frequency in Haploid Wheat x Maize Crosses. "Theor. Appl. Genet"., 73, 403-409.
*Bennet, M. D. "et al." (1990) Wheat x Maize and Other Wide Sexual Hybrids: Their Potential for Genetic Manipulation and Crop Improvement. Gene Manipulation in Plant Improvement II: Proceedings of the 19th Stadler Genetics Symposium, 13-15. March 1989. Columbia, MO, USA, 95-126. Plenum Press, New York.
*Bernard, S. & Charmet, G. (1984) Diallel Analysis of Androgenetic Plant Production in Hexaploid Triticale (x "Triticosecale", Wittmack). "Theor. appl. Genet"., 69, 55-61.
*Binka, A. "et al." Efficient Method of Agrobacterium–mediated Transformation for Triticale (x "Tritosecale" Wittmack) "Journal of Plant Growth Regulation". Published online 28 July 2005. http://www.springerlink.com/content/g1214467t838p117/fulltext.html#CR6
*Burger, H. "et al." (2003) Heterosis and Combining Ability for Grain Yield and Other Agronomic Traits in Winter Triticale. "Plant Breeding", 122, 318-321.
*Cavaleri, P. (2002) Selection Responses for Some Agronomic Traits in Hexaploid Triticale. "Agriscientia", XIX, 45-50.
*Chaudhary, H. K. "et al." (2005) Relative Efficiency of Different Gramineae Genera for Haploid Induction in Triticale and Triticale x Wheat Hybrids Through the Chromosome Elimination Technique. "Plant Breeding", 124, 147-153.
*Chelkowski, J. & Tyrka, M. (2004) Enhancing the Resistance of Triticale by Using Genes From Wheat and Rye. "J. Appl. Genet"., 45(3), 283-295.
*Gallais, A. (1984) Use of Indirect Selection in Plant Breeding. In: Hogenboon, N.G.(ed) "et al." Efficiency In Plant Breeding, Proc. 10th Congress Eucarpia, Pudoc, Wageningen, 45-60.
*González, J.M., Jouve, N. (2000) Improvement of Anther Culture Media for Haploid Production in Triticale. "Cereal Res. Commun"., 28, 65-72.
*Gonzalez, J.M. & Jouve, N. (2005) Microspore Development During "in vitro" Androgenesis in Triticale. Biologia Plantarum, 49 (1), 23-28.
*González, J.M. "et al." (1997) Analysis of Anther Culture Response in Hexaploid Triticale. "Plant Breeding", 116, 302-304.
*Góral, H. (2002) Biological-breeding Aspects of Utilization of Heterosis in Triticale (x "Triticosecale", Wittmack) "Zesz Nauk Akademii Rolniczejw Krakowie", 283, 1-116.
*Góral, H. "et al." (1999) Heterosis and Combining Ability in Spring Triticale (x "Triticosecale", Wittm.). "Plant Breed. Seed Sci"., 43, 25-34.
*Góral, H. "et al." (2005) Assessing Genetic Variation to Predict the Breeding Value of Winter Triticale Cultivars and Lines. "J. Appl. Genet"., 46(2), 125-131.
*Hede, A.R. (2000) A New Approach to Triticale Improvement. http://www.cimmyt.org
*Johansson, N. "et al." (2000) Large-scale Production of Wheat and Triticale Double Haploids Through the Use of a Single-anther Culture Method. "Plant Breeding", 119, 455-459.
*Konzak, C. F. & Zhou, H. (1992) Genetic Control of Green Plant Regeneration From Anther Culture of Wheat. "Genome", 35, 957-961.
*Lukaszewski A. (1990) Frequency of 1RS.1AL and 1RS.1BL Translocations in United States Wheats. "Crop Sci"., 30, 1151-1153.
*Marcinska, M. I. "et al." (1998) Production of Doubled Haploids in Triticale (x "Titicosecale" Wittm.) by Means of Crosses with Maize ("Zea mays" L.) Using Picloram and Dicamba. "Plant Breeding", 117, 211-215.
*Stace, C. A. Triticale: A Case of Nomenclatural Mistreatment. (1987) "Taxon", Vol. 36, No. 2 pp. 445-452
*Tikhnenko N. D. "et al." (2002) The Effect of Parental Genotypes of Rye Lines on the Development of Quantitative Traits in Primary Octoploid Triticale: Plant Height. "Russian Journal of Genetics", 39(1), 52–56.
*Triticale Production and Utilization Manual (2005) Copies available from bill.chapman@gov.ab.ca http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/fcd10535
*Triticosecale information from NPGS/GRIN. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?12927 Accessed Jan. 8, 2008.
*Zimny J., Becker D., Brettschneider R., Lörz H.:(1995) Fertile transgenic Triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack). Mol. Breeding, 1 (2), 155-164, http://www.springerlink.com/content/x7605lw14g65khk8/?p=fa82c0e3d40740069183d9106f47e52c&pi=4External links
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.