- Arithmetic shift
In

computer programming , an**arithmetic shift**is ashift operator , sometimes known as a**signed shift**(though it is not restricted to signed operands). For binary numbers it is abitwise operation that shifts all of the bits of its operand; every bit in the operand is simply moved a given number of bit positions, and the vacant bit-positions are filled in. Instead of being filled with all 0s, as inlogical shift , when shifting to the right, the leftmost bit (usually thesign bit in signed integer representations) is replicated to fill in all the vacant positions.Arithmetic shifts can be useful as efficient ways performing multiplication or division of signed integers by powers of two. Shifting left by "n" bits on a signed or unsigned binary number has the effect of multiplying it by 2

^{"n"}. Shifting right by "n" bits on atwo's complement "signed" binary number has the effect of dividing it by 2^{"n"}, but it always rounds down (towards negative infinity). This is different from the way rounding is usually done in signed integer division (which rounds towards 0). This discrepancy has led to bugs in more than one compiler.For example, in the x86 instruction set, the SAR instruction (arithmetic right shift) divides a signed number by a power of two, rounding towards negative infinity. [

*http://www.arl.wustl.edu/~lockwood/class/cs306/books/artofasm/Chapter_6/CH06-3.html#HEADING3-120 - SAR instruction*] However, the IDIV instruction (signed divide) divides a signed number, rounding towards zero. So a SAR instruction cannot be substituted for an IDIV by power of two instruction nor vice versa.**History and Details**The formal definition of an arithmetic shift, from

Federal Standard 1037C is that it is::A shift, applied to the representation of a number in a fixedradix numeration system and in a fixed-point representation system, and in which only the characters representing the fixed-point part of the number are moved. An arithmetic shift is usually equivalent to multiplying the number by a positive or a negative integral power of the radix, except for the effect of any rounding; compare thelogical shift with the arithmetic shift, especially in the case offloating-point representation.An important word in the FS 1073C definition is "usually". Arithmetic "left" shifts are equivalent to multiplication by a (positive, integral) power of the radix (e.g. a multiplication by a power of 2 for binary numbers). Arithmetic left shifts are, with one exception, identical in effect to logical left shifts. The exception is the minor trap that arithmetic shifts may trigger

arithmetic overflow whereas logical shifts do not. However, arithmetic "right" shifts are major traps for the unwary.It is frequently stated that arithmetic right shifts are equivalent to division by a (positive, integral) power of the radix (e.g. a division by a power of 2 for binary numbers), and hence that division by a power of the radix can be optimized by implementing it as an arithmetic right shift. (A shifter is simpler than a divider. On most processors, shift instructions will execute more quickly than division instructions.) Steele quotes a large number of 1960s and 1970s programming handbooks, manuals, and other specifications from companies and institutions such as DEC,

IBM ,Data General , and ANSI that make such statements. However, as Steele points out, they are all wrong.Arithmetic right shifts are "only" equivalent to division by a power of the radix on an "N-1's-complement" machine (for radix "N"). Arithmetic shifts of binary numbers are only equivalent to division by a power of 2 when the

one's complement representation of signed numbers is being used, for example.This description has been erroneously brought over from the older one's complement architectures to newer

two's complement architectures. But with two's complement binary number representations, arithmetic right shift is "not" equivalent to division by a power of 2. For negative numbers, the equivalence breaks down. The most trivial example of this is the arithmetic right shift of the number -1 (which is represented as all ones) in a two's complement representation, which yields -1.The (1999) ISO standard for the C programming language defines the C language's right shift operator in terms of divisions by powers of 2. Because of the aforementioned non-equivalence, the standard explicitly excludes from that definition the right shifts of signed numbers that have negative values. It doesn't specify the behaviour of the right shift operator in such circumstances, but instead requires each individual C compiler to specify the behaviour of shifting negative values right.fn|6

On an "N's-complement" architecture (for radix "N") an arithmetic shift is equivalent to a division that rounds "towards

negative infinity ", not towards zero.Donald Knuth describes this in terms of afloor function .**Footnotes*** The VHDL arithmetic left shift operator is unusual. Instead of filling the LSB of the result with zero, it copies the original LSB into the new LSB. Whilst this is an exact mirror image of the arithmetic right shift, whereas the conventional definition of the operator is not, it is not the conventional definition of the operator, and is not equivalent to multiplication by a power of 2.

* The Verilog arithmetic right shift operator only actually performs an arithmetic shift if the first operand is signed. If the first operand is unsigned, the operator actually performs a "logical" right shift.

* The >> operator in C and C++ is not necessarily an arithmetic shift. Usually it is only an arithmetic shift if used on a signed integer type; but if it is used on an unsigned integer type, it will be a logical shift.

* In the OpenVMS macro language whether an arithmetic shift is a left or a right shift is determined by whether the second operand is positive or negative. This is unusual. In most programming languages the two directions have distinct operators, with the operator specifying the direction, and the second operand is implicitly positive. (Some languages, such as Verilog, require that negative values be converted to unsigned positive values. Some languages, such as C and C++, do not have defined behaviours if negative values are used.)

* In Scheme`arithmetic-shift`can be both left and right shift, depending on the second operand, very similar to the OpenVMS macro language, although R6RS Scheme adds both`-right`and`-left`variants.`arimethic-shift`in Scheme is not even an operator itself, it is a normal procedure returning the shifted value.

* The C standard was intended to not restrict the C language to either one's complement or two's complement architectures. In cases where the behaviours of one's complement and two's complement representations differ, such as this, the standard requires individual C compilers to document the actual behaviour of their target architectures.**References***

*

*

*

*

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*