- Peter Carter-Ruck
Peter Frederick Carter-Ruck (
26 February 1914 ,Steyning ,West Sussex –19 December 2003 ,Uttlesford ,Essex ) was an English lawyer, specialising inlibel cases.Early life
Carter-Ruck was educated at St Edward's School,
Oxford . He spent three months inGermany during the 1930s, observing the rising popularity ofHitler , an experience that greatly affected him. Upon his return, he trained as asolicitor .Career
Soon after qualifying as a solicitor, Carter-Ruck served as in the
Royal Artillery duringWorld War II , joining as a gunner and obtaining his commission in 1940. The same year, he married Ann, while on leave. By the time he left the armed forces in 1944, he was a Captain.Carter-Ruck's first major case was defending the "
Bolton Evening Post " successfully against a libel action brought by the Labour MP,Bessie Braddock , who, they had claimed, had danced a jig in Parliament. He worked for many years atOswald Hickson Collier & Co and set up his own firm in 1981 when it was suggested that he should retire.He was known for several high-profile cases against British media outlets such as "
Private Eye ", theBBC andChannel 4 . His clients includedPrincess Elizabeth of Toro ,Jani Allan ,Randolph Churchill and SirJames Goldsmith , plus many Conservative and Labour politicians including Neil Hamilton,Cecil Parkinson ,Norman Lamont ,Robert Maxwell andHarold Wilson . He also representedLaurence Olivier ,Spike Milligan ,Cary Grant andRanulph Fiennes .He did
legal aid work, and said it was wrong for successful firms to decline it. He was frequently referred to by "Private Eye", a regular target of his libel cases, as "Peter Carter-Fuck". Despite being ousted from the firm bearing his name, he continued to act on many high-profile cases during the 1990s. In 1989, he criticised the £600,000 pay-out toSonia Sutcliffe , who sued Private Eye for libel as excessive. The amount was later reduced to £60,000 on appeal.In December 1995, Carter Ruck acted for the royal
nanny Tiggy Legge-Bourke , in the matter of an allegation against her byDiana, Princess of Wales , that she had aborted Charles's child. [ [http://www.time.com/time/daily/special/diana/readingroom/9697/21296.html Diana Draws Blood Lashing out at Tiggy brings a legal warning and enrages the Queen] in "Time", February 12 1996 (accessed 31 January 2008)]At one time, he was the oldest practising solicitor in the country. He finally retired in 1998.
Criticism
In 1980,
Daily Express editorDerek Jameson had been advised by Carter-Ruck that if he sued theBBC over their portrayal of him in a "Weekending " sketch, he would win at least £25,000 in damages. Thebarrister in the case,David Eady QC, however advised Carter-Ruck to accept the BBC's offer to settle for £10 ("sic") plus costs. Carter Ruck did not disclose this advice to his client and Jameson duly lost the case and received a bill for £41,342.50 from Carter-Ruck. Jameson learned by chance of the QC's advice and Carter-Ruck's former partner David Hooper claimed that, "Carter-Ruck told him a string of lies". [ cite web | title=The Carter-Ruck chill | url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1112022,00.html | first=David | last=Hooper | work=The Guardian | date=23 December 2003 | accessdate=2008-05-01 ] Carter-Ruck later claimed that he did not want to undermine Jameson's morale in court.Fact|date=May 2008Victories could also be
pyrrhic , as in the case ofWilliam Roache whom Carter-Ruck encouraged to sue "The Sun" for saying he was boring. Roache was awarded £50,000 but as the paper had already paid that amount into court, Roache ended up having to pay his own costs and those of "The Sun". He tried to sue Carter-Ruck but was unsuccessful and declaredbankruptcy .Despite working for the
Law Society between 1971 to 1984, Carter-Ruck was not above disreputable practices. His partner in the firm, David Hooper recalled a case whereHeinemann had asked him to checkRobert Lacey 's biography of theFord family. He found Carter-Ruck's secretary photocopying the book to submit to the Ford family, whom Carter-Ruck was advising to sue because of libels in the book. Hooper resigned in protest.Carter-Ruck and his parter Andrew Stephenson were also investigated by the
Office for the Supervision of Solicitors in 1998 after a complaint from one of their clients, Chequepoint, which had been engaged in lengthy litigation with a rival firm of bureaux de change,Maccorp , and then discovered that Carter-Ruck and Stephenson were also acting for Maccorp. They were both found guilty of a flagrant conflict of interest.The late Michael Wheeler QC also delivered a damning verdict on Carter-Ruck after he arbitrated a dispute between Carter-Ruck and his partners at Oswald Hickson during which Carter-Ruck attempted to blackmail his colleague to falsify his testimony. Wheeler wrote "it seems to be... to be a gross interference with the course of justice such as would (if this had been a court case and not simply an arbitration) have constituted a blatant contempt of court. Certainly, if a member of the bar had behaved as Carter-Ruck has done, I should have no hesitation in reporting his conduct to the Bar Council."
Carter-Ruck's former firm remains active in high-profile defamation cases. Not all clients are satisfied, one former client Adam King who won a libel case against the Telegraph opened several web sites against the firm.
Private Life
Carter-Ruck did not speak to his daughter, Julie Scott-Bayfield, for many years. His son Brian died in a sailing accident in 1973. His wife Ann Maxwell died in March 2003, after 62 years of marriage during which time they appeared to be inseparable. Carter-Ruck himself died nine months later.
References
External links
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1112022,00.html 'The Carter-Ruck chill', "
The Guardian " comment, December 2003]
* [http://www.opinion.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/22/db2201.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2003/12/22/ixopright.html Obituary] "Daily Telegraph "
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.