- Limit ordinal
A

**limit ordinal**is anordinal number which is neither zero nor asuccessor ordinal .Various equivalent ways to express this are:

*It cannot be reached via the ordinal successor operation "S"; in precise terms, we say λ is a limit ordinal if and only if λ > 0 and for any β < λ, there exists γ such that β < γ < λ.

*It is equal to thesupremum of all the ordinals below it, but is not zero. (Compare with a successor ordinal: the set of ordinals below it has a maximum, so the supremum is this maximum, the previous ordinal.)

*It is not zero and has no maximum element.

*It can be written in the form ωα for α > 0. That is, in the ml|Ordinal arithmetic|Cantor normal form|Cantor normal form there is no finite number as last term, and the ordinal is nonzero.

*It is alimit point of the class of ordinal numbers, with respect to theorder topology . (The other ordinals areisolated point s.)Some contention exists on whether or not 0 should be classified as a limit ordinal, as it does not have an immediate predecessor; some textbooks include 0 in the class of limit ordinals [

*Thomas Jech, "Set Theory". Third Millennium edition. Springer.*] while others exclude it [*Kenneth Kunen, "Set Theory. An introduction to independence proofs". North-Holland.*] .**Examples**Because the class of ordinal numbers is

well-order ed, there is a smallest infinite limit ordinal; denoted by ω. This ordinal ω is also the smallest infinite ordinal (disregarding "limit"), as it is theleast upper bound of thenatural numbers . Hence ω represents the order type of the natural numbers. The next limit ordinal above the first is ω + ω = ω·2, and then we have ω·"n", for any natural number "n". Taking the union (thesupremum operation on any set of ordinals) of all the ω·n, we get ω·ω = ω^{2}. This process can be iterated as follows to produce::$omega^3,\; omega^4,\; ldots,\; omega^omega,\; omega^\{omega^omega\},\; ldots,\; epsilon\_0\; =\; omega^\{omega^\{omega^\{cdots\},\; ldots$In general, all of these recursive definitions via multiplication, exponentiation, repeated exponentiation, etc. yield limit ordinals. All of the ordinals discussed so far are still

countable ordinals; it can be proved that there exists norecursively enumerable scheme of naming just all the countable ordinals.Beyond the countable, the first uncountable ordinal is usually denoted ω

_{1}. It is also a limit ordinal.Continuing, one can obtain the following (all of which are now increasing in cardinality):

:$omega\_2,\; omega\_3,\; ldots,\; omega\_omega,\; omega\_\{omega^omega\},ldots$

In general, we always get a limit ordinal when taking the union of a set of ordinals that has no

maximum element.The ordinals of the form ω²α, for α > 0, are limits of limits, etc.

**Properties**The classes of successor ordinals and limit ordinals (of various cofinalities) as well as zero exhaust the entire class of ordinals, so these cases are often used in proofs by

transfinite induction or definitions bytransfinite recursion . Limit ordinals represent a sort of "turning point" in such procedures, in which one must use limiting operations such as taking the union over all preceding ordinals. In principle, one could do anything at limit ordinals, but taking the union is continuous in the order topology and this is usually desirable.If we use the

Von Neumann cardinal assignment , every infinitecardinal number is also a limit ordinal (and this is a fitting observation, as "cardinal" derives from the Latin "cardo" meaning "hinge" or "turning point"): the proof of this fact is done by simply showing that every infinite successor ordinal isequinumerous to a limit ordinal via the Hotel Infinity argument.Cardinal numbers have their own notion of successorship and limit (everything getting upgraded to a higher level).

**References****See also***

ordinal arithmetic

*limit cardinal

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*