- Recovered Territories
Recovered or Regained Territories ( _pl. Ziemie Odzyskane) was the official term used by the Polish post-war authorities to denote those territories which were transferred from
Germany toPoland after theSecond World War .An explanation note in [http://books.google.com.au/books?id=a_49GjK8ovMC&pg=PA466&source=gbs_search_r&cad=0_2&sig=jMhtaVsIbLmsC_LA07eB0mYV158 "The Neighbors Respond: The Controversy Over the Jedwabne Massacre in Poland"] , ed. by Polonsky and Michlic, p.466] Since the drop from official use, the alternative term "Western and Northern Territories" ( _pl. Ziemie Zachodnie i Północne) is preferred, the "Western Territories" being the regions ofPomorze Zachodnie (the formerFarther Pomerania andStettin area),Lubusz Land (the formerNeumark ) andLower Silesia , and the "Northern Territories" being theGdańsk area (the formerFree City of Danzig ) and the regions ofWarmia (formerly "Ermland") andMasuria (both formerly parts ofEast Prussia ).The phrase "recovered" was used to propagate a picture of the Western and Northern Territories having been an integral part of Poland since medieval Piast times, of which the
People's Republic of Poland was the legitimate heir. [Joanna B. Michlic, "Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present", 2006, pp.207-208, ISBN 0803232403, 9780803232402] [Norman Davies, "God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes", 2005, pp.381ff, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401] [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] [Jan Kubik, "The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland", 1994, pp.64-65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847]Along with the so-called recovery, the territories were Polonized by replacing most of the former German population with Poles and removing much of the German cultural heritage. [Dan Diner, Raphael Gross, Yfaat Weiss, "Jüdische Geschichte als allgemeine Geschichte", p.164] [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.344, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175] The centuries of German presence were presented as a mere result of Germany's continuous aggression towards her eastern neighbors ("
Drang nach Osten "). [Norman Davies, "God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes", 2005, pp.381ff, p.395, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401] [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] [Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, "Poland and the European Union", 2000, p.166, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854] The post-war forced population movements were officially termed "repatriations". [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746]The Oder-Neisse frontier was formally recognized by
East Germany in theTreaty of Zgorzelec (1950) and byWest Germany in the Treaty of Warsaw (1970), and was affirmed by the re-unitedGermany in theGerman-Polish Border Treaty (1990) .Area
The "Western Territories" comprise the regions of:
*Pomorze Zachodnie (meaning "Western Pomerania", but not to be confused withVorpommern ), comprising the former GermanFarther Pomerania region and theSzczecin (Stettin) area, which was the easternmost part of GermanWestern Pomerania before the war, also denoted "Stettiner Zipfel". ThesePomerania n areas constituted the GermanProvince of Pomerania before the war and the PolishSzczecin Voivodeship after the transfer.
*Lubusz Land , the formerNeumark ("New March") portion ofBrandenburg . As the area had been the eastern part of the Brandenburgian province, the area was also referred to asEast Brandenburg . The term Lubusz Land ( _de. Lebuser Land) follows a medieval terminology, when parts of the area were named after the then important town ofLebus ( _pl. Lubusz). Although the Polish region is named after Lebus, the town itself lies on the German bank of theOder river.
*Most ofLower Silesia and parts ofUpper Silesia , located in the former GermanProvince of Silesia east of theOder andLusatian Neisse rivers. Lower Silesia also includes eastern parts of the region ofLusatia .The "Northern Territories" comprise:
*theGdańsk (Danzig) area (the formerFree City of Danzig );
*the southern two-thirds of the former German province ofEast Prussia , comprising the regions ofWarmia (Ermland) andMasuria .Origin and use of the term
The term "Recovered Territories" was the official
propaganda termAn explanation note in [http://books.google.com.au/books?id=a_49GjK8ovMC&pg=PA466&source=gbs_search_r&cad=0_2&sig=jMhtaVsIbLmsC_LA07eB0mYV158 "The Neighbors Respond: The Controversy Over the Jedwabne Massacre in Poland"] , ed. by Polonsky and Michlic, p.466] coined in the aftermath ofWorld War II to denote theformer eastern territories of Germany that were being handed over to Poland. The underlying concept was to define post-war Poland as the heir of the medieval Piasts' realm, [Joanna B. Michlic, "Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present", 2006, pp.207-208, ISBN 0803232403, 9780803232402] [Norman Davies, "God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes", 2005, pp.381ff, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401] [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] which was simplified into a picture of an ethnically homogeneous state matching the post-war borders, [Jan Kubik, "The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland", 1994, pp.64-65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847] as opposed to the laterJagiellon Poland, which was multi-ethnic and located further east. [Jan Kubik, "The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland", 1994, pp.65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847] One reason for post-war Poland's favoring a "Piast" rather than a "Jagiellon" tradition wasStalin 's refusal to withdraw from theCurzon line and the Allies' readiness to satisfy Poland with German territory instead. [Rick Fawn, "Ideology and national identity in post-communist foreign policies", 2003, p.190, ISBN 0714655171, 9780714655178] However the original argument for awarding fomerly German territory to Poland – compensation – was changed to the argument that this territory in fact constituted "old Polish lands". [Alfred M. De Zayas, "Nemesis at Potsdam", p.168] Another reason for the emphasis on the Piast era was the Polish desire to create an ethnically homogeneous rather than a multi-ethnic state. [Joanna B. Michlic, "Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present", 2006, p.208, ISBN 0803232403, 9780803232402] [Jan Kubik, "The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland", 1994, p.65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847] Also, the Piasts were perceived to have defended Poland against German peoples, while the Jagiellons' rival had been the growingDuchy of Moscow , making them a less suitable basis for post-war Poland's Soviet-dominated situation. [Jan Kubik, "The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland", 1994, p.65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847] [Rick Fawn, "Ideology and national identity in post-communist foreign policies", 2003, p.190, ISBN 0714655171, 9780714655178] Thus, with Soviet backing, [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] thePRL andPPR adopted this fundamentally "Piast concept" [Rick Fawn, "Ideology and national identity in post-communist foreign policies", 2003, p.190, ISBN 0714655171, 9780714655178] [Joanna B. Michlic, "Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present", 2006, p.208, ISBN 0803232403, 9780803232402] against their pre-war peasant and nationalist opponents. [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] In fact, the question of the "Recovered Territories" was one of the few issues that did not divide the Polish Communists and their opposition, and there was unanimity regarding the western border. Even the underground anti-Communist press called for the Piast borders, "endingGermanisation andDrang nach Osten once and for all". ["Redrawing Nations: Ethnic Cleansing in East-Central Europe" 1944-1948 By Philipp Ther, Ana Siljak Page 81] Post-war propagandists told the myth of the thousand-year struggle between Teuton and Slav [Norman Davies, "God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes", 2005, p.397, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401] while the centuries of German history in the "recovered territories" remained untold. [Norman Davies, "God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes", 2005, p.391, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401] Great efforts were made to propagate the view of "recovered Piast territory", which were actively supported by the Catholic church. [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, pp.287, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175] The sciences were responsible for the development of this perception of history. In 1945 theWestern Institute ( _pl. Instytut Zachodni) was founded to coordinate the scientific activities. Its director,Zygmunt Wojciechowski , characterized his mission as follows: "We don't try for the so called objective historiography. It was our mission to present the Polish history of these countries and to project the current Polish reality of these countries upon their historical background.". [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, pp.282, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175] Historical scientists, archaeologists, linguists, art historians and ethnologists worked in an interdisciplinary effort to legitimize the new borders. [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, pp.281, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175] Their findings were popularised in countless monographs, periodicals, schoolbooks, travel guides, broadcasts and exhibitions. [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, pp.283, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175] Official maps were drawn up to show that the Polish frontiers under the first known Piast princes matched the new ones, [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] and the post-war generation was instructed to assume the Polish nation had evolved on that territory since time immemorial. [Norman Davies, "God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes", 2005, p.386, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401] They were encouraged to believe the People's Republic's territory was indeed the "Polish motherland" ("macierz"), fixed over time even if occupied by "aliens" and regardless of multiple border and population changes in history. [Norman Davies, "God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes", 2005, pp.386, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401] The official view was that the Poles had always had the inalienable and inevitable right to inhabit the "recovered" territories, even if prevented from doing so by higher powers. [Norman Davies, "God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes", 2005, pp.386, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401] As a consequence, the Piast concept was accepted by millions of Poles and is still believed by many. [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] Furthermore, the Piast concept was used to persuade the Allied Powers, who found it difficult to define a Polish "ethnographic territory", to assume that it would be an untolerable injustice to not "give the territories back". [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746]Even though most of the "Recovered Territories" had been under German and Prussian rule for many centuries, many events of this history were perceived as part of "foreign" rather than "local" history in post-war Poland. [Norman Davies, "God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes", 2005, p.393, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401] Polish scholars instead concentrated on the mediaeval Piast history of the region, the cultural, political and economic bonds to Poland, the history of the Polish-speaking population in Prussia and the "Drang nach Osten" as a historical constant since the Middle Ages. [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.281, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175]
By 1949 the term "Recovered Territories" had been dropped from
Polish communist propaganda , but it is still used occasionally in common language. [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.298, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175] On the grounds that those areas should not be regarded as unique territories within the Polish state, the authorities began to refer to them instead as the "Western and Northern Territories".Martin Åberg, MikaelSandberg, "Social Capital and Democratisation: Roots of Trust in Post-Communist Poland and Ukraine", Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2003, ISBN 0754619362, [http://books.google.com/books?id=uy1nPLTUhscC&pg=PA51&sig=ln5zKXKfbZSpr1Uy8Ad8AB4-1Oc Google Print, p. 51] ] [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.298, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175]Polonization of the "Recovered Territories"
Along with the establishment of the People's Republic as the heir of the Piasts, the population had to be made to fit the new frontiers. [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] With its eastern territories (the
Kresy ) annexed by the Soviet Union, Poland was effectively moved westwards and its area reduced by almost 20% (from 389,000 km² to 312,000 km²). cite book | first = Andrzej | last = Paczkowski | others = translation Jane Cave | title = "The Spring Will Be Ours: Poland and the Poles from Occupation to Freedom" | publisher = Penn State Press | year = 2003 | pages = p. 14 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=WoKQWem2yl4C&pg=PA14&lpg=PA14&ots=pLgq3por17&sig=R4N2us9hfrMcUwz_HMSGuywI8AI] Millions of "non-Poles" (mainly Germans and Ukrainians) had to be expelled from the new Poland, while the Poles east of the Curzon line had to be expelled from the Kresy. The expellees were termed "repatriates". [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] The result was the largest exchange of population in European history. [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] The picture of the new western and northern territories being recovered Piast territory was used to forge Polish settlers and "repatriates" arriving there into a coherent community loyal to the new regime,Martin Åberg, MikaelSandberg, "Social Capital and Democratisation: Roots of Trust in Post-Communist Poland and Ukraine", Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2003, ISBN 0754619362, [http://books.google.com/books?id=uy1nPLTUhscC&pg=PA80&ei=p85NR8uhKaCKpgLnsYnuBg&sig=EPpKsFWcnMe5B0eKOjCeYyHyzrU#PPA79,M1 Google Print, p.79] ] and to justify the previousethnic cleansing of the area. [Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, "Myths and Nationhood", 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746] Largely excepted from the expulsions of Germans were the "autochthon s", close to three million ethnically Slavic inhabitants ofMasuria (Masurs ),Pomerania (Kashubians ,Slovincians ) andUpper Silesia (Silesians ), of whom many did not identify with Polish nationality. [Tomasz Kamusella in Prauser and Reeds (eds), "The Expulsion of the German communities from Eastern Europe", p.28, EUI HEC 2004/1 [http://cadmus.iue.it/dspace/bitstream/1814/2599/1/HEC04-01.pdf] ] The Polish government aimed to retain as many autochthons as possible for propaganda purposes, as their presence on former German soil was used to indicate the intrinsic "Polishness" of the area and justify its incorporation into the Polish state as "recovered" territories. [Tomasz Kamusella in Prauser and Reeds (eds), "The Expulsion of the German communities from Eastern Europe", p.28, EUI HEC 2004/1 [http://cadmus.iue.it/dspace/bitstream/1814/2599/1/HEC04-01.pdf] ] "Verification" and "national rehabilitation" processes were set up to reveal a "dormant Polishness" and to determine which were redeemable as Polish citizens; few were actually expelled [Tomasz Kamusella in Prauser and Reeds (eds), "The Expulsion of the German communities from Eastern Europe", p.28, EUI HEC 2004/1 [http://cadmus.iue.it/dspace/bitstream/1814/2599/1/HEC04-01.pdf] ] The "autochthons" not only disliked the subjective and often arbitrary verification process, but they also faced discrimination even after completing it, [Philipp Ther, Ana Siljak, "Redrawing Nations: Ethnic Cleansing in East-Central Europe, 1944-1948", 2001, p.114, ISBN 0742510948, 9780742510944] such as the Polonization of their names. [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, pp.363, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175]Removal of German population and heritage
Despite the propagandist picture of an ancient Polish territory, the "Recovered Territories" after the take-over still hosted a substantial German population, and the centuries of German presence had marked the area a German one. This had to be changed quickly, as the territories' legal status was uncertain at the end of the war, and left room for different interpretations even after the
Potsdam Agreement . The Polish administration set up a "Ministry for the Recovered Territories", headed by the then deputy prime ministerWładysław Gomułka . [Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, "Poland and the European Union", 2000, p.167, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854] A "Bureau for Repatriation" was to supervise and organize the expulsions and resettlements.The expulsion of the remaining Germans in the first post-war years presaged a broader campaign to remove the footprints of centuries of German history and culture from public view. All German placenames were replaced with Polish [Dan Diner, Raphael Gross, Yfaat Weiss, "Jüdische Geschichte als allgemeine Geschichte", p.164] or Polonized medieval Slavic ones. [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.344, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175] If no Slavic name existed, then either the German name was translated or new names were invented. [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.344, 349, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175] The German language was banned, [Dan Diner, Raphael Gross, Yfaat Weiss, "Jüdische Geschichte als allgemeine Geschichte", p.164] and many German monuments, graveyards, buildings etc. were demolished. Objects of art were moved to other parts of the country. [Gregor Thum, "Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.520, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175] Protestant churches were either converted into Catholic ones or used for other purposes. Official propaganda spread all-round anti-German sentiment, which was shared by many of the opposition as well as many in the Catholic church. [Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, "Poland and the European Union", 2000, p.166, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854]
Resettlement
People from all over Poland quickly moved in to replace the former German population in a process parallel to the expulsions. While the Germans were interned and expelled, up to 5 million settlers [Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, "Poland and the European Union", 2000, p.168, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854: gives 4.55 million in the first years] were either attracted or forced to settle the areas. The settlers can be grouped according to their background:
*settlers from Central Poland moving voluntarily (the majority) [Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, "Poland and the European Union", 2000, p.168, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854: 2.8m of 4.55m in the first years]
*Poles that had been freed fromforced labor inNazi Germany (up to two million) [Dierk Hoffmann, Michael Schwartz, "Geglückte Integration?", p142 [http://books.google.de/books?id=Js8XWnqR6HMC&pg=PA140&dq=vertreibung+polen&lr=&sig=ACfU3U3NdOJdTE4UOsjN6kQyponjdFIP8A#PPA142,M1] ] [Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, "Poland and the European Union", 2000, p.168, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854: 1.5m of 4.55m in the first years]
*so-called "repatriants": Poles expelled from the areas east of the new Polish-Soviet border were preferably settled in the new western territories, where they made up 26% of the population (up to two million) [Dierk Hoffmann, Michael Schwartz, "Geglückte Integration?", p142 [http://books.google.de/books?id=Js8XWnqR6HMC&pg=PA140&dq=vertreibung+polen&lr=&sig=ACfU3U3NdOJdTE4UOsjN6kQyponjdFIP8A#PPA142,M1] ] [Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, "Poland and the European Union", 2000, p.168, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854: 1.55m of 4.55m in the first years]
*non-Poles forceably resettled duringOperation Wisła in 1947. Large numbers of Ukrainians were forced to move from south-eastern Poland under a 1947 Polish government operation aimed at dispersing, and therefore assimilating, those Ukrainians who had not been expelled eastward already, throughout the newly acquired territories. Belarusians living around the area around Białystok were also pressured into relocating to the formerly German areas for the same reasons. This scattering of members of non-Polish ethnic groups throughout the country was an attempt by the Polish authorities to dissolve the unique ethnic identity of groups like the Ukrainians, Belarusians andLemkos , [Thum, p.129] and broke the proximity and communication necessary for strong communities to form.
*Tens of thousands of JewishHolocaust -survivors, most of them "repatriates" from the East, settled mostly inLower Silesia , creating Jewish cooperatives and institutions – the largest communities were founded inWroclaw (Breslau, Lower Silesia),Szczecin (Stettin,Pomerania ) andWałbrzych (Waldenburg, Lower Silesia). [Selwyn Ilan Troen, Benjamin Pinkus, Merkaz le-moreshet Ben-Guryon, "Organizing Rescue: National Jewish Solidarity in the Modern Period", pp.283-284, 1992, ISBN 0714634131, 9780714634135] However most of them had left Poland by 1968 due to Polish antisemitism and antisemitic governmental campaigns, [Thum, p.127 + p.128] with the first mass flight of Jews from Poland taking place as a consequence of postwar anti-Jewish violence culminating in theKielce pogrom in 1946. [Selwyn Ilan Troen, Benjamin Pinkus, Merkaz le-moreshet Ben-Guryon, "Organizing Rescue: National Jewish Solidarity in the Modern Period", pp.284ff, 1992, ISBN 0714634131, 9780714634135]Polish and Soviet newspapers and officials encouraged Poles to relocate to the west – "the land of opportunity". [Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, "Poland and the European Union", 2000, p.168, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854] . These new territories were described as a place where opulent villas abandoned by fleeing Germans waited for the brave; fully furnished houses and businesses were available for the taking. In fact, the areas were devastated by the war, the infrastructure largely destroyed, suffering high crime rates and looting by gangs. It took years for civil order to be established.
Today the population of the territories is predominantly Polish, although a small German minority still exists in many places, including
Olsztyn ( _de. Allenstein),Masuria , andUpper Silesia , particularly inOpole Voivodeship .Role of the Recovered Territories in the Communists' rise to power
The Communist government, not democratically legitimized but supported only by the
Red Army , the UB secret service, terror and propaganda, sought to legitimize itself through anti-German propaganda. [Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, "Poland and the European Union", 2000, p.167, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854] The German "revanchism" was played up as a permanent German threat, with the Communists being the only guarantors and defenders of Poland's continued possession of the "Recovered Territories". Gomułka asserted that "the western territories are one of the reasons the government has the support of the people. This neutralizes various elements and brings people together. Westward expansion and agricultural reform will bind the nation with the state. Any retreat would weaken our domestic position." [Dan Diner, Raphael Gross, Yfaat Weiss, "Jüdische Geschichte als allgemeine Geschichte", p.164] The redistribution of "ownerless property" among the people by the regime brought it broad-based popular sympathy. [Dan Diner, Raphael Gross, Yfaat Weiss, "Jüdische Geschichte als allgemeine Geschichte", p.164]Legal status of the territories
During the
Cold War the official position in theFirst World was that the concluding document of thePotsdam Conference was not an internationaltreaty , but a merememorandum . It regulated the issue of the German eastern border, which was to be theOder-Neisse line , but the final article of the memorandum said that the final status of the German state and therefore its territories were subject to a separate peace treaty between Germany and theAllies of World War II . During the period from 1945 to 1990 two treaties between Poland and both East and West Germany were signed concerning the German-Polish border. In 1950 theGerman Democratic Republic and thePeople's Republic of Poland signed theTreaty of Zgorzelec , recognizing the Oder-Neisse line, officially designated by the Communists as the "Border of Peace and Friendship". [ [http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/oder.htm Why is the Oder-Neiße Line a Peace Border? (1950) ] ] On 7 December 1970 theTreaty of Warsaw between theFederal Republic of Germany and Poland was signed concerning the Polish western border. Both sides committed themselves to nonviolence and accepted the existing "de facto" border - theOder-Neisse line . However a final treaty was not signed until 1990 as the "Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany ". This meant that for 45 years, people on both sides of the border (and of the issue) could not be sure that the settlement reached in 1945 would not be changed at some future date.Until the "
Treaty on the Final Settlement ", the West German government regarded the status of the German territories east of the Oder-Neisse rivers as that of areas "temporarily under Polish or Soviet administration". To facilitate wide international acceptance ofGerman reunification in 1990, the German political establishment recognized the "facts on the ground " and accepted the clauses in the "Treaty on the Final Settlement" whereby Germany renounced all claims to territory east of the Oder-Neisse line. This allowed the treaty to be negotiated quickly and for unification of democratic West Germany and communist East Germany to go ahead quickly. In the same year as the Final Settlement came into effect, 1990, Germany signed a separate treaty with Poland, theGerman-Polish Border Treaty , confirming the two countries’ present borders.History of the "Recovered Territories" before 1945
Piast realm
Numerous West Slavic tribes had inhabited most of the area of present-day Poland since the 6th century.
Mieszko I of thePolans from his stronghold in theGniezno area subdued various neighboring tribes in the second half of the 10th century, creating the first Polish state and becoming the first historically recorded Piast duke. His realm roughly included all of the area of the "Recovered Territories" except forWarmia-Masuria . His son and successor,Bolesław I , expanded the southern part of the realm, but lost control overPomerania . After fragmentation, pagan revolts and a Bohemian invasion in the 1030s, Casimir I the Restorer again united most of the former Piast realm, includingSilesia and theLubusz Land , but without Pomerania. Pomerania was subdued again temporarily byBolesław III in 1116-1121. On his death in 1138, Poland was divided into several semi-independent duchies, ruled by Bolesław's sons and later their succesors, who were often in conflict with each other. Partial reunification was achieved byWładysław I , crowned king of Poland in 1320, although the Silesian and Masovian duchies remained independent.In the course of the 12th to 14th centuries, large numbers of German, Dutch and Flemish settlers moved into East Central and
Eastern Europe (a process known as theOstsiedlung ). In Pomerania,Brandenburg ,East Prussia and Silesia, the former West Slav (Polabian Slavs andPoles ) or Balt population became extinguished or dissimilated except for small minorities. In Poland andPomerelia (West Prussia), German settlers formed a minority.Pomerania
The
Pomerania n parts of the Recovered Territories were subject to continuous Piast expeditions from the late 10th century.Mieszko I had conquered at least significant parts of the area, and a bishopric was established in the Kołobrzeg area by his sonBolesław I in 1000–1005/07, before the area was lost again. Despite attempts to again subdue the Pomeranian tribes, this was only managed byBolesław III in several campaigns lasting from 1116 to 1121. There were successful Christian missions in 1124 and 1128, but by the time of Bolesław's death in 1138, most of Pomerania (the Griffin-ruled areas) had again regained independence. The Griffin duchy joined theDuchy of Saxony after the 1164Battle of Verchen , and became part of theHoly Roman Empire in 1181. This period also marks the onset of theOstsiedlung in Pomerania: the first village recorded as German wasHohenkrug in 1170. Except for a period of Danish rule from the 1180s to 1227, theDuchy of Pomerania remained with the Holy Roman Empire until the last Griffin duke died in 1648. At that time the area had been under Swedish control since 1630. From 1648 to 1720 Sweden kept the western part includingStettin , whileFarther Pomerania was made a province ofBrandenburg (laterBrandenburg-Prussia ,Prussia ). In 1720 the Stettin area was transferred fromSwedish Pomerania to the PrussianProvince of Pomerania . In 1815, theDramburg area of theNeumark was attached to the province, as was theSchneidemühl (Piła) area of the formerGrenzmark Posen-Westpreußen in 1938.Gdańsk (Danzig) and the Lauenburg and Bütow Land
The history of the Eastern
Pomerania n areas aroundGdańsk (Danzig) andLauenburg-Bütow (Lębork andBytów ), which are also within the "Recovered Territories", differs somewhat from the history of the bulk of Pomerania. They are situated in the former region ofPomerelia , which was ruled by theSamborides dynasty who, unlike the Griffins, did not join the Holy Roman Empire and remained under Piast control, loosening in the course of the 13th century. After the death of the last Samboride in 1294, the Polish kingsPrzemysł II of Poland and Wenceslaus II and Władysław I for a short period ruled Pomerelia [A. Chwalba, Kalendarium Dziejów Polski, p. 72, ISBN 8308031366] in conflict withBrandenburg , who also claimed the region. TheTeutonic takeover of Gdańsk (Danzig) followed in 1308, and after that Danzig and Lauenburg-Bütow became part of themonastic state of the Teutonic Knights until theSecond Peace of Thorn (1466), when Danzig as a part ofRoyal Prussia became subject to the Polish Crown (though with substantial autonomy). Lauenburg-Bütow was handed over to the Griffin dukes and was a Polish fief for most of the time until theFirst Partition of Poland (1772). Danzig became a part ofWest Prussia in the Second Partition (1793), and was made theFree City of Danzig afterWorld War I .Lubusz Land
The medieval
Lubusz Land , including Lubusz (Lebus ) itself, was also part of Mieszko's realm. Poland lost the bishopric of Lebus to AscanianBrandenburg in 1252, who made it part of theirNeumark . During this period,Ostsiedlung had already begun in the area. The Ascanian margraves expanded their territory east by marriage politics: TheZantoch region with the future town ofLandsberg an der Warthe was added to Neumark in 1254 after a marriage of margraveKonrad I with a daughter ofPrzemysl I , and further northeastern areas were added after the 1277Treaty of Arnswalde with the Pomerelian dukeMestwin II in return for financing this duke's marriage. Neumark was a pawn of theTeutonic Knights from 1402 to 1429, when it became the knights' possession. In 1454 however, the knights pawned the area to Brandenburg again until it was finally sold to the margraves in 1463. From 1535 to 1571, the area was ruled independently byHans von Küstrin , thereafter it remained with Brandenburg until 1945. In the 18th century, the area saw a new colonisation effort by Germans andHugenots . In 1815, some smaller northeastern areas around the town ofDramburg were integrated into theProvince of Pomerania , and in 1938, a small area around the town ofSchwerin/Warthe was made part of the province. The present-day Polish Lubusz Land comprises most of the former Neumark territory east of the Oder River.Former Province of Posen-West Prussia
A small portion of the Recovered Territories east of the Lubusz Land had previously formed the western parts of the Polish provinces of
Pomerelia andGreater Poland ("Polonia Maior"), being lost to Prussia in the First Partition (the Pomerelian parts) and the Second Partition (the remainder). DuringNapoleon ic times the Greater Poland territories were part of theDuchy of Warsaw , but after theCongress of Vienna they were returned to Prussia as part of theGrand Duchy of Posen (Poznań), laterProvince of Posen . AfterWorld War I those parts of the former Province of Posen and ofWest Prussia which were not made part of theSecond Polish Republic were administered asGrenzmark Posen-Westpreußen (Province of Posen–West Prussia) until 1938.ilesia
Silesia continued to be ruled by Piast dukes following the 12th-century fragmentation of Poland. The
Silesian Piasts retained power in most of the region until the early 16th century, the last (George William, duke ofLegnica ) dying in 1675. The first German colonists arrived in the late 12th century, and large-scale German settlement started in the early 13th century with the reign of Henry I. [Hugo Weczerka, "Handbuch der historischen Stätten: Schlesien", 2003, p.XXXVI, ISBN 3-520-31602-1] While Lower and Middle Silesia in the late Middle Ages became German-speaking except for some areas along the northeastern frontier, Upper Silesia retained a Polish character. [Ernst Badstübner, "Dehio - Handbuch der Kunstdenkmäler in Polen: Schlesien", 2003, p.4, ISBN 342203109X] Here, the Germans who arrived during the Middle Ages were mostly Polonized; Germans dominated in large cities and Poles mostly in rural areas. The province came under the control ofBohemia , a state of theHoly Roman Empire , in the 14th century. Silesia passed to theHabsburg Monarchy ofAustria in 1526, and was mostly conquered by Prussia'sFrederick the Great in 1742. A small part ofUpper Silesia became part of Poland after World War I, but the bulk of Silesia formed part of the post-1945 Recovered Territories.Warmia and Masuria
Unlike the remainder of the Recovered Territories, the northern territories of
Warmia andMasuria did not form part of the Piasts' kingdom. Originally inhabited by paganOld Prussians , these regions were incorporated into the state of theTeutonic Knights in the 13th and 14th centuries. By theSecond Peace of Thorn (1466), an area of Warmia around Lidzbark was awarded to the Polish crown as part ofRoyal Prussia , though with considerable autonomy. The remainder of today's Warmia-Masuria region became part ofDucal Prussia , formally a Polish fief. The region was taken by Prussia in theFirst Partition of Poland (1772). It formed the southern part ofEast Prussia after World War I, becoming part of Poland after World War II, with northern East Prussia going to theSoviet Union to form theKaliningrad Oblast .ee also
*
History of German settlement in Eastern Europe
*Former eastern territories of Germany
*German exodus from Eastern Europe
*Territorial changes of Poland after World War II References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.