- Jauhar
Jauhar and Saka refer to the voluntary deaths of men and women of the
Rajput caste in order to avoid capture and dishonour at the hands of their enemies. This was done sometimes by Hindu and Sikh women, in Mughal times and there are recorded incidences of this on a much smaller scale during the Partition in 1947 when women preferred death to being raped, turned into a slave or being forced into a marriage and their enemies religion.Jauhar (also spelled jowhar) was originally the voluntary death on a funeral pyre of the queens and royal womenfolk of defeated Rajput castes. The term is extended to describe the occasional practice of
mass suicide carried out in medieval times byRajput women and men. Mass self-immolation by women was called "Jauhar". This was usually done before or at the same time their husbands, brothers, fathers and sons rode out in a charge to meet their attackers and certain death, the upset caused by the knowledge that their women and younger children were dead, no doubt filled them with rage in this fight to the death called s "saka".Practice
Jauhar is often described in terms of the women and children alone, but should correctly be understood as including the death of the men on the battlefield. Jauhar and saka involved:
# A defending
Rajput army being besieged inside a fortification by an invading enemy army.
# The realization by the defenders that defeat was both imminent and inescapable.
# The realization by the defenders that the enemy army would capture and dishonour women.
# The immolation, "en masse," of women and young children to avoid their molestation by the invading army;
# The men of the beseiged army riding out to a certain death on the battlefield.It was considered proper for the men to fight to the last breath when defeat became certain in a war but Jauhar was committed to avoid capture and dishonour of royal women. When defeat at the hands of a more powerful enemy was imminent, the women, dressed in wedding finery, immolated themselves, then the men, bearing "Kesariya Bana" (saffron coloured dress), attacked the enemy. For men who had been raised their whole life as warriors, nothing was considered more honorable for the Rajput male than to fight and die on the battlefield. Though they might occur at different times Jauhar and Saka were always performed together.
Despite occasional confusion, this practice is not related with "Sati". While both practices have been most common historically in the territory of modern Rajasthan, Sati was a custom performed by widowed women only, while Jauhar and Saka were committed while both the partners were living and only at a time of war.
Occurrence
Jauhar and Saka were limited to the
Hindu Kshatriya casteRajput s, who formed the nobility and ruling classes and castes ofRajasthan and northernIndia .There is extensive glorification of the practice in the local ballads and folk-histories of
Rajasthan ; however, the accuracy of these accounts has probably degraded due to over-romanticization. Accounts of the invaders finding a deserted city with no living residents are not historically accurate as people of the other castesBrahmin s,Charan s, servants and slaves and other groups were part of any city and they would not have participated in sich customs. There are no accounts of Rajputs fleeing the battlefield at the time of a "Saka" as they would have considered it disgraceful to run from the battlefield.There are many instances of Jauhar (and saka), but these are not well recorded. King Vijaipal's wife may have committed Jauhar at the fort of
Bayana , but this is based on ambiguous information from the "Timan Garh". It is now in theKarauli district of Rajasthan. The women-folk of the family of Silhadi the military power-broker may have committed Jauhar.There are a number of other instances of jauhar on record, especially in the Khilji and Tughlaq times. Jauhar was committed during the Tughlaq campaign against the state of Kampili in the Raichur Doab and the siege of Annegondi - later to be famous as Vijayanagar. Searching for other instances of Jauhar would help us to understand whether Jauhar was a Rajput prerogative or was practiced by other military peoples as well. The Jauhar at Annegondi may have been committed only by a particular Rajput contingent in the fort, as after the battle, the besiegers took many prisoners from amongst the Rajput ruling and fighting classes and sent them to Delhi.
The best known cases of Jauhar are the three occurrences at the fort of
Chittaur (Chittaurgarh, Chittorgarh), in Rajasthan, in1303 ,1535 and in1568 .Jaisalmer has witnessed two occurrences of Jauhar. Another occurrence was inChanderi .First Jauhar
In 1303 AD,
Ala-ud-din Khilji , the Sultan of Delhi besiegedChittor fort, which was under the control ofRana Rawal Ratan Singh . The Rana was allowed one final glimpse of his wife,Rani Padmini in a mirror, before he was at the gates and held hostage for Padmini. Padmini sent misleading information that she would join Ala-ud-din, but she was to come with 700 women as befitted her status. The Rajputs were thus able to infiltrate about 2000 men into Ala-ud-din's camp. Each "Palaqi"Palanquin ) contained two Rajput soldiers and four men to lift it.Gora and Badal were leading this team. Ala-ud-din allowed Padmini one final meeting with her husband, which allowed the Rajputs to whisk Ratan Singh out from under the Khilji king's nose. Beaten, Ala-ud-din returned to Delhi to come back better equipped early the next year. The Rajput defense failed as a result of this second attack and, to a man, perished on the battlefield while their womenfolk, led by Maharani Padmini, performed Jauhar. The siege of Chittor, its brave defence by theGuhilas , the saga of Rani Padmini and the Jauhar she led are legendary. This incident has had a defining impact upon the Rajput character and is detailed in a succeeding section.Second Jauhar
Rana Sanga died in 1528 AD after theBattle of Khanua . Shortly afterwards, Mewar andChittor came under the regency of his widow, Rani Karmavati. The kingdom was menaced byBahadur Shah of Gujarat , who besieged Chittorgarh. Without relief from other forces and facing defeat, the Rani committed Jauhar with other women onMarch 8 , 1535, while the Rajput army sallied out to meet the besieging Muslim army and committed saka.According to one romantic legend of dubious veracity, Karmavati importuned the assistance of
Humayun the son ofBabur , her late husband's foe, by sending him aRakhi and a request for his help as a brother. The help arrived too late. This is the occasion for the second of the three Jauhars performed at Chittor.Third Jauhar
Emperor
Akbar besieged the fort ofChittor in September 1567. Changing the strategy,Rana Udai Singh II , his sons and the royal women, using secret routes, escaped soon after the siege began. The fort was left under JaimalRathore and PattaSisodiya 's command. One morning Akbar found Jaimal inspecting repairs to the fort which had been damaged by explosives, and shot him. The bullet hit Jaimal in the leg and wounded him seriously. That same day the Rajputs realizing that defeat was certain, the Rajput women committed Jauhar in the night of February 22, 1568 AD, and the next morning, the Rajput men committed saka. (Abul Faz'l has given a true account of the event as seen byAkbar in his biography in 1568 AD.)ee also
*
Akbarnama
*Jigai in JapanExternal links
* [http://persian.packhum.org/persian/index.jsp?serv=pf&file=00701020&ct=0 persian.packhum.org] - The Akbarnama, part II, chapter 65, H.M.'s Siege of the Fortress of Citũr
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.