- Atrial fibrillation
| MeshID = D001281
Atrial fibrillation (AF or afib) is a
cardiac arrhythmia(abnormal heart rhythm) that involves the two upper chambers (atria) of the heart. It can often be identified by taking a pulseand observing that the heartbeats don't occur at regular intervals, but a conclusive indication of AF is the absence of P waves on an electrocardiogram(ECG). AF is the most common arrhythmia; risk increases with age, with 8% of people over 80 having AF. In AF, the normal electrical impulses that are generated by the sinoatrial nodeare overwhelmed by disorganized electrical impulses that originate in the atria and pulmonary veins, leading to conduction of irregular impulses to the ventricles that generate the heartbeat. The result is an irregular heartbeat which may occur in episodes lasting from minutes to weeks, or it could occur all the time for years. The natural tendency of AF is to become a chronic condition. Chronic AF leads to a small increase in the risk of death.cite journal |author=Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D |title=Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study |journal=Circulation |volume=98 |issue=10 |pages=946–52 |year=1998 |pmid=9737513 |doi=] [cite journal |author=Wattigney WA, Mensah GA, Croft JB |title=Increased atrial fibrillation mortality: United States, 1980-1998 |journal=Am. J. Epidemiol. |volume=155 |issue=9 |pages=819–26 |year=2002 |pmid=11978585 |doi=10.1093/aje/155.9.819]
Atrial fibrillation is often
asymptomatic, and is not in itself generally life-threatening, but may result in palpitations, fainting, chest pain, or congestive heart failure. Patients with AF usually have a significantly increased risk of stroke(up to 7 times that of the general population). Stroke risk increases during AF because blood may pool and form clots in the poorly contracting atria and especially in the left atrial appendage(LAA). The level of increased risk of stroke depends on the number of additional risk factors. If the AF patient has none, the risk of stroke is similar to that of the general population.cite journal |author=Jahangir A, Lee V, Friedman PA, Trusty JM, Hodge DO, Kopecky SL, Packer DL, Hammill SC, Shen WK, Gersh BJ |title=Long-term progression and outcomes with aging in patients with lone atrial fibrillation: a 30-year follow-up study |journal=Circulation |volume=115 |issue=24 |pages=3050–6 |year=2007 |pmid=17548732 |doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.644484] However, many patients do have additional risk factors and AF is a leading cause of stroke.cite journal |author=Wolf PA, Dawber TR, Thomas HE, Kannel WB |title=Epidemiologic assessment of chronic atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke: the Framingham study |journal=Neurology |volume=28 |issue=10 |pages=973–7 |year=1978 |pmid=570666 |doi=] Atrial fibrillation may be treated with medications which either slow the heart rate or revert the heart rhythm back to normal. Synchronized electrical cardioversionmay also be used to convert AF to a normal heart rhythm. Surgical and catheter-based therapies may also be used to prevent recurrence of AF in certain individuals. People with AF are often given anticoagulantssuch as warfarinto protect them from stroke.
American College of Cardiology(ACC), American Heart Association(AHA), and the European Society of Cardiology(ESC) recommend in their guidelines the following classification system based on simplicity and clinical relevance.cite journal |author=Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, "et al" |title=ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society |journal=Circulation |volume=114 |issue=7 |pages=e257–354 |year=2006 |pmid=16908781 |doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.177292]
All atrial fibrillation patients are initially in the category called "first detected AF". These patients may or may not have had previous undetected episodes. If a first detected episode self-terminates in less than 7 days and then another episode begins later on, the case has moved into the category of "paroxysmal AF". Although patients in this category have episodes lasting up to 7 days, in most cases of paroxysmal AF the episodes will self-terminate in less than 24 hours. If instead the episode lasts for more than 7 days, it is unlikely to self-terminate [cite journal | author=Levy S | title=Classification system of atrial fibrillation | journal=Curr Opin Cardiol | year=2000 | pages=54–7 | volume=15 | issue=1 | doi=10.1097/00001573-200001000-00007 PMID 10666661] and it is called "persistent AF". In this case, the episode may be terminated by
cardioversion. If cardioversion is unsuccessful or it is not attempted, and the episode is ongoing for a long time (e.g. a year or more), the patient's AF is called "permanent".
Episodes that last less than 30 seconds are not considered in this system. Also, this system does not apply to cases where the AF is a secondary condition that occurs in the setting of a primary condition that may be the cause of the AF.
Using this system, it's not always clear what an AF case should be called. For example, a case may fit into the paroxysmal AF category some of the time, while other times it may have the characteristics of persistent AF. One may be able to decide which category is more appropriate by determining which one occurs most often in the case under consideration.
In addition to the four categories in the above system, which are mainly defined by episode timing and termination, the ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines describe additional AF categories in terms of other characteristics of the patient.
*"Lone atrial fibrillation" (LAF) - absence of clinical or
echocardiographicfindings of other cardiovascular disease(including hypertension) or related pulmonary disease, and age under 60 years
*"Nonvalvular AF" - absence of rheumatic mitral valve disease, a
prosthetic heart valve, or mitral valve repair
*"Secondary AF" - occurs in the setting of a primary condition which may be the cause of the AF, such as
acute myocardial infarction, cardiac surgery, pericarditis, myocarditis, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, or other acute pulmonary disease
igns and symptoms
Atrial fibrillation is usually accompanied by symptoms related to a rapid heart rate. Rapid and irregular heart rates may be perceived as
palpitations, exercise intolerance, and occasionally produce angina (if the rate is faster and puts the heart under strain) and congestive symptoms of shortness of breathor edema. Sometimes the arrhythmia will be identified only with the onset of a stroke or a transient ischemic attack(TIA). It is not uncommon for a patient to first become aware of AF from a routine physical examination or ECG, as it may be asymptomatic in many cases.
As most cases of atrial fibrillation are secondary to other medical problems, the presence of
chest painor angina, symptoms of hyperthyroidism(an overactive thyroid gland) such as weight lossand diarrhea, and symptoms suggestive of lung diseasewould indicate an underlying cause. A previous history of stroke or TIA, as well as hypertension(high blood pressure), diabetes, heart failureand rheumatic fever, may indicate whether someone with AF is at a higher risk of complications.
The evaluation of atrial fibrillation involves diagnosis, determination of the etiology of the arrhythmia, and classification of the arrhythmia. A minimal evaluation should be performed in all individuals with AF. This includes a history and physical examination, ECG, transthoracic echocardiogram, and routine bloodwork. Certain individuals may benefit from an extended evaluation which may include an evaluation of the heart rate response to exercise, exercise stress testing, a chest x-ray, trans-esophageal echocardiography, and other studies.
Screening for atrial fibrillation is not generally performed, although a study of routine pulse checks or ECGs during routine office visits found that the annual rate of detection of AF in elderly patients improved from 1.04% to 1.63%; selection of patients for prophylactic anticoagulation would improve stroke risk in that age category.cite journal |author=Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FD, Jowett S, "et al" |title=Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trial |journal= BMJ|volume= 335|issue= |pages=383|year=2007 |pmid=17673732 |doi=10.1136/bmj.39280.660567.55]
Routine primary care visit
This estimated sensitivity of the routine primary care visit is 64%. This low result probably reflects the pulse not being checked routinely or carefully.cite journal |author=Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FD, Jowett S, "et al" |title=Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trial |journal= BMJ|volume= 335|issue= |pages=383|year=2007 |pmid=17673732 |doi=10.1136/bmj.39280.660567.55]
The minimal evaluation of atrial fibrillation should generally be performed in all individuals with AF. The goal of this evaluation is to determine the general treatment regimen for the individual. If results of the general evaluation warrant it, further studies may be then performed.
History and physical examination
The history of the individual's atrial fibrillation episodes is probably the most important part of the evaluation. Distinctions should be made between those who are entirely asymptomatic when they are in AF (in which case the AF is found as an incidental finding on an ECG or physical examination) and those who have gross and obvious symptoms due to AF and can pinpoint whenever they go into AF or revert to sinus rhythm.
While many cases of AF have no definite cause, it may be the result of various other problems (see below). Hence,
renal functionand electrolytes are routinely determined, as well as thyroid-stimulating hormone(commonly suppressed in hyperthyroidismand of relevance if amiodaroneis administered for treatment) and a blood count.
In acute-onset AF associated with
chest pain, cardiac troponins or other markers of damage to the heart muscle may be ordered. Coagulationstudies (INR/aPTT) are usually performed, as anticoagulantmedication may be commenced.
Atrial fibrillation is diagnosed on an
electrocardiogram(ECG), an investigation performed routinely whenever irregular heart beat is suspected. Characteristic findings are the absence of P waves, with unorganized electrical activity in their place, and irregularity of R-R interval due to irregular conduction of impulses to the ventricles.
When ECGs are used for screening, the SAFE trial found that electronic software,
primary care physicians and the combination of the two had the following sensitivities and specificities:cite journal |author=Mant J, Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FD, "et al" |title=Accuracy of diagnosing atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram by primary care practitioners and interpretative diagnostic software: analysis of data from screening for atrial fibrillation in the elderly (SAFE) trial |journal= BMJ|volume= 335|issue= |pages=380|year=2007 |pmid=17604299 |doi=10.1136/bmj.39227.551713.AE] :
* Interpreted by software: sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 99%
* Interpreted by a primary care physician: sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 92%
* Interpreted by a primary care physician with software: sensitivity = 92%, specificity = 91%
If paroxysmal AF is suspected but an ECG during an office visit only shows a regular rhythm, AF episodes may be detected and documented with the use of ambulatory
Holter monitoring (e.g. for a day). If the episodes are too infrequent to be detected by Holter monitoring with reasonable probability, then the patient can be monitored for longer periods (e.g. a month) with an ambulatory event monitor.
A non-invasive transthoracic
echocardiogram(TTE) is generally performed in newly diagnosed AF, as well as if there is a major change in the patient's clinical state. This ultrasound-based scan of the heart may help identify valvular heart disease(which may greatly increase the risk of stroke), left and right atrial size (which indicates likelihood that AF may become permanent), left ventricular size and function, peak right ventricular pressure ( pulmonary hypertension), presence of left ventricular hypertrophy and pericardial disease.
Significant enlargement of both the left and right atria is associated with long-standing atrial fibrillation and, if noted at the initial presentation of atrial fibrillation, suggests that the atrial fibrillation is likely to be of a longer duration than the individual's symptoms.
An extended evaluation is generally not necessary in most individuals with atrial fibrillation, and is only performed if abnormalities are noted in the limited evaluation, if a reversible cause of the atrial fibrillation is suggested, or if further evaluation may change the treatment course.
chest X-rayis generally only performed if a pulmonary cause of atrial fibrillation is suggested, or if other cardiac conditions are suspected (particularly congestive heart failure.) This may reveal an underlying problem in the lungs or the blood vessels in the chest. In particular, if an underlying pneumonia is suggested, then treatment of the pneumonia may cause the atrial fibrillation to terminate on its own.
A normal echocardiography (transthoracic or TTE) has a low sensitivity for identifying thrombi (blood clots) in the heart. If this is suspected - e.g. when planning urgent electrical cardioversion - a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is preferred.
The TEE has much better visualization of the
left atrial appendagethan transthoracic echocardiography. This structure, located in the left atrium, is the place where thrombus most commonly is formed in the setting of atrial fibrillation or flutter. TEE has a very high sensitivity for locating thrombus in this areaFact|date=September 2007 and can also detect sluggish bloodflow in this area that is suggestive of thrombus formation.Fact|date=September 2007
If no thrombus is seen on TEE, the incidence of stroke immediately after cardioversion is performed is very low.Fact|date=September 2007
Ambulatory holter monitoring
holter monitoris a wearable ambulatory heart monitor that continuously monitors the heart rate and heart rhythm for a short duration, typically 24 hours. In individuals with symptoms of significant shortness of breath with exertion or palpitations on a regular basis, a holter monitor may be of benefit to determine if rapid heart rates (or unusually slow heart rates) during atrial fibrillation are the cause of the symptoms.
Exercise stress testing
Some individuals with atrial fibrillation do well with normal activity but develop shortness of breath with exertion. It may be unclear if the shortness of breath is due to a blunted heart rate response to exertion due to excessive AV node blocking agents, a very rapid heart rate during exertion, or due to other underlying conditions such as chronic lung disease or coronary ischemia. An exercise stress test will evaluate the individual's heart rate response to exertion and determine if the AV node blocking agents are contributing to the symptoms.
AF is linked to several cardiac causes, but may occur in otherwise normal hearts. Known associations include:
Hypertension(High blood pressure)
* Primary heart diseases including
coronary artery disease, mitral stenosis(e.g. due to rheumatic heart diseaseor mitral valve prolapse), mitral regurgitation, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(HCM), pericarditis, congenital heart disease, previous heart surgery
* Lung diseases (such as
pneumonia, lung cancer, pulmonary embolism, sarcoidosis)
* Excessive alcohol consumption ("
binge drinking" or " holiday heart syndrome")
Carbon monoxide poisoning
pacemakers in the presence of normal atrioventricular conduction. [cite journal |author=Sweeney MO, Bank AJ, Nsah E, "et al" |title=Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=357 |issue=10 |pages=1000–8 |year=2007 |pmid=17804844 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa071880]
family historyof AF increases risk by 30%.cite journal |author=Fox CS, Parise H, D'Agostino RB, "et al" |title=Parental atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation in offspring |journal=JAMA |volume=291 |issue=23 |pages=2851–5 |year=2004 |pmid=15199036 |doi=10.1001/jama.291.23.2851] Various genetic mutations may be responsible.cite journal |author=Saffitz JE |title=Connexins, conduction, and atrial fibrillation |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=354 |issue=25 |pages=2712–4 |year=2006 |pmid=16790707 |doi=10.1056/NEJMe068088]
The primary pathologic change seen in atrial fibrillation is the progressive fibrosis of the atria. This fibrosis is primarily due to atrial dilatation, however genetic causes and inflammation may have a cause in some individuals.
Dilatation of the atria can be due to almost any structural abnormality of the heart that can cause a rise in the intra-cardiac pressures. This includes valvular heart disease (such as mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, and tricuspid regurgitation), hypertension, and congestive heart failure. Any inflammatory state that affects the heart can cause fibrosis of the atria. This is typically due to sarcoidosis but may also be due to autoimmune disorders that create autoantibodies against myosin heavy chains. Mutation of the "
laminAC" gene is also associated with fibrosis of the atria that can lead to atrial fibrillation.
Once dilatation of the atria has occurred, this begins a chain of events that leads to the activation of the renin aldosterone angiotensin system (RAAS) and subsequent increase in matrix metaloproteinases and disintegrin, which leads to atrial remodeling and fibrosis, with loss of atrial muscle mass.
This process is not immediate, and experimental studies have revealed patchy atrial fibrosis may precede the occurrence of atrial fibrillation and may progress with prolonged durations of atrial fibrillation.
Fibrosis is not limited to the muscle mass of the atria, and may occur in the
sinus node(SA node) and atrioventricular node(AV node), correlating with sick sinus syndrome. Prolonged episodes of atrial fibrillation have been shown to correlate with prolongation of the sinus node recovery time, cite journal |author=Elvan A, Wylie K, Zipes D |title=Pacing-induced chronic atrial fibrillation impairs sinus node function in dogs. Electrophysiological remodeling |journal=Circulation |volume=94 |issue=11 |pages=2953–60 |year=1996 |url=http://www.circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/94/11/2953 |pmid=8941126 ] cite journal |author=Manios EG, Kanoupakis EM, Mavrakis HE, Kallergis EM, Dermitzaki DN, Vardas PE |title=Sinus pacemaker function after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: is sinus node remodeling related with recurrence? |journal=Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology |volume=12 |issue=7 |pages=800–6 |year=2001 |pmid=11469431 |doi=10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00800.x ] suggesting that dysfunction of the SA node is progressive with prolonged episodes of atrial fibrillation.
electrical conduction system of the heartallows the impulse that is generated by the sinoatrial node(SA node) of the heart to be propagated to and stimulate the myocardium(muscle of the heart). When the myocardium is stimulated, it contracts. It is the ordered stimulation of the myocardium that allows efficient contraction of the heart, thereby allowing blood to be pumped to the body.
In atrial fibrillation, the regular impulses produced by the sinus node to provide rhythmic contraction of the heart are overwhelmed by the rapid randomly generated electrical discharges produced by larger areas of atrial tissue, often localized to the
pulmonary veins. It can be distinguished from atrial flutter, which is a more organized electrical circuit usually in the right atrium that produces characteristic saw-toothed p-waves on the ECG; in atrial flutter, the discharges circulate rapidly at a rate of 300 beats per minute (bpm) around the atrium; in AF, there is no regularity of this kind at all.
An organized electrical impulse in the atrium produces atrial contraction; the lack of such an impulse, as in atrial fibrillation, produces stagnant blood flow, especially in the
left atrial appendageand predisposes to clotting. The dislodgement of a clot from the atrium results in an embolus, and the damage produced is related to where the circulation takes it. An embolus to the brain produces the most feared complication of atrial fibrillation, namely stroke, while an embolus may also lodge in the mesenteric circulation (the circulation supplying the abdominal organs) or digit, producing organ-specific damage such as bowel ischemiaor ischemia of the fingers or toes.
The main goals of treatment of atrial fibrillation are to prevent temporary circulatory instability and to prevent
stroke. Rate and rhythm control are principally used to achieve the former, while anticoagulationmay be required to decrease the risk of the latter. [cite journal | author=Prystowsky EN | title=Management of atrial fibrillation: therapeutic options and clinical decisions | journal=Am J Cardiol | year=2000 | pages=3D–11D | volume=85 | issue=10A | doi=10.1016/S0002-9149(00)00908-5 PMID 10822035] In emergencies, when circulatory collapse is imminent due to uncontrolled tachycardia, immediate cardioversionmay be indicated.
The primary factors determining atrial fibrillation treatment are duration and evidence of hemodynamic instability.
Cardioversionis indicated with new onset AF (for less than 48 hours) and with hemodynamic instability. If rate and rhythm control can not be maintained by medication or cardioversion, electrophysiological studies with pathway ablation may be required.
Most patients with AF are at increased risk of stroke. The possible exceptions are those with lone AF (LAF). A
systematic reviewof risk factors for strokein patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation concluded that a prior history of stroke or TIA is the most powerful risk factor for future stroke, followed by advancing age, hypertension, and diabetes.cite journal |author= |title=Independent predictors of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review |journal=Neurology |volume=69 |issue=6 |pages=546–54 |year=2007 |pmid=17679673 |doi=10.1212/01.wnl.0000267275.68538.8d] For patients with LAF, the risk of stroke is very low and is independent of whether the LAF was an isolated episode, paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent.cite journal |author=Kopecky SL, Gersh BJ, McGoon MD, "et al" |title=The natural history of lone atrial fibrillation. A population-based study over three decades |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=317 |issue=11 |pages=669–74 |year=1987 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/317/11/669 |pmid=3627174 ] The risk of systemic embolization (atrial clots migrating to other organs) depends strongly on whether there is an underlying structural problem with the heart (e.g. mitral stenosis) and on the presence of other risk factors, such as diabetes and high blood pressure. Finally, patients under 65 are much less likely to develop embolization compared with patients over 75. In young patients with few risk factors and no structural heart defect, the benefits of anticoagulation may be outweighed by the risks of hemorrhage(bleeding). Those at a low risk may benefit from mild (and low-risk) anticoagulation with aspirin(or clopidogrelin those who are allergic to aspirin). In contrast, those with a high risk of stroke derive most benefit from anticoagulanttreatment with warfarinor similar drugs.
United Kingdom, the NICE guidelines recommend using a clinical prediction rulefor this purpose.cite web |author=National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence|url=http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG36 |title=Clinical Guideline 36 - Atrial fibrillation | month=June | year=2006 | accessdate=2007-08-15 |format= |work=] The "CHADS2" score is the best validated clinical prediction rule for determining the risk of stroke (and therefore who should be anticoagulated); it assigns points (totaling 0-6) depending on the presence or absence of co-morbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. In a comparison of seven prediction rules, the best was CHADS2 which performed similarly to the SPAFcite journal |author=Hart RG, Pearce LA, McBride R, Rothbart RM, Asinger RW |title=Factors associated with ischemic stroke during aspirin therapy in atrial fibrillation: analysis of 2012 participants in the SPAF I-III clinical trials. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF) Investigators |journal=Stroke |volume=30 |issue=6 |pages=1223–9 |year=1999 |pmid=10356104 |doi=] and Framinghamcite journal |author=Wang TJ, Massaro JM, Levy D, "et al" |title=A risk score for predicting stroke or death in individuals with new-onset atrial fibrillation in the community: the Framingham Heart Study |journal=JAMA |volume=290 |issue=8 |pages=1049–56 |year=2003 |pmid=12941677 |doi=10.1001/jama.290.8.1049] prediction rules. cite journal |author=Baruch L, Gage BF, Horrow J, "et al" |title=Can patients at elevated risk of stroke treated with anticoagulants be further risk stratified? |journal=Stroke |volume=38 |issue=9 |pages=2459–63 |year=2007 |pmid=17673721 |doi=10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.477133]
To compensate for the increased risk of stroke, anticoagulants may be required. However, in the case of warfarin, if a patient has a yearly risk of stroke that is less than 2%, then the risks associated with taking warfarin outweigh the risk of getting a stroke from AF. [cite journal | author=van Walraven C, Hart RG, Singer DE, "et al." | title=Oral anticoagulants vs aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an individual patient meta-analysis | journal=JAMA | year=2002 | volume=288 | issue=19 | pages=2441–48 | doi= 10.1001/jama.288.19.2441|pmid=12435257] [cite journal | author=Gage BF, Cardinalli AB, Owens D. | title=Cost-effectiveness of preference-based antithrombotic therapy for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation | journal=Stroke | year=1998 | volume=29 | pages=1083–91 | url=http://stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/29/6/1083|pmid=9626276 ]
Atrial fibrillation in the context of mitral stenosis is associated with a seventeen-fold increase in stroke risk.
If anticoagulation is required urgently (e.g. for cardioversion),
heparinor similar drugs achieve the required level of protection much quicker than warfarin, which will take several days to reach adequate levels.
In the initial stages after an embolic stroke, anticoagulation may be risky, as the damaged area of the brain is relatively prone to bleeding (hemorrhagic transformation).cite journal |author=Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Micheli S, Caso V |title=Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment in acute cardioembolic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |journal=Stroke |volume=38 |issue=2 |pages=423–30 | year=2007 |pmid=17204681 |doi=10.1161/01.STR.0000254600.92975.1f [http://www.acpjc.org/Content/147/1/issue/ACPJC-2007-147-1-017.htm ACP JC synopsis ] ] As a result, a
clinical practice guidelineby National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellencerecommends that anticoagulation should begin two weeks after stroke if no hemorrhage occurred.
In cases of chronic stable atrial fibrillation without any other risk factors for thromboembolism, the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy recommends initiating warfarin without heparin bridging. [cite journal | author=Ansell J, Hirsh J, Poller L, Bussey H, Jacobson A, Hylek E | title=The Pharmacology and Management of the Vitamin K Antagonists | journal=Chest | year=2004 | volume=126 | pages=204S–233S | pmid=15383473 | doi=10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.204S] While there is a theoretical concern of causing a transient prothrombotic state with the initiation of warfarin, a study comparing the initiation of warfarin alone with warfarin and
low molecular weight heparinshows no significant difference in the concentrations of endogenous anticoagulants or in markers of active clot formation. [cite journal | author=Zeuthen EL, Lassen JF, Husted SE | title=Is there a hypercoagulable phase during initiation of antithrombotic therapy with oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation? | journal=Thrombosis Research | volume=109 | issue=5-6 | pages=241–246 | year=2003 | doi=10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.071 ]
Among patients with "non-valvular" atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation with warfarin can reduce stroke by 60% while antiplatelet agents can reduce stroke by 20%. cite journal |author=Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI |title=Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |journal=Ann Intern Med |volume=146 |issue=12 |pages=857–67 |year=2007 |pmid=17577005 |doi=] cite journal |author=Aguilar M, Hart R, Pearce L |title=Oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks |journal= Cochrane Database Syst Rev |volume=3 |issue= |pages=CD006186 |year=2007 |pmid=17636831 |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD006186.pub2] . There is evidence that
aspirinand clopidogrelare effective when used together, but the combination is still inferior to warfarin.cite journal |author=Connolly S, Pogue J, Hart R, "et al" |title=Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial |journal=Lancet |volume=367 |issue=9526 |pages=1903–12 |year=2006 |pmid=16765759 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68845-4]
Warfarin treatment requires frequent monitoring with a blood test called the international normalized ratio (INR); this determines whether the correct dose is being used. In atrial fibrillation, the usual target INR is between 2.0 and 3.0 (higher targets are used in patients with mechanical
artificial heart valves, many of whom may also have atrial fibrillation). A high INR may indicate increased bleeding risk, while a low INR would indicate that there is insufficient protection from stroke.
An attempt was made to find a better method of implementing warfarin therapy without the inconvenience of regular monitoring and risk of intracranial hemorrhage. A combination of aspirin and fixed-dose warfarin (initial INR 1.2-1.5) was tried. Unfortunately, in a study of AF patients with additional risk factors for thromboembolism, the combination of aspirin and the lower dose of warfarin was significantly inferior to the standard adjusted-dose warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0), yet still had a similar risk of intracranial hemorrhage. [cite journal | title=Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III randomised clinical trial | journal=Lancet | volume=348 | issue=9028 | pages=633–638 | year=1996 |url=http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673696034873/abstract | pmid=8782752 | doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03487-3]
The very elderly (patients aged 75 years or more) may benefit from anticoagulation provided that their anticoagulation does not increase hemorrhagic complications, which is a difficult goal. Patients aged 80 years or more may be especially susceptible to bleeding complications, with a rate of 13 bleeds per 100 person-years.cite journal |author=Hylek EM, Evans-Molina C, Shea C, Henault LE, Regan S |title=Major hemorrhage and tolerability of warfarin in the first year of therapy among elderly patients with atrial fibrillation |journal=Circulation |volume=115 |issue=21 |pages=2689–96 |year=2007 |pmid=17515465 |doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.653048] This bleed rate would seem to preclude use of warfarin; however, a
randomized controlled trialfound benefit in treating patients 75 years or over with a number needed to treatof 50. cite journal |author=Mant J et al |title=Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial |journal=Lancet |volume=370 |issue= |pages=493–503 | year=2007|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61233-1] Of note, this study had very low rate of hemorrhagic complications in the warfarin group.
Cardioversionis a noninvasive conversion of an irregular heartbeat to a normal heartbeat using electrical or chemical means:
* "Electrical cardioversion" involves the restoration of normal heart rhythm through the application of a DC electrical shock.
* "Chemical cardioversion" is performed with drugs, such as
amiodarone, dronedarone[cite journal |author=Singh BN, Connolly SJ, Crijns HJ, "et al" |title=Dronedarone for maintenance of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation or flutter |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=357 |issue=10 |pages=987–99 |year=2007 |pmid=17804843 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa054686] , procainamide, ibutilide, propafenoneor flecainide.
The main risk of cardioversion is systemic embolization of a
thrombus(blood clot) from the previously fibrillating left atrium. Cardioversion should not be performed without adequate anticoagulation in patients with more than 48 hours of atrial fibrillation. Cardioversion may be performed in instances of AF lasting more than 48 hours if a transesophogeal echocardiogram(TEE) demonstrates no evidence of clot within the heart.
Whichever method of cardioversion is used, approximately 50% of patients
relapsewithin one year, although the continued daily use of oral antiarrhythmic drugs may extend this period. The key risk factor for relapse is duration of AF, although other risk factors that have been identified include the presence of structural heart disease, and increasing age.Fact|date=August 2007
Rate control versus rhythm control using drugs
AF can cause disabling and annoying symptoms.
Palpitations, angina, lassitude (weariness), and decreased exercise tolerance are related to rapid heart rate and inefficient cardiac output caused by AF. Furthermore, AF with a persistent rapid rate can cause a form of heart failurecalled tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy. This can significantly increase mortality and morbidity, which can be prevented by early and adequate treatment of the AF.
There are two ways to approach these symptoms using drugs: rate control and rhythm control. "Rate control" seeks to reduce the heart rate to one that is closer to normal, usually 60 to 100 bpm, without trying to convert to a regular rhythm. "Rhythm control" seeks to restore with
cardioversionthe regular heart rhythm and maintain it with drugs. Studies suggest that rhythm control is mainly a concern in newly diagnosed AF, while rate control is more important in the chronic phase. Rate control with anticoagulation is as effective a treatment as rhythm control in long term mortality studies, the AFFIRM Trial.cite journal | author=Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD | title=A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation | journal=N Engl J Med | year=2002 | pages=1825–33 | volume=347 | issue=23 PMID 12466506]
The AFFIRM study showed no difference in risk of stroke in patients who have converted to a normal rhythm with anti-arrhythmic treatment, compared to those who have only rate control. AF is associated with a reduced quality of life, and while some studies indicate that rhythm control leads to a higher quality of life, the AFFIRM study did not find a difference. [cite journal |author=Thrall G, Lane D, Carroll D, Lip GY |title=Quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review |journal=Am. J. Med. |volume=119 |issue=5 |pages=448.e1–19 |year=2006 |pmid=16651058 |doi=10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.057]
A further study focused on rhythm control in patients with AF and simultaneous heart failure, based on the premise that AF confers a higher mortality risk in heart failure. In this setting, too, rhythm control offered no advantage compared to rate control. [cite journal | author=Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S, "et al" | title=Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure | journal=N Engl J Med | year=2008 | month=June | volume=358 | number=25 | pages=2667-2677] In patients with a fast ventricular response, intravenous
magnesiumsignificantly increases the chances of successful rate and rhythm control in the urgent setting without significant side-effects. [cite journal |author=Onalan O, Crystal E, Daoulah A, Lau C, Crystal A, Lashevsky I |title=Meta-analysis of magnesium therapy for the acute management of rapid atrial fibrillation |journal=Am. J. Cardiol. |volume=99 |issue=12 |pages=1726–32 |year=2007 |pmid=17560883 |doi=10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.057]
Rate control is achieved with medications that work by increasing the degree of block at the level of the AV node, effectively decreasing the number of impulses that conduct down into the ventricles. This can be done with:
Beta blockers(preferably the "cardioselective" beta blockers such as metoprolol, atenolol, bisoprolol)
Cardiac glycosides(i.e. digoxin)
Calcium channel blockers (i.e. diltiazemor verapamil)
In addition to these agents,
amiodaronehas some AV node blocking effects (particularly when administered intravenously), and can be used in individuals when other agents are contraindicated or ineffective (particularly due to hypotension).
Maintenance of sinus rhythm
The mainstay of maintaining sinus rhythm is the use of antiarrhythmic agents. Recently, other approaches have been developed that promise to decrease or eliminate the need for antiarrhythmic agents.
The anti-arrhythmic medications often used in either pharmacological cardioversion or in the prevention of relapse to AF alter the flux of ions in heart tissue, making them less excitable, setting the stage for spontaneous and durable cardioversion. These medications are often used in concert with electrical cardioversion.
In patients with AF where rate control drugs are ineffective and it is not possible to restore sinus rhythm using cardioversion, non-pharmacological alternatives are available. For example, to control rate it is possible to destroy the bundle of cells connecting the upper and lower chambers of the heart - the
atrioventricular node- which regulates heart rate, and to implant a pacemaker instead. A more complex technique, which avoids the need for a pacemaker, involves ablating groups of cells near the pulmonary veins where atrial fibrillation is thought to originate, or creating more extensive lesions in an attempt to prevent atrial fibrillation from establishing itself. Ablationis a technique that has shown some promise for cases of recurrent AF that are unresponsive to conventional treatments. Radiofrequency ablation(RFA) uses radiofrequency energy to destroy abnormal electrical pathways in heart tissue. Other energy sourses include laser, cryothermy and high intensity ultrasound. The energy emitting probe ( electrode) is placed into the heart through a catheterinserted into veins in the groin or neck. Electrodes that can detect electrical activity from inside the heart are also inserted, and the electrophysiologist uses these to "map" an area of the heart in order to locate the abnormal electrical activity before eliminating the responsible tissue.
Most AF ablations consist of isolating the electrical pathways from the
pulmonary veins (PV) [ [http://www.clevelandclinic.org/heartcenter/pub/atrial_fibrillation/pulmonaryvein_ablation.htm The Cleveland Clinic] ] , which are located on the posterior wall of the left atrium. All other veins from the body (including neck and groin) lead to the right atrium, so in order to get to the left atrium the catheters must get across the atrial septum. This is done by piercing a small hole in the septal wall. This is called a transseptal approach. Once in the left atrium, the physician may perform "Wide Area Circumferential Ablation" (WACA) to electrically isolate the PVs from the left atrium. [ [http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/532503_2 Medscape] ]
Some more recent approaches to ablating AF is to target sites that are particularly disorganized in both atria as well as in the
coronary sinus(CS). These sites are termed "complex fractionated atrial electrogram" (CFAE) sites. [cite journal | author= Nademanee K, McKenzie J, Kosar E, Schwab M, Sunsaneewitayakul B, Vasavakul T, Khunnawat C, Ngarmukos T. | title=A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year=2004 | pages=2044–53 | volume=43 | issue=11 | pmid= 15172410 | doi= 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.054] . It is believed by some that the CFAE sites are the cause of AF, or a combination of the PVs and CFAE sites are to blame. New techniques include the use of cryoablation(tissue freezing using a coolant which flows through the catheter), microwave ablation, where tissue is ablated by the microwave energy "cooking" the adjacent tissue, and high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), which destroys tissue by heating. This is an area of active research, especially with respect to the RF ablation technique and emphasis on isolating the pulmonary veins that enter into the left atrium.
Efficacy and risks of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation are areas of active debate. A worldwide survey of the outcomes of 8745 ablation procedures [cite journal | author=Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, Kim YH, Klein G, Packer D, Skanes A. | title=Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation | journal=Circulation | year=2005 | volume=111 | pages=1100–1105| pmid=15723973 | doi=10.1161/01.CIR.0000157153.30978.67] demonstrated a 52% success rate (ranging from 14.5% to 76.5% among centers), with an additional 23.9% of patients becoming asymptomatic with addition of an antiarrhythmic medication. In 27.3% of patients, more than one procedure was required to attain these results. There was at least one major complication in 6% of patients. A thorough discussion of results of catheter ablation was published in 2007 [cite journal | author=Calkins H, Brugada J, Packer DL, Cappato R, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Davies DW, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jais P, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Lindsay BD, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Natale A, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ. | title=HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation | journal=Heart Rhythm | year=2007 | volume=4 | issue=6 | pages= 816–61 | pmid=17556213] ; it notes that results are widely variable, due in part to differences in technique, follow-up, definitions of success, use of antiarrhythmic therapy, and in experience and technical proficiency.
urgical Maze procedure
James Cox, MD, and associates developed the
Cox maze procedure, an open-heart surgical procedure intended to eliminate atrial fibrillation, and performed the first one in 1987. "Maze" refers to the series of incisions made in the atria, which are arranged in a maze-like pattern. The intention was to eliminate AF by using incisional scars to block abnormal electrical circuits (atrial macroreentry) that AF requires. This procedure required an extensive series of endocardial (from the inside of the heart) incisions through both atria, a median sternotomy (vertical incision through the breastbone) and cardiopulmonary bypass (heart-lung machine). A series of improvements were made, culminating in 1992 in the Cox maze III procedure, which is now considered to be the "gold standard" for effective surgical cure of AF. The Cox maze III is sometimes referred to as the "traditional maze", the "cut and sew maze", or simply the "maze". [cite journal |author=Cox JL, Schuessler RB, Lappas DG, Boineau JP |title=An 8 1/2-year clinical experience with surgery for atrial fibrillation |journal=Ann. Surg. |volume=224 |issue=3 |pages=267–73; discussion 273–5 |year=1996 |pmid=8813255|doi=10.1097/00000658-199609000-00003] Minimazesurgery is minimally invasive cardiac surgery similarly intended to cure atrial fibrillation. The "minimaze" procedures are "mini" versions of the original Cox maze procedure. These procedures are less invasive than the Cox maze procedureand do not require a median sternotomy (vertical incision in the breastbone) or cardiopulmonary bypass(heart-lung machine). They use laser, cryothermy, radiofrequency, or acoustic energy to ablate atrial tissue near the pulmonary veins and make other required ablations to mimic the maze.
[http://www.rwjuh.edu/medical_services/min_invasive_atrial_fibrillation.html Minimally Invasive Surgical (Endoscopic) Procedures] are now routinely conducted at hospitals around the country. The endoscopic surgical procedure approach was developed by Adam Saltman, MD in the early 2000s. [cite journal |author=Saltman AE, Rosenthal LS, Francalancia NA, Lahey SJ.|title=A completely endoscopic approach to microwave ablation for atrial fibrillation. |journal= Heart Surg Forum |volume=6 |issue=3 |pages=38–41 |year=2003 |pmid=12821436|]
Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia found in clinical practice. It also accounts for 1/3 of hospital admissions for cardiac rhythm disturbances, and the rate of admissions for AF has risen in recent years.cite journal | author=Friberg J, Buch P, Scharling H, Gadsbphioll N, Jensen GB. | title=Rising rates of hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation | journal=Epidemiology | year=2003 | volume=14 | issue=6 | pages=666–72 | pmid=14569181 | doi=10.1097/01.ede.0000091649.26364.c0] Approximately 2.2 million individuals in the United States and 4.5 million in the European Union have AF. [cite journal |author=Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, "et al" |title=Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study |journal=JAMA |volume=285 |issue=18 |pages=2370–5 |year=2001 |pmid=11343485|doi=10.1001/jama.285.18.2370]
The incidence of atrial fibrillation increases with age. The prevalence in individuals over the age of 80 is about 8%. [cite journal |author=Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Gardin JM, Smith VE, Rautaharju PM |title=Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects (the Cardiovascular Health Study) |journal=Am. J. Cardiol. |volume=74 |issue=3 |pages=236–41 |year=1994 |pmid=8037127|doi=10.1016/0002-9149(94)90363-8] In developed countries, the number of patients with atrial fibrillation is likely to increase during the next 50 years, due to the growing proportion of elderly individuals. [cite journal | author=Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, Singer DE | title=Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study | journal=JAMA | year=2001 | pages=2370–5 | volume=285 | issue=18 | doi=10.1001/jama.285.18.2370 | pmid=11343485 PMID 11343485]
Because the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation requires measurement of the electrical activity of the heart, atrial fibrillation was not truly described until 1874, when
Edmé Félix Alfred Vulpianobserved the irregular atrial electrical behavior that he termed "fremissement fibrillaire" in dog hearts. [Vulpian A. (1874). Note sur les effets de la faradisation directe des ventricules du coeur chez le chien. "Archives de Physiologie Normale et Pathologique" 6:975.] In the mid-eighteenth century, Jean-Baptiste de Sénacmade note of dilated, irritated atria in people with mitral stenosis. [McMichael J. (1982). History of atrial fibrillation 1628-1819 Harvey-de Senac-Laennec. "Br Heart J" 48: 193-7. PMID 7049202.] The irregular pulse associated with AF was first recorded in 1876 by Carl Wilhelm Hermann Nothnagel and termed "delirium cordis", stating that " [I] n this form of arrhythmia the heartbeats follow each other in complete irregularity. At the same time, the height and tension of the individual pulse waves are continuously changing". [Nothnagel H. (1876). Ueber arythmische Herzthatigkeit. "Deutsches Archiv fur Klinische Medizin" 17: 190-220.] Correlation of delirium cordis with the loss of atrial contraction as reflected in the loss of "a waves" in the jugular venous pulse was made by Sir James MacKenzie in 1904. [MacKenzie J. (1904). The inception of the rhythm of the heart by the ventricle. "Br Med J" 1: 529-36.] Willem Einthovenpublished the first ECG showing AF in 1906. [Einthoven W. (1906). Le telecardiogramme. "Archives Internationales de Physiologie" 4: 132-64.] The connection between the anatomic and electrical manifestations of AF and the irregular pulse of delirium cordis was made in 1909 by Carl Julius Rothberger, Heinrich Winterberg, and Sir Thomas Lewis. [Rothberger CJ, Winterberg H. (1909). Vorhofflimmern und Arhythmia perpetua. "Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift" 22: 839-44] [Lewis T (1909). Auricular fibrillation: a common clinical condition. "Br Med J" 2: 1528] [cite journal |author=Flegel KM |title=From delirium cordis to atrial fibrillation: historical development of a disease concept |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=122 |issue=11 |pages=867–73 |year=1995 |pmid=7741373 |doi=]
* [http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4451 American Heart Association] page on atrial fibrillation
* [http://www.patient.co.uk/showdoc/23068682/ Atrial fibrillation] at patient.co.uk
* [http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/booths/AF.html Bandolier] (evidence-based medicine) resource on atrial fibrillation
* [https://online.epocrates.com/u/29111/Chronic+atrial+fibrillation Atrial fibrillation] at [https://online.epocrates.com Epocrates Online]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.