- Smooth infinitesimal analysis
Smooth infinitesimal analysis is a mathematically rigorous reformulation of the calculus in terms of
infinitesimal s. Based on the ideas ofF. W. Lawvere and employing the methods ofcategory theory , it views all functions as being continuous and incapable of being expressed in terms of discrete entities. As a theory, it is a subset ofsynthetic differential geometry .The "nilsquare" or "
nilpotent " infinitesimals are numbers "x" where "x"² = 0 is true, but "x" = 0 need not be true at the same time.This approach departs from the classical logic used in conventional mathematics by denying the
law of the excluded middle , i.e., "NOT" ("a" ≠ "b") does not have to mean "a" = "b". All functions whose domain is "R", the continuum, are continuous and infinitely differentiable. For example, one could attempt to define a discontinuous function "f"("x") with "f"("x") = 1 for "x" = 0, and "f"("x") = 0 for "x" ≠ 0. However, the domain of this function is not provably "R", since it is not provable that for any "x", either "x" = 0 or "x" ≠ 0 must hold.In typical models of smooth infinitesimal analysis, the infinitesimals are not invertible, and therefore the theory does not contain infinite numbers. However, there are also models that include invertible infinitesimals.
Other mathematical systems exist which include infinitesimals, including
nonstandard analysis and thesurreal number s. Smooth infinitesimal analysis is like nonstandard analysis in that (1) it is meant to serve as a foundation for analysis, and (2) the infinitesimal quantities do not have concrete sizes (as opposed to the surreals, in which a typical infinitesimal is 1/ω, where ω is the von Neumann ordinal). However, smooth infinitesimal analysis differs from nonstandard analysis in its use of nonclassical logic, and in lacking thetransfer principle . Some theorems of standard and nonstandard analysis are false in smooth infinitesimal analysis, including theintermediate value theorem and theBanach-Tarski paradox . Statements innonstandard analysis can be translated into statements about limits, but the same is not always true in smooth infinitesimal analysis.Intuitively, smooth infinitesimal analysis can be interpreted as describing a world in which lines are made out of infinitesimally small segments, not out of points. These segments can be thought of as being long enough to have a definite direction, but not long enough to be curved. The construction of discontinuous functions fails because a function is identified with a curve, and the curve cannot be constructed pointwise. We can imagine the intermediate value theorem's failure as resulting from the ability of an infinitesimal segment to straddle a line. Similarly, the Banach-Tarski paradox fails because a volume cannot be taken apart into points.
ee also
*
Category theory
*Non-classical analysis
*Synthetic differential geometry Further reading
*Bell, John L., [http://publish.uwo.ca/~jbell/invitation%20to%20SIA.pdf Invitation to Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis] (PDF file)
*Bell, John L., "A Primer of Infinitesimal Analysis", Cambridge University Press, 1998.
*Moerdijk, I. and Reyes, G.E., "Models for Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis", Springer-Verlag, 1991.External links
*Michael O'Connor, [http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.3307 An Introduction to Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.