- ING 4727
ING 4727 was a
barge belonging toIngram Barge Company that became infamous when it went over or through alevee and landed in a residential neighborhood ofNew Orleans, Louisiana duringHurricane Katrina .Background and specifications
ING 4727 was built in
1990 . It is a dry cargo cover-top barge with a steel hull. It has an overall length of 200 feet (61 m), a beam of 35 feet (10.7 m) and a height of 12 feet (3.7 m), plus a coaming height of approximately 4 feet (1.2 m) above the deck. Thefiberglass covers atop the hopper add another approximately 5 feet (1.5 m) of height. The cargo hopper yields 84659 cubes of volume. Fully loaded to a draft of 10 feet (3 m), the barge can carry 1877 tons of cargo. Light (empty) draft is 1 foot 4 & 1/2 inches (0.4 m). [cite web | author=Ingram Barge Company| year=2005| title=Ingram Draft Registers | format=PDF | url=http://www.ingrambarge.com/additional/Ingram_Draft_Registers.pdf | accessdate=2006-01-18]ING 4727 and Hurricane Katrina
Shortly before Katrina, ING 4727 was under charter by
Lafarge North America , having recently delivered a load ofcement , and was reportedly empty just before the storm. ING 4727 was reportedly in theMississippi River-Gulf Outlet Canal in New Orleans when the storm hit. [cite journal | title=Breakaway Barge Follow-up | journal=GCMA News | date=November/December 2005 | issue=35 | url=http://www.gulfcoastmariners.org/newsletters/novdec2005_35/newsletternovdec_2005_35.htm#breakway%20barge | format=Dead link|date=May 2008 ] Evidently not secured adequately forhurricane conditions, the barge found its way into theIndustrial Canal (also known as the Inner Harbor Navigational Canal) where it went through (or caused -- see below) a breach into theLower 9th Ward neighborhood.While many other vessels in southeast Louisiana broke their moorings during the storm, ING 4727 became particularly notable both due to its size and because of where it landed. Although its dimensions are standard for barges in commerce on the
Mississippi River System (of which the Industrial Canal is a part), it is larger than most houses. [cite web | title=Barges and Tugboats | work=Coosa-Alabama River Improvement Association | url=http://www.caria.org/barges_tugboats.html | accessdate=2006-03-08] During and right after the storm, ING 4727 was moved around by currents in the flooded neighborhood, smashing houses and cars beneath it in an area of several city blocks.peculation on the barge's role
Many locals blame the barge for the catastrophic inundation of the area. Some lawyers have blamed the barge, including its owners and the cement terminal that had moored the barge and which had the barge in its care, custody, and control at the time of the hurricane.
A week after the storm Army Corps of Engineers project manager Al Naomi gave his preliminary impression, saying, "One would think it's the barge that did it," and confirming that the barge striking the floodwalls would have "precipitated a tremendous collapse". [cite journal | author= | title=Corps trying to find reasons for collapse | journal=Times-Picayune | date=
6 September 2005 | url=http://www.nola.com/weblogs/print.ssf?/mtlogs/nola_tporleans/archives/print077196.html ] However, in the preliminary report presented to Congress, experts say that the barge was drawn through an existing hole in the floodwall, and that it was the topping of the Industrial Canal floodwall, not the barge, that caused the break. [cite paper | author=Seed, R.B. "et al" | title=Preliminary Report on the Performance of the New Orleans Levee Systems in Hurricane Katrina | date=17 November 2005 | url=http://hsgac.senate.gov/_files/Katrina/Preliminary_Report.pdf ] The LSU report subsequently found that overtopping did not occur, rather, design failures precipited the levee failures.By late 2007, several investigations were completed that included analysis of the question of whether the barge had a causative role in one or more of the failures in the floodwalls atop the Industrial Canal levees, or whether it came into the city from an already-existing breach. The investigators funded by the National Science Foundation -- from the University of California at Berkeley -- concluded that the barge went through an already-existing breach caused by foundation failure of the floodwall. Another group of investigators, funded by the State of Louisiana, came to the same conclusion. Finally, a $20 million study, funded by the Department of Defense/United States Army Corps of Engineers, blamed the Industrial Canal levee failures on overtopping of the floodwalls by the storm surge and resulting scour and undermining of the foundation -- not the barge.
There is also speculation that the barge may have caused the other nearby breaches in the Industrial Canal by striking the floodwalls on the other side before bouncing back and going all the way through the levee near the end of Prieur Street, although all the scientists and engineers who investigated the failures regard such speculation as dubious and without any evidentiary basis.
After Katrina
As the Lower 9th Ward was dewatered, ING 4727 at first came to rest atop a number of house sites on the east side of Jourdan Avenue.
Hurricane Rita , however, subsequently raised the water level in the Industrial Canal sufficiently to top the still-incomplete levee repairs, reflooding the area and refloating the barge.As waters were again drained from the area, the barge came to rest a few dozen yards from its earlier location, diagonally across Jourdan Avenue near the intersection of North Roman Street, partially atop former homes and a school bus.
In the months after Katrina, the barge became a morbid tourist attraction for those interested in the devastation.
On
22 February 2006 , salvage work began which lifted the barge approximately 4 feet (1.2 m) into the air using inflatable bags so that the bottom of the vessel could be inspected for damage, and on24 February Titan Maritime began the process of cutting up and removing it from the area. A number of pieces were under court order to be preserved as evidence in pending lawsuits, [cite journal | author=Gwen Filosa | title=A symbol of the storm finally being carted away | journal=Times-Picayune | date=24 February 2006 | url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-5/114076415339890.xml ] although that order has been modified to allow for the disposal of all remaining portions of the barge Fact|date=April 2008. Removal of the pieces of the barge from the Lower 9th Ward was completed the third week of March, 2006.On 4 June, 2007, a Federal trial looking into possible liability of Ingram and other parties for damage from the barge began in New Orleans. [cite journal | author=Associated Press report | title=Barge At Center Of Post-Katrina Lawsuit | journal=WDSU | date=
5 March 2007 | url=http://www.wdsu.com/news/13441889/detail.html?rss=no&psp=news ] [cite journal | author=Gwen Filosa | title=Testimony Begins in Barge Case | journal=Times-Picayune | date=6 March 2007 | url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/06/testimony_begins_in_barge_case.html ]On March 31, 2008, Judge Helen Berrigan, Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, issued an Opinion that exonerated the barge owner, Ingram Barge Company, from any liability for the ING 4727 breaking free of its moorings during or after Hurricane Katrina passed through the New Orleans area. [cite journal | author= Associated Press| title=La.: Judge exonerates Ingram Barge | journal=Forbes | date=
2 April 2008 | url=http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2008/04/02/afx4845949.html ]ee also
*
Effect of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans
*Levee failures in Greater New Orleans, 2005
*Alternative theories regarding Hurricane Katrina Notes
External links
* [http://www.ingrambarge.com/ Ingram Barge Company]
* [http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=29.970504&lon=-90.022587&z=19&r=0&src=aska Aerial photograph of barge]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.