- Italian War of 1542–1546
Infobox Military Conflict
conflict= Italian War of 1542–46
partof= theItalian Wars
caption= TheSiege of Nice in 1543 (drawing by Toselli, after an engraving by Aeneas Vico)
date= 1542–46
place=England ,France ,Italy ,Spain , and theLow Countries
result= Inconclusive
combatant1=
combatant2=
commander1=
commander2=
notes=* Personal union including Spain and theHoly Roman Empire The Italian War of 1542–46 was a conflict late in the
Italian Wars , pittingFrancis I of France andSuleiman I of theOttoman Empire against theHoly Roman Emperor Charles V and Henry VIII of England. The course of the war saw extensive fighting inItaly , France, and theLow Countries , as well as attempted invasions ofSpain and England; but, although the conflict was ruinously expensive for the major participants, its outcome was inconclusive.The war arose from the failure of the
Truce of Nice , which ended theItalian War of 1536–38 , to resolve the long-standing conflict between Charles and Francis—particularly their conflicting claims to theDuchy of Milan . Having found a suitable pretext, Francis once again declared war against his perpetual enemy in 1542. Fighting began at once throughout the Low Countries; the following year saw a joint Franco-Ottoman attack onNice , as well as a series of maneuvers in northern Italy which culminated in the bloodyBattle of Ceresole . Charles and Henry then proceeded to invade France, but the longsiege s ofBoulogne-sur-Mer andSaint-Dizier prevented a decisive offensive against the French.Charles came to terms with Francis by the Treaty of Crépy in late 1544, but the death of Francis's younger son, the Duke of Orléans—whose proposed marriage to a relative of the Emperor was the cornerstone of the treaty—made it moot less than a year afterwards. Henry, left alone but unwilling to return Boulogne to the French, continued to fight until 1546, when the Treaty of Ardres finally restored peace between France and England. The deaths of Francis and Henry in early 1547 left the resolution of the Italian Wars to their heirs.
Prelude
The Truce of Nice, which ended the
Italian War of 1536–38 , provided little resolution to the long conflict between the Holy Roman Emperor and the King of France; although hostilities had ended, giving way to a cautious entente, neither monarch was satisfied with the war's outcome. Francis continued to harbor a desire for theDuchy of Milan , to which he held a dynastic claim; Charles, for his part, insisted that Francis comply at last with the terms of the Treaty of Madrid, which had been forced on the French king during his captivity in Spain after theItalian War of 1521–1526 . [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 385–387.] Other conflicting claims to various territories—Charles's to Burgundy and Francis's to Naples and Flanders, among others—remained a matter of contention as well.Negotiations between the two powers continued through 1538 and into 1539. In 1539, Francis invited Charles—who faced a rebellion in the Low Countries—to travel through France on his way north from Spain. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 389–391.] Charles accepted, and was richly received; but while he was willing to discuss religious matters with his host, he delayed on the question of political differences, and nothing had been decided by the time he left French territory. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 391–393. Knecht writes that "the Emperor's itinerary from Loches northwards had evidently been devised to show him the principal artistic achievements of [Francis's] reign.... no expense had been spared to make his stay memorable" (Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 392).]
In March 1540, Charles proposed to settle the matter by having
Maria of Spain marry Francis's younger son, the Duke of Orléans; the two would then inherit theNetherlands ,Burgundy , andCharolais after the Emperor's death. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 394. The proposal specified, however, that the territories would revert to theHabsburg line if Mary died childless. Several other marriages between the Habsburg andValois were also considered—notably one between Charles's son Phillip and Jeanne d'Albret.] Francis, meanwhile, was to renounce his claims to the duchies of Milan and Savoy, ratify the treaties of Madrid and Cambrai, and join an alliance with Charles. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 394. Knecht, citing Brandi, terms the proposed alliance "a league in defence of Christendom" (Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 394).] Francis, considering the loss of Milan too large a price to pay for future possession of the Netherlands and unwilling to ratify the treaties in any case, made his own offer; on 24 April, he agreed to surrender the Milanese claim in exchange for immediate receipt of the Netherlands. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 394–395.] The negotiations continued for weeks, but made no progress, and were abandoned in June 1540. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 395. The failure of the negotiations led to the downfall ofAnne de Montmorency , who had been their chief proponent; for more details, see Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 395–397.]Francis soon began gathering new allies to his cause. Duke
Wilhelm of Jülich-Cleves-Berg , who was engaged in a dispute with Charles over the succession inGuelders , sealed his alliance with Francis by marrying Francis's niece,Jeanne d'Albret . [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 396.] Francis sought an alliance with theSchmalkaldic League as well, but the League demurred; by 1542, the remaining potential French allies in northern Germany had reached their own understandings with the Emperor. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 478. Among other factors, the German Protestants were critical of the treatment accorded to theHuguenots in France.] French efforts farther east were more fruitful;Suleiman I of theOttoman Empire , seeking to distract Charles from Ottoman advances inHungary , encouraged the Franco-Imperial rift. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 478–479.]On 4 July 1541, however, the French ambassador to the Ottoman court, Rincon, was killed by Imperial troops as he was travelling near
Pavia . [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 479. Also killed was one Cesare Fregoso, a diplomat in French employ on his way toVenice .] In response to Francis's protests, Charles denied all responsibility, promising to conduct an inquiry with the assistance of the Pope; he had by now formed plans for a campaign inAfrica , and wished to avoid further entanglements in Europe. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 479. The Pope's intervention was requested by Francis himself.]By the end of September 1541, Charles was in
Majorca , preparing an attack onAlgiers ; Francis, considering it impolitic to attack a fellow Christian who was fighting the infidel, promised not to declare war for as long as the Emperor was campaigning. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 479.] The Imperial expedition, however, was entirely unsuccessful; storms scattered the invasion fleet soon after the initial landing, and Charles had returned to Spain with the remainder of his troops by November. [Arnold, "Renaissance at War", 144–145; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 479. The Imperial troops abandoned their horses—those they had not been forced to eat—and their guns as they evacuated.] On 8 March 1542, the new French ambassador returned fromConstantinople with promises of Ottoman aid in a war against Charles. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 479.] Francis declared war on 12 July, naming various injuries as the causes; among them was Rincon's murder, which he proclaimed "an injury so great, so detestable and so strange to those who bear the title and quality of prince that it cannot be in any way forgiven, suffered or endured". [Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 72; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 479–480..]Initial moves and the Treaty of Venlo
The French immediately launched a two-front offensive against Charles. In the north, the Duke of Orléans attacked
Luxembourg , briefly capturing the city; in the south, a larger army underClaude d'Annebault and Francis's eldest son, the Dauphin Henry, unsuccessfully besieged the city ofPerpignan in northern Spain. [Black, "European Warfare", 80; Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 72; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 480.] Francis himself was meanwhile inLa Rochelle , dealing with a revolt caused by popular discontent with a proposed reform of the "gabelle " tax. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 480. For more details of the "gabelle" revolt, see Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 480–483.]By this point, relations between Francis and Henry VIII were collapsing. Henry—already angered by the French refusal to pay the various pensions, which were owed to him under the terms of past treaties—was now faced with the potential of French interference in
Scotland , where he was entangled in the midst of an attempt to marry his son toMary, Queen of Scots , that would develop into the open warfare of the "Rough Wooing ". [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 486.] He had intended to begin a war against Francis in the summer of 1543, but negotiating a treaty to that effect with the Emperor proved difficult; since Henry was, in Charles's eyes, a schismatic, the Emperor could not promise to defend him against attack, nor sign any treaty which referred to him as the head of the Church—both points upon which Henry insisted. [Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 388–389. The matter of royal style was finally resolved by referring to Henry as "Defender of the Faith, etc." in the final documents.] Negotiations continued for weeks; finally, on 11 February 1543, Henry and Charles signed a treaty of offensive alliance, pledging to invade France within two years. [Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 72; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 486; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 388–389.] In May 1543, Henry sent Francis an ultimatum threatening war within twenty days; and, on 22 June, at last declared war. [Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 72; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 486; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 389. Elton argues that the only explanation for this move is that Henry believed his Scottish entanglements to be concluded (Elton, "England Under the Tudors", 194).]Hostilities now flared up across northern France. On Henry's orders,
Sir John Wallop crossed the Channel toCalais with an army of 5,000 men, to be used in the defense of the Low Countries. [Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 389.] The French, under Antoine de Bourbon, Duke of Vendôme, had capturedLillers in April; by June, d'Annebault had takenLandrecies as well. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 486–487.] Wilhelm of Cleves openly joined the war on Francis's side, invadingBrabant , and fighting began inArtois and Hainaut. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 486.] Francis inexplicably halted with his army nearRheims ; in the meantime, Charles attacked Wilhelm, invading theDuchy of Julich and capturing Düren. [Black, "European Warfare", 80; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 487.]Concerned about the fate of his ally, Francis ordered the Duke of Orléans and d'Annebault to attack Luxembourg, which they took on 10 September; but it was too late for Wilhelm, as he had already surrendered on 7 September, signing the Treaty of Venlo with Charles. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 487. Wilhelm's surrender made his marriage to Jeanne d'Albret pointless, and it was annulled in 1545.] By the terms of this treaty, Wilhelm was to concede the overlordship of
Guelders andZutphen to Charles, and to assist him in suppressing the Reformation. [Blockmans and Prevenier, "Promised Lands", 232; Hughes, "Early Modern Germany", 57.] Charles now advanced to besiege Landrecies, seeking battle with Francis; but, after a brief standoff, Francis withdrew toSaint-Quentin on 4 November, leaving the Emperor free to march north and seizeCambrai . [Black, "European Warfare", 80; Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 72; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 487.]Nice and Ceresole
On the Mediterranean, meanwhile, other engagements were underway. In April 1543, the Sultan had placed
Hayreddin Barbarossa 's fleet at the disposal of the French king. Barbarossa left theDardanelles with more than a hundredgalley s, raided his way up the Italian coast, and in July arrived inMarseilles , where he was welcomed by François de Bourbon, Count of Enghien, the commander of the French fleet. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 487.] On 6 August, the joint Franco-Ottoman fleet anchored off the Imperial city ofNice and landed troops at Villefranche; a siege of the city followed. [Arnold, "Renaissance at War", 180; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 487–488.] Nice fell on 22 August, although the citadel held out until the siege was lifted on 8 September. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 488–489.]Barbarossa was by this point becoming a liability; on 6 September, he had threatened to depart if he were not given the means with which to resupply his fleet. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 489.] In response, Francis ordered that the population of
Toulon —except for "heads of households"—be expelled, and that the city then be given to Barbarossa, who used it as a base for his army of 30,000 for the next eight months. [Arnold, "Renaissance at War", 180; Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 72–73; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 489. The Ottomans opened amosque and aslave market in the city, shocking European observers—who were, however, favorably impressed by the strict discipline of the Ottoman troops.] Yet Francis, increasingly embarrassed by the Ottoman presence, was unwilling to help Barbarossa recaptureTunis ; so the Ottoman fleet sailed forIstanbul in May 1544, pillaging the Neapolitan coast along the way. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 489; Setton, "Papacy and the Levant", 472–473. Knecht gives the date of the fleet's departure as 23 May, while Setton cites 26 May. Setton also notes that the Sultan, told by the French ambassador of the affair, "promised to pay for the supplies with which his fleet had been furnished" (Setton, "Papacy and the Levant", 473).]In
Piedmont , meanwhile, a stalemate had developed between the French, under the Sieur de Boutières, and the Imperial army, underAlfonso d'Avalos ; d'Avalos had captured the fortress ofCarignano , and the French had besieged it, hoping to force the Imperial army into a decisive battle. During the winter of 1543–44, Francis significantly reinforced his army, placing Enghien in command. D'Avalos, also heavily reinforced, advanced to relieve Carignano; and, on 11 April 1544, Enghien and d'Avalos fought one of the few pitched battles of the period at Ceresole. Although the French were victorious, the impending invasion of France itself by Charles and Henry forced Francis to recall much of his army from Piedmont, leaving Enghien without the troops he needed to take Milan. D'Avalos's victory over an Italian mercenary army in French service at theBattle of Serravalle in early June 1544 brought significant campaigning in Italy to an end.France invaded
On 31 December 1543, Henry and Charles had signed a treaty pledging to invade France in person by 20 June 1544; each was to provide an army of no less than 35,000 infantry and 7,000 cavalry for the venture. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 490; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 389.] Against this Francis could muster about 70,000 men in his various armies. [The number was a record high for the whole century; see John A. Lynn, "Recalculating French Army Growth during the "Grand Siêcle", 1610–1715", in Rogers, "Military Revolution", 117–148.] The campaign could not begin, however, until Henry and Charles had resolved their personal conflicts with Scotland and the German princes, respectively. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 490.] On 15 May, Henry was informed by the Edward Seymour, Earl of Hertford, that, after his raids, Scotland was no longer in a position to threaten him; he then began to make preparations for a personal campaign in France—against the advice of his council and the Emperor, who believed that his presence would be a hindrance. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 490; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 393–394.] Charles had meanwhile reached an understanding with the princes at the Diet of Speyer, and the Electors of Saxony and Brandenburg had agreed to join his invasion of France. [Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 73; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 490. Francis attempted to dispatch an embassy to the Diet, but was denied a safe-conduct; Knecht writes that his herald "was sent home after being told that he deserved to be hanged" (Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 490).]
By May 1544, two Imperial armies were massed to invade France: one, under Ferrante Gonzaga, Viceroy of Sicily, north of Luxemburg; the other, under Charles himself, in the
Palatinate . [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 490.] On 25 May, Gonzaga captured Luxembourg and moved towardsCommercy andLigny , issuing a proclamation that the Emperor had come to overthrow "a tyrant allied to the Turks". [Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 73; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 490–491.] On 8 July, Gonzaga besieged Saint-Dizier; Charles and the second Imperial army soon joined him. [Black, "European Warfare", 81; Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 73; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 491.]Henry, meanwhile, had sent an army of some 40,000 men to Calais under the joint command of Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk, and Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk. [Black, "European Warfare", 81; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 491; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 394.] While Henry continued to squabble with the Emperor over the goals of the campaign and his own presence in France, this massive army moved slowly and aimlessly into French territory. [Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 394. Scarisbrick relates that Norfolk wrote to the Privy Council that "he had expected to know, before this, where he was supposed to be going" (Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 394).] Finally, Henry decided that the army was to be split. Norfolk, ordered to besiege
Ardres orMontreuil , advanced towards the latter; but he proved unable to mount an effective siege, complaining of inadequate supplies and poor organization. [Black, "European Warfare", 81; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 491; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 394–395.] Suffolk was ordered to attack Boulogne; on 14 July, Henry crossed to Calais and moved to join him. [Elton, "England Under the Tudors", 195; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 491; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 395. Henry could not ride, and was carried in a litter; Elton notes that "at fifty-four Henry was in fact an old man" (Elton, "England Under the Tudors", 195).] The Siege of Boulogne began on 19 July—despite the protests of the Emperor, who insisted that Henry should advance towards Paris. [Arnold, "Renaissance at War", 180; Black, "European Warfare", 81; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 491; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 395.]Charles himself, on the other hand, was still delayed at Saint-Dizier; the city, fortified by
Girolamo Marini and defended by Louis IV de Bueil, Count of Sancerre, continued to hold out against the massive Imperial army. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 491. Knecht notes that Marini was "one of the best military engineers of his day" (Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 491).] On 24 July, Charles capturedVitry , from which French forces had harassed his supply lines; finally, on 8 August, the defenders of Saint-Dizier, running low on supplies, sought terms. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 491.] On 17 August, the French capitulated, and were permitted by the Emperor to leave the city with banners flying; their resistance for 41 days had broken the Imperial offensive. [Arnold, "Renaissance at War", 180; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 491.] Some of Charles's advisers suggested withdrawing, but he was unwilling to lose face and continued to move towards Châlons, although the Imperial army was prevented from advancing across theMarne by a French force waiting atJâlons . [Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 73; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 491–492.] The Imperial troops marched rapidly through Champagne, capturingÉpernay ,Châtillon-sur-Marne ,Château-Thierry , andSoissons . [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 492.]The French made no attempts to intercept Charles. Troops under
Jacques de Montgomery, Sieur de Lorges , sackedLagny-sur-Marne , whose citizens had allegedly rebelled; but no attempt was made to engage the advancing Imperial army. [Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 73; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 492.] Paris was gripped by panic, although Francis insisted that the population had nothing to fear. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 492–493.] Charles finally halted his advance and turned back on 11 September. [Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 73; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 493.] Henry, meanwhile, was personally directing the besiegers at Boulogne; the town fell in early September, and a breach was made into the castle on 11 September. [Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 395. Henry apparently greatly enjoyed the proceedings of the siege.] The defenders finally surrendered a few days later. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 493; Phillips, "Testing the 'Mystery'", 47; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 395.]Treaty of Crépy
Charles, short on funds and needing to deal with increasing religious unrest in Germany, asked Henry to continue his invasion or to allow him to make a separate peace. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 493.] By the time Henry had received the Emperor's letter, however, Charles had already concluded a treaty with Francis—the Peace of Crépy—which was signed by representatives of the monarchs at
Crépy-en-Laonnais in Picardie on 18 September 1544. [Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 74; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 493.] The treaty had been promoted at the French court by the Emperor's sister, Queen Eleanor, and by Francis's mistress, the Duchess of Étampes. By its terms, Francis and Charles would each abandon their various conflicting claims and restore the "status quo" of 1538; the Emperor would relinquish his claim to theDuchy of Burgundy and the King of France would do the same for theKingdom of Naples , as well as renouncing his claims as suzerain ofFlanders andArtois . [Armstrong, "Emperor Charles V", 28.] The Duke of Orléans would marry either Charles's daughter Mary or his niece Anna; the choice was to be made by Charles. In the first case, the bride would receive the Netherlands andFranche-Comté as a dowry; in the second, Milan. Francis, meanwhile, was to grant the duchies of Bourbon,Châtellerault , andAngoulême to his son; he would also abandon his claims to the territories of theDuchy of Savoy , including Piedmont and Savoy itself. Finally, Francis would assist Charles against the Ottomans—but not, officially, against the heretics in his own domains. [Armstrong, "Emperor Charles V", 28–29; Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 74; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 493. Charles was to make the choice of bride within four months of the treaty.] A second, secret accord was also signed; by its terms, Francis would assist Charles with reforming the church, with calling aGeneral Council , and with suppressing Protestantism—by force if necessary. [Blockmans, "Emperor Charles V", 74; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 493. Blockmans notes that Francis pledged to provide 10,000 infantry and 400 cavalry to Charles for a venture against the Protestants.]The treaty was poorly received by the Dauphin, who felt that his brother was being favored over him; by Henry VIII, who believed that Charles had betrayed him; and by the Sultan. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 493–494; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 396. Knecht, citing Rozet, Lembey, and Charriere, notes that the Sultan "nearly had the French ambassador impaled" (Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 494).] Francis would fulfill some of the terms; but the death of the Duke of Orléans in 1545 rendered the treaty moot. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 494.]
Boulogne and England
The conflict between Francis and Henry continued. The Dauphin's army advanced on Montreuil, forcing Norfolk to raise the siege; Henry himself returned to England at the end of September 1544, ordering Norfolk and Suffolk to defend Boulogne. [Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 395–396.] The two dukes quickly disobeyed this order and withdrew the bulk of the English army to Calais, leaving some 4,000 men to defend the captured city. [Phillips, "Testing the 'Mystery'", 47; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 396–397.] The English army, outnumbered, was now trapped in Calais; the Dauphin, left unopposed, concentrated his efforts on besieging Boulogne. [Elton, "England Under the Tudors", 195; Phillips, "Testing the 'Mystery'", 47, 51–52; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 397.] On 9 October, a French assault nearly captured the city, but was beaten back when the troops prematurely turned to looting. [Arnold, "Renaissance at War", 180; Phillips, "Testing the 'Mystery'", 48–50.] Peace talks were attempted at Calais without result; Henry refused to consider returning Boulogne, and insisted that Francis abandon his support of the Scots. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 501; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 397–398.] Charles, who had been appointed as a mediator between Francis and Henry, was meanwhile drawn into his own disputes with the English king. [Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 398–399.]
Francis now embarked on a more dramatic attempt to force Henry's hand—an attack on England itself. For this venture, an army of more than 30,000 men was assembled in Normandy, and a fleet of some 400 vessels prepared at
Le Havre , all under the command ofClaude d'Annebault . [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 502; Phillips, "Testing the 'Mystery'", 50–51. Although d'Annebault bore the title of "Admiral", he had no experience in naval warfare.] On 31 May 1545, a French expeditionary force landed in Scotland. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 501–502.] In early July, the English under John Dudley, Viscount Lisle, mounted an attack on the French fleet, but had little success due to poor weather; nevertheless, the French suffered from a string of accidents: d'Annebault's first flagship burned, and his second ran aground. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 502.] Finally leaving Le Havre on 16 July, the massive French fleet entered theSolent on 19 July and briefly engaged the English fleet, to no apparent effect; the major casualty of the skirmish, the "Mary Rose ", sank accidentally. [Elton, "England Under the Tudors", 195; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 502; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 401.] The French landed on the Isle of Wight on 21 July, and again at Seaford on 25 July, but these operations were abortive, and the French fleet soon returned to blockading Boulogne. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 502; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 401–402.] D'Annebault made a final sortie nearBeachy Head on 15 August, but retired to port after a brief skirmish. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 502.]Treaty of Ardres
By September 1545, the war was a virtual stalemate; both sides, running low on funds and troops, unsuccessfully sought help from the German Protestants. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 502–503; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 399–400.] Henry, Francis, and Charles attempted extensive diplomatic maneuvering to break the deadlock; but none of the three trusted the others, and this had little practical effect. [Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 404–407.] In January 1546, Henry sent the Earl of Hertford to Calais, apparently preparing for an offensive; but one failed to materialize. [Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 408.]
Francis could not afford to resume a large-scale war, and Henry was concerned only for the disposition of Boulogne. Negotiations between the two resumed on 6 May. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 503; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 408.] In the end, the Treaty of Ardres—also known as the Treaty of Camp—was signed on 7 June 1546. By its terms, Henry would retain Boulogne until 1554, then return it in exchange for two million écus; in the meantime, neither side would construct fortifications in the region, and Francis would resume payment of Henry's pensions. Henry, for his part, pledged not to attack the Scots without cause. [Elton, "England Under the Tudors", 195; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 503; Phillips, "Testing the 'Mystery'", 52; Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 409.] Upon hearing the price demanded for the city, the Imperial ambassador told Henry that Boulogne would remain in English hands permanently. [Scarisbrick, "Henry VIII", 409.]
Aftermath
The war was exorbitantly expensive; for both Francis and Henry it had been the costliest conflict of their reigns. [Elton, "England Under the Tudors", 195; Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 503. The English war effort cost nearly two million pounds. Francis had needed more than two million écus for his navy alone, and was spending almost 250,000 écus per year on new fortifications.] In England, the need for funds led to what Elton terms "an unprecedented burden of taxation", as well as the systematic
debasement of coinage. [Elton, "England Under the Tudors", 195.] Francis also imposed a series of new taxes and instituted several financial reforms. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 504–507.] He was not, therefore, in a position to assist the German Protestants, who were now engaged in theSchmalkaldic War against the Emperor; by the time any French aid was to be forthcoming, Charles had already won his victory at theBattle of Muhlberg . [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 517–518. Knecht writes that "in November [1546] , Annebault declared that the imperial alliance needed to be preserved at all costs, regardless of the Protestants. By January 1547, however, the military situation had become so ominous for the Protestants that Francis saw the need to strengthen their hand" (Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 518).] As for Suleiman, the conclusion of theTruce of Adrianople in 1547 brought his own struggle against theHabsburgs to a temporary halt. [Kinross, "Ottoman Centuries", 234–235.]Henry VIII died on 28 January 1547; on 31 March, Francis followed. [Knecht, "Renaissance Warrior", 541–542; Phillips, "Testing the 'Mystery'", 52.] Henry's successors continued his entanglements in Scotland; and when, in 1548, friction with the Scots led to the resumption of hostilities around Boulogne, they decided to avoid a
two-front war by returning the city four years early, in 1550. [Phillips, "Testing the 'Mystery'", 52.] The causes of the war themselves—chiefly, the contested dynastic claims in Italy—remained unresolved until the Peace of Cateau-Cambrésis brought theItalian War of 1551–59 and six decades conflict to a close.Notes
References
* Armstrong, Edward. "The Emperor Charles V". Volume 2. London: Macmillan and Co., 1902.
* Arnold, Thomas F. "The Renaissance at War". Smithsonian History of Warfare, edited byJohn Keegan . New York: Smithsonian Books / Collins, 2006. ISBN 0-06-089195-5.
* Black, Jeremy. "Dynasty Forged by Fire". "MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History" 18, no. 3 (Spring 2006): 34–43. ISSN|1040-5992.
* ———. "European Warfare, 1494–1660". Warfare and History, edited by Jeremy Black. London: Routledge, 2002. ISBN 0-415-27532-6.
* Blockmans, Wim. "Emperor Charles V, 1500–1558". Translated by Isola van den Hoven-Vardon. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN 0-340-73110-9.
* Blockmans, Wim and Walter Prevenier. "The Promised Lands: The Low Countries Under Burgundian Rule, 1369–1530". Translated by Elizabeth Fackelman. Edited by Edward Peters. The Middle Ages Series, edited by Ruth Mazo Karras. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999. ISBN 0-8122-1382-3.
* Elton, G. R. "England Under the Tudors". A History of England, edited by Felipe Fernández-Armesto. London: The Folio Society, 1997.
* Hall, Bert S. "Weapons and Warfare in Renaissance Europe: Gunpowder, Technology, and Tactics". Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997. ISBN 0-8018-5531-4.
* Hughes, Michael. "Early Modern Germany, 1477–1806". Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992. ISBN 0-8122-1427-7.
* Kinross, Patrick Balfour. "The Ottoman Centuries: The Rise and Fall of the Turkish Empire". New York: HarperCollins, 1977. ISBN 0-688-08093-6.
* Knecht, Robert J. "Renaissance Warrior and Patron: The Reign of Francis I". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. ISBN 0-521-57885-X.
* Oman, Charles. "A History of the Art of War in the Sixteenth Century". London: Methuen & Co., 1937.
* Phillips, Charles and Alan Axelrod. "Encyclopedia of Wars". Vol. 2. New York: Facts on File, 2005. ISBN 0-8160-2851-6.
* Phillips, Gervase. "Testing the 'Mystery of the English'". "MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History" 19, no. 3 (Spring 2007): 44–54. ISSN|1040-5992.
* Rogers, Clifford J., ed. "The Military Revolution Debate: Readings on the Military Transformation of Early Modern Europe". Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1995. ISBN 0-8133-2054-2.
* Scarisbrick, J. J. "Henry VIII". London: The Folio Society, 2004.
* Setton, Kenneth M. "The Papacy and the Levant (1204-1571)". Vol. 3, "The sixteenth century to the reign of Julius III". Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, 1984. ISBN 0-8716-9161-2.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.