Battle of Boroughbridge

Infobox Military Conflict
conflict=Battle of Boroughbridge
partof=


caption=Map of the battlefield.
date=16 March 1322
place=Boroughbridge, Yorkshire
result=Royal victory
combatant1=Royal forces
combatant2=Baronial forces
commander1=Andrew Harclay
commander2=Thomas of Lancaster
Humphrey de Bohun, Earl of Hereford †
Roger de Clifford
strength1=c. 4,000
strength2=c. 700+
casualties1=Unknown
casualties2=UnknownThe Battle of Boroughbridge was a battle fought on 16 March 1322 between a group of rebellious barons and King Edward II of England, near Boroughbridge, northwest of York. The culmination of a long period of antagonism between the king and Thomas, Earl of Lancaster, his most powerful subject, it resulted in Lancaster's defeat and execution. This allowed Edward to re-establish royal authority, and hold on to power for another five years.

Not in itself a part of the Wars of Scottish Independence, the battle is significant for its employment of tactics learned in the Scottish wars in a domestic, English conflict. Both the extensive use of foot soldiers rather than cavalry, and the heavy impact caused by the longbow, represented significant steps in military developments.

Background

Edward II was a weak and inefficient king, and his reign was marked by military failure and internal strife. [Prestwich (2005), p. 178.] A great number of the barony turned against the king, and the leader of the opposition eventually became Thomas of Lancaster. [Maddicott (1970), pp. 92–4.] Lancaster was Edward's cousin, and next to the king he was the richest man in the country. [Maddicott (1970), pp. 2–3, 9.] Through a set of regulations known as the Ordinances, Lancaster and his associates had been trying to put restrictions on royal authority, but by the late 1310s Edward was again in full control of central government.Citation|last=Maddicott|first=J.R|authorlink=John Maddicott|contribution=Thomas of Lancaster, second earl of Lancaster, second earl of Leicester, and earl of Lincoln (c.1278–1322)|date=2004|title=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography|publisher=Oxford University Press|place=Oxford|url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/27195|accessdate=2008-07-19] The situation was aggravated by the king's ostentatious patronage of his favourite, Hugh Despenser, and Hugh's father by the same name. [McKisack (1959), p. 58.]

In 1319, the king and Lancaster fell out during a failed campaign against Scotland. [Maddicott (1970), pp. 247–9.] The next year Lancaster refused to attend a parliament summoned by the king, and later the same year, Edward obtained papal absolution from his oath to follow the Ordinances. Meanwhile a inheritance dispute had broken out in the Welsh Marches between the Despensers and certain marcher lords, including Humphrey de Bohun, Earl of Hereford. [McKisack (1959), pp. 58–61.] Lancaster now took the initiative with the discontented. In 1321 he summoned two meetings of magnates, one at Lancaster's residence of Pontefract in March, and the other at Sherburn in June. [Maddicott (1970), pp. 268–9.] The meetings consisted of northern and marcher lords, as well as Lancaster's own retainers, but little assistance was forthcoming from the northerners. The marcher rebellion, and the threat of civil war, forced the king to exile the younger Despenser, but the favourite was recalled within weeks.

Edward now seized the initiative, and moved northwards. Lancaster convened one final meeting at Doncaster in November, and also entered into an alliance with Robert I of Scotland to strengthen his hand against the king. [Maddicott (1970), pp. 295, 302–3.] In January 1322 Edward crossed the River Severn, and secured the surrender of several of the marcher lords while Lancaster remained passive. [McKisack (1959), pp. 65–6.] The earl's most trusted retainer, Robert de Holland, then defected to the king, and as the royal army crossed the River Trent Lancaster was forced to flee north.McKisack (1959), p. 66.] On 16 March Lancaster and his army had reached Boroughbridge by the River Ure. There they were cut off by the forces of Sir Andrew Harclay, a veteran from the Scottish wars, who had gathered the levies from the counties of Cumberland and Westmorland.

The battle

When Lancaster arrived at the town of Boroughbridge, Harclay was already in possession of the bridge crossing the river. The rebel forces counted probably no more than 700 knights and men-at-arms, against the 4,000 or so soldiers in the royal army.Maddicott (1970), p. 311.] [cite web|url=http://www.battlefieldstrust.com/resource-centre/medieval/battlepageview.asp?pageid=281|title=The Armies & the Losses|publisher=The Battlefields Trust|accessdate=2008-07-19] Lancaster initially tried to negotiate, but Harclay could not be swayed. Since there was no realistic alternative place to cross the river, and with the royal forces in pursuit from the south, the rebels had no choice but to fight. The ensuing battle was short and one-sided.Prestwich (2005), p. 201.]

Harclay had deployed his men on foot to hold the bridge from the northern side.cite web|url=http://www.battlefieldstrust.com/resource-centre/medieval/battlepageview.asp?pageid=283&parentid=282|title=Deployments|publisher=The Battlefields Trust|accessdate=2008-07-19] Additional forces were placed at a nearby ford, though contemporary sources do not specify the exact location of this ford. The royal pikemen were deployed in a schiltron formation, a tactic learned from the Scots in the Scottish wars.cite journal|last=Tout|first=T.F|authorlink=Thomas Frederick Tout|date=1904|title=The Tactics of the Battles of Boroughbridge and Morlaix|journal=The English Historical Review|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|volume=19|issue=76|pages=p. 712|url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/548616|accessdate=2008-07-19] The formation proved efficient against the oncoming cavalry. The rebels divided into two columns; one led by Hereford and Roger de Clifford, attacking the bridge on foot, the other under Lancaster, trying to cross the ford by horse. According to a graphic description in the chronicle the "Brut", Hereford was killed as he crossed the bridge by a pikeman hiding underneath, who thrust his spear up through the earl's anus.cite web|url=http://www.battlefieldstrust.com/resource-centre/medieval/battlepageview.asp?pageid=284&parentid=282|title=The Action|publisher=The Battlefields Trust|accessdate=2008-07-19] Clifford was also severely injured, and that column of the army fell into disarray. Lancaster's party fared little better; under heavy archery fire his cavalry was cut off before it even reached the ford, and forced to retreat. This event shows an early – if not entirely novel – efficient use of the longbow against cavalry, a tactic which was to become central to future English military success.

Lancaster negotiated a truce with Harclay, and withdrew to the town. During the night a great number of the rebels deserted, and the next day the sheriff of York arrived from the south with additional forces. Lancaster, now greatly outnumbered and with no chance of retreat, had no choice but to surrender to Harclay. [McKisack (1959), pp. 66–7.]

Aftermath

Thomas of Lancaster was taken to Pontefract Castle, which by now had fallen to the king. There he was submitted to what was little more than a show trial, and – in front of a gathering of earls and barons – sentenced to death. [Maddicott (1970), pp. 311–2.] On 22 March he was led out of the castle and beheaded in front of a jeering crowd. [McKisack (1959), p. 67.] In the years to come, a cult emerged around the person of the late earl as a martyr, and even a possible saint. [cite journal|last=Theilmann|first=John M|date=1990|title=Political Canonization and Political Symbolism in Medieval England|journal=The Journal of British Studies|publisher=The University of Chicago Press|location=Chicago|volume=29|issue=3|pages=pp. 148–52|url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/175729|accessdate=2008-07-19] Lancaster had shown no signs of extraordinary piety or other personal abilities during his lifetime, and the cult has been interpreted as a reaction to the incompetent and oppressive reign of Edward II. [Maddicott (1970), pp. 329–30.]

Some thirty of Lancaster's followers were also executed, [cite web|url=http://www.battlefieldstrust.com/resource-centre/medieval/battlepageview.asp?pageid=285&parentid=282|title=Capture|publisher=The Battlefields Trust|accessdate=2008-07-19] among these Clifford and the baron John Mowbray. [Citation|last=Summerson|first=Henry|authorlink=|contribution=Clifford, Robert, first Lord Clifford (1274–1314)|date=2004|title=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography|publisher=Oxford University Press|place=Oxford|url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/5658|accessdate=2008-07-19] [Citation|last=Archer|first=Rowena E|authorlink=|contribution=Mowbray, John (I), second Lord Mowbray (1286–1322)|date=2004|title=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography|publisher=Oxford University Press|place=Oxford|url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/19450|accessdate=2008-07-19] As for Robert Holland, his defection saved him from execution, but his close association with Lancaster made him suspect in the eyes of the king, and he was imprisoned until 1327. The very next year he was murdered, possibly by order of Henry, Thomas's brother and heir. [Citation|last=Maddicott|first=J.R|authorlink=John Maddicott|contribution=Holland, Sir Robert (c.1283–1328)|date=2004|title=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography|publisher=Oxford University Press|place=Oxford|url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/37562|accessdate=2008-07-19]

Andrew Harclay was richly rewarded for his loyal and competent performance at Boroughbridge. On 15 March he was created earl of Carlisle, and promised lands worth 1000 marks yearly. Yet Harclay, who had turned down Lancaster's overtures to join in the rebellion, was no great adherent of the king. As a warden of the Scottish Marches he grew constantly more frustrated with the king's idleness, and eventually negotiated a peace treaty with the Scots. This action on Harclay's part amounted to treason, and early in 1323 he was apprehended by the king's men, and hanged, drawn and quartered. [Citation|last=Summerson|first=Henry|authorlink=|contribution=Harclay , Andrew, earl of Carlisle (c.1270–1323)|date=2004|title=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography|publisher=Oxford University Press|place=Oxford|url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/12235|accessdate=2008-07-19]

As for Edward II himself, his dependence on the Despensers grew only deeper, and their transgressions more severe. [cite book|last=Fryde|first=N.M|title=The Tyranny and Fall of Edward II, 1321–1326|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|date=1979|isbn=052122201X] In 1327, his wife Isabella, together with her lover Roger Mortimer, staged a coup against the king. Edward II was deposed and his son, Edward III, succeeded in his place. [Prestwich (2005), pp. 213–20.]

References

ources

*cite book|first=May|last=McKisack|authorlink=May McKisack|title=The Fourteenth Century: 1307–1399|edition=|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|year=1959|id=ISBN 0-19-821712-9
*cite book |first=J. R.|last=Maddicott|authorlink=John Maddicott|title=Thomas of Lancaster, 1307–1322: A study in the reign of Edward II |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |year=1970 |isbn=0198218370
*cite book|first=M.C.|last=Prestwich|authorlink=Michael Prestwich|title=Plantagenet England: 1225–1360|edition=|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|year=2005|id=ISBN 0-19-822844-9

External sources

* [http://www.battlefieldstrust.com/resource-centre/medieval/battleview.asp?BattleFieldId=7 The Battle of Boroughbridge at The Battlefields Trust.]
* [http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/upload/pdf/Boroughbridge.pdf English Heritage Battlefield Report: Boroughbridge 1322]