- Trepanation in Mesoamerica
Trepanation in Mesoamerica has been practised by a number of
pre-Columbian cultures in theMesoamerica n region, dating from at least the mid-Preclassic era (ca. 1500 BCE), and continuing up to the late Postclassic, or ca. 1200 CE. [See summary in Romero (1970).]Trepanation (also known as "trephining", "trephinning", or "trepanning") involves an intentional and planned operation to open or bore into theskull on a live subject, using tools specifically designed for the purpose. This can be accomplished by several techniques, such as drilling, incising and abrasion, or some combination of these. The purpose of such operations ranges from the medicinal (intended to relieve pressure, or address a number of other ailments) to the ritualised and experimental.In pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, evidence for the practice of trepanation and an assortment of other cranial deformation techniques comes from a variety of sources, including physical cranial remains of pre-Columbian burials, allusions in iconographic artworks and reports from the post-colonial period.
Overview
Trepanation has been practised by a variety of historical cultures and societies across the globe, with evidence for it dating back to theNeolithic period, [See Walker (1997), which reports the "earliest unequivocal evidence for trepanation" in a burial nearEnsisheim in theAlsace region of France, that was dated to 5100–4900 BCE. See also citation and commentary in Tiesler (2003a).] and its use has continued up to the present era under certain limited circumstances by a few cultures. If the patient manages to survive the procedure, the bone begins to slowly grow back from the rim of the hole towards the center. This new bone growth is measurably thinner than the undamaged bone at the rim, providing scientists examining a trepanated skull with a means to establishing whether or not the person lived beyond the operation.Among
New World societies, trepanation is most commonly found in the Andean civilizations such as the Inca, [ Tiesler (2003a)] where it is frequently associated with pre-existing cranial damage, indicating that it had a use as a reasonably-successful medical procedure— by one estimate, more than 70% of the patients survived the operation. [Verano (1997), as cited in Tiesler (2003a). It should be noted that 'successful' in this context is an assessment of the patient survival-rate, and not necessarily of its efficacy as a cure to a pre-existing ailment. Generally, whether or not the treatment was successful in alleviating the symptoms of the patient's medical complaint is difficult to ascertain from the osteological data.] Recently, anthropologists have discovered evidence which suggests that survival rates may have been as high as 80 to 90 percent. [ [http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/31466/title/Incan_skull_surgery Science News / Incan Skull Surgery ] ]Its prevalence among Mesoamerican civilizations is much lower, at least judging from the comparatively few trepanated crania which have been uncovered. [Tiesler (2003a).] The archaeological record is further complicated by the practice of skull mutilation and modification which was carried out "after" the death of the subject, in order to fashion "trophy skulls" and the like of captives and enemies. This was a reasonably widespread tradition, illustrated in pre-Columbian art which on occasion depicts rulers adorned with or carrying the modified skulls of their defeated enemies, or of the ritualistic display of sacrificial victims. Several Mesoamerican cultures used a skull-rack (known by its Nahuatl term, "
tzompantli " ) on which skulls were impaled in rows or columns of wooden stakes.Even so, some evidence of genuine trepanation in Mesoamerica (i.e., where the subject was living) has been recovered.
urvey
Early colonial reports
Sixteenth-century Spanish colonial accounts like those of
Bernardino de Sahagún and BishopDiego de Landa contain references to the use of trepanation techniques among Mesoamericans to alleviate pain, such as for persistent headaches and that which results from the practice of deliberately deforming the cranium (for aesthetic purposes) by using compression boards and other methods.Central Mexico and Oaxaca
The earliest archaeological survey [According to Tiesler (2003a).] published of trepanated crania was a late 19th-century study of several specimens recovered from the
Tarahumara mountains by the Norwegianethnographer Carl Lumholtz. [Lumholtz's study was published in the journal "American Anthropologist" (Lumholtz & Hrdlička 1897).] Later studies documented cases identified from a range of sites inOaxaca and centralMexico , such asTilantongo , Oaxaca and the major Zapotec site ofMonte Albán . Two specimens from theTlatilco civilization's homelands (which flourished around 1400 BCE) indicate the practice has a lengthy tradition, [Romero (1970).] although the culturalprovenance of these particular specimens has been disputed. [See Tiesler (2003a) for mention of dissenting views.]A 1999 study of seven trepanated crania from Monte Albán showed a combination of single and multiple elliptical holes drilled or worn into the cranial cap, performed exclusively on the upper
parietal bones. The sample crania were from both male and female adults, and evidence of healing around the perforations suggested that about half had survived the operation. Most of the skulls in the study showed signs of earlier cranial damage, indicating (as with the Andean examples) that the operations were an attempt to repair or alleviate this head-trauma.Tiesler (1999).]From these analyses, it appears that a technique of straightforward abrasion was employed in the earliest-dated finds, to be combined later on with drilling and incision techniques.
Crania recovered from
Cholula show another form of trepanation ("supra-inial lesion"), where a depression has been worn into the back of the skull, without however substantially perforating it. [Rodríguez (1972), as cited in Tiesler (2003a).]Maya region and Yucatán Peninsula
Specimens identified from the
Maya civilization region of southern Mexico,Guatemala and theYucatán Peninsula show no evidence of the drilling or cutting techniques found in central and highland Mexico. Instead, the pre-Columbian Maya seemed to have utilised an abrasive technique which ground away at the back of the skull, thinning the bone and sometimes perforating it, similar to the examples from Cholula. Many of the skulls from the Maya region date from the Postclassic period (ca. 950–1400), and include specimens found atPalenque inChiapas , and recovered from theSacred Cenote at the prominent Postclassic site ofChichen Itza in northern Yucatán.The practice of deliberate cranial deformation or flattening is well-documented among the pre-Columbian
Maya peoples , and is evidenced from the Preclassic era onwards. By the use of cradleboards and other compression techniques applied to the growing skull from infancy, a variety of head-shapes were fashioned, with different regions and time-periods exhibiting a difference in style and ideal. The practice was applied to both males and females, and was not thought to be particularly associated with class or social standing. It was widely adopted however, to the point where one particular study [Tiesler (2003b)] which examined over 1,500 skulls drawn from across the Maya region determined that at least 88% exhibited some form of intentional cranial deformation. These practices clearly had no therapeutic purpose, but rather were intertwined with the expression of Maya cultural values, beliefs and identity. Thus, it is entirely possible, and argued by some scholars in the field such as Vera Tiesler, [See Tiesler 1999, 2003a and in particular 2003b.] that trepanation among the Maya was also imbued with a culturally-significant meaning apart from any professed medical benefit.Notes
References
: cite journal |author=aut|Lumholtz, Carl |authorlink=Carl Sofus Lumholtz |coauthors=and aut|
Aleš Hrdlička |year=1897 |month=December|title=Trephining in Mexico |journal=American Anthropologist |location=Washington, DC |publisher=Anthropological Society of Washington |volume=10 |issue=12 |pages=pp.389–396 |doi=10.1525/aa.1897.10.12.02a00010 |issn=0002-7294 |oclc=1479294: cite journal|author=aut|Rodríguez, Zaid Lagunas|year=1972 |title=La trepanación suprainiana en cráneos de Cholula, Puebla |journal=Comunicaciones Proyecto Puebla-Tlaxcala |location=Puebla, Mexico |publisher=Fundación Alemana para la Investigación Científica , volume=8 |pages=pp.47–50 |oclc=3769369 es icon: cite book|author=aut|Romero Molina, Javier|year=1970|chapter=Dental Mutilation, Trephination, and Cranial Deformation |title=Handbook of Middle American Indians|Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 9: Physical Anthropology |editor=T. Dale Stewart (volume ed.) |others=Robert Wauchope (series ed.) |publisher=University of Texas Press |location=Austin |edition=2nd. edition (revised)|oclc=277126 |isbn=|isbn=0-292-70014-8: cite book |author=aut|Stone, James L. |coauthors=and aut|Javier Urcid |year=2003 |chapter=Pre-Columbian Skull Trepanation in North America |editor=Robert Arnott, Stanley Finger, and Christopher Upham Murray Smith (eds.) |others=with the support of Boleslav Lichterman and Rupert Breitweiser |title=Trepanation: Discovery, History, Theory |location=Lisse, Netherlands |publisher=Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers |pages=pp.237–252|isbn=90-265-1923-0 |oclc=54094816 : cite paper|author=aut|Tiesler Blos, Vera|date=1999 |title=Rasgos Bioculturales Entre los Antiguos Mayas: Aspectos Culturales y Sociales |publisher=Doctoral thesis in Anthropology, UNAM es icon: cite web|author=aut|Tiesler Blos, Vera|date=2003a |title=Cranial Surgery in Ancient Mesoamerica |work=Mesoweb articles|publisher=Mesoweb: An Exploration of Mesoamerican Cultures |url=http://www.mesoweb.com/features/tiesler/Cranial.pdf |format=PDF online publication|accessdate=2006-05-23: cite web|author=aut|Tiesler Blos, Vera|date=2003b |title=Head Shaping and Dental Decoration Among the Ancient Maya |url=http://www.mesoweb.com/features/tiesler/index.html |work=Mesoweb articles|publisher=Mesoweb: An Exploration of Mesoamerican Cultures |format=PDF online publication|accessdate=2006-05-23: cite book|author=aut|Verano, John|year=1997|chapter=La trepanación como tratamiento terapéutico para fracturas craneales en el antiguo Perú |title=Estudios en antropología biológica, nowrap|vol. 8 |editor=Rosa Ma. Ramos Rodríguez and Ma. Eugenia Peña Reyes (eds.)|series=Coloquio de Antropología Física “Juan Comas”, VIII. 1995. Ciudad de México |location=México, D.F.|publisher=Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas –Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , in association with Asociación Mexicana de Antropología Biológica, andInstituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia |pages=pp.65–81 |id=ISSN|1405-5066 |oclc=28004605 es icon: cite journal|author=aut|Walker, Amélie A.|year=1997 |month=September/October |title=Neolithic Surgery |url=http://www.archaeology.org/9709/newsbriefs/trepanation.html |format=reproduced online|journal=Archaeology |volume=50 |issue=5 |pages=p.9 |issn=0003-8113 |oclc=1481828
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.