- Ammosaurus
Taxobox|
name = "Ammosaurus"
fossil_range =Early Jurassic
regnum =Animalia
phylum =Chordata
classis =Sauropsida
superordo =Dinosauria
ordo =Saurischia
subordo =Sauropodomorpha
infraordo =Sauropoda
familia =Anchisauridae
genus = "Ammosaurus"
species = "A. major"
species_authority = Marsh,1889
binomial = "Ammosaurus major"
binomial_authority = Marsh,1891
synonyms = (originally "Anchisaurus major")"Ammosaurus" (pronEng|ˌæməˈsɔrəs; "sand lizard") is a
genus ofsauropodomorph dinosaur from theEarly Jurassic Period ofNorth America . At 4 meters (13 feet) in length, it was small compared to some other members of its suborder, which included the largest animals ever to walk theEarth . It was a versatile animal, able to move bothbiped ally andquadruped ally, and may have been omnivorous.Naming
The generic name "Ammosaurus" is derived from the Greek words "ammos" ("sandy ground") and "sauros" ("lizard"), referring to the
sandstone in which it was found and its reptilian nature. There is one currently valid species ("A. major"), which is so named because it is larger than "Anchisaurus", of which it was originally considered a second species. Famous Americanpaleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh created this specific name in1889 . In1891 , Marsh created the new genus "Ammosaurus" for this species and he subsequently named another species ("Ammosaurus solus") in1892 , although scientists now consider it synonymous with "A. major".ynonym with "Anchisaurus"?
The relationships of "Ammosaurus" with other dinosaurs are highly uncertain at this time. It is an early member of the suborder
Sauropodomorpha and is most closely related to "Anchisaurus", with which it may actually be synonymous. Different paleontologists consider "Anchisaurus" to be either a basalprosauropod (Galton & Upchurch, 2004) or a basalsauropod (Yates & Kitching, 2003; Yates, 2004).Marsh originally described "Ammosaurus major" as "Anchisaurus major", although he removed it to its own new genus only 2 years later. However, some recent studies have suggested that "Ammosaurus" and "Anchisaurus" are the same animal after all (Sereno, 1999; Yates, 2004). Other scientists prefer to keep the two genera separate due to anatomical differences in the
pelvis and hind foot, although the two animals are still consideredsister taxa (Galton & Upchurch, 2004).Fossil discoveries
Fossil s of "Ammosaurus" were originally discovered in thePortland Formation of theNewark Supergroup in the U.S. state ofConnecticut . This formation preserves an arid environment with strong wet and dry seasons, from thePliensbachian through toToarcian stages of the Early Jurassic Period, roughly 190 to 176 million years ago. The original specimens were recovered from a sandstonequarry , which was used in the construction of theSouth Manchester Bridge in Connecticut. In fact, theholotype specimen was discovered by quarry workers. Unfortunately, it consists of only the rear half of the skeleton, as the block containing the front half had already been installed in the bridge. In1969 , the bridge was demolished, and some "Ammosaurus" remains were recovered. Three other incomplete skeletons of different ages are also known from Connecticut, but there is no knownskull (Weishampel & Young, 1996)."Ammosaurus" outside Connecticut
"Ammosaurus" remains have been reported from other parts of North America, but may not represent the species "A. major", if they represent the genus at all.
The
Navajo Sandstone ofArizona is the same age as the Portland Formation, and has produced prosauropod remains that have been referred to as "Ammosaurus" (Galton, 1971). However, it is possible that these actually belong to the genus "Massospondylus ", otherwise known only fromSouth Africa (Galton & Upchurch, 2004).In the Canadian province of
Nova Scotia , scientists have unearthed prosauropods from theMcCoy Brook Formation , which is about 200 to 197 million years old, from the Early JurassicHettangian stage. The Nova Scotia material provides clues about the diet of these animals. A large number ofgastrolith s, stones swallowed to grind up plant material in the gut, were found in theabdomen , as well as bone from the skull of a smalllizard , "Clevosaurus ". This indicates that these dinosaurs were omnivorous, with a diet mainly consisting of plants but with an occasional supplement of meat (Shubin et al., 1994). However, these remains have never been fully described or illustrated and are only tentatively referred to "Ammosaurus". Further study may either confirm or falsify thishypothesis .References
*Galton, P.M. 1971. The prosauropod dinosaur "Ammosaurus", the crocodile "Postosuchus", and their bearing on the age of the "Navajo Sandstone" of Northeastern Arizona. "Journal of Palaeontology" 45: 781-795.
*Galton, P.M. & Upchurch, P. 2004. Prosauropoda. In: Weishampel, D.B., Dodson, P, & Osmolska, H. (Eds.) "The Dinosauria" (2nd Edition). Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 232-258.
*Marsh, O.C. 1889. Notice of new American dinosaurs. "American Journal of Science" Series 3, 37: 331-336.
*Marsh, O.C. 1891. Notice of new vertebrate fossils. "American Journal of Science" Series 3, 42: 265-269.
*Shubin, N.H., Olson, P.E., & Sues, H.-D. 1994. Early Jurassic small tetrapods from the McCoy Brook Formation of Nova Scotia, Canada. In: Fraser, N.C. & Sues, H.-D. (Eds.). "In the Shadow of Dinosaurs: Early Mesozoic Tetrapods". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 244-250.
*Weishampel, D.B. & Young, L.O. 1996. "Dinosaurs of the East Coast". Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 275 pp.
*Yates, A.M. & Kitching, J.W. 2003. The earliest known sauropod dinosaur and the first steps towards sauropod locomotion. "Proceedings of the Royal Society of London" 270: 1753–1758.
*Yates, A. M. 2004. "Anchisaurus polyzelus" (Hitchcock): the smallest known sauropod dinosaur and the evolution of gigantism among sauropodomorph dinosaurs. "Postilla" 230: 1-58.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.