- John Couch Adams
Infobox Scientist
name = John Couch Adams
box_width = 300px
image_width = 240px
caption =
birth_date = birth date|1819|06|15
birth_place =Laneast ,Cornwall ,Great Britain
death_date = death date and age|1892|01|21|1819|06|15
death_place =Cambridge Observatory,Cambridgeshire ,England
residence =
citizenship =
nationality = British
ethnicity = Cornish
field =
work_institutions =
alma_mater =University of Cambridge
doctoral_advisor =
academic_advisors =John Hymers
doctoral_students =
notable_students =
known_for =
author_abbrev_bot =
author_abbrev_zoo =
influences =
influenced =
prizes =
religion =
footnotes =John Couch Adams (
June 5 1819 –January 21 ,1892 ), was a Britishmathematician andastronomer . Adams was born inLaneast ,Cornwall and died in Cambridge. The Cornish name Couch is pronounced "cooch".His most famous achievement was predicting the existence and position of Neptune, using only
mathematics . The calculations were made to explain discrepancies with Uranus'sorbit and the laws of Kepler and Newton. At the same time, but unknown to each other, the same calculations were made byUrbain Le Verrier . Le Verrier would assist Galle in locating theplanet (September 1846); which was found within 1° of its predicted location, a point in Aquarius. (There was, and to some extent still is, some controversy over the apportionment of credit for the discovery; seeDiscovery of Neptune .)He was Lowndean Professor at the
University of Cambridge for thirty-three years from 1859 to his death. He won theGold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society in 1866. In 1884, he attended theInternational Meridian Conference as a delegate for Britain.A crater on the
Moon is jointly named after him,Walter Sydney Adams andCharles Hitchcock Adams . Neptune's outermost known ring and theasteroid 1996 Adams are also named after him. TheAdams Prize , presented by the University of Cambridge, commemorates his prediction of the position of Neptune. His personal library is now in the care ofCambridge University Library .Early life
Adams was born at Lidcot, a farm at
Laneast , [Anon.] (1911) " [http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/John_Couch_Adams John Couch Adams] , "Encyclopaedia Britannica "] near Launceston,Cornwall , the eldest of seven children. His parents were Thomas Adams (1788–1859), a poortenant farmer , and his wife, Tabitha Knill "née" Grylls (1796–1866). The family were devoutWesleyan s who enjoyedmusic and among John's brothers, Thomas became amissionary , George afarmer , andWilliam Grylls Adams , professor ofnatural philosophy andastronomy atKing's College London . Tabitha was a farmer's daughter but had received a rudimentary education from John Couch, her uncle, whose small library she had inherited. John was intrigued by the astronomy books from an early age.John attended the Laneast village school where he acquired some Greek and
algebra . From there, he went, at the age of twelve, to Devonport, where his mother's cousin, the Rev. John Couch Grylls, kept a private school. There he learnedclassics but was largely self-taught inmathematics , studying in the Library ofDevonport Mechanics' Institute and reading "Rees's Cyclopaedia " andSamuel Vince 's "Fluxions". He observedHalley's comet in 1835 fromLandulph and the following year started to make his own astronomical calculations, predictions and observations, engaging in private tutoring to finance his activities.In 1836, his mother inherited a small estate at
Badharlick and his promise as a mathematician induced his parents to send him to theUniversity of Cambridge , and in October 1839 he entered as asizar at St John's College. He graduated with a B.A. in 1843 as thesenior wrangler and firstSmith's prize man of his year.Discovery of Neptune
In 1821,
Alexis Bouvard had published astronomical tables of theorbit ofUranus , making predictions of future positions based onNewton's laws of motion and gravitation. [A. Bouvard (1821), " [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1821tapp.book.....B&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=44b52c369020669 Tables astronomiques publiées par le Bureau des Longitudes de France] ", Paris, FR: Bachelier] Subsequent observations revealed substantial deviations from the tables, leading Bouvard to hypothesize some perturbing body. [ [Anon.] (2001) "Bouvard, Alexis", "Encyclopaedia Britannica ", Deluxe CDROM edition] Adams learnt of the irregularities while still an undergraduate and became convinced of the "perturbation" theory. Adams believed, in the face of anything that had been attempted before, that he could use the observed data on Uranus, and utilising nothing more than Newton's law of gravitation, deduce themass , position and orbit of the perturbing body. On the 3rd of July 1841, he noted his intention to work on the problem.Hutchins (2004)]After his
final examination s in 1843, Adams was elected fellow of his college and spent the summer vacation in Cornwall calculating the first of six iterations. While he worked on the problem back in Cambridge, he tutored undergraduates, sending money home to educate his brothers, and even taught Mrs Ireland, his bedmaker, to read.Supposedly, Adams communicated his work to
James Challis , director of theCambridge Observatory , in mid-September 1845 but there is some controversy as to how. On 21 October 1845, Adams, returning from a Cornwall vacation and without appointment, twice called onAstronomer Royal George Biddell Airy inGreenwich . Failing to find him at home, Adams reputedly left a manuscript of his solution, again without the detailed calculations. Airy responded with a letter to Adams asking for some clarification. It appears that Adams did not regard the question as "trivial", as is often alleged, but he failed to complete a response. Various theories have been discussed as to Adams's failure to reply, such as his general nervousness, procrastination and disorganisation.Sheehan "et al." (2004)]Meanwhile,
Urbain Le Verrier , on10 November 1845 , presented to the "Académie des sciences " inParis a memoir on Uranus, showing that the pre-existing theory failed to account for its motion. On reading Le Verrier's memoir, Airy was struck by the coincidence and initiated a desperate race for English priority in discovery of the planet. [Smart (1947) "p."59] The search was begun by a laborious method on 29 July. Only after the discovery of Neptune on 23 September 1846 had been announced in Paris did it become apparent that Neptune had been observed on 8 and12 August but because Challis lacked an up-to-date star-map it was not recognized as a planet.A keen controversy arose in France and England as to the merits of the two astronomers. As the facts became known, there was wide recognition that the two astronomers had independently solved the problem of Uranus, and each was ascribed equal importance. However, there have been subsequent assertions that "The Brits Stole Neptune" and that Adams's British contemporaries retrospectively ascribed him more credit than he was due. But it is also notable (and not included in some of the foregoing discussion references) that Adams himself publicly acknowledged Le Verrier's priority and credit (not forgetting to mention the role of Galle) in the paper that he gave 'On the Perturbations of Uranus' to the Royal Astronomical Society in November 1846:-
Adams held no bitterness towards Challis or Airy and acknowledged his own failure to convince the astronomical world:
Adams' style of working
His lay fellowship at St John's College came to an end in 1852, and the existing statutes did not permit his re-election. However, Pembroke College, which possessed greater freedom, elected him in the following year to a lay fellowship which he held for the rest of his life.Despite the fame of his work on Neptune, Adams also did much important work on gravitational astronomy and terrestrial magnetism. He was particularly adept at fine numerical calculations, often making substantial revisions to the contributions of his predecessors. However, he was "extraordinarily uncompetitive, reluctant to publish imperfect work to stimulate debate or claim priority, averse to correspondence about it, and forgetful in practical matters". It has been suggested that these are
symptom s ofAsperger syndrome which would also be consistent with the "repetitive behaviours and restricted interests" necessary to perform the Neptune calculations, in addition to his difficulties in personal interaction with Challis and Airy.Sheehan & Thurber (2007)]In 1852, he published new and accurate tables of the moon's
parallax , which supersededJohann Karl Burckhardt 's, and supplied corrections to the theories ofMarie-Charles Damoiseau ,Giovanni Antonio Amedeo Plana , andPhilippe Gustave Doulcet .He had hoped that this work would leverage him into the vacant post as superintendent of
HM Nautical Almanac Office butJohn Russell Hind was preferred, Adams lacking the necessary ability as an organiser and administrator.ecular acceleration of the Moon
It had been observed since ancient times that the
Moon 's position in the sky was drifting over time. In 1693,Edmond Halley had shown that the rate of the drift was increasing by approximately 11" per century, an effect known as the "secular acceleration of the Moon". Pierre-Simon Laplace had given an explanation in 1787 in terms of changes in the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit. He considered only the radial gravitational force on theMoon , from theSun andEarth but obtained close agreement with the historical record of observations. [ cite book | title=Orbital Motion | url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Hzv7k2vH6PgC&pg=PA313&lpg=PA313&dq=laplace+secular+acceleration&source=web&ots=sY0PYNeBdY&sig=oH6uZ3ElvWlVh2vz56bWymHitag | pages=313 | author=Roy, A. E. | year=2005 | publisher=CRC Press | id=ISBN 0750310154 | location=London ]In 1820, at the insistence of the "
Académie des sciences ", Damoiseau, Plana andFrancesco Carlini revisited Laplace's work, investigatingquadratic and higher-order perturbing terms, and obtained similar results, again addressing only a radial, and neglecting tangential, gravitational force on the Moon. Hansen obtained similar results in 1842 and 1847.de la Rue (1866)]In 1853, Adams published a paper [ cite journal | title=On the secular variation of the Moon's mean motion | author= Adams, J. C. | journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London | volume=143 | year=1853 | pages=397–406 | doi=10.1098/rstl.1853.0017] showing that, while tangential terms vanish in the first-order theory of Laplace, they become substantial when quadratic terms are admitted. Small terms integrated in time come to have large effects and Adams concluded that Plana had overestimated the secular acceleration by approximately 1.66" per century.
At first, Le Verrier rejected Adams's results.Kushner (1989)] In 1856, Plana admitted Adams's conclusions, claiming to have revised his own analysis and arrived at the same results. However, he soon recanted, publishing a third result different both from Adams's and Plana's own earlier work. Delaunay in 1859 calculated the fourth-order term and duplicated Adams's result leading Adams to publish his own calculations for the fifth, sixth and seventh-order terms. Adams now calculated that only 5.7" of the observed 11" was accounted for by gravitational effects.
Later that year, Philippe Gustave Doulcet, Comte de Pontécoulant published a claim that the tangential force could have no effect though
Peter Andreas Hansen , who seems to have cast himself in the role ofarbitrator , declared that theburden of proof rested on Pontécoulant, while lamenting the need to discover a further effect to account for the balance. Much of the controversy centred around the convergence of thepower series expansion used and, in 1860, Adams duplicated his results without using a power series. SirJohn Lubbock also duplicated Adams's results and Plana finally concurred. Adams's view was ultimately accepted and further developed, winning him theGold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society in 1866. The unexplained drift is now known to be due totidal acceleration .In 1858 Adams became professor of mathematics at the
University of St Andrews , but lectured only for a session, before returning to Cambridge for the Lowndean professorship of astronomy and geometry. Two years later he succeeded Challis as director of the Observatory, a post Adams held until his death.The Leonids
The great
meteor shower of November 1866 turned his attention to theLeonids , whose probable path and period had already been discussed and predicted byHubert Anson Newton in 1864. Newton had asserted that thelongitude of the ascending node , that marked where the shower would occur, was increasing and the problem of explaining this variation attracted some of Europe's leading astronomers.Using a powerful and elaborate analysis, Adams ascertained that this cluster of meteors, which belongs to the solar system, traverses an elongated ellipse in 33.25 years, and is subject to definite perturbations from the larger planets, Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus. These results were published in 1867.
Some experts consider this Adams's most substantial achievement. His "definitive orbit" for the Leonids coincided with that of the
comet 55P/Tempel-Tuttle and therefore suggested the, later widely accepted, close relationship between comets and meteors.Later career
Ten years later,
George William Hill described a novel and elegant method for attacking the problem of lunar motion. Adams briefly announced his own unpublished work in the same field, which, following a parallel course had confirmed and supplemented Hill's.Over a period of forty years, he periodically addressed the determination of the constants in
Carl Friedrich Gauss 's theory of terrestrial magnetism. Again, the calculations involved great labour, and were not published during his lifetime. They were edited by his brother,William Grylls Adams , and appear in the second volume of the collected "Scientific Papers". Numerical computation of this kind might almost be described as his pastime. He calculated theEuler–Mascheroni constant , perhaps somewhat eccentrically, to 236 decimal places and evaluated theBernoulli numbers up to the 62nd.Adams had boundless admiration for Newton and his writings and many of his papers bear the cast of Newton's thought. In 1872,
Isaac Newton Wallop, 5th Earl of Portsmouth donated his private collection of Newton's papers to Cambridge University. Adams andG. G. Stokes took on the task or arranging the material, publishing a catalogue in 1888. [ cite web | url=http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/prism.php?id=55 | title=Introduction to the Newton Manuscripts Catalogue | publisher=The Newton Project | accessdate=2007-08-24 ] ["A Catalogue of the Portsmouth Collection of Books and Papers written by or belonging to Sir Issac Newton, the Scientific Part of which has been Presented by the Earl of Portsmouth to the University of Cambridge, drawn up by the Syndicate appointed 6th November 1982", Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1888]The post of
Astronomer Royal was offered him in 1881, but he preferred to pursue his peaceful course of teaching and research in Cambridge. He was British delegate to theInternational Meridian Conference at Washington in 1884, when he also attended the meetings of the British Association atMontreal and of the American Association atPhiladelphia .Honours
*He is reputed to have been offered a knighthood on
Queen Victoria 's 1847 Cambridge visit but to have declined, either out of modesty, or fear of the financial consequences of such social distinction;
*Copley medal of theRoyal Society , (1848);
*Adams Prize , founded by the members of St John's College, to be given biennially for the best treatise on a mathematical subject (1848);
*President of theRoyal Astronomical Society , (1851-1853 and 1874-1876).Family and death
Five years later his health gave way, and after a long illness he died at the Cambridge Observatory on
21 January 1892 , and was buried in St Giles's cemetery, near his home. In 1863 he had married Miss Eliza Bruce, ofDublin , who survived him. His wealth at death was £32,434 (£2.6 million at 2003 prices [ cite journal | title=Consumer Price Inflation since 1750 | author=O‘Donoghue, J. "et al." | journal=Economic Trends | volume=604 | year=2004 | pages=38–46, March | url=http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/article.asp?ID=726 ] ).Memorials
*Memorial in
Westminster Abbey with a portrait medallion, byAlbert Bruce Joy ;
*A bust, by Joy in the hall of St John's College, Cambridge;
*Another youthful bust belongs to the Royal Astronomical Society;
*Portraits by:
**Hubert von Herkomer in Pembroke College;
**Paul Raphael Montord in the combination room of St John's;
*There is a memorial tablet, with an inscription by Archbishop Benson inTruro Cathedral ;
*Passmore Edwards erected a public institute in his honour at Launceston, near his birthplace.References
Bibliography
*1911
Obituaries
*"
The Times ", 22 January 1892, p.6 col.d ( [http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Adams.html link on this page] )
* cite journal | url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu//full/seri/AJ.../0011//0000112.000.html | title=John Couch Adams | journal=Astronomical Journal | volume=11 | year=1892 | pages=112 | author= [Anon.] | doi=10.1086/101653
* cite journal | url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu//full/seri/MNRAS/0053//0000184.000.html | title=Obituary: John Couch Adams | journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | volume=53 | year=1892 | pages=184 | author= [J. W. L. Glaisher]
* cite journal | url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu//full/seri/Obs../0015//0000173.000.html | title=John Couch Adams | journal=The Observatory | volume=15 | year=1892 | pages=173 | author=J. W. L. Glaisher | authorlink=James Whitbread Lee Glaisher
* [Anon.] (1891-2) "Journal of the British Astronomical Association" 2: 196–7About Adams and the discovery of Neptune
* cite journal | author=Airy, G. B. | authorlink=George Biddell Airy | title=Account of some circumstances historically connected with the discovery of the planet exterior to Uranus | journal=Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society | volume=16 | year=1847 | pages=385–414
* cite book | url=http://www.gutenberg.net/etext/10655 | title=The Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy | author=Airy, W. (ed.) | year=1896 | publisher=Cambridge University Press fromProject Gutenberg
* [Anon.] (1911) " [http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/John_Couch_Adams John Couch Adams] , "Encyclopaedia Britannica "
* cite book | title=In Search of Planet Vulcan: The Ghost in Newton's Clockwork Universe | author=Baum, R. & Sheehan, W. | publisher=Plenum | year=1997
* cite journal | title=Private research and public duty: George Biddell Airy and the search for Neptune | author=Chapman, A. | journal=Journal for the History of Astronomy | volume=19(2) | pages=121–139 | year=1988
* cite journal | url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu//full/seri/MNRAS/0026//0000157.000.html | title=Address on award of RAS gold medal for work on secular acceleration of the Moon | journal=Monthly Notes of the Royal Astronomical Society | volume=26 | year=1866 | pages=157 | author=de la Rue, W. | authorlink=Warren de la Rue
*Doggett, L. E. (1997) "Celestial mechanics", in cite book | title=History of Astronomy, an Encyclopedia | author=Lankford, J. (ed.) | year=1997 | pages=131–40
* cite book | title=History of the Royal Astronomical Society [1] : 1820–1920 | author=Dreyer, J. L. E. & Turner, H. H. (eds) | origyear=1923 | year=1987 | pages=161–2
* cite book | author=Grosser, M. | title=The Discovery of Neptune | year=1962 | publisher=Harvard University Press | id=ISBN 0674212258
*cite encyclopedia | author=— | title = Adams, John Couch | encyclopedia =Dictionary of Scientific Biography | volume = 1 | pages = 53-54 | publisher = Charles Scribner's Sons | location = New York | date = 1970 | isbn = 0684101149
*Harrison, H. M (1994). "Voyager in Time and Space: The Life of John Couch Adams, Cambridge Astronomer". Lewes: Book Guild, ISBN 0-86332-918-7
* cite journal | author=Hughes, D. W. | title=J. C. Adams, Cambridge and Neptune | journal=Notes and Records of the Royal Society | volume=50 | year=1996 | pages=245–8 | doi=10.1098/rsnr.1996.0027
*Hutchins, R. (2004) " [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/123 Adams, John Couch (1819–1892)] ", "Oxford Dictionary of National Biography ", Oxford University Press, accessed 23 August 2007 ODNBsub
* cite journal | author=J. W. L. G. [J. W. L. Glaisher] | title=James Challis | journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | volume=43 | year=1882–3 | pages=160–79
*cite web|url=http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/nk/neptune/index.htm |title=Neptune's Discovery. The British Case for Co-Prediction. |accessdate=2007-03-19 |last=Kollerstrom |first=Nick |date=2001 |publisher=Unuiversity College London |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20051111190351/http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/nk/neptune/index.htm |archivedate=2005-11-11
* cite journal | author=Kushner, D. | year=1989 | title=The controversy surrounding the secular acceleration of the moon's mean motion | journal=Archive for History of Exact Sciences | volume=39(4) | pages=291–316
* cite book | title=The Planet Neptune: An Historical Survey before Voyager | authorurl=Patrick Moore | publisher=Praxis | year=1996 | author=Moore, P.
* cite journal | year=1904 | title=A description of Adams’s manuscripts on the perturbations of Uranus | author=Sampson, R.A. | journal=Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society | volume=54 | pages=143–161
* cite journal | title=John Couch Adams's Asperger syndrome and the British non-discovery of Neptune | volume=61(3) | year=2007 | pages=285–299 | author=Sheehan, W. & Thurber, S. | journal=Notes and Records of the Royal Society | doi=10.1098/rsnr.2007.0187
*Sheehan, W. "et al." (2004). [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000CA850-8EA4-119B-8EA483414B7FFE9F The Case of the Pilfered Planet - Did the British steal Neptune?] "Scientific American"
* cite journal | author=Smart, W. M. | title=John Couch Adams and the discovery of Neptune | journal=Nature | volume=158 | year=1946 | pages=829–830 | doi=10.1038/158648a0
* cite journal | author=— | title=John Couch Adams and the discovery of Neptune | journal=Occasional Notes of the Royal Astronomical Society | volume=2 | year=1947 | pages=33–88
* cite journal | title=The Cambridge network in action: the discovery of Neptune | author=Smith, R. W. | journal=Isis | volume=80(303) | pages=395–422 | year=1989 | doi=10.1086/355082
* cite book | year=2000 | title=The Neptune File | author=Standage, T. | publisher=Penguin PressBy Adams
*Adams, J. C., ed. W. G. Adams & R. A. Sampson (1896-1900 "The Scientific Papers of John Couch Adams", 2 vols, London: Cambridge University Press, with a memoir by J. W. L. Glaisher:
**Vol.1 (1896) Previously published writings;
**Vol.2 (1900) Manuscripts including the substance of his lectures on the Lunar Theory.
*A collection, virtually complete, of Adams's papers regarding the discovery of Neptune was presented by Mrs Adams to the library of St John's College, see: Sampson (1904), and also:
**"The collected papers of Prof. Adams", "Journal of the British Astronomical Association", 7 (1896–7)
**"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society", 53 184;
**"Observatory", 15 174;
**"Nature", 34 565; 45 301;
**"Astronomical Journal", No.254;
**R. Grant, "History of Physical Astronomy", p.168; and
**"Edinburgh Review ", No.381, p.72.
*The papers were ultimately lodged with the Royal Greenwich Observatory and evacuated toHerstmonceux Castle duringWorld War II . After the war, they were stolen byOlin J. Eggen and only recovered in 1998, hampering much historical research in the subject. cite web | author=Kollerstrom, N. | year=2001 | url=http://web.archive.org/web/20050206110748/www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/nk/neptune/takes.htm | title=Eggen takes the papers | work=The British Case for Co-prediction | publisher=University College London | accessdate=2007-08-23 ]External links
* [http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Adams.html Biography on the St Andrews database]
*
*
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.