- Maynard v West Midlands Regional Health Authority
-
Maynard v. West Midlands Regional Health Authority [1985] 1 All ER 635 is an English tort law case concerning the Bolam test for professional negligence.
The patient presented with symptoms of tuberculosis but both the consultant physician and the consultant surgeon took the view that Hodgkin's disease, carcinoma, and sarcoidosis were also possibilities, the first of which if present would have required remedial steps to be taken in its early stages. Instead of waiting for the results of the sputum tests, the consultants carried out a mediastinoscopy to get a biopsy. The inherent risk of damage was to the left laryngeal recurrent nerve, even if the operation was properly done. In the event, only tuberculosis was confirmed. Unfortunately, the risk became a reality and the patient suffered a paralysis of the left vocal cord. The decision of the physician and the surgeon to proceed was said by their expert peers to be reasonable in all the circumstances.
See also
A court may prefer one body of opinion to the other but that is no basis for a conclusion of negligence.
Notes
English law Core subjects Further subjects Company law · Competition law · Labour law · Commercial law · Procedure · Family law · Courts of England and WalesRelated systems Law of the United Kingdom · Northern Irish law · Scots law · Welsh law · Law of the British Virgin Islands · Australian law · Canadian law · Hong Kong law · Indian law · Law of New Zealand · Law of the United States · Anglo-Saxon law · Common law · Equity · English case lawCategory · PortalCategories:- English tort case law
- 1985 in case law
- 1985 in the United Kingdom
- United Kingdom law stubs
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.