Physician–patient privilege

Physician–patient privilege
Scale of justice 2.svg
Evidence
Part of the common law series
Types of evidence
Testimony · Documentary
Real (physical) · Digital
Exculpatory · Scientific
Demonstrative
Eyewitness identification
Genetic (DNA) · Lies
Relevance
Burden of proof · Laying a foundation
Public policy exclusions · Spoliation ·
Character · Habit · Similar fact
Authentication
Chain of custody
Judicial notice · Best evidence rule
Self-authenticating document
Ancient document
Witnesses
Competence · Privilege
Direct examination
Cross-examination  · Redirect
Impeachment · Recorded recollection
Expert witness · Dead Man's Statute
Hearsay and exceptions
in English law · in United States law
Confessions · Business records
Excited utterance · Dying declaration
Party admission · Ancient document
Declaration against interest
Present sense impression · Res gestae
Learned treatise · Implied assertion
Other common law areas
Contract · Tort · Property
Wills; trusts and estates
Criminal law
v · d · e

Physician–patient privilege is a legal concept, related to medical confidentiality, that protects communications between a patient and his or her doctor from being used against the patient in court.[1] It is a part of the rules of evidence in many common law jurisdictions. Almost every jurisdiction that recognizes physician-patient privilege not to testify in court, either by statute or though case law, limits the privilege to knowledge acquired during the course of providing medical services.[2] In some jurisdictions, conversations between a patient and physician may be privileged in both criminal and civil courts.

Contents

Scope

The privilege may cover the situation where a patient confesses to a psychiatrist that he or she committed a particular crime. It may also cover normal inquiries regarding matters such as injuries that may result in civil action. For example, any defendant that the patient may be suing at the time cannot ask the doctor if the patient ever expressed the belief that his or her condition had improved. However, the rule generally does not apply to confidences shared with physicians when they are not serving in the role of medical providers.[3] As bioethicist Jacob Appel has written:

I cannot simply declare that, because I am a physician, all the advice that I offer to friends and family is privileged. What I tell my patients at the hospital may be protected from judicial scrutiny. What I tell my buddies on the golf course or at the pool hall, on the other hand, is fair game for prosecutors--even if I happen to have M.D. license plates and a caduceus pin on my lapel. Otherwise, any mobster worth his salt would send his consigliere to medical school rather than law school.
—[4]

The rationale behind the rule is that a level of trust must exist between a physician and the patient so that the physician can properly treat the patient. If the patient were fearful of telling the truth to the physician because he or she believed the physician would report such behavior to the authorities, the treatment process could be rendered far more difficult, or the physician could make an incorrect diagnosis.[5]

For example, a below-age of consent girl came to a doctor with a sexually transmitted disease. The doctor is usually required to obtain a list of the patient's sexual contacts to inform them that they need treatment. This is an important health concern. However, the patient may be reluctant to divulge the names of her older sexual partners, for fear that they will be charged with statutory rape. In some jurisdictions, the doctor cannot be forced to reveal the information revealed by his patient to anyone except to particular organizations, as specified by law, and they too are required to keep that information confidential. If, in the case, the police become aware of such information, they are not allowed to use it in court as proof of the sexual conduct.

United States

In the United States, the Federal Rules of Evidence do not recognize doctor-patient privilege.

At the state level, the extent of the privilege varies depending on the law of the applicable jurisdiction. For example, in Texas there is only a limited physician-patient privilege in criminal proceedings, and the privilege is limited in civil cases as well. See generally Texas Occupations Code section 159.003 and Texas Rules of Evidence, Rule 509(b).

See also

References

  1. ^ Appel, Jacob M. Dr. Coburn's Peculiar Privilege, October 2, 2009
  2. ^ Appel, Jacob M. Dr. Coburn's Peculiar Privilege, October 2, 2009
  3. ^ Appel, Jacob M. Dr. Coburn's Peculiar Privilege, October 2, 2009
  4. ^ Appel, Jacob M. Dr. Coburn's Peculiar Privilege, October 2, 2009
  5. ^ Appel, Jacob M. Dr. Coburn's Peculiar Privilege, October 2, 2009

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • physician-patient privilege — The right to withhold evidence in a trial or other legal proceeding on the basis that any information disclosed by a patient to a doctor for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment is confidential (unless the patient consents to disclosure).… …   Law dictionary

  • Physician-patient privilege — In the laws of many common law jurisdictions, the concept of legal privilege, or the rule that certain conversations are so private and confidential that they cannot be used as evidence in court, extends to communication between a patient and… …   Wikipedia

  • physician-patient privilege — noun the right of a physician to refuse to divulge confidential information from a patient without the consent of the patient • Hypernyms: ↑privilege …   Useful english dictionary

  • physician-patient privilege — See patient physician privilege …   Black's law dictionary

  • doctor-patient privilege — See: physician patient privilege Category: Accidents & Injuries Category: Criminal Law Category: Representing Yourself in Court Category: Small Claims Court Category …   Law dictionary

  • doctor-patient privilege — In law of evidence, right of patient to exclude from evidence communications made by him to his physician; recognized in most jurisdictions but sometimes limited; e.g. to communications to psychotherapist …   Black's law dictionary

  • doctor-patient privilege — In law of evidence, right of patient to exclude from evidence communications made by him to his physician; recognized in most jurisdictions but sometimes limited; e.g. to communications to psychotherapist …   Black's law dictionary

  • patient — Person under medical or psychiatric treatment and care. Person may be patient and physician patient privilege may apply, where physician attends person for purpose of giving professional aid, even though person attended is unconscious or unaware… …   Black's law dictionary

  • patient-physician privilege — The right of one who is a patient to refuse to divulge, or have divulged by his physician, the communications made between he and his physician. This privilege is provided for by statute in most states, and, where recognized, it belongs to the… …   Black's law dictionary

  • privilege — A particular and peculiar benefit or advantage enjoyed by a person, company, or class, beyond the common advantages of other citizens. An exceptional or extraordinary power or exemption. A peculiar right, advantage, exemption, power, franchise,… …   Black's law dictionary

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
… Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”